Bill to amend Goondas Act introduced in Tamil Nadu Assembly
The Tamil Nadu government on Saturday (April 26, 2025) introduced a Bill in the Assembly to amend the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum-Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982.
Though the Bill bore the name of Electricity, Prohibition and Excise Minister V. Senthilbalaji, who was present in the House, Law Minister S. Regupathy introduced it in the Assembly.
Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, in 2024-25, announced in the Assembly that the Act (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982) would be amended suitably to control the activities of persons committing economic offences.
Biomedical waste rules
Explaining the need to amend the Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules, 2016, under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, the Bill also recalled the observation of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court that it was time to book the violators of the Rules.
The Bill also pointed out the grave risks posed by biomedical waste to public health and environment, and complaints about the dumping of such waste in Tamil Nadu from neighbouring States.
The Bill said certain consequential amendments were required since the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Central Act XLV of 1860) and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974) were repealed and re-enacted as the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Central Act 45 of 2023) and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Central Act 46 of 2023), respectively.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Nearly half of Haryana's information officers fail to pay RTI penalties: Data
Over the past 18 years, 48.6% of information officers in Haryana have failed to deposit fines imposed on them by the Haryana State Information Commission. This data, procured under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, reveals that these penalties were levied on officers for failing to provide complete information within the stipulated time. Responding to a query by Haryana Soochna Adhikar Manch convener Subhash, the commission disclosed that 4,043 information officials had been fined in this period. The total penalty imposed on them amounts to Rs. 5.9 crore, of which Rs. 2.84 crore has been recovered. However, 1,965 officials are yet to pay their fines, leaving over Rs. 3 crore unpaid. RTI activist Subhash, who founded the Haryana Soochna Adhikar Manch in 2007, has emphasised the need for strict action against officials who withhold information and later fail to deposit fines. Another activist, P P Kapoor, previously approached the Lokayukta demanding action against defaulting officers. He also urged the anti-corruption ombudsman to direct the government to recover fines with interest. Kapoor told The Indian Express that hearings on the matter were nearing completion, and he expected a ruling soon. He has suggested that retirement benefits should be withheld from officers who fail to clear penalties before superannuation. Former State Information Commissioner Hemant Atri has consistently pushed for a mechanism to ensure compliance with commission orders. He advocates for strict action against State Public Information Officers (SPIOs) who ignore hearings and fail to implement directives. Atri explained that, during his tenure, he held First Appellate Authorities (FAAs) accountable for enforcing his orders. He emphasised that drawing and disbursing officers (DDOs) and FAAs should be responsible for ensuring penalty payments, warning that failure to comply could result in action under Section 20(2) of the RTI Act, 2005. A senior Haryana government official told The Indian Express that the administration would soon issue instructions directing SPIOs to deposit their fines with the state exchequer. Sukhbir Siwach's extensive and in-depth coverage of farmer agitation against three farm laws during 2020-21 drew widespread attention. ... Read More
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Only civil courts can try land ownership or title disputes: Odisha HC
CUTTACK : In a significant ruling, the Orissa high court has held that revenue authorities cannot adjudicate disputes involving ownership or title to land, emphasising that such matters fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of civil courts. The vacation bench of Justice S K Panigrahi issued the order on May 30, setting aside an eviction order passed by the tehsildar of Dhamnagar under the Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment (OPLE) Act, 1972. The case pertains to Dinabandhu Behera, who challenged the eviction proceedings initiated against him on the grounds that the state had erroneously recorded the disputed land in its name during the hal settlement. Behera claimed that his father had legally come into possession of the property after an 'ekpadia' (a written recognition) was issued by the ex-intermediary post-estate abolition. His father's name was subsequently recorded in the tenant ledger and rent was regularly paid to the govt. Upon his death, Behera came into possession of the land. But, despite these records, the tehsildar initiated eviction proceedings treating Behera as an encroacher. The sub-collector and collector of Bhadrak later upheld the eviction order. The HC, while setting aside all these orders, stated that the existence of a bona fide dispute over ownership and title renders summary eviction proceedings under the OPLE Act is inappropriate. "The revenue authorities, who conduct summary procedures, are not competent to adjudicate such complex disputes of title," Justice Panigrahi observed. The court further noted that Behera had already approached the civil judge, junior division, Dhamnagar, seeking declaration of his right, title and interest in the suit land. He had also prayed for a declaration that the encroachment proceedings were unsustainable, given the pending civil suit. Reaffirming the supremacy of civil courts in deciding title-related matters, the court ruled that "summary proceedings by revenue authorities cannot constitute the proper forum for adjudication where a bona fide dispute exists over title".
New Indian Express
44 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Seven, including minor, held for murder of 17-year-old Bihar girl in Bengaluru
BENGALURU: The Surya City police have arrested seven people, including a minor, in connection with the murder of a 17-year-old girl from Bihar, who was allegedly killed by her relative in Bengaluru. Police said they plan to invoke provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, as the postmortem report confirmed the victim had been sexually assaulted. The girl's body was found stuffed inside a blue suitcase and abandoned near the railway tracks in Chandapura on May 21. The victim had arrived in Bengaluru on May 18 with her relative Ashiq Kumar (42). When her family was unable to contact her or Kumar, they filed a missing person complaint at a local police station in Bihar on May 23. A senior officer told TNIE that the suitcase contained only the body, with no identification or belongings, making identification and investigation more difficult. Photographs of the deceased were circulated nationwide, and two days later, Surya City Police Inspector Sanjeev Kumar Mahajan received information that helped identify the girl.
