logo
Panel proposes financial autonomy, independent Secretariat for Delhi Assembly

Panel proposes financial autonomy, independent Secretariat for Delhi Assembly

Indian Express10-06-2025
In a move that can give more powers to the Speaker, the Delhi Legislative Assembly's Rules Committee has moved a proposal to establish an independent Secretariat and grant financial autonomy to the House, officials said.
The committee, under the chairmanship of Speaker Vijender Gupta, has given in-principle approval to the proposal, and a resolution in this regard is likely to be moved in the upcoming Monsoon Session, officials added.
'Since its constitution in 1993, the Delhi Assembly has been functioning without a dedicated secretarial cadre or financial independence. Unlike Parliament and State Legislatures, where the Speaker has authority over appointments and administrative matters, the Delhi Assembly relies on officers deputed from various government departments. This dependency has led to operational inefficiencies and curtailed the Assembly's functional autonomy,' said an official.
Acknowledging this concern, the Speaker, in a recent meeting, proposed the establishment of a separate Legislative Secretariat and bringing in financial autonomy for the Assembly. This proposal aligns with Articles 98 and 187 of the Constitution, which ensure such provisions for Parliament and State Legislatures, respectively, said officials.
Currently, there are three Union Territories (UT) — Delhi, Puducherry, and Jammu & Kashmir — that have their own assemblies. Of these, the Delhi Assembly is the only one created as a constitutional body, whereas the Puducherry and J&K legislatures are statutory bodies created by the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, and Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, respectively.
However, no such provision for a separate Secretariat was made for the Delhi Assembly either in the Constitution or in the Government of NCT of Delhi Act, 1991, according to a statement by the Delhi Assembly.
'In light of Article 239 AA(b) of the Constitution — which empowers Parliament to regulate matters related to the functioning of the Delhi Legislative Assembly — it has been proposed that the Rules Committee may recommend an amendment to the GNCTD Act, 1991. This would enable the formation of a separate Secretariat and grant financial autonomy to the Delhi Assembly, bringing it at par with State Legislatures and the UT of Jammu & Kashmir,' the statement said.
Officials said once implemented, the proposal would mark a major step forward in ensuring institutional independence and effective functioning of the Delhi Assembly as a constitutional legislative body.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Why should prisoner foot bill?': Delhi HC reserves order on MP Engineer Rashid's plea against cost to attend Parliament
‘Why should prisoner foot bill?': Delhi HC reserves order on MP Engineer Rashid's plea against cost to attend Parliament

Indian Express

time8 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘Why should prisoner foot bill?': Delhi HC reserves order on MP Engineer Rashid's plea against cost to attend Parliament

The Delhi High Court Monday orally asked the government why Baramulla MP Abdul Rashid Sheikh alias Engineer Rashid should bear the expenses when he is attending Parliament while on custody parole, and not on interim bail. The court reserved its order on Rashid's plea seeking a waiver on the cost to be borne by the MP for his security and travel arrangements for attending House proceedings. The matter was heard by a bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Anup Bhambhani. 'What I'm very concerned about…this man has not even gotten his liberty back (through bail or interim bail)…the jail is travelling with him (while he is out on custody parole), and when the jail travels with him, it is for jail to incur the expense…,' Justice Bhambhani remarked orally. Addressing Lok Sabha two weeks ago, the Independent MP from Baramulla began with a disclaimer: 'Please don't stop me for 10-12 minutes, for God's sake. I'm coming from (representing a constituency of) Kashmir, I'm coming from Tihar Jail…' After reading a couplet, he went on to condemn the April 22 Pahalgam attack while emphasising the need to 'win the hearts of Kashmiris to end militancy in Kashmir'. He added, 'It is not a communal issue. It is a political issue. You need to give a political resolution.' The MP went on to say, 'Main aapse puchna chahta hu, isliye nahi ki main aaj Rs 1.5 lakh deke idhar aaya, lekin aap jab mere liye nahi bol sake, aap Kashmiriyo ke liye kya bolenge. (I want to ask you, not because I had to pay Rs 1.5 lakh to attend Parliament, but when you couldn't speak up for me, how will you raise your voice for Kashmiris).' Rashid defeated National Conference leader Omar Abdullah, who is currently the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, in the Baramulla seat by over 2 lakh votes in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. However, he has been lodged in Delhi's Tihar Jail since 2019 in a case of alleged terror funding and the National Investigation Agency (NIA) has accused him of using various public platforms to 'propagate the ideology of separatism and secessionism'. He was arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in the NIA case lodged in 2017 against Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) founder Hafiz Saeed and other 'secessionist and separatist' leaders, and a special NIA court in Delhi framed charges against Rashid in March 2022. In March this year, the Delhi High Court, while allowing the MP to attend Parliament during the Budget session, had imposed the condition that the expenses for Rashid's travel and other arrangements shall be borne by him while he is in the state's custody. When the same condition was imposed on him a second time to attend the Monsoon Session of Parliament, Rashid – through his advocate Vikhyat Oberoi – challenged it before the high court. In the cost break-up furnished by the Delhi Government on Monday before the bench, it was submitted that Rashid's Parliament escort party comprises an assistant commissioner of police, an inspector, a sub-inspector, an assistant sub-inspector, and eight head constables. In a notification on November 12, 2024, the Delhi government had fixed the charges for deployment of 'additional police on payment, to private persons, commercial establishments and for other duties' as per provisions of the Delhi Police Act and Delhi Police (Miscellaneous Matters) Rules. However, Senior Advocate N Hariharan, arguing on behalf of Rashid, pointed out that the notification will not be applicable in the MP's case. Justice Bhambhani also questioned the Delhi Prisons counsel on the rationale of the costs. 'He (Rashid) has to pay the salary (of the escort party)?…These people (police personnel being deployed) are not contractual employees of the state. If this ACP or the inspector is on leave, he (the police personnel) would still get a salary. So why should a person who has been granted custody parole, foot the bill for their salary?' A statement from the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Nyayik Abhiraksha Vahini, Delhi Armed Police (NAV DAP) from July 23 reads, 'As per instructions from the Govt of NCT of Delhi, NAV DAP is charging Rs 7,039 for each ACP, Rs 7,176 for each inspector, Rs 5,739 for each SI, Rs 4,783 for each ASI, Rs 4,232 for each HC (head constable) and Rs 3,658 for each constable per shift i.e., per day of five hours and per night of four hours for the deployment of police guard to private persons on payment basis. As such, (considering) 10 hours in a day, then total 02 shifts will be calculated and the estimate cost of custody charge will come to Rs 1,44,795,' for Rashid. The DAV NAP transports prisoners between jails and courts or investigative agency offices.

LS adjourned briefly amid din over voter roll revision, Speaker announces full language interpretation rollout
LS adjourned briefly amid din over voter roll revision, Speaker announces full language interpretation rollout

Hans India

time8 minutes ago

  • Hans India

LS adjourned briefly amid din over voter roll revision, Speaker announces full language interpretation rollout

New Delhi: The Lok Sabha was adjourned till noon on Tuesday following persistent sloganeering and disruptions by Opposition members, who demanded a debate on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. The House managed to take up only three questions during Question Hour before Speaker Om Birla called for adjournment amid rising chaos. As the session commenced, Speaker Birla made a significant announcement (in Hindi) regarding linguistic interpretation inclusivity in Parliament. He informed members that interpretation services are now available in all languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution. Previously, interpretation was provided in 18 languages, including Assamese, Bengali, Bodo, Dogri, Gujarati, Kannada, Maithili, Malayalam, Manipuri, Marathi, Nepali, Odia, Punjabi, Sanskrit, Sindhi, Tamil, Telugu, and Urdu. The addition of Kashmiri, Konkani, and Santhali completes the constitutional language roster. 'India is the world's largest democracy. Let us cooperate to ensure smooth functioning of the House,' Birla urged. To which a few members quipped, 'There is a need to save the constitution.' Despite the appeal, Opposition MPs raised slogans such as 'We want justice' and 'Save the Constitution,' demanding accountability over the voter list revision in Bihar. The din rendered ministerial responses inaudible, even as Question Hour proceeded briefly. Among the few questions addressed, BJP MP Dr Sanjay Jaiswal called for the inclusion of Bhojpuri in the Constitution and sought details on the sanctioned personnel strength for the newly launched Bharatiya Bhasha Anubhag. He also inquired whether Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) had been framed to integrate technology for promoting Indian languages. DMK MP Selvam G. raised concerns about the number of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, women, and marginalised groups benefiting from the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY-G) in Tamil Nadu, including those still on the waiting list. Before the minister could answer, Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan informed the House that the Tamil Nadu government is deliberately not sanctioning houses for the poor in the state. He said he appealed and urged the Tamil Nadu government to provide houses to the poor. BJP MP Vishnu Datt Sharma questioned the Minister of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare about the Indian Council of Agricultural Research's (ICAR) mandate, seeking clarity on its responsibilities across veterinary science, animal husbandry, fisheries, poultry, apiculture, and natural resource management. The Monsoon Session continues to be marred by repeated adjournments, with the Opposition pressing for transparency and debate on electoral reforms.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store