Major U.S. Middle East-Focused Buildup Confirmed (Updated)
U.S. air, naval, and ground forces have already been aiding in the defense of Israel since the start of the current hostilities last week. Readers can first get up to speed on the latest developments in the conflict between Israel and Iran in our reporting here.
Though currently sailing in the Western Pacific, 'the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group is heading to the Middle East without delay,' a U.S. official told TWZ. The U.S. official added that this is a scheduled deployment to replace the USS Carl Vinson and its strike group, which is currently on station in the Middle East. However, they would not say when Vinson might now be expected to leave the region.
USS Nimitz is about to transit Malacca Strait, likely heading to CENTCOM AOR. pic.twitter.com/0C4tIqEpRC
— Duan Dang (@duandang) June 16, 2025
Fox News has separately reported that the decision to send Nimitz to the Middle East, though previously planned, has been accelerated by multiple months, and that it and Vinson will be in the region together for at least a period of time. In addition to the carrier and its air wing, Nimitz's strike group is currently known to include four Arleigh Burke class destroyers. At least one fast attack submarine also typically accompanies Navy carriers on deployments.
CONFIRMED: The USS Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group is on its way to the Middle East from the South China Sea, a U.S. official tells Fox News. The Nimitz was previously scheduled to replace the USS Carl Vinson carrier strike group which has been deployed for several months,…
— Jennifer Griffin (@JenGriffinFNC) June 16, 2025
When asked, a second U.S. official could not comment specifically on the recent movement of KC-135R and KC-46A tankers, but told TWZ that 'additional defensive forces are moving to the region to provide flexible options for leadership.' They declined to elaborate on the exact composition of those forces.
Other reports have linked the flights directly to this 'defensive' buildup.
A U.S. official confirms to me a wave of tanker flights across the Atlantic in the last 24 hours, in part to have resources closer to the Middle East and provide options to defend U.S. assets and interests. https://t.co/js0WPCpkZu
— Dan Lamothe (@DanLamothe) June 16, 2025
Both U.S. officials spoke to TWZ on the condition of anonymity to discuss operational details.
The Air Force's Air Mobility Command (AMC), which oversees the bulk of the service's tanker and airlifter fleets, declined to comment in response to queries from TWZ, citing operational security concerns. We have also reached out to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM), and the U.S. Navy's Pacific Fleet (PACFLT) headquarters for more information. CENTCOM directed us to contact the White House, which we have also done.
Just having an additional aircraft carrier strike group in the region will offer an important boost in available defensive and offensive capacity to U.S. commanders. As part of any regional contingency operation, Nimitz's air wing could be tasked with helping to intercept aerial threats, including drones and cruise missiles, as well as striking targets on land and at sea. Naval F-35 Joint Strike Fighters, like the F-35Cs currently embarked upon the USS Carl Vinson, are known to have shot down drones launched by Iranian-backed Houthi militants in Yemen in recent months, something TWZ was first to report.
The other ships in a carrier strike group offer significant air and missile defense capabilities, as well as their own ability to target enemy vessels and/or ground-based assets. Collectively, a carrier and its escorts can provide a wide array of other forms of valuable support, including in terms of surveillance and reconnaissance, as well as command and control and battle management.
A senior Israel Defense Forces (IDF) told TWZ over the weekend that Aegis combat system-equipped ships, which would be Arleigh Burke class destroyers and/or Ticonderoga class cruisers, have already been helping to intercept missiles heading toward Israel since the current conflict erupted. There is also evidence of the use of SM-3-series anti-ballistic missile interceptors, which U.S. warships with Aegis systems specially configured to support the ballistic missile defense mission employ.
The Third-Stage Rocket Motor for a U.S. Navy RIM-161 SM-3 Block lB Surface-to-Air Missile was apparently discovered yesterday in Iran, confirming that Arleigh Burke-Class Guided-Missile Destroyers with the U.S. Navy, likely stationed in the Eastern Mediterranean, are assisting in… pic.twitter.com/HZC8zCxxJY
— OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) June 15, 2025
U.S. officials had previously told us that an additional Arleigh Burke, the USS Thomas Hudner, was moving into the Eastern Mediterranean in light of current events. Another destroyer of this type was also reportedly repositioned for a potential forward deployment to the region, if requested. Thomas Hudner is notably a BMD configured Arleigh Burke, which would bring additional SM-3s to the theater along with other munitions. U.S. stockpiles of SM-3s, in general, are relatively limited, and the Navy also currently has no operational way of re-loading vertical launch systems on warships like Arleigh Burke at sea.
In terms of observed U.S. airpower movements, online flight tracking software shows that at least 32 Air Force tankers have now arrived at locations across Europe and the Middle East. It remains unclear whether any of the tankers were 'dragging' combat jets with them across the Atlantic.
Good morning.With the addition of 4 tankers out of New Jersey, there are now at least 32 tankers observed in the overnight group. A considerable portion went to Morón Air Base in Spain, with others on to UK, Germany, Italy and 1 to Estonia. A few pressed on to CENTCOM AOR. https://t.co/2Dvy31FtWc pic.twitter.com/5fvFE2jb9a
— Evergreen Intel (@vcdgf555) June 16, 2025
4 of the 32+ tankers that crossed the Atlantic overnight are still en route to their destinations. KC-46A Pegasus RCH026 and RCH027 are heading to the Pegasus convention at Ramstein, while KC-135s RCH032 and RCH033 join the party in Chania, Greece. https://t.co/rZreci5GPe pic.twitter.com/hqaEfhAm2q
— TheIntelFrog (@TheIntelFrog) June 16, 2025
Distribution map. Moron, Spain had the most at 11-12 tankers. https://t.co/F0Fj0RS9QT pic.twitter.com/eCW7DvLoAq
— RivetJoint (@SpeckleBelly64) June 16, 2025
The aforementioned senior IDF official also told TWZ that U.S. fighter aircraft in the region have been taking part in defensive operations already. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagles played key roles in defending Israel from incoming missile and drone attacks last year. F-15Es recently saw their counter-drone capabilities, in particular, significantly expand through the addition of laser-guided Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System II (APKWS II) rockets to their available arsenal. Air Force F-16s in the Middle East had already been using APKWS IIs to down drones launched by Iranian-backed Houthi militants in Yemen since last year, which we were first to report.
From bases in Europe, the armada of aerial refueling aircraft would also be positioned to support long-range flights by cargo aircraft, movement of fighters, or even global airpower bombers, from the United States to the Middle East and back.
TWZ has previously highlighted the potential role that the unique combination of Air Force B-2 bombers carrying 30,000-pound GBU-57/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker buster bombs could play in procuring deeply buried Iranian facilities, including the nuclear enrichment plant at Fordo, should the U.S. government make the decision to join Israel's campaign on a kinetic level.
Just moving additional ground-based air and missile defense assets, or replenishing stocks of interceptors for units already forward deployed, by air, also requires significant resources, as you can read more about here. U.S. Army Patriot surface-to-air missile systems and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) ballistic missile defense systems in the Middle East are also among the assets already being employed in the defense of Israel.
Third, Anniston.
RCH313 is C-17A 07-7172 #AE146Apic.twitter.com/BBp0JFonMt
— Evergreen Intel (@vcdgf555) June 16, 2025
Whether the new U.S. military buildup presages a new phase of American participation in the conflict remains to be seen. As TWZ noted when the armada of tankers first appeared heading east over the Atlantic, that movement is something one expects to see in a number of different contingency scenarios. Beyond increasing options for defending Israel, there remains the prospect that U.S. interests across the region come under more direct threat. Iran has notably reiterated long-standing threats to close the highly strategic Strait of Hormuz, though there are questions about its ability to and interest in doing so given the global ramifications of such action, as we recently explored in detail. Anti-ballistic missile defense, in particular, would be key to responding to any Iranian strikes aimed at bases hosting U.S. forces in the Middle East, as well as an attempt to blockade the Strait of Hormuz.
Contingencies include: -opting to provide AR to IAF.-Joining the kinetic offensive fight (offensive) -Dealing countering an attempt to close the strait (defensive)-Providing BM left of launch interdiction/hunt (defensive) -Providing a robust bridge for global airpower bomber…
— Tyler Rogoway (@Aviation_Intel) June 16, 2025
Pressure also reportedly continues to build on U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration to enter the conflict more actively in support of Israel and its objectives. In particular, Israeli forces have significantly more options for attempting to neutralize deeply buried facilities in Iran, especially the Fordo enrichment plant. Knocking out Fordo is widely seen as essential for putting a real hold on Iran's ability to produce nuclear weapons. Even just providing the Israeli Air Force (IAF) with U.S. aerial refueling support would give that country's ongoing campaign a major boost, as we have noted before.
In the meantime, the scope of Israel's campaign against Iran is also steadily moving beyond its initial focus on nuclear targets. This has been driven in part by what Iran has targeted in Israel, including energy-related sites, in retaliation.
Whether or not a major shift in U.S. policy toward the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict occurs, the U.S. military is now engaged in a major buildup of forces that could be poised to help with any future offensive, as well as defensive operations, in the Middle East.'Over the weekend, I directed the deployment of additional capabilities to the United States Central Command Area of Responsibility,' U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has now said in a statement. 'Protecting U.S. forces is our top priority and these deployments are intended to enhance our defensive posture in there region.'
pic.twitter.com/TMb47DQMVZ
— Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (@SecDef) June 16, 2025'Consistent with the duty to protect U.S. forces in the Middle East, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth directed the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group to the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility to sustain our defensive posture and safeguard American personnel,' a U.S. defense official has now also told TWZ directly. ' In the U.S. European Command (EUCOM) AOR the U.S. Navy continues to conduct operations in the Eastern Mediterranean in support of U.S. national security objectives.'
They also reiterated a previous statement that 'the U.S. is assisting in shooting down missiles targeting Israel on land and by sea.'
Contact the author: joe@twz.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
12 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump's DC crime clean-up is not a partisan issue: Doug Burgum
Fox News correspondent Alexandria Hoff has the details on President Donald Trump's public safety emergency. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum pushes back against Democrats' claim that crime is down in Washington, D.C.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
China and Russia have the leverage to disrupt Trump's dealmaking
President Trump is planning to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin potentially this week in the Alaska. The topic is the war in Ukraine and Trump's intention to end the killing there. Obviously, despite what Trump promised during the election, 24 hours was not enough time to reach an agreement. Trump sending his ubiquitous envoy Steve Witkoff to Moscow last week suggests this was the president's initiative and not Putin's. Perhaps Trump did not want his 10-day demand to Putin to end the war to expire without some measure of success. In any event, one can only speculate why Putin accepted the meeting — and it does not appear Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will be part of that meeting, although Trump would be obliged to see him separately. Why Putin agreed has several possible explanations. He may need to end the sanctions for economic reasons. His offensive may have gained his objectives in Ukraine. Or Putin may conclude that as the 2014-2015 Minsk Agreements failed to provide security for Ukraine, a cease-fire will allow him to use what Lenin called 'other means' to gain control of his neighbor. So far, the administration has not claimed that Trump's submarine deployments to 'appropriate places' was a deciding factor in convincing or coercing Putin to meet. U.S. submarines have been operating in proximity to the former Soviet Union and now Russia since the Cold War began. On a few occasions, operations were inside Soviet territorial waters. Trump did threaten North Korea's Kim Jong Un with 'fire and fury,' claiming his button — meaning the nuclear trigger — was bigger than Kim's. After this clash of rhetoric, both met twice. But nothing occurred other than Trump's claim that he 'fell in love' with the ' Little Rocket Man.' Did U.S. submarines have the same effect on Putin? At Trump's disposal as commander in chief is the U.S. Navy's fleet of 68 nuclear submarines. Fourteen are Ohio class armed with 7,500 mile range Trident ballistic missiles. Four are able to carry up to 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles with a 1,000 mile range. Fifty are attack boats carrying torpedoes and cruise missiles. How two submarines could get Putin's attention is not clear. Russia has complained mightily when Tomahawk-armed U.S. warships sailed within 1,000 miles of Putin's physical location. But there is no obvious advantage in using Ohio class submarines as a signal, given the range of its Trident missiles. Missile and attack submarines could deploy in proximity to major Russian naval bases in the Kola peninsula in the Arctic or Petropavlovsk in the Pacific. But presumably, U.S. submarines are already there. The Baltic is too confined and shallow for nuclear submarine operations. The Mediterranean Sea is more suitable but gives no strategic advantage. The Black Sea is closed to all submarines not belonging to the littoral states; and the transit of surface warships is restricted by the Montreux Convention. So did the submarines make a difference? Who knows? Sanctions have not seemed to affect Putin's behavior. Russia has deftly shifted selling about half its oil exports to China and India. Trump has imposed sanctions on India but not China yet. Putin knows that Trump-imposed secondary sanctions on China is a double-edged sword. China has not been impressed by Trump's ' liberation day ' threat of tariffs and secondary sanctions. Why? The reason is due to which nation is more dependent on the other — China on the U.S. or the U.S. on China. China has withheld certain rare earth elements from the U.S. on which U.S. companies depend. China has additional assets to leverage. And why would China not seek to poach U.S. exports to other markets? India has less clout than China. A tariff war will drive India closer to China and away from the Quad, which comprises the U.S., Japan, Australia and India. None of this will be in American interests. And there is a worse case. Suppose China and India do cut off energy imports from Russia. Where will they turn? The U.S. cannot make up the difference yet. Increases in demand could drive the price of oil through the proverbial roof, causing a recession or worse. Does Trump understand these realities? Or does he not care? So what leverage does Trump have over Putin, and Putin over Trump? Putin knows Trump wants to end the war. Is Putin seeking a 2025 version of the infamous 1938 Munich Agreement in which United Kingdom Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain sought 'peace for our time' or a real solution? Knowing Putin, you have the answer. Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is UPI's Arnaud deBorchgrave Distinguished Columnist, a senior advisor at the Atlantic Council, the chairman of two private companies and the principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. He and former United Kingdom Defense Chief David Richards are the authors of a forthcoming book on preventing strategic catastrophe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Will JD Vance run for president in 2028? VP pressed on potential White House bid
WASHINGTON – Vice President JD Vance said it's "way too early" to consider the 2028 election as political observers speculate about whether he'll launch a White House bid. Questions have swirled after President Donald Trump suggested to reporters Aug. 5 that Vance was 'most likely' the heir to the MAGA movement. Though Trump hasn't formally endorsed a GOP successor, he acknowledged that Vance would 'probably be favored at this point.' Trump also said Secretary of State Marco Rubio is 'somebody that maybe would get together with JD in some form.' Vance said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that he saw Rubio a month ago and both of them just 'laughed at the whole thing.' 'Neither one of us are focused on politics. We're focused on actually doing a good job for the American people,' Vance said. 'If we do a good job, number one, that's the reward in and of itself," Vance added. "That all have made a big difference in the lives of our country for the last six months and the next three and a half years. But if we do a good job, the politics will take care of itself.' Vance said it's premature to speak of the political future. 'It's frankly way too early to be thinking about 2026,' he said, referencing next year's midterm elections. 'It's certainly way too early to be thinking about 2028.' Rubio, who ran for president in 2016, told Fox News host Lara Trump in a July interview he thinks Vance would make a strong nominee for Republicans in 2028. 'I think he's doing a great job as vice president. He's a close friend, and I hope he intends to do it,' Rubio said. As for his own future political aspirations, Rubio said, 'I feel honestly – you never know what the future holds; you never rule things out or anything, because you just don't know. Things change very quickly.' Contributing: Zac Anderson This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Will JD Vance run in 2028? VP weighs in after Trump comments