logo
How Vodacom and Maziv convinced everyone they had changed

How Vodacom and Maziv convinced everyone they had changed

Daily Maverick23-07-2025
All the details from the Vodacom/Maziv merger Competition Appeals Court hearing where R12bn in promises nearly caused a fender-bender.
When senior counsel representing the Competition Commission, advocate Daniel Berger, said, 'My lord, as an officer of the court, I am duty bound to commit this statement to the public record,' I nearly drove my car off the road in shock.
I was on my way from collecting my kids from school to drop my son off at his football practice, and things were getting spicy in the post-lunch session of Competition Appeals Court (CAC) proceedings. But how did we get here?
The devil in the details
Earlier this month, I reported on the Competition Commission's dramatic about-turn on the Vodacom/Maziv merger – how they went from fierce opposition to sudden support after the parties agreed to 'revised conditions'. Now, sitting in back-to-school traffic with a Teams call crackling through my car speakers, I got the full story of exactly what those conditions entail.
And frankly, it's either the most comprehensive set of telecoms concessions in South African history, or the most elaborate corporate sleight of hand.
The headline number that had everyone's attention was always going to be the money.
Maziv has committed to a cumulative capital expenditure (capex) of 'at least R12-billion' over five years for network expansion and maintenance. That's 'two more (billions) than it was before,' as one counsel helpfully clarified for those of us trying to do math while navigating parking lot chaos.
But here's where it gets interesting – and where my daughter, sitting in the passenger seat doing homework, started asking why I was shouting at my laptop again: of that R12-billion, R9-billion will be spent specifically on new fibre projects, with the commitment period restarted from April 2025. They've effectively put the 'clock back to zero' on their investment timeline.
The kicker? The capex will be 'primarily but not exclusively spent on roll-out of infrastructure in low-income areas.' This isn't just about passing homes – it's about actually connecting them.
The million homes promise
Maziv has undertaken to pass at least one million homes in lower-income areas over five years, with at least 350,000 homes in what they're calling 'key areas' (think Alexandra Township), what counsel is calling the 'lowest of low-income homes'.
My daughter is now asking what I mean when I keep muttering about 'homes passed'. How do you explain to a 14-year-old that a telecoms company just promised to wire up the townships?
But the really fundamental concession – the one that had legal eagles in the virtual courtroom practically purring, is this: Maziv must provide 'sufficient capex to ensure that every home passed in terms of the commitments that wishes to be connected on the prevailing terms and conditions for connection is connected' for five years.
What this means
They can't just run fibre past your house in Alex and then charge you R2,000 to actually connect. They have to budget for actual connections, not just the theatrical gesture of running cables down your street..
Boardroom chess
The shareholding arrangements have been tweaked in ways that would make any corporate governance lawyer proud. Vodacom still gets its initial 30% co-controlling equity interest, but the path to 40% just became significantly more complicated.
Under the revised conditions, which now meet muster for Compcom sign-off, 'Vodacom can't increase its shareholding beyond 34.9% without the consent of the Commission.' And if it wants to move to more direct forms of control, it'll need fresh merger approval entirely.
I gaze directly into the sun, trying to follow the technical submissions about board composition. All parties are now trying to explain, much to the chagrin of the merging parties, to Judge President Norman Manoim that the 'extra four percent' shareholding isn't the nothingburger he keeps making it out to be.
You see, the composition of the board has been restructured since the Competition Tribunal blocked the deal: seven Maziv directors, seven Vodacom directors, and now four independent directors (up from three), plus CEO/CFO. Crucially, 'Vodacom will not be entitled to veto their appointment' of independent directors.
It's corporate governance with training wheels, designed to address exactly the control concerns that got this deal prohibited in the first place.
Clearing the blockade
The legal arguments against the Competition Tribunal's original prohibition are where this hearing gets properly spicy. Advocate Jerome Wilson, representing the merging parties, spent considerable time arguing that the tribunal had 'misdirected itself' through what he called 'internal mistrust' and 'cynicism or bias'.
The tribunal, Wilson argued, relied on 'extraordinary allegations' about alleged past collusion between Vodacom and MTN from media reports dating back to 1994 – allegations that were never properly tested in proceedings. This context, he said, apparently 'infected the Tribunal's entire reasoning process'.
Wilson's most damning critique focused on the tribunal's 'counterfactual analysis', basically, what would happen without the merger. The tribunal assumed Vodacom would become a very significant fibre player in low-income areas and that other players would fill any investment gap.
The evidence? A Dark Fibre Africa representative testimony saying it would take 'at least three years for me to find an investor and I cannot guarantee you that I would find one', and that 'nobody else has come up since 2015' other than Vodacom.
The tribunal's reliance on speculation rather than what Wilson calls 'real world outcomes' was deemed a fundamental error. But this does not erase the other issues.
The maths starts math-thing
While lawyers argued legal theory, the market realities are crazy. Pre-merger, Maziv (through Vumatel) commanded 32% of the fibre-to-the-home (FTTH) market with 2,050,000 homes passed. Vodacom's standalone fibre network? A measly 2.5% with 158,000 homes.
Post-merger, the combined entity will control 34.5% of homes passed (2,208,000) and 34.4% of homes connected (885,000). That makes them significantly larger than Telkom's Openserve at 20.9% of homes passed.
I explain to my now fully engaged teenager that this deal is essentially creating a duopoly in South Africa's wholesale fibre market: Vodacom-Maziv versus Openserve, with everyone else scrambling for scraps.
Which was the original Compcom opposition point, until the merging parties sweetened the deal to get government buy-in – the DTIC and communications minister both supported the appeal.
Honeypot dealmaking
These post-tribunal public interest commitments read like a policymaking wet dream. Free gigabit per second fibre connections for all public schools, libraries, and clinics passed by the FTTH network roll-out. More police stations getting Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) products. Enhanced employee share ownership plans.
Vodacom has also committed to achieving 90% 5G population coverage within five years, with obligations to connect additional FWA users that will require them to 'price their FWA competitively'.
For pricing protection, FTTH can't increase prices for the lowest-price options for two years, and there can be 'no forced upgrades' for five years – protecting lower-income consumers from being pushed on to more expensive packages.
You see, the tribunal's concern was that Vodacom's veto rights could allow it to force Maziv to act against its profit-maximising interests – essentially, to favour Vodacom over other wholesale customers.
The merging parties argued this was a 'fundamental conceptual error'. Vodacom would account for 'less than 20% of Maziv's revenues', so any theoretical side payments or compensation for non-profit-maximising behaviour simply wouldn't make economic sense.
The burden of debt
What's often lost in the regulatory theatre is why Maziv needed this deal in the first place. CIVH, Maziv's parent company (owned by Remgro), was carrying R19.5-billion in debt by mid-2024. This merger provides the capital injection needed to fund the next phase of fibre expansion, particularly into areas where the business case is marginal.
The 'lessening of competition' identified by the tribunal primarily affected 'certain wealthier households' – about 2,000 to 7,500 homes, according to the merging parties. They argued this was insignificant when weighed against connecting a million low-income homes.
One genuinely innovative aspect of the revised conditions is an enhanced 'fast-track interim relief process' for foreclosure concerns. This allows an expert to make binding determinations while formal investigations are under way, 'taking the load off the commission' for complex, time-sensitive issues.
It's regulatory innovation born from regulatory failure. A recognition that the traditional competition processes aren't nimble enough for rapidly evolving telecoms markets.
Concession is a town in Zimbabwe
As I finally switch off the Teams call, the bigger picture comes into focus. Compcom's about-turn isn't just about accepting better conditions, it's about accepting that South Africa's digital infrastructure reality requires uncomfortable compromises.
The revised deal creates what's being called a 'fibre powerhouse with unparalleled market scale' while theoretically addressing competition and public interest concerns. Whether those theoretical protections work in practice remains to be seen.
But here's the uncomfortable truth that emerged from the proceedings: the same companies we don't trust to compete fairly are the only ones with deep enough pockets to bridge our digital divide.
In a country where millions still lack basic connectivity, that might be a trade-off we're willing to make. DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ramaphosa announces urgent measures to shield South African firms from Trump's tariff fallout
Ramaphosa announces urgent measures to shield South African firms from Trump's tariff fallout

Daily Maverick

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Ramaphosa announces urgent measures to shield South African firms from Trump's tariff fallout

This comes after the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition launched an export support desk on Thursday night as one of its 'urgent interventions' to support South African exporters affected by the tariffs. South Africa is preparing a package to support companies that are vulnerable to the US tariffs, after it failed to secure a trade deal with Washington before a deadline set by US President Donald Trump. 'All channels of communication remain open to engage with the US, and our negotiators are ready pending invitation from the US,' President Cyril Ramaphosa said in a statement on Friday morning. 'In the meantime, government is finalising a package to support companies that are vulnerable to the reciprocal tariffs. The package consists of a number of measures to assist companies, producers and workers affected by the tariffs on SA exports to the US. The details of the measures will be announced in due course,' said Ramaphosa. This comes after the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition launched an export support desk on Thursday night as one of its 'urgent interventions' to support South African exporters affected by the tariffs. On Thursday, Trump signed an executive order placing new tariff rates on dozens of countries, hours before the 1 August 2025 deadline he had set for deals to be made. Some countries received modified tariff rates, while South Africa's remained at the 30% previously proposed by the US. (Source: The Outlier) According to the executive order, the higher import duty rates will take effect seven days from the date of the order. 'All applicable exceptions published in the previous US executive order are set to remain in force, and these exceptions covered products such as copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber articles, certain critical minerals, stainless steel scrap and energy products,' said Ramaphosa. South African officials have been working frantically for months to secure a trade deal with the US to avert Trump's punishing tariffs. South Africa proffered a proposed framework deal to US trade representatives in Washington in May, before Ramaphosa and Trump met at the White House. Representatives were later told they needed to revise this proposal, in accordance with the Trump administration's new template for US trade with sub-Saharan Africa, which they were told would be shared ' soon '. Earlier this week, it appeared the country was still waiting for this template. In his statement, Ramaphosa said the department was in 'constant contact' with the US on its framework deal. He said trade relations between SA and the US were 'complementary in nature' and that South African exports 'do not pose a threat' to US industry. 'South Africa will continue to pursue all diplomatic efforts to safeguard its national interests. It is important that as a country we keep our people at work and our companies producing some of the high-quality products destined for many parts of the world. 'To this end, government will intensify its diversification strategy to create resilience of our economy, and is working with export councils and industry associations, as well as top exporters to the US with a view to assist with alternative markets,' he said. Call to renew 'intensive negotiations' Dr Boitshoko Ntshabele, the CEO of the Citrus Growers Association, told Daily Maverick the 30% tariff 'will be felt most acutely in rural communities in the Northern and Western Cape, the two provinces from which we export to the US'. Ntshabele said it was still possible to reach a trade deal with the US before 7 August, and called on Ramaphosa to renew 'intensive negotiations'. 'The category of seasonal fresh produce offers clear mutual benefits to both countries. South African citrus is exported to the US during the northern hemisphere's summer months. This secures continued supply in the category and in no way threatens domestic US growers. 'It is notable that Brazilian orange juice has been exempted from US tariffs. Fresh South African citrus plays a significant role in keeping America healthy, keeping citrus consumers in the category, and in avoiding possible citrus price increases. 'We have passed the middle of the southern hemisphere's citrus season, and local citrus growers have managed to accelerate a limited number of shipments to the US in the past weeks, which has mitigated some of the effects of the tariff on the current season's US exports. But should a beneficial trade deal not be concluded, our next export season will feel the full effect of the tariff.' Ntshabele welcomed the department's emergency measures, but said that without a deal, 'Our growers in the Western and Northern Cape will face a potentially devastating scenario, especially since the US citrus market's appetite for our produce until very recently offered the potential for creating many more local citrus jobs.' 'No company can compete with 30% tariffs' The Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) on Friday said it was 'extremely concerned' about the impact of the 30% tariff on all South African goods, barring minerals. 'We fear the devastation this will wreak upon farmworkers in the citrus industry from the Western Cape to Limpopo, to motor manufacturing workers from the Eastern Cape to Gauteng. No company can compete with 30% tariffs. Many may close,' said Cosatu in a statement. Daily Maverick reported previously that Trump's punishing tariffs would kneecap South African industries, including the automotive sector and the citrus industry. 'This calamity has been made worse as South Africa has been unfairly made a global skunk with comparatively far better tariffs of 15% announced for neighbouring states, economic sector competitors and most of the world, ironically including many regimes with dubious understandings of the rule of law and real human rights abuses and genocides, who will now have a real advantage over South African exports,' Cosatu added. In a statement on Friday morning, DA spokespersons on Trade, Industry and International Relations, MPs Toby Chance and Ryan Smith, said that the commencement of the 30% tariffs on SA goods was a 'devastating outcome' for the country. 'Both the departments of Trade, Industry and Competition, and International Relations and Cooperation should hang their heads in profound shame today. This 'no deal' scenario is due to sheer negligence, failed diplomacy and ineptitude,' they said. The Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber said that the imposition of the 30% tariffs was a 'big blow for local businesses, especially in the automotive and agricultural sectors'. 'The Eastern Cape economy is likely to be the most adversely affected in the country by these developments. 'We are deeply concerned about the impact these developments may have on our automotive industry, which is anchored by the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) which undertake completely knocked down assembly in South Africa. These OEMs are responsible for creating well over a 100,000 jobs at their own operations and within their components supplier networks. 'Furthermore it is estimated that the knock-on employment impact of these OEMs and components manufacturers results in over 500,000 formal jobs being created across the entire automotive supply chain. Around 40% of automotive employment in the country is located in the Eastern Cape,' the chamber said in a statement. DM

Emfuleni crisis highlights local government debt as Treasury cracks the whip
Emfuleni crisis highlights local government debt as Treasury cracks the whip

Daily Maverick

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Emfuleni crisis highlights local government debt as Treasury cracks the whip

The closure of the Emfuleni Local Municipality offices due to unpaid rent highlights the local government debt crisis, something Treasury hopes to fix by withholding grants from defaulting municipalities. Residents of Emfuleni were unable to make payments or lodge enquiries at the municipality's Vanderbijlpark offices this week after they were locked due to the failure to pay the monthly R6.4-million rent. According to the DA's Emfuleni caucus leader, Duncan Mthembu, this is a 'powerful symbol' of a nationwide crisis of municipal dysfunction and ballooning debt. Freedom Front Plus Councillor Hein van der Lith said the property owner had closed the building, which has more than 100 offices, twice previously this year and three times in 2024. He said the closure follows a recent recommendation from the Gauteng Legislature's Committee on Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Cogta) to place the troubled municipality under administration. Emfuleni was recently identified by Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana as one of 39 municipalities that have persistently failed to pay water boards and other parties such as pension funds, medical aids, SARS, the Auditor-General, and continues to adopt unfunded budgets. The minister said he would suspend all grants to the 39 municipalities for the rest of the financial year due to their ongoing failures. The DA's Mthembu said the closure of the Emfuleni offices meant 'residents have been left confused and stuck on how to proceed in getting assistance with payments and enquiries'. Emfuleni is located in Gauteng and comprises areas such as Vanderbijlpark. Mthembu said this was 'nothing more but an abject failure in governance, and something as simple as communication. The municipality could not even inform residents of their offices' closure.' Account attached Emfuleni's problems have been compounded by Rand Water's decision to attach the municipality's bank account due to its R1.7-billion unpaid debt. Emfuleni Municipality spokesperson Makhosonke Sangweni denied that the municipality had failed to honour its payment agreement with Rand Water, describing it as 'arbitrary'. Emfuleni Finance MMC Hassan Mako said, 'The municipality is unable to access its bank account because Rand Water has attached the account, and this situation has persisted for two months.' He said the municipality had considered taking the matter to court, but the mayor refused. Mako said the municipality had formed a special purpose vehicle (SPV) with Rand Water that would manage the water and sanitation services. 'However, Rand Water seems to be more focused on delaying the launch process by continuously attaching the municipality's accounts,' said Mako. 'The SPV project requires R1.3-billion, while Rand Water is owed R1.7-billion. Nevertheless, the municipality has committed to servicing the debt in tranches so that other service providers can be paid,' said Mako. Describing the impact of having its bank account attached, Mako said, 'There is no diesel to pick up refuse. Contractors that were assisting us with cleaning illegal dumps are not paid and have left the sites. When offices are closed, it means workers are paid salaries for doing nothing, and municipal infrastructure projects are suffering.' Emfuleni also owes Eskom R8.5-billion as at the end of June 2025. 'We believe the municipality is being held ransom by Rand Water, which negatively impacts service delivery. As a collective, we urge the mayor to lead by allowing this matter to be resolved in court in the best interest of service delivery,' Mako added. Emfuleni's municipal debt came under the spotlight in a letter from Godongwana to Cogta Minister Velenkosini Hlabisa on the ongoing crisis in municipalities. Gondongwana cracks whip on debt-ridden municipalities At the end of June, Godongwana informed Hlabisa that he would invoke Section 216(2) of the Constitution against the 39 most dysfunctional municipalities for 'persistent non-compliance'. This section allows the National Treasury to stop the transfer of funds to an organ of state if it commits a 'serious or persistent material breach' of measures designed to ensure transparency and expenditure control. According to Godongwana, Treasury has outlined a strict mechanism to force compliance: if any of the 18 defaulting municipalities fail to provide proof of full payment to their respective water boards within seven days of the 30 June letter, their Local Government Equitable Share (LGES) will be stopped. This withheld equitable share will only be released in portions, with stringent conditions. The first portion must be strictly used to pay current water board accounts, with proof of payment required, before a second amount is released for arrears owed under a valid repayment arrangement. According to the letter from Godongwana, if these conditions were not met, or if evidence of payments to institutions such as SARS, pension funds and other statutory third parties is not submitted, Treasury would approach Parliament to endorse the stopping of all LGES transfers for the rest of the 2025/26 municipal financial year. Municipal financial years run from 1 July to 30 June. Treasury also plans to withhold conditional infrastructure transfers. 'It is advisable that, parallel to the LGES withholding process, Rand Water, Vaal Central, Lepelle Northern, and Magalies Water enforce their credit control policies to also attach the bank accounts of the defaulting municipalities to enforce a change in behaviour of these municipalities. The same applies to all the water boards, in order to avoid a similar situation and prevent escalating debt across water boards,' said Godongwana. Earlier this year, Hlabisa told Daily Maverick the national government was sending a message to municipalities that 'it is time to pay'. During his 2025 departmental budget vote debate speech, the Cogta minister said: 'We have concurred with Treasury to compel the payments for water boards and Eskom, and pay pension and medical aid contributions to third parties. Notably, the same principle will have to apply to all government departments who owe municipalities, they must be compelled to pay what is due to municipalities.' Municipalities across the country owe Eskom almost R110-billion. Writing in Business Live, Municipal IQ managing director Kevin Allan said the local government debt crisis was caused by poor governance, a lack of oversight, and weak administrative capacity. 'The suspension of grants, therefore, represents the Treasury's move from carrot to stick. But this approach is not without risk. Service interruptions, project delays and cash flow constraints may follow in affected municipalities. Residents could bear the brunt of deteriorating services, and protest action may escalate,' said Allan. He described Treasury's decision as 'both bold and necessary'. 'The stakes are enormous. Without intervention, the escalating debt spiral could not only collapse local government, but destabilise national service delivery and weaken the country's fiscal standing,' Allan continued. 'Above all, municipalities must get back to basics. They must adopt funded budgets, bill accurately, collect revenue diligently and prioritise creditor payments. Professionalising financial management, insulating administration from politics and enforcing accountability are not optional – they are essential. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store