
ASEAN-GCC-China: A Brave New World?
Posterity, I dare say, will regard the recently concluded ASEAN-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Summit in Kuala Lumpur in May as a historic turning point.
While the ASEAN Summit and its related meetings like the ASEAN-GCC Summit were equally historic for their role in progressing ASEAN's agenda, current trade wars and geopolitical fragmentation have somehow made many quarters perceive the inaugural ASEAN-GCC-China Summit as the gamechanger during the recent ASEAN gathering.
A potential 'reconciler to the fragmented world'
Malaysia could stand proud not merely for arranging such a smoothly run Summit, but also for the bridging of minds that have arguably emerged as key voices of the newly resurgent Global South, particularly through the successful issuance of a Joint Statement – usually the most difficult feat in any multilateral meeting.
As part of their Joint Statement, the ASEAN-GCC-China leaders condemned the continued atrocities on the people of Gaza and called for a ceasefire, echoing the sentiments of all right-minded peoples across the world.
Beyond politics, a deeper trilateral economic integration makes perfect sense. For context, the combined numbers for ASEAN, GCC and China speak for themselves: over a quarter of the world's population, and a collective GDP of almost USD trillion.
Figures for foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows, too, stack up nicely: ASEAN attracted USD billion in FDI inflows, representing about a significant portion of global FDI. China received USD billion, while the GCC secured USD billion. Collectively, these figures accounted for roughly a substantial share of global FDI inflows.
From such data alone, the significance of this combined economic might was clear to the leaders from China and the two economic blocs.
ASEAN can be a strategic gateway to the East Asian markets. Malaysia, in particular, with our well-established trade and industrial ecosystem, rule of law and ease of investor journey is also well-poised to facilitate such investments into the broader ASEAN and East Asian markets.
The GCC's economic dynamism, strategic location connecting Europe, Asia and Africa, and its shared religious and cultural values with Malaysia as well as ASEAN make it an ideal partner for deeper economic integration. Indeed, ASEAN's trade with the GCC stood at USD billion and FDI inflows were USD million.
On a wider scale, China, as we know, was ASEAN's largest trading partner with USD billion in trade and USD billion in foreign direct investment.
China and the GCC are hence crucial economic partners for ASEAN and for Malaysia. It therefore is totally appropriate for us to want to engage with them, both on a bilateral and trilateral format.
That is also why Malaysia will soon start negotiations for a free trade agreement (FTA) with the GCC, because there is so much potential to increase the current total trade between Malaysia and the GCC.
How ASEAN deals benefit its people
But I want to go a bit more granular and show how engaging on an ASEAN-GCC-China scale can benefit ordinary Malaysians, including the youth, women and MSMEs. Through the Priority Economic Deliverables (PEDs) under the Economic Pillar of Malaysia's ASEAN Chairmanship, the Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry (MITI) and other related Ministries are working diligently to ensure substantial progress for these PEDs by year-end.
Some of these are of course directly linked to the GCC and China. For instance, we have completed negotiations to not only upgrade the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA) but also the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA). Both of these will be signed in October, boosting both intra-ASEAN and ASEAN's trade with China which as we know will be key to tide our region over during this period of geopolitical instability.
Separately, another of our PEDs, namely the Joint Declaration on Economic Cooperation Between the ASEAN-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) was also completed in full. Through this, our two regions will explore new avenues of cooperation like market integration, sustainability, decarbonisation, digital transformation and inclusion, including for MSMEs.
Sectorally, ASEAN's PED on the Development of Policy Recommendations and Guidelines to Support ASEAN EV Implementation Roadmap will benefit from China's global leadership in electrical vehicles (EVs). Accounting for more than a large majority of global electric car production, China also produced more than a dominant share of all EV batteries ever manufactured.
Consider also the Endorsement of the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation, which is clearly in alignment with the GCC's ramping up of its efforts to diversify its economies and energy mix away from oil and gas in pursuit of renewable energy (RE). They have pledged a massive investment in RE by the end of the decade to transition to clean energy and reduce carbon emissions.
There are, indeed, many synergies for economic integration. Development of ASEAN Tourism Outlook? China and GCC are key tourist markets for ASEAN. An ASEAN Framework for Integrated Semiconductor Supply-Chain (AFISS)? China is both a major chip buyer and maker. In conclusion, when Malaysia proposed the PEDs for its Chairmanship year, we were clear on how we could boost ASEAN's socio-economic dynamism and ergo, the ASEAN-GCC-China trilateral relationship can likewise contribute to this.
Furthermore, global demand for halal products is currently valued at over USD trillion and will grow significantly by the end of the decade. This is a market ASEAN, GCC and China can collaborate to tap on and even corner together.
Also, as previously highlighted, as a combined market of more than two billion people, ASEAN, GCC and China should be regions where young Malaysian men and women, including those in small business, look for job or business opportunities. We are paving the way for all our Malaysian jaguhs to enter wider markets for their goods and services, while ensuring that their interests will always be safeguarded through well negotiated FTAs.
Deeper economic integration supports regional security
But one would argue that even spreading one's wings to ASEAN really is just a waypoint for the truly ambitious. While other regions may draw inwards, our three are seeking even greater connectivity for our people and businesses.
The coming together of ASEAN-GCC-China's leaders signals that we refuse for our horizons to be limited—by ourselves or others—to our own borders or backyards.
Indeed, deeper economic integration would do well to better support regional security, which feeds into ASEAN's Political-Security deliverables.
This is also why ASEAN – with its principles of centrality, neutrality, non-alignment – must matter to not only its Member States, but also to partners like the GCC, China and indeed, other Dialogue Partners like Australia, Canada, the European Union, India, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Japan and New Zealand.
Truth be told, what we can achieve together through this nascent ASEAN-GCC-China trilateral configuration is only limited by our imaginations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
40 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Brokering Cambodia-Thailand ceasefire is not about vainglory
WHAT did they say about trust being like a vase, which once broken, will never be the same again? So, do we leave it in tatters, or try to fix it back to form? This could well describe the state of play between Cambodia and Thailand sharing a border which has long been an unruly frontier, where old maps, national pride and political survival intersect. The trust deficit between the two considerably outweighs the cultivated goodwill, leaving no illusion that whatever peace struck on the anvil of diplomacy will be ironclad. Thus, the brokering of a ceasefire between the two following recent clashes is a reminder that diplomacy's true measure lies not in sweeping settlements, but in holding the line against worse outcomes. Tensions that began simmering in May erupted as Cambodian and Thai troops exchanged fire in disputed territory along the Dangrek mountains. Thanks to the trust shortfall, what began as a familiar border clash escalated sharply when Cambodia deployed multiple launch rocket systems that hit a hospital, among other targets, prompting Thailand to respond with F-16 jet strikes, possibly the first time its air force had fired in anger since a brief border war with Laos in 1987. Tens of thousands fled to makeshift camps. The fighting was the most intense in more than a decade. On July 28, Cambodia and Thailand agreed to halt hostilities from midnight. Meeting in Putrajaya under Malaysia's chairmanship of Asean, both prime ministers accepted an immediate and unconditional ceasefire. The agreement was the product of painstaking, unglamorous but by no means lacklustre facilitation by Malaysia, with the United States playing a consequential, parallel role. US President Donald Trump added urgency by warning that tariff negotiations with both countries would not proceed until "fighting stops". China, present as an observer, lent additional weight to the talks — particularly important for Cambodia, which counts Beijing as its most dependable backer. The optics mattered: the message was that de-escalation was in everyone's interest, and that Malaysia's convening role was part of a wider diplomatic effort, not an exercise in rivalry. Reaching the ceasefire was never a foregone conclusion as, not surprisingly, the two sides took diametrically opposed approaches to handling the dispute. Phnom Penh sought to internationalise the issue, reviving old appeals to the International Court of Justice and casting itself as the aggrieved party. Bangkok insisted on tackling it bilaterally, out of the global spotlight and far from anything that might invite international arbitration. Neither could be seen to back down. Into this maelstrom stepped Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who engaged both Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai with care but never so much as to box either side in. By bringing the two leaders to Putrajaya and offering to coordinate observers, Malaysia showed that an Asean chair willing to act and quick on the draw could still shape events. The ceasefire was framed as an initial measure to halt the fighting and stabilise the situation, not even as a prelude to dispute resolution. Follow-up arrangements rely largely on bilateral mechanisms between Cambodia and Thailand, with Asean in a supporting role. That was by design. A heavier Asean role might have triggered resentment and made the arrangement harder to sustain. But this doesn't preclude Anwar, in his personal capacity, from doing the nudging and cajoling to both parties, more as Asean family members than as chair sitting in council. All said, while the crucial role of political leaders is undeniable, a lasting pause will require more than cabinet orders. It will need continued discipline from commanders of both sides on the ground. Anwar stressed that point to members of the Asean diplomatic corps during an interface session in Jakarta, on the sidelines of his visit to Indonesia. Complaints that Asean failed to resolve the dispute swiftly miss the point entirely. There was never any prospect of conjuring fantasy settlements overnight, a standard at which no international body performs any better. For Malaysia, this is not a pursuit in vainglory. The role of Asean chair is designed to be facilitative, not proprietorial. Asean works best when the chair is willing to act, not by trying to foist solutions, but by creating the space and opportunity in which they might one day emerge.


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Anwar: Nation forever grateful to warriors who bled for Malaysia
KUALA LUMPUR: The service and sacrifices of the nation's warriors and heroes will forever be remembered in Malaysia's history, says Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. He described their sacrifices as a crucial moment in ensuring the nation's peace, security and harmony remain strong and well-protected. "May Allah place the warriors and soldiers who have shed blood and given their lives for the country's peace among the righteous and the faithful," he said in a Facebook post. Earlier, Anwar and his wife, Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, accompanied His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim and Her Majesty Raja Zarith Sofiah, King and Queen of Malaysia, to a Yasin recital, tahlil and prayer ceremony at the National Mosque along with members of the security forces and the public in conjunction with this year's Warriors' Day celebration. Tomorrow, the 2025 Warriors' Day celebration will be held at Dataran Pahlawan Negara, Putrajaya. Warriors' Day is commemorated on July 31 each year to honour the struggle and sacrifices of the country's security personnel in ensuring prosperity and sovereignty, and has been organised in rotation by the Malaysian Armed Forces and the Royal Malaysia Police since 1968. – BERNAMA

Barnama
an hour ago
- Barnama
Rubio, Malaysian Foreign Minister Discuss Thailand-Cambodia Tensions
WASHINGTON, July 30 (Bernama-Sputnik/RIA Novosti) -- US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Malaysian Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan discussed tensions between Thailand and Cambodia, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said on Wednesday. 'Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke with Malaysian Foreign Minister to thank the Malaysian government for its role in deescalating tensions between Thailand and Cambodia and successfully facilitating a ceasefire agreement over the ongoing border dispute,' Bruce said in a statement, reported Sputnik/RIA Novosti. Rubio reiterated the US desire to reach peace and a ceasefire, she added.