OpenAI's chief research scientist shares the book that inspired him when he was unsure about his career path
In OpenAI's latest podcast episode, published Friday, Pachocki said he didn't know what he wanted to do with his career as a teenager in high school. He recalled one book that inspired him during those searchful, formative years: "Hackers and Painters" by Y Combinator cofounder Paul Graham.
"My dad gave me this book when I was, I think I was like 15, I was pretty unsure of what I wanted to do," Pachocki said. "It was a Polish version of a book by some author I didn't know called 'Hackers and Painters.'"
"I found that pretty inspiring," he added. Pachocki joined OpenAI in 2017. He has overseen the development of GPT-4 and replaced OpenAI cofounder Ilya Sutskever as chief scientist in May 2024.
"Hackers and Painters" contains a collection of essays from Graham, including one based on a guest lecture he gave at Harvard University about the similarities between hacking and painting.
"What hackers and painters have in common is that they're both makers," Graham wrote. "Along with composers, architects, and writers, what hackers and painters are trying to do is make good things. They're not doing research per se, though if in the course of trying to make good things they discover some new technique, so much the better."
Having one of the key figures at Sam Altman 's company inspired by Graham is a bit of a full-circle moment.
Graham published "Hackers and Painters" in 2004, about a year before the investor co-founded Y Combinator and met 19-year-old Stanford dropout Altman. Altman's startup at the time, Loopt, would be one of the first batch of companies backed by the startup accelerator.
In 2009, Graham added Altman to his list of five of the "most interesting startup founders of the last 30 years." Five years later, he chose Altman to take his position as Y Combinator's president.
"It's actually very hilarious thinking about it now," Pachocki said. "I didn't really connect the dots."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
42 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Seaport Global Sticks to Its Hold Rating for Ralliant Corporation (RAL)
In a report released today, Scott Graham from Seaport Global maintained a Hold rating on Ralliant Corporation. The company's shares closed last Friday at $43.50. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. According to TipRanks, Graham is a 5-star analyst with an average return of 11.4% and a 61.58% success rate. In addition to Seaport Global, Ralliant Corporation also received a Hold from Evercore ISI's Amit Daryanani in a report issued on August 13. However, on August 14, Bank of America Securities reiterated a Sell rating on Ralliant Corporation (NYSE: RAL). The company has a one-year high of $55.08 and a one-year low of $42.00. Currently, Ralliant Corporation has an average volume of 2.64M. Based on the recent corporate insider activity of 9 insiders, corporate insider sentiment is positive on the stock. This means that over the past quarter there has been an increase of insiders buying their shares of RAL in relation to earlier this year. Earlier this month, Ganesh Moorthy, a Director at RAL bought 2,000.00 shares for a total of $90,340.00.
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Lindsey Graham's strategy for an end to Russia's war in Ukraine: Peace by pocketbook
Trump in early August hiked tariffs on India to 50 percent due to the country's purchasing of Russian oil. Graham claimed that it was those sanctions that drove Putin to acquiesce to the Alaska visit. And going after China — another major consumer of Russian oil — could prove even more pivotal, he said. 'If we take it to the next level and tell China you're next, then I think we can have an end to this war,' Graham said. 'The second most important person on the planet to end this war is President Xi in China. If he went to Putin and said it's time to end this war, I can't help you anymore because you're putting my country at threat, this war would end.' But Trump was far from threatening in his meeting with Putin last week. He rolled out the red carpet for the Russian leader and the two rode together in the presidential limousine. The meeting ended without a ceasefire or even concrete plans for a trilateral talk involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. But Graham was quick to attack those who suggested that meant the confab was a failure. Also on Sunday, special envoy Steve Witkoff said that Russia had consented to 'Article 5-like protections' for Ukraine at the conclusion of the war. 'To all these media analysts who say this was a bust, that's ridiculous,' he said. 'We have progress we didn't have before. We have momentum for peace. We'll see where it goes. So I'll leave it up to Trump.' Zelenskyy — and a selection of European leaders — will journey to Washington on Monday to touch base with Trump on what comes next. Graham insisted that Europe, too, must be willing to further sanction Russia in a bid to stop the fighting. 'To our European allies, up your game. Quit complaining about what we're not doing in America and do more yourself,' he said. 'Put tariffs on every country that buys Russian oil and gas cheaply to benefit Putin's war machine. Do what Trump's doing.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI is at a classic strategy crossroads involving its ‘moat'—which Warren Buffett believes can make or break a business
It's an epochal moment as history's latest general-purpose technology, AI, forms itself into an industry. Much depends on these early days, especially the fate of the industry's leader by a mile, Open AI. In terms of the last general-purpose technology, the internet, will it become a colossus like Google or be forgotten like AltaVista? No one can know, but here's how to think about it. OpenAI's domination of the industry is striking. As the creator of ChatGPT, it recently attracted 78% of daily unique visitors to core model websites, with six competitors splitting up the rest, according to a recent 40-page report from J.P. Morgan. Even with that vast lead, the report shows, OpenAI is expanding its margin over its much smaller competitors, including even Gemini, which is part of Google and its giant parent, Alphabet (2024 revenue: $350 billion). The great question now is whether OpenAI can possibly maintain its wide lead (history would say no) or at least continue as the industry leader. The answer depends heavily on OpenAI's moat, a Warren Buffett term for any factor that protects the company and cannot be easily breached–think of Coca-Cola's brand or BNSF Railroad's economies of scale, to mention two of Buffett's successful investments. On that count the J.P. Morgan analysts are not optimistic. Specifically, they acknowledge that while OpenAI has led the industry in innovating its models, that strategy is 'an increasingly fragile moat.' Example: The company's most recent model, GPT-5, included multiple advances yet underwhelmed many users. As competitors inevitably catch up, the analysts conclude, 'Model commoditization is an increasingly likely outcome.' With innovations suffering short lives, OpenAI must now become 'a more product-focused, diversified organization that can operate at scale while retaining its position' at the top of the industry–skills the company has yet to demonstrate. Bottom line, OpenAI can maintain its leading rank in the industry, but it won't be easy, and betting on it could be risky. Yet a different view suggests OpenAI is much closer to creating a sustainable moat. It comes from Robert Siegel, a management lecturer at Stanford's Graduate School of Business who is also a venture capitalist and former executive at various companies, many in technology. He argues that OpenAI is already well along the road to achieving a valuable attribute, stickiness: The longer customers use something, the less likely they are to switch to a competitor. In OpenAI's case, 'people will only move to Perplexity or Gemini or other solutions if they get a better result,' he says. Yet that becomes unlikely because AI learns; the more you use a particular AI engine, the more it learns about you and what you want. 'If you keep putting questions into ChatGPT, which learns your behaviors better, and you like it, there's no reason to leave as long as it's competitive.' Now combine that logic with OpenAI's behavior. 'It seems like their strategy is to be ubiquitous,' Siegel says, putting ChatGPT in front of as many people as possible so the software can start learning about them before any competitor can get there first. Most famously, OpenAI released ChatGPT 3.5 to the public in 2022 for free, attracting a million users in five days and 100 million in two months. In addition, the company raised much investment early in the game, having been founded in 2015. Thus, Siegel says, OpenAI can 'continue to run hard and use capital as a moat so they can do all the things they need to do to be everywhere.' But Siegel, the J.P. Morgan analysts, and everyone else knows plenty can always go wrong. An obvious threat to OpenAI and most of its competitors is an open-source model such as China's DeepSeek, which appears to perform well at significantly lower costs. The venture capital that has poured into OpenAI could dry up as hundreds of other AI startups compete for financing. J.P. Morgan and Siegel agree that OpenAI's complex unconventional governance structure must be reformed; though a recently proposed structure has not been officially disclosed, it is reportedly topped by a nonprofit, which might worry profit-seeking investors. As for moats, OpenAI is obviously in the best position to build or strengthen one. But looking into the era of AI, the whole concept of the corporate moat may become meaningless. How long will it be, if it hasn't been done already, before a competitor asks its own AI engine, 'How do we defeat OpenAI's moat?' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
