Tariffs Are Making New Cars Even More Unaffordable, Says Study
Though it seems like a high amount, a quick glance at car-buying platforms and automakers' websites shows that there are many models on the market with MSRPs far below that threshold. However, a new study from the research department at Cars Commerce, the company behind Cars.com, shows that a few key factors will keep cars unaffordable.
According to new data from Cars Commerce's Industry Insights Report for the first half of 2025, the impact of the Trump administration's tariffs on imported cars, as well as the threat arising from the end of Federal EV Tax Credits, would fuel an affordability crisis that can greatly impact the U.S. car industry.
"With price hikes on many imports starting to emerge, the $7,500 federal EV tax credit set to expire in September, and the entry-priced segment now shrinking for three consecutive months, affordability remains the biggest challenge to continued growth," said David Greene, industry analyst at Cars Commerce. "How automakers respond in the second half - through pricing, production, and incentives - will shape the road ahead."
Most notably, Cars Commerce found that the inventory of cars priced under $30,000 saw a massive dip. Per their data, cars under $30K made up just 13.6% of new car inventory in the first half of 2025. That number is a considerable loss compared to 2019, when such vehicles made up 38% of the market.
In terms of dealer inventory, the segment saw 3.9% growth year over year (YoY); however, it lags behind the 5.6% overall increase for new-car inventory. The segment is the most exposed to tariffs, as about 92% of the cars sold under $30K are actually imported from overseas. Just two cars in that segment, the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla, are built in the US, though some models are produced in Japan.
At the same time, the segment that Cars.com defined as the "mid-range new car segment;" which consists of cars costing between $30,000 and $49,000, accounted for nearly half of all inventory, though 50% of the vehicles in this price bracket are imported. The data suggests that automakers are adjusting to tariffs, as the share of imported cars within the $70,000-plus price segment increased from 40% in May to 41% in June.
The study also shows that dealers increased their inventory by 5.6% during the first half of 2025, as they stocked up before tariffs were imposed in April. Additionally, there was a surge in sales as consumers rushed to secure pre-tariff pricing in March and April, leading to a 3.9% increase in new car sales compared to the first half of 2024. The increase in new vehicle purchases raised the supply of used cars, as many customers traded in their vehicles before the tariffs took effect. Consequently, used car prices dipped slightly in the first quarter of 2025 but rebounded with a 1.6% increase in the second quarter.
According to data from Cars.com, more than half of consumers said that the tariffs have influenced their decision to buy American-made cars. Additionally, over 73% of respondents would consider purchasing U.S.-built cars to avoid extra costs. Currently, the supply of pre-tariff new cars is depleting, and as a result, the study predicts that we should expect price increases in the near future.
So far this year, the average price of new cars has risen by only $97; however, vehicles from the United Kingdom have become over $10,000 more expensive. In contrast, EU-built cars have seen an average increase of nearly $2,500. Meanwhile, the prices of vehicles from China, Canada, and Korea, as well as American-built cars, have decreased by an average of $200.
In addition, Cars Commerce also found that EV buyers will be affected in the latter half of the year, as the federal $7,500 tax credit for new EVs is set to expire after September. In its survey of electric vehicle (EV) buyers, 53% said that the federal tax credits were a primary reason for their purchases, adding that it may be "difficult" to maintain the momentum of 28 consecutive months of new EV inventory growth once the calendar hits October.
The Trump administration and some lawmakers say they're trying to make cars more affordable by imposing tariffs, but according to the consulting firm AlixPartners, these tariffs could cost the auto industry about $30 billion by 2026. Although manufacturers like Nissan and Volvo are taking localization concerns seriously with their recent plans to consolidate factories, trim the U.S. lineup, and move production of their top-selling vehicles to factories in the U.S., it should be reiterated that this isn't a simple flip of the switch; Volvo, for instance expects to make the first XC60s in South Carolina by 2026.
Until then, those on the buyers' side have all the tools to find out which specific vehicles are "American-made," including the NHTSA's Part 583 American Automobile Labeling Act Reports, which are publicly available on their website.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Former Jobs Data Chief Decries Firing of Successor
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump's firing of the chief labor statistician was criticized by her predecessor, who called it an unfounded move that will undermine confidence in a key data set on the US economy. We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole NYC Mayor Adams Gives Bally's Bronx Casino Plan a Second Chance 'This is damaging,' William Beach, whom Trump picked in his first term to head the Bureau of Labor Statistics, said on CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. Trump on Friday fired Erika McEntarfer hours after labor market data showed weak jobs growth based in part on steep downward revisions for May and June. The move by Trump, who claimed the latest monthly report was 'phony,' prompted an outcry from economists and lawmakers. 'I don't know that there's any grounds at all for this firing,' said Beach, whom McEntarfer replaced in January 2024. 'And it really hurts the statistical system. It undermines credibility in BLS.' Studies indicate that the agency's data is more accurate than 20 or 30 years ago, including any revisions of the initial data, Beach said. Even so, he said he'll trust future BLS data because people working for the agency are 'some of the most loyal Americans you can imagine,' making the bureau 'the finest statistical agency in the entire world.' Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, speaking Sunday on CBS's Face the Nation, urged the US government to improve its data collection to avoid revisions that engender distrust. 'We watch what consumers really do. We watch what businesses really do,' Moynihan said, while not addressing the politics of the firing. 'They can get this data, I think, other ways, and I think that's where the focus would be.' He noted the revision for May and June data, while not unusual, was one of the largest in seven years. 'That creates doubt around it,' he said. 'Let's spend some money. Let's bring the information together. Let's find where else in the government money is reported.' McEntarfer was confirmed by the Senate in a bipartisan 86-8 vote. Vice President JD Vance, then a senator, voted to approve her nomination. Kevin Hassett, Trump's chief economic adviser at the White House, alleged that the large jobs data revisions were poorly explained and were evidence enough for a 'fresh set of eyes' at BLS. He sought to contradict Beach's portrayal of the agency as politically neutral. 'The bottom line is that there were people involved in creating these numbers,' Hassett said on NBC's Meet the Press. Pressed on whether Trump would fire anyone offering data he disagreed with, Hassett, who heads the National Economic Council, disagreed. 'No, absolutely not,' he said. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable.' (Updates with Moynihan comments beginning in sixth paragraph.) How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts What's Really Behind Those Rosy GDP Numbers? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.


New York Post
14 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump's EU trade deal win: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 4, 2025
The Issue: President Trump strikes a landmark EU trade deal before his new tariffs take effect. President Trump and his team keep on striking massive deals ('EU got a deal!,' July 28). How long can the biased media and Democrats not give credit where credit is due? Advertisement Now it's time for Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell to cut interest rates and really get the economy moving. Bob Robustelli Stamford, Conn. Advertisement This is what happens when you elect a businessman as president, instead of a politician. Democrats lambasted Trump on the tariffs, but look how wrong they were. Robert Berk Manhattan Advertisement Saying the tariff deal with the EU is a lopsided win for the United States doesn't consider the whole picture. Sure, tariffs for EU products are 15% versus zero tariffs on US products to the EU, but this doesn't take into consideration the European Value Added Tax. VATs (somewhat similar to sales taxes in the United States) are on average 21.8%, compared to the US sales tax average of 7.25%. Add the US sales tax average to the new 15% EU tariff, and the US total average 'sales tax' is 22%. One can certainly argue this is not good for the EU or US consumers who foot that tax bill, but at least the revenue percentages for each government are similar. Advertisement Brice Russell Naples, Fla. Powell says he's against cutting interest rates because he wants to see how Trump's tariff policies and trade deals play out. That's not the absolute worst position to take. However, with each trade deal Trump inks, particularly the European Union one touted as 'the biggest deal ever made,' the United States becomes even more of an economic powerhouse. How much greater could we be doing if the US economy was turbo charged with an interest-rate cut to 3%? After the Fed stalling for months on a rate cut, Trump's mammoth EU deal has more than made his case for a stable and vibrant US economy. It's time that Powell abandons his cautious position and allows Trump to take full ownership of the US economy, which he is so far doing a spectacular job of managing. Eugene R. Dunn Advertisement Medford Touché, Miranda Devine ('Don deal proves all wrong — again!,' July 31). I guess the screams from those leftist idiots that the sky is falling shouldn't have been taken so literally. Hysteria was spewed by the media and their political minions, but they'll do whatever it takes to undermine Trump. Even many on the left, as hard as it is for them, cannot deny that Trump has a magical power that has the world coming around to even up the playing field. As Trump said, 'Victory is its own reward!' Advertisement Shame on the Democrats for trying to undermine what is best for everyone in this country. Kevin Judge Naples, Fla. Here's how I would deal with the tariff dilemma: Make tariff-free zones with some countries, let's say all Caribbean Community nations. Impose a basic minimum tariff, let's say 10%, with the opportunity to negotiate at a later date. Advertisement Then have conversations with like-minded nations to negotiate the tariff rates. Finally, call for a world conference, and I am sure it will be well-attended with solid suggestions from experts. Anant Nagpur Ottowa, Canada It didn't take Trump long to get the wheels in motion, and now our economy is like a well-oiled machine. Advertisement The naysayer Democrats were hoping that his tariffs would cause pandemonium and utter gloom, but take a good look — that didn't happen. Although prices haven't fallen (especially when dining out), what was once unaffordable has all of the sudden become within your budget simply because of consumer confidence. That's a good feeling that was absent for the last four long years. Ron Zajicek Cortlandt Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.


The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Sen. Padilla on BLS chief firing: ‘I think an investigation is certainly in order'
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said on Sunday he would support an investigation into President Trump's firing of the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 'I think an investigation is certainly in order,' Padilla said in an interview on NBC News's 'Meet the Press.' Padilla noted he recently called for an investigation into potential violations of the Hatch Act related to the White House's involvement in the GOP redistricting effort. 'The example after example of Donald Trump weaponizing, no longer just the Department of Justice, but he's trying to weaponize the Bureau of Labor Statistics,' Padilla said. Trump on Friday directed his team to fire the BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer following a large jobs data revision that he blamed squarely on the appointee of former President Biden. The jobs report released Friday showed a significant downturn in May and June of this year, suggesting the U.S. added 258,000 fewer jobs over those months than had initially been reported. Trump said McEntarfer 'faked the Jobs Numbers' before the 2024 election in order to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris's White House bid, citing labor statistics revisions during the Biden administration that boosted job numbers ahead of the election. Padilla said Trump's decision to fire the commissioner reveals their anxiety about the economy. 'That tells you a lot about their insecurity about the economy and the state of Economic Affairs in America because everything that they're claiming to be true is not true,' he said. 'Prices are still going up. This is from a president who promised to bring prices down. And so the American people are feeling it. The impact of tariffs, $2,400 a year for working families across the country. That's the reality of tariffs.'