Matthew Thomas: City of Erie is a 'dead man walking,' but solutions not hard
The city of Erie, Pa., is a dead man walking.
In 1965, the population of the city I came to love as a Gannon student (class of 2009) was 140,000 strong. Now, 60 years later, 90,000 people may be an optimistic estimate.
Those numbers mean our average loss per decade stands at 8,333 residents, putting us on track for just 65,000 in 30 years. As things stand, that could take us from being the third-largest Pennsylvania city to the eighth.
As has happened in deep-blue cities like Chicago and Detroit, that could also mean seeing a lot of neighborhoods in which home values drop to approximately $1, as a lack combines with high city property taxes to make many houses worthless (even with the current national housing boom).
I recently noted to a group of retired businessmen and city officials that my wife and I and our three young children (the third is due in July) live in Erie by choice, not job or economic compulsion.
I'm an attorney with thousands of cases and countless courtroom hours under his belt. I've handled legal matters in five different Pennsylvania counties, ranging from debt defense (and collection) to high-level criminal cases, and I've worked as a law clerk (legal research and writer) for several judges, as well as practiced estate law. I've also worked as a full-time editor and writer for a Catholic media outlet and published articles and columns through at least five professional media organizations. I speak Spanish fairly well (I could probably return to fluency with a few months of study) and hold degrees in both political science and law.
My wife is a librarian (although now a stay-at-home mom) with 20 years of unbroken experience and two college degrees. She was the acting director of the Erie County Public Library on two separate occasions (she twice turned down the top job to focus on our children).
We've chosen to stay in Erie and invest in its future and not leave, but that's starting to feel like a lonely vigil as we watch almost all of our friends in our age range leave the city for other spots in the county, or move even farther afield.
Many who have stayed here have watched their children endure the horrors of the local public school system (per U.S. News and World Report, Erie High School has a graduation rate of just 70%, whereas every other Erie County high school except North East keeps its rate at 90% or higher — and North East is at 89%).
They've also watched crime skyrocket (a 17-year-old was recently shot and killed two doors down from my house) and dangerous drugs flood the streets to the point where a high school student attending a party, once a cause of only mind concern, can quickly turn into a tragedy.
As someone with a relative who struggled with cocaine addiction, I find that deeply concerning.
A gentleman I was recently speaking with about my candidacy (and whom I genuinely like and respect) told me not to worry about Erie's decline. "Many immigrants are moving in," he assured me.
Even assuming that by "immigrants" he means "Swiss bank executives, Korean doctors, Catholic priests from Africa and brilliant Japanese computer programmers," I hope I can be forgiven for still being concerned at the mass exodus of families that have lived here for generations.
I'm also concerned that all those immigrant doctors clamoring to make a home in Erie will quickly discover that Millcreek has better schools, and join the rush for the door.
My decades of experience in watching, studying, and writing about government (as well as my firsthand look, as a lawyer, at Erie's crime problem) tells me that we're at a crossroads, but a crossroads that provide a golden opportunity.
As with most places in America, the solutions to Erie's problems really aren't hard.
Clean up the streets (literally and figuratively), untie the hands of our city's police force and have them push back — hard — on crime, including (yes) drug crimes and domestic abuse. Increase police funding. Work with the federal government to get anyone out of our city who isn't supposed to be here. No one who commits violent crimes or transports drugs into our neighborhoods should continue to walk our streets.
Bring in businesses that provide good, reliable wages for families and a real tax base to fix our town — not a dozen more nonprofit operations that pay zero tax dollars and are funded by temporary grants.
The recent tariffs at the national level provide an incredible opportunity to places with the capacity to make all manner of goods in America, and Erie is one of them.
More: Who are the candidates for city of Erie, county races in the May primary?
Or…allow the city to finish its steady decline. Believe me, another grant or another project to fix up the downtown (as nice as that is) won't turn things around. If you care about the city, consider a change of direction and, yes, maybe a change away from the political party that has ruled, uncontested, since the mid-1960s (remember what I said above about when the decline started?). Let's go find the future.
Matthew Thomas is seeking the Republican nomination in the May 20th Erie mayoral primary.
This article originally appeared on Erie Times-News: Thomas: Immigrants can't save Erie - policing, jobs will | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
27 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Vance says Musk making a 'huge mistake' in going after Trump but also tries to downplay the attacks
BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — Vice President JD Vance said Elon Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after President Donald Trump in a storm of bitter and inflammatory social media posts after a falling out between the two men. But the vice president, in an interview released Friday after the very public blow up between the world's richest man and arguably the world's most powerful, also tried to downplay Musk's blistering attacks as an 'emotional guy' who got frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Vance said. Vance's comments come as other Republicans in recent days have urged the two men, who months ago were close allies spending significant time together, to mend fences. Musk's torrent of social media posts attacking Trump came as the president portrayed him as disgruntled and 'CRAZY' and threatened to cut the government contracts held by his businesses. Musk, who runs electric vehicle maker Tesla, internet company Starlink and rocket company SpaceX, lambasted Trump's centerpiece tax cuts and spending bill but also suggested Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the president's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. 'Look, it happens to everybody,' Vance said in the interview. 'I've flown off the handle way worse than Elon Musk did in the last 24 hours.' Vance made the comments in an interview with ' manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the U.S. Navy when he opened for Trump at a military base in Qatar. The vice president told Von that as Musk for days was calling on social media for Congress to kill Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' the president was 'getting a little frustrated, feeling like some of the criticisms were unfair coming from Elon, but I think has been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk.' 'I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine,' he added. Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. The interview was taped Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Von showed the vice president Musk's claim that Trump's administration hasn't released all the records related to sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein because Trump is mentioned in them. Vance responded to that, saying, 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Vance said in response to another post shared by Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vance. 'It's totally insane. The president is doing a good job.' Vance called Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, which sought to cut government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good.' The vice president also defended the bill that has drawn Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination.' 'It's a good bill,' Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.' He also said it was ridiculous for some House Republicans who voted for the bill but later found parts objectional to claim they hadn't had time to read it. Vance said the text had been available for weeks and said, 'the idea that people haven't had an opportunity to actually read it is ridiculous.' Elsewhere in the interview, Vance laughed as Von cracked jokes about famed abolitionist Frederick Douglass' sexuality. 'We're gonna talk to the Smithsonian about putting up an exhibit on that,' Vance joked. 'And Theo Von, you can be the narrator for this new understanding of the history of Frederick Douglass.' The podcaster also asked the vice president if he 'got high' on election night to celebrate Trump's victory. Vance laughed and joked that he wouldn't admit it if he did. 'I did not get high,' he then said. 'I did have a fair amount to drink that night.' The interview was taped in Nashville at a restaurant owned by musician Kid Rock, a Trump ally.


Washington Post
36 minutes ago
- Washington Post
#TeamTrump vs #TeamMusk: A tenuous relationship in its twilight
The breakup of a once-powerful allyship between billionaire Elon Musk and President Donald Trump has forced even the pair's most ardent supporters to pick sides. Conservatives watched this week with a mixture of bemusement and horror as the men publicly fought on social media, sharing explosive allegations, threats and more than one ridiculing meme.


Fox News
37 minutes ago
- Fox News
Medical professionals say schools have gotten too political, citing ‘unscientific modes of thinking'
Two medical professionals argued in a new report that "medical school has gotten too political," citing "unscientific modes of thinking." "Medical students are now immersed in the notion that undertaking political advocacy is as important as learning gross anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology," the authors wrote in The Chronicle of Higher Education. Sally Satel, a lecturer in psychiatry at Yale University School of Medicine, and Thomas S. Huddle, a professor at the University of Alabama at Birmingham's Heersink School of Medicine, cited several instances of political sentiments affecting the medical school industry. They noted that researchers are "promoting unscientific modes of thinking about group-based disparities in health access and status." "The University of Minnesota's Center for Antiracism Research for Health Equity decrees 'structural racism as a fundamental cause of health inequities,' despite the fact that this is at best an arguable thesis, not a fact. (The center was shut down last month.) The Kaiser Family Foundation states that health differentials 'stem from broader social and economic inequities,'" the authors write. Satel and Huddle pushed further by detailing an incident that occurred at the University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center. The institution not only called for a ceasefire in the Gaza war between Israel and Hamas, the authors wrote that staff chanted "intifada, intifada, long live intifada!" which "echoed into patients' rooms." The New York Times reported last summer that the protesters at the University of California, San Francisco, chanting "intifada" consisted of medical students and doctors. Such an incident lays out more deeply the consequences of medical schools prioritizing politics over instruction on professional imperatives, according to the authors. "These doctors were not putting patients first — if anything, they were offending and intimidating patients. They were putting their notion of social justice first," they wrote. The two medical professionals cite other instances where medical schools are steeped in politics, such as endorsing "racial reparations" and instituting "antiracism" training in order to qualify for a medical license in the wake of George Floyd's death. Satel and Huddle offer medical professionals "guidelines" for how to "responsibly" meet patients' needs while leveraging their "professional standing to effect change", including advocating for policies that "directly help patients and are rooted in professional expertise while ensuring that their advocacy does not interfere with their relationships with their colleagues, students, and patients." Satel, a practicing psychiatrist, told Fox News Digital that she is the medical director of a methadone clinic that represents a clinical setting. In response to Fox News Digital's request for comment, Huddle said that his "academic career has been as a clinician teaching how to care for patients while caring for them."