
Welfare reforms risk leaving stain on Labour, MP warns
But the Government has proposed freezing the 'limited capability for work' (LCW) part of the benefit until 2030, and new claimants who sign up for the 'limited capability for work and work-related activity' payment will receive a lower rate than existing claimants after April 2026, unless they meet a set of severe conditions criteria or are terminally ill.
Commons Work and Pensions Committee chairwoman Debbie Abrahams urged the Government to push back its reforms until November 2026.
'This is to allow for the NHS capacity to ramp up and to ensure funding follows health need, so that people with newly required conditions or impairments can receive early treatment and a better aligned labour market that will enable them to return to work quickly,' the Labour MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth told the Commons.
'Without this, there is the risk that 45,000 more newly disabled people and their children will be pushed into poverty.'
Ms Abrahams described her pitch as a 'reasonable compromise', costing £141 million in lost savings.
Ms Maskell tried to block the Bill's progression at second reading last week using a reasoned amendment, which failed by 149 votes to 328, majority 179.
Around 90 minutes before that vote, social security minister Sir Stephen Timms promised in an intervention to halt a proposed reform to the separate personal independence payment (Pip) benefit, with any changes now only coming in after a review.
'The cart before the horse, the vote before the review, and this omnishambles of a Bill, these people with fluctuating conditions not knowing where they stand, and for that, nor where any of us stand by the end of today,' Ms Maskell said on Wednesday.
The York Central MP had earlier said: 'No matter what spin, to pass the Bill tonight, this will leave such a stain on our great party, founded on values of equality and justice.'
She urged MPs to gut the Bill of plans to roll out a lower rate of out-of-work benefit for new claimants from 2026 and freeze the LCW component.
'Their contention is my contention – sick and disabled people have not been consulted,' Ms Maskell added.
I voted against the UC&PIP Bill. It's now due back for next stage in Parliament. My next Amendment 👇would safeguard those with fluctuating conditions, or a recurrence of a condition from being placed onto a lower rate of universal credit#York #UC #PIP pic.twitter.com/YOrDlCYURw
— 💙Rachael Maskell MP (@RachaelMaskell) July 9, 2025
She has proposed that current out-of-work benefits claimants should not be put on the proposed lower rate of out-of-work benefit, if they slip out of and then back into the eligibility criteria either side of the changes.
'If someone has a fluctuating physical or mental health condition like multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, cystic fibrosis, or other recurring muscular-skeletal condition, if following a period of remission and work then relapse and returning to universal credit, unless unequivocally stated, they will return onto the pittance of £50-a-week for their health element,' she said.
Sir Stephen intervened and asked her to acknowledge 'how the Bill protects people in exactly the situation that she describes', where claimants are prone to seasonal conditions such as chest infections over the winter.
If a pre-2026 claimant slips out of being eligible for universal credit but meets the eligibility criteria again within six months, the Bill would demand that they be considered 'continuously entitled to an award'.
It would mean that they could go 'straight back onto the position they are in at the start', the minister added.
Labour MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge Marie Tidball urged the Government to properly work with disabled people in the Pip review, known as the Timms review.
Ms Tidball, a disabled MP who tabled a cross-party amendment on the Timms review, said: 'While the minister will head up this review, the voices of disabled people must be front and centre.
'The measures in this new clause emphasise the need for disabled people and disabled people's organisations to make up the majority of the taskforce, and to have a significant role in the leadership of the review, and I believe carers could be a part of that.'
She said any recommendations must be debated in the Commons before implementation. She said: 'Output of this review must also be meaningful and not performative.'
Independent MP Zarah Sultana, who quit Labour last week, spoke in the Commons for the first time since her decision, where she hit out at the Government.
The MP for Coventry South MP said: 'The truth is this – Westminster is broken but the real crisis is deeper. This is a Government, not out of touch, but also morally bankrupt. It works for billionaires and big business while turning its back on disabled people.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
6 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's inheritance tax must be scrapped
How have we managed to create a world where a dwindling band of taxpayers is funding a growing number of able-bodied people to live relatively comfortably on benefits without even being required to look for work? As the welfare bill balloons, the Government has to find more money because its own MPs will not let it cut payments or tighten the rules. Since the Chancellor Rachel Reeves has promised not to increase borrowing or add to the taxes of so-called 'working people' she is forced to look elsewhere, notably at pensions and savings. Now she is targeting inheritance tax (IHT) to plug holes in the finances ahead of an autumn Budget. Treasury officials have been told to examine greater restrictions on gifting money and assets. The tax burden is at its highest for nearly 80 years. Taxpayers who are by no means rich are dragged into paying higher rates by the pernicious freezing of allowances. The minority of earners who contribute the most in taxes have gone along with this in the expectation of being able to help their children with any accumulated wealth left to them by a rapacious state. If the morality of this tax is questionable, tougher rules are not even politically advantageous. Polling shows it is probably the most unpopular tax of all, even among people who are unlikely to have to pay it. It would be a desperate act to tighten the rules further, but Ms Reeves is cornered. IHT is a tax on the prudent and family-minded. It involves being taxed when you die on wealth that was taxed while being accumulated in life, and therefore discourages wealth creation and retention. In drawing up their new policies, the Tories should commit to its abolition.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US announces $1 billion in funding for critical minerals, materials sectors
Aug 13 (Reuters) - The Trump administration will make available $1 billion in funding to accelerate the growth of the U.S. critical minerals and materials sectors, the Energy Department said in a statement on Wednesday. The department will issue notices of funding opportunities to advance and scale mining, processing and manufacturing technologies in the critical minerals and materials supply chains, the statement said.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
UK could fail to meet commitment to spend 80% of foreign aid on gender equality projects
Ministers are considering scrapping a commitment to spend 80% of foreign aid on projects supporting gender equality, the Guardian has learned. Critics warned the move could worsen the impact of Donald Trump's rollback of funding for diversity and aid projects abroad, which has affected maternal and reproductive health services in developing countries. The Conservative government committed in 2023 to ensuring that 80% of the Foreign Office's bilateral aid programmes have a focus on gender equality by 2030. Labour ministers reaffirmed the commitment earlier this year. Stephen Doughty, a junior Foreign Office minister, said ministers would continue to work towards the target in March, even after the government had announced it was cutting international aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP to spend more on defence. Under the target, 80% of aid spending must go to programmes that have gender as a component by 2030, though it does not need to be the main focus. David Lammy, the foreign secretary, told MPs last month that he could not 'commit to decisions made by the last government' and it was 'for us to look at this afresh'. The government spent £15.3bn in aid in 2023, the latest year for which final figures are available. Of this, £10bn was bilateral aid spent directly on projects in developing countries, instead of multilateral institutions such as the UN. Provisional figures suggest that the UK's aid spending fell to £14.1bn in 2024, an 8% decrease on the previous year, with £11.3bn going to bilateral aid. A government impact assessment said in July that the government's aid cuts meant that in Africa – where half of the UK's bilateral aid goes – spending was being reduced in women's health and emergency response in countries including the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. The assessment warned that 'reductions to health spending risk an increase in disease burden and ultimately in deaths, impacting in particular those living in poverty, women, children and people with disabilities'. It also said that there would be cuts to girls' education programmes in countries including Ethiopia, Sierra Leone and Nigeria and to projects encouraging women's participation in peace processes, with specific conflicts including Ukraine and Sudan supported at a reduced scale. Critics warned that scrapping the 80% commitment could compound the impact of the US and UK aid cuts and exacerbate what feels like 'a global war on women'. Labour has promised to prioritise women and girls in government including by promoting sexual and reproductive health and rights abroad, and tackling gender-based violence. Harriet Harman, the former acting Labour leader, was appointed UK special envoy for women and girls in March 2025. Sarah Champion, the Labour chair of the international aid committee, said: 'The UK's commitments to women and girls are not just words on a page, they're a lifeline that gives hope to some of the poorest and most vulnerable on the planet. 'The Trump administration immediately cut all international maternal and reproductive health support, and just last month, burned contraception it had bought for low-income countries. Now is the time for the UK to step up our commitment to gender programming, not step away. 'When we look at conflicts, climate impact and nutrition it is always women and girls who bear the brunt. Our aid programming gives them hope and opportunities in what feels like a global war on women. We can't take that away from them now.' Alex Farley, a policy manager at Bond, the UK network for NGOs, said that 'at a time when women's rights globally are under attack and the US has been gutting all gender equality and diversity programming, it's definitely very worrying to see the UK following suit.' 'Gender equality programming has already been put at disproportionate risk in the government's cuts to UK aid. Upholding the 80% commitment, alongside stand-alone gender programmes, is really important for the UK to send a signal showing that it's committed to tackling gender inequality rather than stepping back.' Amelia Whitworth, head of policy, campaigns and youth at Plan International UK said: 'Anti-gender movements are growing, humanitarian and climate crises are intensifying, and girls and women are being hit hardest. In a world where girls' rights are being rolled back, the UK has to hold the line. 'With USAID slashing over 80% of its programmes – including funding for gender and DEI initiatives – and European donors retreating, the need for the UK to uphold its gender equality commitments has never been greater.' An FCDO spokesperson confirmed that the government was 'carefully reviewing the viability of existing commitments' after cutting aid spending to 0.3%. 'As the foreign secretary has said, women and girls are a fundamental priority,' the spokesperson said. 'From appointing a dedicated special envoy for women and girls to improving energy access for 15 million women worldwide, the UK has demonstrated how integrating gender equality into its international work can transform lives. We will continue to champion the rights of women and girls globally and ensure that gender equality is embedded across all the department's priorities.'