logo
Baby Milk Recalled in 9 States, FDA Sets Risk Warning

Baby Milk Recalled in 9 States, FDA Sets Risk Warning

Newsweeka day ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A recent recall of human donor milk distributed across nine states has been classified as the second-highest risk level—of three—by food inspectors.
The milk was voluntarily recalled by Columbus-based nonprofit Ohio Health Mother Milk Bank on July 14 after an inaccurate temperature reading from a thermometer on one pasteurization machine.
The recall affects a total of 5,735 bottles of milk distributed in Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Vermont and West Virginia, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said.
FDA inspectors issued a Class II status on August 4, indicating a possibility of temporary or reversible health issues, or a remote chance of serious consequences.
Newsweek contacted Ohio Health's media team via email on Tuesday.
Stock photo shows a bottle of milk displayed in front of a sleeping baby.
Stock photo shows a bottle of milk displayed in front of a sleeping baby.
Getty Images
Why It Matters
The recall highlights recurring public health concerns surrounding safety and labeling of vital products intended for infants and medically vulnerable populations.
FDA recall classifications are directly linked to the potential health consequences, with a Class II status indicating a possibility of temporary or medically reversible health issues, or only a remote chance of serious consequences, should consumers use the implicated product.
What To Know
Many mothers rely on donated or purchased human donor milk when not producing enough milk or when parents have adopted. It is also often given to premature or low birth weight infants.
The recall affects:
4,006 units of OH MMB Human Donor Milk, 20.00 Cal/oz., 1.00 g/dl. Protein, packaged in 3 oz. plastic bottles
And 1,729 units of OH MMB Human Donor Milk, 20.00 Cal/oz., 0.80 g/dl. Protein, packaged in 6 oz. plastic bottles
The FDA said in its August 4 classification update that exact concentration of protein can vary.
Affected customers in the nine states are advised to check any recently received milk bank products for recall status and contact the Ohio Health Mother Milk Bank or their state health department for further instruction.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has three risk categories for food recalls. They are described on the agency's website as follows:
"Class I—a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.
"Class II—a situation in which use of, or exposure to, a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote.
"Class III—a situation in which use of, or exposure to, a violative product is not likely to cause adverse health consequences."
What Happens Next
The donor milk recall remains active and listed as ongoing by the FDA as of August 5. Subsequently, consumers in the affected states are urged not to use the recalled products and to consult with relevant health providers regarding possible exposure.
If you are interested in donating your breast milk to Ohio Health, call (614) 566-0630 or email MilkBank@OhioHealth.com to begin the donor screening process.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Becton, Dickinson and Company Submits Application to the FDA for a New, At-Home HPV Test
Becton, Dickinson and Company Submits Application to the FDA for a New, At-Home HPV Test

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Becton, Dickinson and Company Submits Application to the FDA for a New, At-Home HPV Test

Becton, Dickinson and Company (NYSE:BDX) is one of the . On July 31, Becton, Dickinson and Company (NYSE:BDX) announced that it submitted an application to the U.S. FDA for a new, at-home HPV test. The new HPV test focuses on patients to self-collect a sample at their home using a swab, the size of a Q-tip, simplifying lab processing. According to BD, this method also reports more high-risk strains of HPV compared to other tests on the market today. A person wearing a state-of-the-art medical device for nerve conduction tests. 'We envision a world where women are empowered with access and a choice for their HPV screening, whether it be in a routine visit at the doctor's office or the comfort and privacy of their own home via a self-collected sample. Cervical cancer and the loss of more than 4,000 women per year to this devastating disease is preventable, and we believe at-home testing is an important leap forward to our goal of eliminating this type of cancer,' said Nikos Pavlidis, president of BD Diagnostic Solutions. BD's new HPV test will include a state-of-the-art self-collection swab technology that also offers convenient mailing from home to the lab, supporting broader participation in cervical cancer screening programs. The self-collected swab requires no manual sample preparation by clinical laboratory technologists. This process will allow them to focus on higher-value work. Becton, Dickinson and Company (NYSE:BDX) is a global medical technology company that focuses on the development, manufacturing, and sale of various medical supplies, devices, diagnostic products, and laboratory equipment. While we acknowledge the potential of BDX as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio

Ice Cream Recall Map Shows States With New Warning
Ice Cream Recall Map Shows States With New Warning

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Ice Cream Recall Map Shows States With New Warning

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. DFA Dairy Brands, LLC, is recalling the Friendly's brand of Cookies & Cream ice cream due to undeclared soy and wheat concerns. Newsweek reached out to the company via email on Wednesday for comment. Why It Matters Numerous recalls have been initiated this year due to the potential for damaged products, foodborne illness, contamination and undeclared food allergens. Millions of Americans experience food sensitivities or allergies every year. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the nine "major" food allergens in the U.S. are eggs, milk, fish, wheat, soybeans, Crustacean shellfish, sesame, tree nuts and peanuts. People with a wheat or soy allergy could experience a "serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products," the FDA warns. What To Know In the alert, the FDA says that the recalled products were packaged mistakenly in Friendly's Vanilla Bean cartons with a Cookies & Cream lid. The recalled products were distributed through UNFI to retail locations in Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia. Below is a map showing the states impacted by the recall: The ice cream was sold in 48-fluid ounce containers with a best-by date of November 26, 2025. No other Friendly's products are impacted by the recall, the FDA alert notes. What People Are Saying The FDA in the alert, in part: "The voluntary recall was initiated after it was discovered that a limited quantity of Cookies & Cream ice cream was mistakenly packaged in Friendly's Vanilla Bean ice cream cartons that did not identify the soy and wheat ingredients. No illnesses or adverse reactions have been reported. This recall is being made with the knowledge of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration." In an email to Newsweek in January, the FDA said: "Most recalls in the U.S. are carried out voluntarily by the product manufacturer and when a company issues a public warning, typically via news release, to inform the public of a voluntary product recall; the FDA shares that release on our website as a public service. "The FDA's role during a voluntary, firm-initiated, recall is to review the recall strategy, evaluate the health hazard presented by the product, monitor the recall, and as appropriate alert the public and other companies in the supply chain about the recall. "The FDA provides public access to information on recalls by posting a listing of recalls according to their classification in the FDA Enforcement Report, including the specific action taken by the recalling company. The FDA Enforcement Report is designed to provide a public listing of products in the marketplace that are being recalled." Additional information on recalls can be found via the FDA's Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts. What Happens Next Customers who have purchased the recalled product are urged to return the ice cream to the original place of purchase for a refund, the FDA alert notes. People with additional questions may contact DFA Dairy Brands, LLC, via phone at 800- 587-2259. Further recalls or updates are possible as investigations continue, and consumers are encouraged to monitor FDA alerts for developments.

NFL smelling salts ban: NFLPA provides key updates on policy
NFL smelling salts ban: NFLPA provides key updates on policy

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

NFL smelling salts ban: NFLPA provides key updates on policy

The NFL announced Tuesday its teams would be prohibited from distributing smelling salts to its players during the league's 2025 season. However, the league did not actually ban the products from being used, as the NFLPA clarified Wednesday. "We were not notified of this club policy change before the memo was sent out," the NFLPA wrote in a message to its players, per ESPN. "To clarify, this policy does not prohibit player use of these substances, but rather it restricts clubs from providing or supplying them in any form. The NFL has confirmed this to us." The confusion stemmed from the NFL's initial memo to players, which explained why NFL clubs would no longer be permitted to distribute smelling salts to its players. "In 2024, the FDA issued a warning to companies that produce commercially available ammonia inhalants (AIs), as well as to consumers about the purchase and use of AIs, regarding the lack of evidence supporting the safety or efficacy of AIs marketed for improving mental alertness or boosting energy. The FDA noted potential negative effects from AI use. AIs also have the potential to mask certain neurologic signs and symptoms, including some potential signs of concussion. As a result, the NFL Head, Neck, and Spine Committee recommended prohibiting the use of AIs for any purpose during play in the NFL. "In light of this information, effective for the 2025 NFL season, clubs are prohibited from providing or supplying ammonia in any form at NFL games. For clarity, 'ammonia' refers to ammonia capsules, inhalers, ammonia in a cup, and any form of 'smelling salts.' This prohibition applies to all club personnel (including but not limited to team physicians, athletic trainers, strength and conditioning coaches and coaches or other personnel). The prohibition applies through the entirety of all NFL games, including during all pregame activities, and halftime, and applies on the sideline and in stadium locker rooms." Several NFL players took the memo to mean the use of smelling salts had been banned outright. That upset many, including San Francisco 49ers tight end George Kittle, who said he was "distraught all day" after reading the memo. "I'm an every drive guy," Kittle said of his use of smelling salts in an appearance on NFL Network. "I considered retirement. We got to figure out a middle ground here guys. Somebody help me out, somebody come up with a good idea… I miss those already." After the NFLPA's clarification, Kittle no longer has to worry about negotiating a middle ground. He will, however, have to provide his own stash of smelling salts if he wants to continue using them in 2025. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NFL players not banned from using smelling salts, NFLPA says

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store