This Is What Mercedes Thinks An Electric AMG Should Sound Like
The new AMG.EA electric architecture will underpin two vehicles - the sedan you see here and, of course, an SUV. These underpinnings are expected to feature next-generation axial flux motors from subsidiary YASA Motors, a technology that BMW is also exploring. As for output, we expect close to a thousand horsepower in the car (if not more, depending on how many motors the EV gets). The current AMG GT 63 S E Performance range-topper only offers 831 hp, but as a hybrid and not an all-electric vehicle, it doesn't need more because it doesn't have loads of weight to lug around. That being said, this new EV will have smaller and lighter batteries than the current crop of Mercedes EQ models.
When the Ioniq 5 N arrived, many doubted whether Hyundai's all-electric performance crossover could be genuinely engaging to drive, but in the years since, numerous evangelists of combustion have conceded that a simulated engine sound and a system that closely mimics a traditional gearbox's responses can convert the non-believers. However, as the comments section of the post shows, many more refuse to even entertain the idea that an EV could be fun, so Mercedes will have to work twice as hard to prove that this is still an AMG at heart, even if it looks half as sleek as the Vision EQXX concept it draws inspiration from.
Its first target will be the astonishingly good Porsche Taycan, and with such a high bar, we expect all the high-tech tricks in the book: active battery management, a highly advanced traction control system, and some adaptive aerodynamic elements. We'll know more before the end of the month, as AMG has previously confirmed a reveal for June.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Does It Cost To Charge a Rivian Monthly Compared To Gas for Other Luxury Cars?
As electric vehicles gain traction in the luxury market, many consumers are weighing the financial benefits of going electric. With volatile gas prices and growing environmental concerns, the question of electric versus gas-powered luxury vehicles has become increasingly relevant. Read More: Find Out: The Rivian R1T pickup and R1S SUV represent premium electric options, but how do their operating costs compare to BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Audi models? Here's how monthly Rivian charging costs compare to fueling traditional luxury vehicles. Rivian Charging Costs The cost to charge a Rivian varies significantly based on location and charging method. Home charging typically costs about half of a gas tank fill-up. Discover Next: Home Charging Economics According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the national average electricity rate is around $0.15 per kWh, though regional variations range from $0.10 to $0.30+ per kWh. The Rivian R1T has battery capacities of 135 kWh (Large pack) or 106 kWh (Standard pack), per Rivian's official specifications. Based on the real-world efficiency of 2.5 miles per kWh: Monthly Home Charging Costs (1,000 miles): At $0.15/kWh: $75-$95 At $0.20/kWh: $100-$125 At $0.30/kWh: $150-$190 Public Charging Electrify America charges around 48 cents per kWh for fast charging. Heavy public charging users can expect $150-$250 monthly costs. Luxury Gas Car Comparison Most luxury vehicles require premium gasoline. According to AAA's Gas Prices, regular gas averages $3.15 per gallon nationally, making premium fuel approximately $3.50-$3.75 per gallon. Monthly Fuel Costs for 1,000 Miles: Luxury SUVs: BMW X5 (19 mpg): $189 Mercedes GLE (20 mpg): $180 Audi Q7 (19 mpg): $189 Luxury Sedans: BMW 5 Series (25 mpg): $144 Mercedes E-Class (26 mpg): $138 Audi A6 (25 mpg): $144 The Bottom Line For drivers charging primarily at home, Rivian offers significant monthly savings: Potential Monthly Savings: vs. Luxury SUVs: $85-$115 vs. Luxury Sedans: $45-$70 Annual savings: $540-$1,380 However, those relying heavily on public charging may find costs approaching efficient luxury sedans. Regional Impact Geographic location significantly affects this comparison. States with low electricity rates and high gas prices heavily favor electric vehicles, while areas with expensive electricity and cheap gas narrow the gap. Beyond Monthly Costs Additional Rivian advantages include minimal maintenance requirements, no oil changes, reduced brake wear, and potential HOV lane access. Traditional luxury cars offer established service networks, no range anxiety, and faster refueling. Conclusion Rivian ownership typically offers $80-$100 monthly savings compared to luxury SUVs for most drivers with home charging access. The key is understanding your usage patterns, local utility rates, and charging infrastructure before making the switch from premium gasoline to premium electrons. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region This article originally appeared on What Does It Cost To Charge a Rivian Monthly Compared To Gas for Other Luxury Cars? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
USA Today
18 hours ago
- USA Today
Here's why BMW decided to offer this daring purple paint job
I hate when my doorbell rings. Not so much because I dislike people, but because of the cacophony unleashed by my family's very good German shepherd mutt, Rosie, when someone has the gall to ring unannounced. She huffs. She puffs. She growls. She barks. And she's not satisfied until you leave. (Please leave.) The Twilight Purple Pearl Metallic 2025 BMW M2 that's part of our yearlong review fleet has been especially troubling for her. On more occasions than I care to remember, people visit our driveway or porch and want to talk about the M2's color. Well-meaning neighbors with questions, local students who want to snap a couple photos, supposedly 'no contact' Uber Eats deliveries, and even solicitors who come to the door to sell free Wi-Fi or religion — the first question out of anyone's mouths is 'That your BMW? I love the color!' It's not just at home, either. It's at gas stations, intersections (to the dude in the '90s CR-V who yelled, 'beautiful car, whatever you're doing keep it up!' — it's not mine, but thanks! I will), and curbside, like the skaters who whipped out their phones to grab a video as we rolled up to a stop sign. Even hypercars or early pre-production prototypes don't get this kind of attention in otherwise car-jaded Los Angeles. It's an introvert's nightmare and an extrovert's dream. The deep metallic crystalline pearled purple paint is hardly the only flashy color on offer on the G87 M2, or even in the rest of the BMW lineup. The M2 also offers up such extroverted colors as Zandvoort Blue (metallic light blue), São Paolo Yellow (radioactive slime green), and Java Green II metallic, which reminds these American eyes of a Mopar hue from the early '70s. And that's just on the M2 alone. More popular models like the M3/M4, and X5/X6 M have a long list of what BMW calls 'Individual' colors, too. BMW's regular line also has its fair share of flashier color options. Considering how refreshingly outside the norm it is for an automaker to offer a deep roster of colors beyond blacks, grays and whites, we reached out to BMW's design team to find out more about Twilight Metallic Purple and how it picks and chooses colors. The color testing process The journey from idea in Munich to barking at a doorbell in Los Angeles is a long one, taking up to four years in some instances. It starts with a car's project team commissioning a new color with BMW's design team. That team then reaches out to BMW's color suppliers with ideas and to explore any new up-and-coming paint technologies and mixtures. Most colors can then move straight onto the next step from here, but newer ones need a bit more work. They're often first incorporated into the Individual line, where BMW trials more adventurous shades before potentially putting them in regular rotation. Things can also get really complicated for wild paints. As a BMW representative put it to us, everyone has an opinion. 'Colors are an emotional topic. You can't prove someone right or wrong in the design phase. This is a very tricky situation for a color engineer. A [financial] controller wants to offer only five different blacks because we know that black is usually the most common choice. A designer wants to offer all the fancy ideas he has in his mind, and a product manager wants to offer 100 different colors because the customer might love those.' Making matters more complicated, sometimes the negotiations between the different teams result in a compromise on a color choice that looks great in sample form but terrible on a car. Somewhere exists an archive of BMW's rejected colors that we're dying to see. Once the human hurdle is tackled, BMW moves on to industrialization (effectively setting up the supply chain and factories to produce the new color) and testing begins. Testing sounds tedious. During the process, BMW trials the new paint colors for opacity, UV resistance and compatibility with radar-based driver assist systems. While 'stealth' radar-absorbing paints aren't exactly a problem, some colors might be too light or too dark in certain parts of the light spectrum, causing reflections that make it hard for radars to 'see' the car. There's a standard homologation process to ensure this and other issues, such as paint volatility, don't happen. Once those things are cleared, BMW integrates the color into its factory and has its paint shop test to make sure that the color is suitable for its spray chambers, meaning that the color sprays evenly and doesn't linger in the air, which would cause problems for cars not destined to be painted in a fantastic shade of purple. The final step is ensuring the paint shows its true color when sprayed onto the various plastics, fibers and metals that make up a modern automobile's exterior. If the color passes that final test, it's approved and introduced into BMW's product line. Why did BMW choose purple? BMW views Twilight Metallic Pearl Purple — and indeed all its more extroverted colors — as an extension of what it's done in the past. Looking back on the company's color catalog of the last 40 years or so shows that to largely be true. São Paulo Yellow, for instance, is a modern take on Dakar Yellow, which appeared on the E36 BMW M3. Other colors, such as Zandvoort Blue, were developed specifically for the M team and named for racetracks or locales, such as Brooklyn Grey Metallic and Portimão Blue. The Twilight Purple Pearl on our M2 was inspired by Daytona Techno Violet, which like Dakar Yellow, was found on the E36 M3. BMW told us Twilight Purple was one of the more controversial additions to the current M2 in 2025, but, as a spokesperson told us, 'Sometimes the progressive voices prevail.' Thank goodness for that. The gamble — if you can call it that — on Twilight Purples has already paid off, with the color proving a hit among customers. BMW says Black Sapphire metallic is by far the most popular color on the G87 M2, with nearly one in four being painted that way. Zandvoort Blue and São Paulo Yellow are the second and third most popular colors, respectively, with purple close behind — a pleasant surprise, BMW told us. If my anecdotal experiences (and Rosie's reactions) are any indication, Zandvoort Blue and São Paulo Yellow shouldn't get too comfortable. Photos by MotorTrend staff
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Germany To Bet Big On Skyranger Gun System To Address Growing Drone Threat
Speculation over a very large-scale German order for anti-aircraft guns, as part of a broader air defense initiative focusing, to a significant degree, on counter-drone capabilities, has brought these kinds of weapons back under the spotlight. Last week, it was reported that German arms manufacturer Rheinmetall is awaiting a multi-billion-dollar order from the German Armed Forces for its Skyranger anti-aircraft gun. During a recent earnings call, the firm's CEO, Armin Papperger said that he expected Skyranger contracts from the German military worth between $7-9 billion to be signed this year. The systems would be delivered by 2035. Papperger didn't mention how many Skyrangers Germany is looking to buy, but the German defense and security website hartpunkt reports that orders of this kind of value could amount to between 500 and 600 systems. The same sorts of figures have been suggested by unnamed well-informed sources, hartpunkt adds. Whatever the final figure, this is clearly a very significant investment. It's also notable that the Skyranger represents a type of capability that the German Armed Forces did away with after the end of the Cold War. Previously, the German Army relied on the Gepard self-propelled anti-aircraft gun to fulfill many of its short-range air defense (SHORAD) needs, especially on the battlefield. Armed with twin radar-aimed 35mm automatic cannons, mounted on a single turret, the Gepard was based on the chassis of the Leopard 1 main battle tank, meaning it could keep up with armored formations on the move. Search and tracking radars on the Gepard allowed it to locate, track, and engage targets at night and amid poor weather conditions. Although withdrawn from service by Germany in 2010, the Gepard has since found a new lease of life in Ukrainian hands, where it has won plaudits for its performance against Shahed/Geran-type one-way long-range attack drones, in the Gepard and point defense systems like it were intended primarily to engage low-flying tactical aircraft, including helicopters, and to a lesser degree, cruise missiles and tactical jets. Now, conflicts like that in Ukraine have underscored the threat posed by all kinds of drones, as well as cruise missiles. This has led to many different nations seriously rethinking their SHORAD requirements, which were widely neglected once the perceived threat of the Warsaw Pact evaporated. You can read our in-depth article on how this affected the U.S. Army, in particular, here. A video reportedly showing two Russian Shahed-136 (Geran-2) loitering munitions being shot down by the Ukrainians with a German-delivered Flakpanzer Gepard self-propelled anti-aircraft gun (SPAAG) during last night's attack in Odesa Oblast, southern Ukraine.… — Status-6 (Military & Conflict News) (@Archer83Able) September 7, 2023 What's perhaps most notable about the drone threat, in particular, is how it extends all the way from the kinds of large-scale warfare that would be anticipated in a future conflict between China and the United States in the Pacific, all the way down to smaller national armed forces, and even to non-state actors. It's also worth noting that Germany has already ordered Rheinmetall's Skyranger. In February 2024, the company announced the award of a $695-million contract to supply the German Armed Forces with the Skyranger 30 system, comprising one prototype and 18 series-production vehicles. An option exists for a further 30 systems. The initial Skyranger 30 order is part of the German military's Nah- und Nächstbereichsschutz (NNbS) program, which translates as short- and very short-range air defense. In the German application, the Skyranger 30 is integrated into an 8×8 Boxer wheeled armored vehicle. While this doesn't offer the same levels of protection and mobility as the older Gepard, it's cheaper and more easily deployable. Since it's on a wheeled armored platform, it still offers good levels of mobility and protection. In terms of firepower, the Skyranger 30 turret is armed with a single 30mm x 173 KCE revolver gun, rather than the twin 35mm cannons found on the Gepard. However, the guns are supplemented by short-range surface-to-air missiles, which can comprise FIM-92 Stinger, Mistral, or specialized counter-uncrewed air system (CUAS) interceptors. Germany has selected Stinger missiles, which it already uses in the SHORAD role. The guns are also provided with more modern ammunition than was the case with the Gepard, including programmable airburst ammunition, like the AHEAD from Oerlikon. These rounds release a cloud of sub-projectiles just ahead of a target, increasing the probability of a kill and making it better suited to tackling low, slow, and small air threats like drones, rockets, and mortar projectiles. As well as increasing the speed of engagements and boosting lethality, airburst rounds also significantly reduce the risk of collateral damage on the ground. The typical effective range of the 30mm cannon is around 1.8 miles. The primary sensor is the Spexer 2000 3D MKIII X-band pulse-Doppler radar from the German Hensoldt company, which is designed to be especially effective in detecting and tracking small drones, among other aerial threats. It can detect targets at distances of up to 25 miles and is also integrated with an electro-optical sensor package for detection, identification and engagement. As well as Germany, the Skyranger 30 has also been ordered by Austria, and Rheinmetall has reported interest from Lithuania and Denmark. Hungary has meanwhile tasked the company with developing a version of the Skyranger 30 mounted on the Lynx KF41 tracked armored fighting vehicle, as seen in the video below. While there's now widespread agreement that the SHORAD capabilities of many armed forces, especially within NATO, have become alarmingly eroded, especially in light of the fast-developing drone threat, there remain some questions about the best way of dealing with this new reality. On the one hand, gun-based systems like the Skyranger 30 are notably cheaper than using missiles against the same kinds of targets, especially when it comes to lower-end drones that may only cost a matter of several tens of thousands of dollars, or far less. There is also little doubt about the effectiveness of anti-aircraft guns against these kinds of targets. Even the aging Gepard has been reported as having had excellent results in Ukrainian service. There are multiple accounts testifying to the effectiveness of the Gepard against Russian drones, and in some cases, cruise missiles, especially when used in a point defense role against various low-flying aerial targets. However, sourcing the necessary ammunition for Ukraine's German Gepards has proved difficult. As we've noted previously, the vehicles' 35mm automatic cannons were produced in Switzerland, as are significant stockpiles of shells for them. That country's policy of neutrality in regard to the conflict forced the German government to pursue a deal with domestic defense contractor Rheinmetall to restart production of 35mm ammunition in 2023. Ukrainian serviceman talks about his experience commanding the Gepard air-defence system crew. — WarTranslated (@wartranslated) May 26, 2023 Even if the required ammunition is available, it's still not the cheapest solution, especially when it comes to lower-end threats. There is an argument that these are better dealt with by lighter anti-aircraft guns, typically firing 50-caliber ammunition. This is not only considerably cheaper than cannon ammunition for 30mm or 35mm weapons, but is also much more readily available. Ukraine has also introduced a 50-caliber SHORAD system that's optimized to defeat Russian drones, known as Sky Sentinel. This has been described by the Ukrainian Armed Forces as 'a cost-effective and scalable solution for defending both cities and frontline regions from Shaheds, reconnaissance drones, and even cruise missiles.' While Sky Sentinel's range is classified, it combined a 50-caliber heavy machine gun with an AI-enabled fire-control system, and the prototype reportedly found immediate success in bringing down Shahed/Geran drones. Notably, the program was also funded for the military by volunteer donations. Each Sky Sentinel unit costs around $150,000, compared to around $10-12 million for a Skyranger. Using AI also means the Sky Sentinel requires a relatively small crew to operate it, making it ideal for the defense of critical fixed infrastructure. Of course, while a system like the Skyranger is far more expensive than the Sky Sentinel, it is also much more versatile and far more capable. Its range and overall performance mean it can engage a far wider variety of targets, over a much bigger area, and also engage multiple targets more quickly. Meanwhile, its armored platform allows it to traverse the battlefield and provide organic air defense for units on the move. In contrast, a 50-caliber air-defence gun provides a very short effective engagement range against a limited number of gargets in a short timeframe. At the same time, as mentioned above, Germany considers the Skyranger 30 to be just one component of a multi-layered ground-based air defense 'umbrella' that should be able to deal with the whole spectrum of threats, ranging from ballistic missiles all the way down to nano-drones. This will involve a wide range of different air defense solutions, including non-kinetic ones. Anti-aircraft cannons like the Skyranger 30 will play a critical role, but will be a part of a more complex air defense picture. It should also be noted that, since the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, Rheinmetall has also explored the possibility of lower-cost self-propelled anti-aircraft guns. Most interestingly, it has looked at whether Cold War-era Leopard 1 tanks can have their turrets swapped out to be fitted with the Skyranger 35 system, in an initiative driven by Ukraine's insatiable demand for ground-based air defenses. The company has also pitched its more modern Leopard 2 with the same turret, indicative of a broader resurgence in interest in SHORAD systems. Looking further ahead, directed-energy weapons like lasers and microwave emitters, as well as CUAS interceptor drones, will likely augment and possibly one day replace gun and missile systems in many areas, especially in terms of engaging small drones, as well as counter-rocket, artillery, and mortar (C-RAM) work. For the time being, however, Germany looks like it is going to respond to the fast-developing drone threat by investing heavily in the Skyranger 30. Such is the scale of the likely procurement that Germany should be able to field Skyranger 30 both in a battlefield SHORAD role and in point defense of critical infrastructure, where a potentially hostile drone presence has already become manifest. With this, the German Armed Forces are set to regain the self-propelled anti-aircraft gun capability that was lost with the withdrawal of the Gepard. Contact the author: thomas@ Solve the daily Crossword
