Criminal Justice season 4: Who killed Roshni? Anju, Raj, Ira or someone else? Netizens claim killer may not be who you suspect
Criminal Justice: A Family Matter
dropping on July 3, 2025, fans aren't just waiting—they're investigating. The
courtroom drama
has turned everyday viewers into full-time Reddit detectives, each armed with screenshots, trailer stills, and timelines. As
Pankaj Tripathi
's Madhav Mishra inches closer to uncovering the truth behind nurse Roshni Saluja's murder, the internet is already racing to deliver its verdict.
Season 4 has kept audiences gripped with its layered storytelling. Dr. Raj Nagpal stands accused of murdering his girlfriend, nurse Roshni, while his estranged wife Anju and daughter Ira are slowly pulled into the shadows of suspicion. Every episode has introduced a new piece of evidence—from surveillance gaps to a suspicious lactose-free milk bottle—blurring the lines between guilt and innocence.
Episode 7 ended with fresh twists, forcing fans to reconsider everything they thought they knew. And now, Reddit is brimming with bold, elaborate theories. (Beware, spoiler alert ahead!)
The most convincing theory? The 'other doctor' did it
One Reddit user suggests the killer is not Dr. Nagpal, but a fellow physician. According to their theory, this doctor suspected Roshni of poisoning Nagpal's daughter and, out of concern (and a possible college connection with Anju), tried to intervene. A confrontation allegedly turned fatal, with Anju helping cover it up. The motive? Protection. The fallout? A frightened daughter withholding the truth. The twist? She might just testify in the finale.
Is the murder weapon a red herring—or the key?
The scalpel, found late in the season, sparked intense speculation. Why did Anju hire Madhav Mishra? Was it guilt, or was it to protect someone else, like herself? As more viewers dig deeper, some argue the real killer might be Kamala, based on a woman's hand shown in the trailer's slitting scene. Others lean towards lesser-known characters like Roshni's ex-boyfriend, citing suspiciously little screen time.
Slow burn or genius build-up? Fans are split
While some viewers have dismissed the season as slow or underwhelming, others argue that the real issue is its weekly release format. 'It's not boring—it's suspenseful,' one fan defended. 'There are over 30 different plausible theories circulating. That means the show is doing its job: no one knows what's coming.' Still, many agree on one thing—if the final twist involves Anju, Raj, or Ira as the killer, it better be backed by airtight logic. Anything less could risk making the tension-filled build-up feel unearned.
The final hearing
With just one episode to go, Criminal Justice: A Family Matter has managed to do what few shows can—get everyone guessing, debating, and playing armchair detective. As July 3 approaches, one question looms large: Will the writers outsmart the internet?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Explained: Why Sydney Sweeney's new American Eagle ad is being called 'fascist' and 'Nazi'- and being labelled 'white supremacist'
Godwin's law states that any internet discussion will always veer towards someone making a comparison with Nazi or Hitler. And now that 4chan/Reddit ailment has escaped into the real world. A denim ad meant to celebrate American style has instead ignited a firestorm online, with critics accusing American Eagle and actress Sydney Sweeney of peddling "Nazi fascist" propaganda through a campaign that plays on the phrase 'great genes'—a pun some say dangerously echoes eugenic and white supremacist ideals. TL;DR Sydney Sweeney stars in a new American Eagle ad campaign with the tagline: 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans.' The campaign includes a video where Sweeney crosses out the word 'genes' and replaces it with 'jeans.' Online critics say the ad is coded with racial overtones and liken it to white supremacist propaganda. Accusations include promoting eugenic ideals and glorifying 'white genes.' Neither Sweeney nor American Eagle has responded to the growing backlash. What's in the ad? The ad, part of American Eagle's new denim campaign, features 27-year-old Euphoria actress Sydney Sweeney in a distinctly Americana setting—fixing her car, slipping into the driver's seat, all while sporting a pair of jeans. The tagline reads: 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans.' A follow-up video posted to American Eagle's Instagram shows Sweeney approaching a billboard with the phrase 'great genes.' She strikes out the word 'genes' with red paint and replaces it with 'jeans.' A cheeky wordplay, right? Not according to a growing number of online critics. Why are people calling it 'Nazi propaganda'? T by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Up to 70% off | Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo he criticism stems from the historical baggage tied to the phrase 'great genes.' According to a widely circulated Salon article, the expression has long been associated with white supremacist ideals—used to promote whiteness, thinness, and eurocentric beauty standards. The problem, critics argue, is that when the phrase is paired with Sweeney—a blue-eyed, blonde-haired woman often labelled the embodiment of 'classic American beauty'—it begins to resemble eugenic messaging. 'A blonde haired blue eyed white woman is talking about her good genes—that is Nazi propaganda,' said one viral TikTok user. The visual of Sweeney crossing out 'genes' and writing 'jeans' has also been read as symbolic—an attempt to deflect or mock the implications of genetic superiority while simultaneously reinforcing them. What are people saying online? Social media backlash has been fierce and fast: On X (formerly Twitter): 'The Sydney Sweeney American Eagle jeans ad is NAZI propaganda, and you're a fascist if you don't agree.' 'They could've gotten a beautiful Black woman to do this ad, but they picked a yt [white] woman instead…' 'American Eagle needs to delete those Sydney Sweeney ads. They are genuinely scary.' On TikTok: Several creators have posted explainers breaking down the 'dog whistles' embedded in the ad, referencing how similar language was used in Nazi Germany and, more recently, in far-right political circles to celebrate white dominance. But is this really that deep? That's the cultural debate now unfolding. On one hand, the campaign is clearly playing on a pun—'genes' and 'jeans.' On the other, when those words are paired with an image of a conventionally white American beauty and a brand literally called American Eagle, the symbolism feels more loaded than cheeky. Whether or not the messaging was intentional, critics argue that intent doesn't negate impact—especially when mass-market fashion ads operate in an ecosystem shaped by decades of race, class, and beauty privilege. Have American Eagle or Sydney Sweeney responded? No. As of July 28, 2025, neither the actress nor the brand has issued a public statement addressing the controversy. American Eagle's Instagram post remains live, though comments appear to be limited or heavily moderated. Has the campaign affected the brand? Ironically, while the backlash raged online, the campaign did boost business. According to reports, American Eagle saw a 4% spike in shares after the ad dropped. But social goodwill may have taken a hit. Gen Z and millennial consumers—core demographics for American Eagle—have increasingly shown a preference for socially conscious branding, and this incident could create longer-term reputational risks. Why is Sydney Sweeney often controversial? This isn't the first time the actress has found herself in political hot water. Sweeney previously drew criticism in 2022 when photos surfaced from her mother's 60th birthday party, where guests were seen in red hats that looked like MAGA caps. The hats actually read 'Make Sixty Great Again,' a pun on her mother's milestone birthday, but many on the internet interpreted it as a pro-Trump statement. The actress denied any political affiliations at the time, saying the celebration was not intended to be political, but the incident left the internet keeping a close eye on her public image. In this case, it's less about what Sweeney has said and more about what her image represents in the broader cultural landscape. FAQs Q: What's wrong with the phrase 'great genes'? A: It has historical ties to eugenics and white supremacy, especially when used to describe blonde, blue-eyed, Eurocentric beauty as inherently superior. Q: Was this ad intentionally fascist? A: That's debatable. There's no proof of intent—but critics argue that the visual and verbal cues, even if unintentional, mirror fascist aesthetics and ideas. Q: Why hasn't the ad been pulled? A: American Eagle has yet to respond. The company may be weighing whether the controversy helps or hurts brand visibility in the long run. Q: Is Sydney Sweeney responsible? A: That depends on how much creative input she had. While she starred in the ad, the brand and agency are ultimately responsible for messaging and design. Bottom line: In the age of internet hyper-literacy, ads don't live in a vacuum. Whether by accident or design, this campaign has stirred up a hornet's nest about race, beauty, and nationalism—and no one involved seems ready to put out the fire.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Who is Loloverruled? HasanAbi's friend accused of being a 'sex pest' after graphic DMs and videos leak online
(Image via @loloverruled/Instagram) Internet personality and frequent HasanAbi guest, Alex aka 'Loloverruled,' has become the focus of explosive online controversy this week. Known for his appearances during HasanAbi's Twitch streams, the influencer is now under fire after multiple women came forward with unsettling allegations. The situation has rapidly escalated on social media, with screenshots, personal testimonies, and commentary flooding platforms like X and Reddit. Loloverruled faces backlash after disturbing claims surface on X On July 28, 2025, X user @KatanaSpeaks released a detailed thread that included screenshots and claims from several people accusing Loloverruled of being a 'sex pest and serial abuser.' The thread quickly made waves, leading to speculation and backlash directed at the influencer, who has since locked his account. — Awk20000 (@Awk20000) Screenshots included in the thread reportedly show Loloverruled describing his sexual experiences in graphic detail, using language that many users found alarming and inappropriate. One of the now-viral posts referenced an out-of-body experience during a sexual act, drawing bizarre comparisons to Leonardo DiCaprio, a detail that turned the thread into a hotbed of disbelief and memes. More individuals speak out with screenshots and disturbing anecdotes Shortly after the thread went live, other X users began posting their own stories. @J3ssicaStarling claimed to have seen video evidence of Loloverruled sending sexually explicit content to sex workers on social media. Another user, @bustitopen420, alleged that the influencer contacted her after she wore his merchandise. She claims he then sent her explicit photos and asked for her STD test results, a claim that quickly shocked many of his followers. The post gained even more traction when Ethan Klein (@h3h3productions) shared it on his Instagram story, writing, 'Hasan's best friend just outted as a freak - Lolo? More like uh-oh.' Community response divided as influencer locks his account With Loloverruled disappearing from public view, the internet rushed to react. His account, now private, left many wondering if a public statement would ever come. But earlier this week, the influencer posted a cryptic message saying he's currently undergoing outpatient therapy and is 'mulling over' whether to speak publicly. HasanAbi subreddit reacts with mixed opinions The drama quickly spilled into HasanAbi's fan subreddit, r/Hasan_Piker. Some users voiced concern and called for accountability, while others cautioned against rushing to judgment, especially with Ethan Klein involved. As more voices continue to emerge and scrutiny mounts, the future of Loloverruled's online presence, and his standing within HasanAbi's inner circle, remains uncertain. Whether fans believe the allegations or not, the story of Loloverruled has dominated online conversations. Between X threads, locked accounts, and shady screenshots, it's become one of those internet moments that keeps unfolding, and keeps people watching. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Vijay Sethupathi offered Rs 2 lakhs for caravan favour': Casting couch allegation surfaces, victim reportedly in rehab
Actor Vijay Sethupathi is currently making headlines due to a shocking allegation. A social media user named Ramya Mohan has accused the actor of pretending to be a 'saint' while allegedly being the opposite. In a now-deleted post on X, she claimed that Vijay Sethupathi offered her Rs 2 lakh for 'caravan favours.' While there is no official confirmation regarding this, here's everything she alleged in her viral post. Here's all that Ramya Mohan claimed in her post about 'casting couch culture' Kollywood's drug and casting couch culture is not a joke. A girl known personally to the user, now a media personality, was allegedly dragged into this toxic environment. The girl is currently in a rehab center. The user claims the industry involves drugs, manipulation, and transactional exploitation, all disguised as 'industry norms.' She alleges that Vijay Sethupathi (@VijaySethuOffl) offered: -Rs 2 lakh for 'caravan favors' -Rs 50,000 for 'drives' She accuses him of pretending to be a saint on social media while being exploitative in private. The girl was allegedly 'used' by him for years. The user insists this is not an isolated incident but a widespread issue in the industry. She criticizes the media for glorifying such men. She concludes by saying the drug-sex nexus in the industry is real and not a joke. Why did Ramya Mohan delete the post after it went viral? After deleting the tweet in which she alleged the actor of multiple things she stated the reason why she did so. She wrote in another post, 'I shared that tweet out of frustration and to vent. Didn't expect it to get this much attention. Getting too many enquiries about it now. Out of concern for her privacy and wellbeing I've decided to take it down. Hope that's respected.' Internet reacts to Vijay Sethupathi being accused of manipulation Before the tweet was deleted, the screenshot landed on Reddit with many people reacting to it. One wrote, 'I trust this person! People pretending to be Holier than thou online are the worst!.' Another added, 'These are heavy allegations so idk if they should be trusted fully but Op in my personal experience moral posturing guys are usually the worst.' A third went on to add, 'Nothing new at all. The ones who obsess over proving how humble or ideal they are are usually the complete opposite. ' An old accusation against Vijay Sethupathi In a Reddit thread that was shared months ago, some people talked about accusations or 'tea' related to Vijay. One allegedly claimed, 'His wife fought with Aishwarya Rajesh and called her a homewrecker for which Aishwarya Rajesh told his wife that he is the one who is not leaving her and asked her to control her husband.' Vijay Sethupathi recent controversy: When actor apologised for a video of his son Surya chewing bubble gum Vijay Sethupathi recently addressed backlash over a video showing his son, Surya, chewing bubble gum while meeting fans at the premiere of Surya's debut film, Phoenix. The clip drew criticism online, with some viewers calling Surya's behavior arrogant. Sethupathi clarified that he didn't ask for the video to be removed and apologized to anyone who felt offended or misinterpreted the situation. It's important to note that neither Vijay Sethupathi nor anyone from his team has commented on the matter so far, so these remain unverified allegations and rumours.
