logo
Trump vs Musk: Perils of confronting POTUS

Trump vs Musk: Perils of confronting POTUS

Hindustan Times4 hours ago

During Tesla CEO Elon Musk's tenure heading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) for President of the United States (POTUS) Donald Trump, their relationship was characterised by some as a bromance. Indeed, when Musk left DOGE on May 30, President Trump gave him a gold key to the White House.
The Trump-Musk relationship, which at that time appeared to be rapturous, unravelled shortly thereafter. That occurred when Musk publicly opposed Trump's major legislative initiative — the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act — calling it a 'disgusting abomination' in a post on X on June 3. After that, there was an exchange of insults between Musk and Trump on their respective social media platforms X and Truth Social. For about one week, it appeared this war of words might go on for some time. Then, on June 10, Musk walked back his comments, expressing regret over some of his recent posts about President Trump stating that 'they went too far'. His post on X, which appeared at 3:04 a.m. in Washington on June 10, was not completely surprising. Trump's self-styled First Buddy had gone conspicuously quiet in the past few days, as he rebuffed overtures from Musk's camp seeking a rapprochement.
This public capitulation of the world's richest man before the world's most powerful individual came just a week after their alliance collapsed in such a chaotic and very public fashion. It underscores who holds the upper hand in this clash between two of the most influential people in the world today.
Musk's retreat proves he is no fool. He understands that Trump can be vengeful and especially dangerous given his executive power. The President's threat last week to pull federal contracts from Tesla and SpaceX made clear what was at stake.
It definitely appears that Musk's apology was about self-preservation. It underscores an undeniable truth of Washington: When it comes down to it, political power prevails. And Trump, for now, holds the cards. His return to the White House has re-established him as the most feared and courted figure in American politics. Musk may command legions of fans online and billions in market value, but he is not the commander-in-chief.
There's also an instructive — and cautionary — lesson here for Democrats eager to welcome Musk into their fold. One of those is Indian American Representative Ro Khanna, who reportedly spoke with people close to Musk about the billionaire possibly helping the Democratic Party in next year's midterms. 'Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit exploding Trump Bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump's unconstitutional administration,' the lawmaker whose congressional district includes much of Silicon Valley told Semafor on June 6. 'I look forward to Elon turning his fire against MAGA Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026.'
The Democrats need to remember that this is the same Musk who reportedly bankrolled nearly $300 million to help secure Trump's election in 2024. He also spent millions of dollars on an April Supreme Court election in the state of Wisconsin supporting a conservative Republican candidate who lost. Expecting that same Musk to carry their water in November 2026, and hoping to use his shoulder to fire at Trump, is most likely wishful thinking and, given Musk's diminishing reputation, probably undesirable.
Musk's personal approval rating is in freefall. In the most recent Economist/YouGov poll, Musk's favourability is 23 points underwater — and a striking 74% of Republicans say they would back Trump over him. In addition, Musk's political activities have cast a long shadow over his company Tesla. The company went from being ranked eighth in 2021 to 95th now, in the Axios Harris corporate reputation poll of America's most visible companies.
Another major reason Democrats should keep their distance from Musk is that he remains beholden to Trump's positions on many things. For example, before his public mea culpa, he enthusiastically supported Trump's crackdown on immigration protests in Los Angeles. Even with Musk's apology, it remains unclear whether Trump will ever welcome him back into his inner circle. Perhaps he will — if the Tesla CEO pours hundreds of millions more into Trump's political machine. Or, if he makes a deal with the Trump family regarding business ventures.
In closing, there is no question who won this tussle. It was Donald Trump, not Elon Musk.
Frank F Islam is an entrepreneur, civic leader, and thought leader based in Washington DC. The views expressed are personal.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump to host Pak's Asim Munir after he backed Nobel Peace Prize bid: White House
Trump to host Pak's Asim Munir after he backed Nobel Peace Prize bid: White House

India Today

time17 minutes ago

  • India Today

Trump to host Pak's Asim Munir after he backed Nobel Peace Prize bid: White House

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday hosted Pakistan's military chief, General Asim Munir, at the White House in a rare meeting that followed Munir's call for Trump to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Munir credited Trump with preventing what could have become a nuclear war between India and Pakistan during their brief military standoff in May, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly White House confirmed that the meeting was held in recognition of Munir's remarks lauding Trump's role in halting a potential escalation between the two nuclear-armed hours before the meeting, Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a 35-minute phone call with Trump to firmly clarify that the ceasefire following the May 7-10 military standoff had been achieved through direct communication between the Indian and Pakistani militaries - not through any external mediation. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said PM Modi reiterated that New Delhi has never accepted third-party involvement in its bilateral issues with Islamabad and never India's assertion, Trump insisted his intervention was decisive. Speaking to reporters ahead of Munir's visit, Trump said both countries were "going at it" and credited his outreach with defusing the crisis. He praised both Prime Minister Modi and General Munir for their roles, calling it a collaborative success, but one shaped significantly by US stopped a war between Pakistan and India. I love Pakistan," Trump said. "Modi is a fantastic man. I spoke to him last night. We are going to make a trade deal with Modi of India."He added, "This man [Munir] was extremely influential in stopping the war from the Pakistani side, and Modi from the Indian side. They were going at it-and they're both nuclear countries. I stopped a war between two major nuclear nations, but I don't think I've seen a single story written about it."The four-day conflict between India and Pakistan in early May was sparked by the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, in which 26 people - most of them tourists - were response, India launched retaliatory strikes on nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) as part of Operation Sindoor. Pakistan countered with unprovoked attacks targeting civilian areas and military infrastructure, all of which were thwarted by India's air defence has maintained that the de-escalation was the result of existing backchannel military communications. Foreign Secretary Misri also dismissed suggestions of a US-India trade dialogue or any request for mediation during the confirmed that while Trump and PM Modi had planned to meet in person on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, the meeting was called off due to Trump's early departure amid the escalating Middle East reportedly invited the PM to visit the US en route back from Canada, but PM Modi declined due to prior commitments, and instead extended an invitation to Trump to attend the Quad leaders' summit in India later this year - an offer the US President InMust Watch

Amid VA policy change row, employees receive 'wild' email and asked to report waste, abuse
Amid VA policy change row, employees receive 'wild' email and asked to report waste, abuse

Time of India

time18 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Amid VA policy change row, employees receive 'wild' email and asked to report waste, abuse

At a time when new VA hospital bylaws regarding treatment offered to Democrats and unmarried veterans have sparked outrage, VA employees have received a email asking them to report waste and fraud. The email has also instructed them to provide a one-sentence description of the problem and their recommended solution. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What does the email sent to VA employees read? Employees at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) were instructed to report a single instance of "fraud, waste, or abuse," as the agency announced the discontinuation of its previous requirement for staff to submit weekly emails listing five work accomplishments. According to a leaked email from VA Chief of Staff Christopher Syrek , employees at VA were directed to identify a departmental problem and suggest a solution for it last week, reports NewsWeek. VA is the second-largest U.S. government department, which employs approximately 470,000 March, tech billionaire Elon Musk who was spearheading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), formed to slash federal spending and downsizing agencies. He had asked government employees to send a detailed weekly email detailing their list of accomplishments achieved in the previous week. Failure to comply would be taken as a resignation, Musk said at the since Musk has announced his departure from DOGE, some agencies have continued to demand these emails while others have put a halt to it, including the Department of Defense, reports development comes after a report in The Guardian claimed that new Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals could refuse care to veterans based on factors like marital status and political affiliation due to an executive order by President Trump. The Guardian reported that 'doctors and other medical staff can also be barred from working at VA hospitals based on their marital status, political party affiliation or union activity."White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly adamantly denied The Guardian's reporting. Writing on social platform X, Kelly addressed the article's writer, Aaron Glantz, saying, 'Aaron, this is a totally FALSE story that The Guardian should retract immediately. Fearmongering with our Veterans to try to score clicks for your failing 'news outlet' is pathetic and shameful.'"Starting today, VA is ending the requirement for these weekly updates, but we are asking you to make a different, one-time submission. Please identify a VA issue that you consider to be a problem and an example of fraud, waste, or abuse and provide a one-sentence description of the problem and your recommended solution," the VA email sent on June 13 read. It added that staff were to email submissions to their direct supervisors by June Williams, director of the Center for Defense Information at the nonpartisan watchdog Project On Government Oversight, told Newsweek that the request needed to be managed carefully by VA leadership. While emphasizing the importance of addressing waste, fraud, and abuse, he cautioned that the email could be perceived as 'a threatening demand' for staff to 'rat on their colleagues.'Williams said: "I think the impact of this depends a lot on how individual line managers address it. As a professional watchdog, I believe we should all—government employees and private citizens alike—always be on the lookout for waste, fraud and abuse. I see setting an example and teaching others how to be better watchdogs as fundamental not only to my job, but also my identity as a citizen of a democracy. So, if VA employees are encouraged to treat this email as inspiration to be more careful with the public trust, I'm all for continued: "I'm concerned that if VA employees receive this email from a Trump appointee, without reinforcement from their more immediate supervisors, they will wonder if the Trump administration trusts the VA chain of command, and they will receive it as a threatening demand that they rat on their colleagues. I'd expect this to be counterproductive."The email has stirred concern among VA employees. One staff member, speaking to Newsweek on the condition of anonymity due to fear of retaliation, described the message as "insulting." They noted that the government already has established mechanisms—such as the Government Accountability Office and the Office of Inspector General—for reporting waste."The email was wild, they said. "And it felt like once again a 'snitch on your co-workers' email."

Asim Munir to meet Donald Trump at the White House: Lunch date sparks memes, mystery, and a whole lot of buzz
Asim Munir to meet Donald Trump at the White House: Lunch date sparks memes, mystery, and a whole lot of buzz

Time of India

time18 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Asim Munir to meet Donald Trump at the White House: Lunch date sparks memes, mystery, and a whole lot of buzz

US President Donald Trump met Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir in Washington amid the ongoing Iran-Israel war. The rare closed-door meeting sparked speculation over Pakistan's mediation ambitions, counterterrorism ties, and its support for Iran. India, facing fallout from a Kashmir terror attack, remains wary. Trump claimed Munir helped prevent conflict with India, a statement New Delhi disputes. Meanwhile, social media users mocked the high-stakes summit with Bollywood memes, highlighting the online reaction to serious geopolitical moves. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Pakistan signals mediation role in Iran conflict Counterterrorism and controversy Strategic interests and broader agendas Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Fallout in India Internet reaction: Bollywood memes and cringe In a rare high-level engagement, US President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan 's Chief of Army Staff, Field Marshal Asim Munir , at the White House on Wednesday. The meeting took place in the Cabinet Room and was confirmed in the president's daily schedule. This is the first time since 2001, when General Pervez Musharraf met a US president, that a Pakistani military chief has held such talks with an American backdrop is tense. The Middle East is ablaze with conflict between Iran and Israel, and Washington is weighing its military options. Trump's discussion with Munir came as part of efforts to manage escalating regional tensions—and perhaps explore Pakistan's role in told reporters at the White House, 'I love Pakistan,' adding that Munir was 'extremely influential' in stopping recent fighting between India and Pakistan. However, he did not clarify what he hoped to achieve from their to some media reports, Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir was seen as he arrived at the the White House in Washington, DC to meet the US President Donald has positioned itself as a potential mediator in the Israel-Iran war. Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, speaking in parliament earlier this week, said: 'Our intention was always to see successful negotiations between the United States and Iran.' He added that Iran was open to talks, provided Israel stopped its his Washington visit, Munir reaffirmed Pakistan's support for Iran. At a public event, he stated Pakistan's 'clear and strong' backing for Tehran in the war, while also voicing support for American efforts to de-escalate the Minister Shehbaz Sharif echoed this sentiment in a post on social media, saying he had called the Iranian president 'to express Pakistan's unwavering solidarity with the brotherly people of Iran in the face of Israel's unprovoked aggression.'Pakistan's history with Iran is long and complex. The late Abdul Qadeer Khan, widely considered the father of Pakistan's nuclear programme, was accused of sharing nuclear designs with Iran. These atomic ties have drawn global scrutiny for geopolitics, Munir's US trip included a focus on counterterrorism. According to Dawn, the most concrete outcome of the visit may be a strengthened counterterrorism partnership with the US, especially in combatting Islamic State Khorasan (IS-K), which poses threats across South not everyone welcomed Munir in Washington. Outside a hotel event where he was speaking, overseas Pakistanis protested loudly, chanting slogans like 'Pakistanio ke Qatil,' 'Mass Murderer Asim Munir,' and 'Democracy dies when guns speak.'Political analyst Hassan Askari Rizvi called the White House meeting 'a kind of special gesture given by President Trump.' And it's clear that the symbolism of this meeting was not lost on Pakistan's state-run media either. Pakistan Television called it 'important and historic,' claiming it showed 'growing confidence' in the country's military visit is set to continue with meetings with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to reports from Pakistani outlets. Analysts believe the discussions may go beyond just reported by Bloomberg, Michael Kugelman, a senior fellow at the Asia Pacific Foundation, said, 'The Pakistani army chief is a powerful figure, and this army chief is especially powerful. He has a very large portfolio.' He noted that talks may also touch on crypto policy and critical Bagchi, head of the Delhi-based Ananta Centre, observed, 'The Trump administration is discovering new ways or new reasons to engage the Pakistan army and Pakistan.' Historically, the US has leaned on Pakistan's military to manage regional security threats, from Afghanistan to meeting has raised eyebrows in India, particularly given the fragile state of US-India ties. On 22 April, 26 tourists were killed in a deadly terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir. New Delhi blamed Pakistan, calling it an orchestrated act of terrorism. Islamabad denied any and Pakistan—both nuclear powers—came dangerously close to open conflict in May. Trump later claimed credit for brokering a ceasefire using trade as leverage. India rejected the assertion. In a call with Trump, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi made it clear: 'At no time, at any level, were there any talks on issues like India-US trade deal or mediation between India and Pakistan through America,' Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said in a video had been expected to meet Trump at the G-7 summit in Canada, but Trump cut his trip short, citing urgent developments in the Middle East. Modi, not a G-7 member, had been invited as a guest by Canadian Prime Minister Mark India and the US have maintained strong ties across successive administrations—largely to counter China—the latest developments suggest friction. US-India trade talks have stalled, and New Delhi remains firmly against any US attempt to mediate with diplomats negotiated in hushed rooms, the internet had its own take. Social media erupted with memes mocking the Trump-Munir meeting, comparing it to scenes from vintage Bollywood user posted an image captioned, 'Donald Trump after meeting Asim Munir,' alongside a screenshot from the 1997 film Ishq featuring Sadashiv Amrapurkar. Another likened the encounter to a dramatic father-son showdown from Rishtey (2002).Others shared doctored clips claiming to show 'Donald Trump and Asim Munir's exclusive video from the White House.' The mood online was clear—cynical, irreverent, and steeped in cultural closed-door meeting with Pakistan's army chief reflects shifting priorities as Washington recalibrates its Middle East approach. At the same time, it signals a subtle realignment of regional partnerships—with Pakistan asserting its diplomatic muscle, India hardening its stance, and the US still trying to keep one foot in each tensions high, and alliances fluid, the world is watching. And as memes continue to fly, what happens behind closed doors could shape the next chapter of regional politics.(With inputs from Bloomberg)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store