Uttar Pradesh Gets New Acting DGP: Who Is IPS Officer Rajeev Krishna?
Krishna, a 1991-batch Indian Police Service officer, assumed charge following the retirement of acting DGP Prashant Kumar on May 31
Senior IPS officer Rajeev Krishna has been appointed as the acting director general of police (DGP) of Uttar Pradesh, marking another transition in the state's top police leadership.
Krishna, a 1991-batch Indian Police Service officer, assumed charge following the retirement of acting DGP Prashant Kumar on May 31. This makes him the fifth consecutive officer to be appointed in an 'acting" capacity since 2022.
Founding chief of UP ATS, pushed tech-driven policing
Known for his integrity and innovative approach to policing, Krishna previously served as the director general of vigilance and chairman of the Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment and Promotion Board.
Born on June 26, 1969, in Noida, Rajeev Krishna began his policing career in 1991. He has held several key positions, including senior superintendent of police (SSP) in cities like Agra, Lucknow, and Bareilly. He gained prominence in 2004 for his decisive action against kidnapping gangs, solidifying his reputation as a tough and effective officer.
Krishna also served as the founding chief of Uttar Pradesh's Anti-Terror Squad and held significant roles such as director general of the Police Academy and inspector general of operations in the Border Security Force. His tenure was marked by the implementation of technology-driven policing initiatives like Operation Pehchaan and e-Malkhana, aimed at modernising the force and raising cybercrime awareness.
Family in public service
His brother-in-law, Rajeshwar Singh, a former IPS officer, is now a member of the legislative assembly (MLA) from Sarojini Nagar in Lucknow.
Rajeshwar's wife, Lakshmi Singh, serves as the police commissioner of Gautam Buddha Nagar.
'Acting' appointments
Since the removal of Mukul Goel as the permanent DGP in May 2022, Uttar Pradesh has seen a series of acting police chiefs. Goel was dismissed for 'neglect of duty" and reassigned as director general of Civil Defence.
Following his departure, the state appointed Devendra Singh Chauhan as acting DGP, who served until his retirement in March 2023. He was succeeded by RK Vishwakarma, who held the position until May 2023. Vijay Kumar then took over as acting DGP, followed by Prashant Kumar, who served until his retirement in May 2025.
Rajeev Krishna's appointment continues this trend of interim leadership within the state's police force.
New rules for selecting DGP
In November 2024, the Uttar Pradesh government introduced the Director General of Police, UP Selection and Appointment Rules, 2024, to formalise the appointment process for the state's police chief. Under these rules, a six-member committee, chaired by a retired high court judge, will oversee the selection.
The committee comprises the chief secretary, a nominee from the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), the chairperson or a nominee from the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission, the additional chief secretary (home), and a retired DGP. The committee will assess candidates based on service records, experience, and a minimum of six months of remaining service. The appointed DGP will serve a fixed term of two years or until retirement, whichever is sooner.
Rajeev Krishna's appointment as acting DGP comes as Uttar Pradesh strives to enhance its law enforcement capabilities and restore public confidence.
First Published:
June 01, 2025, 07:00 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Assam villagers claim to receive threat calls from Bangladeshi fundamentalists
Fresh security concerns have emerged in Assam's Dhubri district after villagers living along the India-Bangladesh border reported receiving threatening phone calls and audio clips from individuals claiming affiliation with Bangladesh's fundamentalist group Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI).The audio messages, traced to a Bangladeshi number, warned locals of "terrible consequences' if they cooperated with Indian security forces. Villagers were allegedly threatened with arson if anyone from the area was of Lakhimari and Bishkhowa under Golakganj police station were among the first to alert authorities. 'We are living in constant fear. People are too scared to speak openly,' said one villager. Following the alerts, both the Border Security Force (BSF) and Assam Police have stepped up security along the sensitive border threats come just days after a youth from the same border area was arrested on the eve of Independence Day with a Bangladeshi SIM card and a Bangladeshi flag in his possession. The incident has fuelled suspicions of cross-border attempts to destabilise the region.A senior police officer said the developments indicate a pattern of 'anti-India activities' being pushed across the border. 'These threats cannot be ignored. Security forces are maintaining high vigilance,' the officer villagers, however, the uncertainty is deeply unsettling. 'We just want peace, but after these warnings, people are worried about their safety,' another resident said.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Assam
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
'Death knell for democracy': Opposition slams Centre's PM, CM removal bills
Opposition leaders on Wednesday launched a scathing attack on the Centre after Home Minister Amit Shah introduced three bills in the Lok Sabha that seek to provide a framework for the removal of the Prime Minister (PM), Union Ministers, Chief Ministers (CM), and Ministers in States and Union Territories facing serious criminal charges. The bills are The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025 The Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025 The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025 All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief and Lok Sabha member Asaduddin Owaisi said the proposals could turn India into a 'police state,' comparing the framework to Nazi Germany's Gestapo. 'This violates the principle of separation of powers and undermines the right of the power to elect a government…This government is hell-bent on creating a police state. This will be a death nail unleashed on elected government. Indian Constitution is being amended to turn this country into a police state,' he warned in the House. West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee also hit out at the Centre, terming the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill 'a step towards something that is more than a super-Emergency, a step to end the democratic era of India forever.' " This draconian step comes as a death knell for democracy and federalism in India. What we are witnessing is unprecedented—the Bill is nothing short of a Hitlerian assault on the very soul of Indian democracy. The Bill seeks to strip the judiciary of its Constitutional role—to take away the power of Courts to adjudicate on matters that lie at the very heart of justice and federal balance. By vesting such powers in partisan hands, the Bill mutilates democracy," she said in a post on X. Congress MP Manish Tewari also said, "the bill is against the jurisprudence of criminal justice and distorts Parliamentary democracy. The bill opens door for political misuse and throws all constitutional safeguards to the wind". What do the bills propose? The bills stipulate that leaders, including the PM and CMs, who are arrested on charges carrying a prison term of five years or more and remain in custody for 30 consecutive days, will be removed from office on the 31st day. The removal would be executed by the President in the case of the PM, by the CM for state ministers, by the Governor for CMs, and by the Lieutenant-Governor for CMs in Union Territories. However, they can be re-appointed on release from custody. In the statement of objects and reasons for the proposed amendments, Shah said that the character and conduct of ministers should be 'beyond any ray of suspicion' and that allowing those facing serious charges to continue in office would 'diminish the constitutional trust reposed by people in him.'
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Owaisi submits notice opposing three bills that enable removal of PM, CMs and other elected representatives
Hyderabad parliamentarian Asaduddin Owaisi on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) opposed the introduction of the three bills in the Lok Sabha that enable the removal of Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, Union Ministers and Ministers in States and Union Territories who are arrested and detained on serious criminal charges. Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Owaisi said that he has given notice to oppose the introduction of The Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025, The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025 and The Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025. The All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) president said that his opposition was on the grounds that the amendments would give executive agencies wide, sweeping powers which would enable them to become judge, jury and executioner. Any Chief Minister or minister would be detained on mere suspicion, and baseless allegations. Pointing to two scenarios, Mr. Owaisi said that it is only after the Prime Minster and Chief Minister, who are heads of government, recommend removal that ministers can be removed, or if the Council of Ministers lose confidence. 'They want to turn the country into a police state. This is the quintessential 1933 moment which saw the formation of the Gestapo [in Nazi Germany],' Mr. Owaisi told The Hindu even as he drew attention to the gravity of the situation. He pointed out that the move would deal a massive body-blow to democracy and federalism He emphasised that it was not arrest, but mere detention for a period of 30 days would lead to the removal of the ministers. He said that political leaders such as N. Chandrababu Naidu, Hemant Soren and Arvind Kejriwal were in jail for extended periods of time. He pointed out that sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including Section 152, and Section 4 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act could be invoked arbitrarily for detention or arrest. 'I am opposing the very introduction of these Bills,' he said. The Hyderabad MP said that the move would force elected representatives, who are accountable to the public, to be accountable to executive agencies which report to the Union government, such as the Central Bureau of Investigation, and Enforcement Directorate, as it would leave them to their mercy. The All India Services officers are under the Department of Personnel and Training, a concern of the Centre.
