
'This rammed, sweaty hell makes it obvious holiday hotspots need to change'
In May 1969, a skinny schoolboy from an English market town celebrated his ninth birthday with his parents. Not at home under the big skies of East Anglia, but in Malgrat de Mar, a beach resort near Barcelona.
His Liverpudlian parents had left the city in 1959 with a job move and, 10 years later, they had upgraded the family home from a modest council house to a mortgaged three-bedroom semi. Holidays were getting an upgrade too - from a caravan in Great Yarmouth to joining the first, joyful wave of Brits jetting to the sun-drenched Spanish costas.
Foreign holidays were, literally, taking off in the booming late Sixties and the Apollo Saturn V-obsessed boy with wavy brown hair was beyond excited about his first trip on a plane, a hotel with a swimming pool, a newly-acquired red and white lilo and a seemingly limitless supply of chilled chocolate milk. His parents opted for chilled drinks that were certainly not chocolate milk.
The boy was me and, with my parents now sadly departed to the Great Sunlounger in the Sky, I cannot verify the price of the holiday or the name of the beachfront hotel. But I am fairly sure it was with the now-defunct Clarksons and we flew from Luton, probably with Court Line.
It was a fabulous week: endless hours on the lilo in the pool, a matador poster birthday present from the holiday rep (a young German woman– Ingrid?) and there was a railway by the beach and I was mesmerised to near Apollo-levels by the expresses hurtling past the sands.
Dad also took me to Barcelona FC's Camp Nou stadium and said it was almost as good as Anfield. He was a wise man. And, in 1969, Spain was still under the dictatorship of Generalissimo Franco and his stern machine-gun-toting Guardia Civil police with their curious Tricornio leather hats. They were even more scary than my teacher, Miss Frost.
Was it exciting being in the vanguard of British tourism to Spain? Absolutely, I was regaling my school mates with tales of exotic Spain (mostly the wonders of chilled chocolate milk and speeding trains by the beach) for days when I got back.
So, fast forward five decades to just before the pandemic. The schoolboy is now in his late 50s, certainly not skinny and unencumbered by wavy brown hair. And I am on a Mediterranean cruise with my wife Debbie, with the ship calling next at gorgeous Santorini in Greece's Cyclades islands.
It should have been one of the highlights of the week-long voyage. It turned out to be an overtourism Hades. There were five cruise ships anchored in the caldera, disgorging thousands of passengers by tenders to the small harbour below clifftop Insta-fave Fira.
The queue for the cable car ride up was a tedious hour or so. Then we emerged into the insanity of Fira - a seething morass of sweating humanity shuffling through the narrow streets, bumping into each other, doors, cafe chairs and tables.
Ludicrously rammed. Truly awful. Debbie and I agreed this was not something to be part of and there were simply way too many cruise passengers visiting in a day. We bailed. Cable car queue out of Hades dodged, a slippery walk down the donkey poo-slimed cobbles of the Karavolades Stairs took us to a tender and a retreat to the ship.
Never again, we said. Too many people. Much as we love a cruise, something needs to be done. And Santorini has acted.
Measures to relieve overtourism pressures include a levy and daily limit on the number of cruise passengers and restrictions on how many ships can visit. Other ports such as Nice, Amsterdam and Venice have also enforced restrictions and Juneau in Alaska is looking at options
Spain has been at the forefront of locals' overtourism protests – perhaps 100,000 massed across the Canaries last weekend – and cruise limits are in place in Barcelona and Palma. This is not just about cruise passengers, though. There are wider issues of mass beach and city tourism in Spain and beyond and the impact it can have on a community
That said, we should not forget the huge amount of valuable income tourism can generate. Billions poured into economies and hundreds of thousands of jobs are not to be ignored, just as the grievances of locals in destinations are not to be ignored either. A very tricky issue to balance out.
Indeed, the problem is much closer to home, too, with concerns in holiday hotspots Norfolk and Cornwall that tourist towns are choked in high season and being 'hollowed out' with the rise of second homes and short-term rentals such as Airbnb making it harder for locals to get on the property ladder.
So what can be done?
There is no easy sticking plaster for a complicated and emotive problem, though sensible levels of cruise ship access does seem a reasonably simple and effective quick fix for certain locations.
Nightly tourist taxes? More and more common but I think they just grift a few quid for the local council and determined travellers shrug their shoulders, pay up and turn up. Quotas? Not sure how that can be implemented with freedom of movement. How can you stop someone getting on a plane to Barcelona or Tenerife?
A quota of digital tourism permits for a hotel stay? Possibly. But how to enforce for the unlicensed privately rented accommodation? And discover new, lesser-visited places?
This seems to have potential to spread the load around and enjoy exploring fresh destinations. Might just be a bit cheaper too. Go in less-crowded low/shoulder-season? Again, it may spread the load, share revenue around the months and again may save you a few quid.
Stay at home? It's not always sunny here and that holiday abroad is always one of the last things hard-working Brits will give up.
Getaways overseas have changed immeasurably since the 1969 boy with the lilo - and overtourism is not an issue that is going to lie low.
1969 - Spain has 18.9 million foreign tourists
2024 - Spain has 18.8 million tourists from the UK alone
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU
Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights, and the second related to free hand luggage Four European countries are outraged at new rules that could limit how much delayed passengers can claim in compensation and when airlines can charge passengers for carrying hand luggage. Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights. The Council decided that passengers on short-haul flights would have to be delayed by four hours or more before they could claim compensation, rather than the current three. For long-haul flights, delays will have to be six or more hours. The good news for passengers is that compensation for those delayed on short-haul flights will increase from €250 (£211) to €300. However, compensation for long-haul flights will be cut from €600 to €500. The changes were first tabled 13 years ago and must still be approved by the European Parliament before they become law. The European Consumer Organisation, the BEUC, has argued that the changes will be a huge blow for consumers and deprive 'the majority of passengers from their compensation rights". The BEUC claims that most delays are between two and four hours. While the UK now sets its own compensation rules following Brexit, the changes will impact Brits if they come into force, as it will apply to passengers taking flights with an EU carrier. This means it could affect a passenger travelling to and from an EU country on an EU airline. The second decision relates to baggage allowance. Under the new rules, the concept to free luggage will be limited to 'personal items' that can be placed under the front seat. That will leave other stowed cabin bags exposed to charges. Spain, Germany, Slovenia, and Portugal voted against the changes, warning that they could mean passengers end up paying extra for almost any cabin bag. The Spanish government criticised the new rules as 'too restrictive.' Spain's Minister for Social Rights, Consumer Affairs and the 2030 Agenda, Pablo Bustinduy, described the changes as an 'outrage'. The political agreement, adopted by a qualified majority in the EU Council, was voted against by Spain, Germany, Slovenia and Portugal. Minister Bustinduy argued that the new rules would violate consumer rights and "only strengthen the power and profits of airlines." If the rules are accepted, then Ryanair would have to change its free hand luggage policy. Right now, the budget Irish airline require customers to have a bag no larger than 40x20x25 centimetres, which must fit under the seat in front. Under the new rules, the dimensions will be changed to 40x30x15 centimetres. That means Ryanair would be obliged to allow a bag 10 centimetres wider, but could also reduce the depth currently allowed by 10 centimetres.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Tenerife chaos as Brits sit on sunbed stacks for '2 hours' and refuse to move
Sun bed wars are hotting up in Tenerife as onlookers film tourists sitting on pre-stacked sun-beds before hotel staff have even had a chance to unload them Holiday destinations are seeing the increase of "sun-bed wars" erupt across Spain as desperate tourists scramble to secure their sunbathing spots. The latest move, described as "weird" by one TikToker shows an unnamed hotel in Tenerife, where it appears guests are sitting on sunbed stacks which have not yet been dissembled and set out for guests that day. The video, by @hellerdee, looks down from a presumed balcony at tourists sitting and waiting for staff to come and set up the loungers. The caption read: 'Weirdos waiting 2 hours for sunbeds to be unlocked.' The poster used the hashtag Tenerife in the clip. The issue, while not new, has caused outrage among fellow holidaymakers who have mocked people for getting up at early doors to secure their loungers for a day around the pool. Commenters were quick to share their outrage over the habit. One said: "Can you imagine cutting your night short on holiday to get up early to reserve a sunbed?" Another added: 'If you're getting up early to get a sunbed you need to get a life." 'Ahhh nothing says relaxing holiday like getting up at the crack of dawn 2 fight 4 a lounger,' a third user joked. Another simply labelled it 'worst nightmare'. Some even shared their own nightmare experiences with securing a sunbed. 'Just got back from Majorca and people were outside at 5.30am reserving sunbeds,' one comment shared. Another added: 'Nothing worse than these type of people. I was in Barbados and 2 people left their towels on a bed until 4pm and then used them for 30 mins getting the last bit of the sun.' Others expressed how stressful being in such a situation must be. One added: 'Thank god I've never stayed in a hotel where people were waking up at 6am and fighting for sunbeds. Cause I've heard some mad stories. Real life back home is less stressful than that. What's the point of a holiday.' Getting up early wasn't the only issue that triggered viewers. Many commenters also wondered how many of these sunbed hoggers were even using the beds for the full day. 'That's just taking it to the extreme, how many of them put their towels on the bed and then left it there all day,' one commenter asked. The poster replied, '95% of them!!!' While individual hotels reserve the right to stop people from bagging their sunbeds at the crack of dawn, and set their own rules, one Spanish beach has started imposing fines for such behaviour. Calpe, a seaside town in Costa Blanca will get anyone doing such a thing to cough up a £210 in peak season. The rule extends to beaches along Calpe's coastline where offenders face having their belongings confiscated by police. Unoccupied sunbeds The same account posted a TikTok a few days prior which showed footage of the hotel from a balcony view. By the pool, there were several sunbeds left with towels draped over them, but no one sitting on them. In their caption, they wrote: 'A follow on from Tenerife Sur sunbed wars… towels and no bodies on beds. (Pile of beds at the back locked and get unlocked 11am… these are the 9am ones with towels and no people on them)' Commenters were equally outraged. 'Ngl I'd give it like 5-10 mins and if no one appeared I'd just move the towel and the bed and use it anyway,' one said.


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Passengers flying with major airlines to face new 4 hour rule at airports
In a huge blow to Brits, EU countries have green-lighted controversial plans to lengthen the wait time before delayed passengers can claim compensation for both short and long-haul journeys Customers flying with some big name air operators on short-haul flights have been hit with a brutal four-hour warning over a controversial shakeup. After 12 years of wrangling, EU countries have green-lighted plans to lengthen the wait time before flyers can lodge claims for delayed flights. Currently, passengers have to be delayed by more than three hours before qualifying for compensation. However, under the new stipulations - which still have to be negotiated with the European Parliament before they become law - short-haul travellers will only be eligible to claim compensation after being delayed by four hours or more, while those on longer journeys will have to sit tight for a six-hour hold-up before they can lodge a compensation claim. It's not all bad news though, as EU nations have also agreed to increase the amount of compensation for those delayed on short-haul journeys from €250 (approx £210.47) to €300 (£252.56). But, passengers hit with delays on long-haul flights could see their compensation reduce from €600 (£505) to €500 (£420). The trade body Airlines for Europe (A4E), which represents companies such as Ryanair, easyJet and Lufthansa, and The European Consumer Organisation, the BEUC, both slammed the rules - arguing it would deprive the majority of passengers from being able to claim compensation. This is because most delays are only between two and four hours. "Europe has been waiting for transparent and workable passenger rights for 12 years and member states have fallen at the final hurdle to deliver," A4E said. "Member states have diluted the European Commission's original proposal and introduced even more complexity." According to Yorkshire Live, German members of the European People's Party have also expressed their disapproval, stating that 'decreasing the rights to compensation for air passengers would be a step in the wrong direction'. "Reimbursement after a three-hour delay has been standard for many years and should remain so," they added. A senior EU diplomat is believed to have said that 'no politician wants to say more than four hours' at risk of dampening Europeans' holiday plans. The news comes amidst accusations by 16 consumer protection associations from 12 Member States against seven budget airlines for imposing unfair charges on passengers' hand luggage. "The European Court of Justice has made it very clear that hand baggage is an integral part of the basic ticket price. Normally, there is no surcharge on the price as long as the hand luggage is of a reasonable size," explained Steven Berger, a solicitor with the European Consumers' Organisation (BEUC). "All we're seeing is a proliferation of airlines charging for this baggage... We're calling for very clear rules. Passengers must be able to take one piece of luggage, a small suitcase or a rucksack." He added: "At the moment, there are two different opposing positions among the member states in the Council. On the whole, you have the camp of the member states that are going to defend the three hours to be able to benefit from the right to compensation and others that are going to ask for five hours and nine hours based on distance. So right now this is really the big source of conflict." *Prices based on EUR to GBP conversions at the time of writing.