New Jersey lawmakers eye hiking nicotine taxes to boost revenue
Some state budget provisions are beginning to come into relief days ahead of a deadline to pass a spending bill before the new fiscal year begins on July 1.
Top-ranking legislators in the Senate introduced tax proposals pitched as part of Murphy's budget plan that would raise levies on cigarettes and the fluid used in vaping devices.
'Hopefully, some of this revenue will be applied to smoking cessation programs,' Sen. Joe Vitale (D-Middlesex), the chamber's health chairman and a sponsor of one of the bills, told the New Jersey Monitor.
A bill sponsored by Sen. Paul Sarlo (D-Bergen), the chamber's budget chair, would nudge New Jersey's cigarette per-pack tax up from $2.70 to $3, while Vitale's bill would triple tax rates on electronic cigarette fluid sales at both wholesale and retail levels.
Gov. Phil Murphy pitched both proposals in the budget plan he unveiled in February. They were among a raft of proposed tax increases meant to generate $1.2 billion in additional revenue as New Jersey faces tightening fiscal conditions, a deficit, and uncertainty over the future of its federal funding.
In February budget documents, administration officials urged lawmakers to boost cigarette tax revenue as smoking wanes and is supplanted by newer nicotine delivery mechanisms.
Absent the increase, the tax on cigarettes was expected to generate $365.3 million in the coming fiscal year, down from an estimated $374 million in the current one. With the higher rate, that tax would generate $406.3 million, according to treasury documents.
The increase would allow some money from New Jersey's cigarette tax, about $10.7 million, to flow into the state's general fund.
The first $391.5 million in cigarette tax revenue is dedicated to an off-budget fund that pays for smoking cessation and other health care programs, and some additional funds must be used to pay down bonds issued against cigarette tax revenue.
Opponents warned raising the tax would harm convenience stores, gas stations, and other retailers that carry tobacco products.
The changes would push smokers to cross state lines to purchase cigarettes in Pennsylvania, which charges a $2.60-per-pack cigarette tax, said Eric Blomgren, executive director of the New Jersey Gasoline, C-Store, and Automotive Association.
'For each individual that does so, there are two losses. One is to the retailer who not only lost that sale, but also the cup of coffee, snack, or other purchase that customer would have also bought,' he said. 'The other is to the state, which in an effort to squeeze $3.00 from a pack instead loses the $2.70 it was already getting, plus another roughly 77 cents in lost sales tax.'
Excise taxes like those that New Jersey levies on nicotine products have dual roles. In addition to the revenue they generate, they are meant to deter taxpayers from certain activities, like smoking and drinking.
Vitale, a longtime supporter of higher excise taxes on nicotine products, cautioned New Jersey might see limited success on that second prong.
'I think that the revenue's required, and it serves, at some level, as a disincentive to smoke, but the actual data doesn't support it as much as I thought it did,' Vitale said. 'The people who have an addiction have an addiction. Whether it's $2.70 a pack or $3 a pack, they're going to continue to smoke unless there's an alternative for them.'
The nicotine taxes are among a range of revenue raisers Murphy has proposed for the next fiscal year. Legislators, including Sarlo, have stated opposition to some others, including a proposal to subject recreational activities like laser tag to the state's sales tax.
Under Vitale's proposal, the state's tax on e-cigarette cartridges would rise from 10 cents to 30 cents per milliliter. That increase would add about 56 cents to a four-pack of Juul cartridges and roughly $1.44 to a four-pack of Vuse Alto cartridges.
New Jersey's tax on e-cigarette cartridges can be applied to wholesalers or retailers, depending on the flow of goods.
The bill would separately raise the tax rate on bottled vaping fluid to 30% of retail price, from 10%.
It would also require distributors and retailers to take inventory of their stock of vaping fluid, report it to the state, and pay the additional tax within a month of the bill becoming law.
Blomgren argued the state should enforce its existing ban on flavored vaping products before seeking to boost revenue by raising tax rates.
Last year, Attorney General Matt Platkin fined 19 stores for selling illegal flavored vapes. In January, he sent warnings to nearly 11,000 businesses warning of a ban that had by then been on the books for five years.
'It is doubtful that many of the people selling an illegal product are paying the state the proper tax on vape products. In fact, one of our members recently purchased an illegal flavored product from a competitor, and found they did not even charge them sales tax,' Blomgren said.
Murphy and lawmakers must pass and sign an annual spending bill before July 1 to avert a government shutdown.
An earlier version of this story quoted Sen. Vitale saying lawmakers are mulling a tax hike on nicotine pouches. A Senate Democrats spokesman said that is not under consideration.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
DOJ to begin turning over Epstein docs to Oversight panel Friday: Comer
The House Oversight Committee announced Monday it expects to begin receiving Epstein-related files from the Department of Justice (DOJ) by the end of the week. 'Officials with the Department of Justice have informed us that the Department will begin to provide Epstein-related records to the Oversight Committee this week on Friday. There are many records in DOJ's custody, and it will take the Department time to produce all the records and ensure the identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted,' Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said in a statement. 'I appreciate the Trump Administration's commitment to transparency and efforts to provide the American people with information about this matter.' The plans spurred pushback from the panel's Democrats who said DOJ was failing to fully comply, failing to meet the original deadline and supply all documents. The panel, on a bipartisan basis, subpoenaed the Justice Department for files related to the deceased financier who was awaiting trial on sex trafficking charged when he died by suicide. The motion last month from Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.) called for the 'full, complete, unredacted Epstein files to be delivered concurrently to the majority and minority.' Comer's announcement Monday came the same day that former Attorney General Bill Barr was deposed by the Oversight panel on the Epstein matter, the first in a series of scheduled interviews. Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), the top Democrat on the panel, said after the deposition that Democrats would require all requested records from the DOJ. 'The most critical thing the House Oversight Committee needs for its investigation is the full, complete, and unredacted Epstein files, as well as any 'client list,'' he said. 'The bipartisan Oversight Committee subpoena requires these documents by tomorrow, and if the committee does not receive the files, it will be clear the Trump Epstein Coverup continues.' Republican Reps. Nancy Mace (S.C.), Scott Perry (Pa.) and Brian Jack (Ga.) joined Democrats in approving the request in July. The committee then also approved by voice vote a motion from Perry to 'expand the full committee's investigation' into the Epstein matter by also issuing subpoenas to a number of high-profile former Democratic officials: former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Attorney General Eric Holder, former Attorney General Merrick Garland and former FBI Director and special counsel Robert Mueller.


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Fewer Americans than ever confident in food safety regulations: Gallup
Confidence in the government's ability to ensure food safety in the U.S. has hit a new low — a drop driven largely by distrust among Democrats, according to a poll released Monday. Gallup's latest survey of consumer habits found that 53 percent of Americans said they have at least a 'fair amount' of faith in federal regulators maintaining a safe food supply. Confidence had hovered around 70 percent from 2007 to 2019, based on Gallup's previous findings, but it fell below 60 percent for the first time last year and continued to drop. The latest poll found that confidence among Republicans in the government's ability to maintain food safety held steady at 41 percent from last year to this year after President Trump's return to the White House, but confidence fell off among Democrats. About 74 percent of Democrats expressed confidence in federal food safety oversight in 2024, compared to 48 percent this year. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has heavily emphasized food as part of his overhaul of federal health care initiatives, but sweeping budget cuts across the federal government and has raised additional concerns at the FDA. Officials have maintained that none of the cuts impacted the number of inspectors or other food regulators. The Associated Press reported in April that the FDA had been struggling for years to ramp up inspections after the COVID-19 pandemic and that outside contractors were being hired to fill some inspector roles. The FDA, which has issued about 100 safety alerts and food recalls this year based on the agency's active database, penned a letter to food industry leaders last month urging better communication about product safety concerns. 'At the FDA, we believe that radical transparency in food safety and nutrition actions is key to reducing foodborne illness and chronic disease, setting a strong foundation for lifelong health,' FDA Commissioner Marty Makary wrote in the memo, specifically highlighting concerns about chemical contaminants in foods for infants and toddlers. The Gallup poll surveyed 1,002 adults July 7-21 across all U.S. states and the District of Columbia. It has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.


Fast Company
10 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Trump wants to change voting. The Constitution was designed to protect it from people like him
President Donald Trump has big plans for redesigning the way states hold elections ahead of the 2026 midterms, calling for a nationwide end to mail-in ballots and voting machines on Monday. The U.S. Constitution stands in his way. In a new post on his social network Truth Social, Trump wrote that he was 'going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS' as well as voting machines, which he called 'Highly 'Inaccurate'' and 'Seriously Controversial.' 'ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS,' Trump wrote without providing evidence supporting his claims. Presidents aren't given power over state election law. The 'Elections Clause' in Article I Section 4, leaves 'the times, places, and manner of holding elections' for the U.S. House and Senate up to the states, and only Congress is given power 'make or alter' these rules. Subscribe to the Design newsletter. The latest innovations in design brought to you every weekday Privacy Policy | Fast Company Newsletters Trump falsely claimed in his social media post on Monday that the U.S. is the only country with mail-in voting (at least 40 countries allow people to vote by mail), and he said he would sign an executive order ahead of next year's midterm election to make the changes. Eight states and Washington, D.C., allow for all-mail-in elections, and an additional 15 states allow for mail-in elections in some circumstances and jurisdictions, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Hollow legal ground Trump's apparent legal argument for having the power to end mail-in voting as president, as laid out in his post, is that states are 'merely an 'agent'' for the federal government in counting and tabulating votes, and the president is the ultimate authority of the federal government. 'They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them,' Trump wrote. Like his push for Texas to adopt new congressional districts that are gerrymandered to help Republicans, Trump's latest election proposals are about letting the president decide policy that's actually left up to the states, and giving the executive branch power to shape the legislative branch that was designed to act as one of its checks. Rather than a separation of powers, it's a consolidation.