
‘Should I splurge my pension at 60 to dodge inheritance tax?'
Write to Pensions Doctor with your pension problem: pensionsdoctor@telegraph.co.uk. Columns are published weekly.
Dear Charlene,
The principal reason for making contact was to seek your thoughts on how the inheritance tax changes announced last October have changed views regarding the timing of drawing of pensions.
The commonly accepted wisdom previously was that one should draw on pensions once other savings has been exhausted due to the inheritance tax exemption. I appreciate there were other considerations to consider (such as reaching age 75), tax position and family circumstances.
Does this 'draw last' mantra fall away post the introduction of the tax changes? Or does the tax wrapper of Sipps still encourage individuals to draw on their savings last? In the event there was a choice to draw on Isas vs Sipps, should the former still be drawn first?
On a separate point, I have a defined benefit pension scheme. I am turning 60 next year, which would be the normal retirement age for the scheme. Do the changes in inheritance tax alter the approach to drawing on the pension and whether someone should delay taking it?
Many thanks,
– Chris
Dear Chris,
The proposed changes to pensions and inheritance tax are not yet finalised. The consultation on how the initial proposals might work closed in January, and the Government received significant feedback and concerns.
One thing is clear though – the Government wants to encourage people to use their pensions in retirement, rather than leaving them untouched as a way of passing on wealth free of inheritance tax.
While it's difficult to second guess how the changes might work, they've certainly got people thinking about the order in which they might want to access their retirement savings.
At this point in time, there isn't enough information to give you a precise answer, so I've set out the general situation and my thoughts.
Inheritance tax considerations
Even with the proposed changes, most people will not leave estates with an inheritance tax liability.
Married couples will usually have up to £1m that can be sheltered from the tax between them, thanks to spousal exemptions and the combined effects of the nil-rate bands on offer.
Inheritance tax usually applies at 40pc on assets above available allowance and exemptions. The nil-rate band is £325,000 per person, with up to £175,000 available as an additional residence nil-rate band for people who leave their property to a direct descendant. This starts to get tapered away for the highest-value estates (more than £2m).
If you have a spouse or civil partner, they'll also inherit an additional Isa allowance, called the 'additional permitted subscription'. This means you can pass on not just the total wealth in your Isas to them, but the value of the tax-free wrapper too.
Accessing your pensions
You can usually take up to 25pc of the value of your pension(s) tax-free (subject to the overall lump sum allowance of £268,275), with withdrawals above this subject to income tax at your marginal rate.
Defined contribution schemes let you buy an annuity with the remaining pension pot to give you a secure, guaranteed income for life or leave funds invested to drawdown which you can withdraw from as and when you need to.
Alternatively, you can access chunks of you pension at a time, with 25pc tax-free and the remaining 75pc taxable.
Your defined benefit pension will pay you an income based on your salary and your length of service. You'll also be able to up to 25pc tax-free, although it varies between schemes as to how this affects the starting pension income you receive.
It'll be up to your scheme whether you can defer taking this pension. If they allow it, you'll need to understand if they pay you arrears or whether you'll benefit from a higher pension when it does start, but you'll need to work out whether this extra money will make up for the years you won't be getting the income for and to factor in the tax consequences.
From an inheritance tax point of view, this scheme has no 'pot', so there is little benefit in not taking it. The main consideration will be your other income and the rate of income tax you'll pay.
It will also usually pay a pension to your spouse or dependant if you die. This would not form part of your estate under the pensions and inheritance tax proposals in the same way as an unused pension pot.
It's also worth keeping in mind that you'll be able to claim any state pension from age 66 which, although paid gross, also counts towards your total income for tax purposes.
Spending in retirement
As you've mentioned, what to do with any income from your pensions and other accounts really does depend on your personal situation, what you'd like from retirement, and making sure you don't leave yourself short in funding that first.
Under the inheritance tax proposals, it will make sense for most people to take their tax-free cash from their pension pots before they turn 75.
Plenty of people already do that, and often have plans for all or some of the money. What they don't spend stays within their estate when working out inheritance tax – just like it would in an unused pension pot under the inheritance tax proposals.
But if the money was kept within the pension, the beneficiary will (also) pay income tax when they take it out, if the original pension holder dies after reaching age 75. This potential double taxation is a big area of concern with the current proposals.
Rather than exhausting one type of account before the other, a blended approach (between pensions, Isas and any other investments) will help you make the most of the tax allowances on offer through your retirement, and perhaps mean you can help your loved ones, too.
As all Isa withdrawals will be tax-free, on the face of it, using Isas to supplement your income after taking tax-free cash seems like the obvious place to start to keep more of your withdrawals.
But if you are worried about inheritance tax, then taking income from your pension(s) too could help you to reduce the value of your estate, help you spend more on yourself to get the most from retirement, and even make gifts to loved ones. Remember that taking pension income withdrawals (above your tax-free cash) could mean you tip into a higher income tax bracket.
Some people are considering giving away their taxed pension income as gifts to help their children make extra pension contributions. Not only does the child's retirement pot get a boost, but they'll also get tax relief on the money paid in, which could in some cases cancel out (or even be worth more than) the income tax you paid on the way out.
Making gifts and inheritance tax rules can be complex though, so it's an area I would suggest you get some professional advice on to avoid any costly mistakes.
What you can do now
While we wait for the new rules, there are a couple of things you can do.
The first is to review your pension nominations. Nominating a pension beneficiary gives them the option to move anything they inherit from you into their own pensions, rather than being left with a lump sum option.
It's also worth reviewing your will and considering setting up a power of attorney.
If you're still unsure of the best path when we get more information on the proposals, I'd really recommend getting some qualified financial advice to put your mind at rest.
Best wishes,
– Charlene
Charlene Young is a pensions and savings expert at online investment platform AJ Bell. Her columns should not be taken as advice or as a personal recommendation, but as a starting point for readers to undertake their own further research.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Starmer steel deal shows Swinney how nationalisation should work
A compelling read it certainly wasn't but it helped pass the time before the sun started to go down and I could think about dinner. Economists have never agreed on the benefits of nationalisation and history is littered with failed examples, particularly in the UK. But the two leaders currently occupying Bute House and Downing Street certainly seem to be in agreement that it's a good thing. And in many cases it is good but it's what you do with the assets as a Government after it is been taken into public control that is the important thing. It is here that John Swinney and Sir Keir Starmer diverge dramatically if recent events are anything to go by. Last week, a £500 million five-year deal was struck between Network Rail and British Steel to help save the Scunthorpe steelworks. British Steel is to supply 337,000 tonnes of rail track, which will secure thousands of manufacturing jobs. Why this is important is that it comes just two months after the UK Government used emergency powers to prevent the blast furnaces from immediate closure. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, said it 'truly transforms the outlook for British Steel and its dedicated workforce in Scunthorpe'. British Steel is to supply a minimum of 337,000 tonnes of long and short rail. A further 80-90,000 tonnes is to be provided by other European manufacturers and deals are expected to be announced shortly, the Department for Transport (DfT) said. In March, Chinese firm Jingye, which bought British Steel in 2020, proposed to shut Scunthorpe's two blast furnaces and other key steelmaking operations. Alan Simpson: The new £144m electric rail line without enough trains Alan Simpson: Build more houses for rural Scots, not tax second home owners Alan Simpson: NatureScot may be threatening a rare mussel it should be protecting Alan Simpson: Scotland's tourism sector needs to be heard before it's too late This came despite months of negotiations and a £500 million co-investment offer from the UK Government. As a result, Jingye launched a consultation which it said would affect between 2,000 and 2,700 jobs. In April, the UK Government used emergency powers to take control of British Steel and continue production at the site. The Scunthorpe plant has been producing steel for Britain's railways since 1865. The Network Rail contract, worth an estimated £500 million, starts on July 1 and is set to provide the company with 80% of its rail needs. To ensure security of supply, Network Rail is set to award smaller contracts to some European manufacturers, who will supply specialist rail products alongside British Steel. The agreement is the first major public procurement since the emergency legislation was passed. Both Network Rail and the Scunthorpe steel plant are both owned by the UK Government and the swift deal is clearly a direct benefit of being nationalised. No need for public procurement rules when both sites are state-owned. The Government sees it as being complimentary to the UK and US trade deal which aims to lower tariffs and protect jobs across key sectors, including steel. The deal also compares to the complete and utter horlicks that the Scottish Government has made following nationalisation of key industries. Ministers, of course, took over the stricken Ferguson Marine shipyard in Port Glasgow in 2019 after it collapsed into administration. It seemed to be the right decision as the shipyard's main customer was the state-owned ferry body CMAL, so a steady stream of orders should have been expected. Instead the yard is facing an uncertain future after losing out on several publicly funded ferry building contracts. Now ministers have even halted a vital subsidy for the yard that is needed to bring in vital work to keep it alive, it can be development has raised alarm that the yard will not survive beyond any delivery of the much-delayed and over budget CalMac ferry Glen Rosa. The yard's business plan to 2029 assumed that the Scottish Government would sanction a direct award of the small vessel replacement programme. It was an integral part of a plan to deliver a 'sustainable, profitable, efficient and competitive yard'. After it was decided that the £175m contract would go to a competitive tender, CMAL, the state-controlled ferry procurer declared in March that the job to build seven new loch-class electric ferries would go to Poland .It previously awarded two other ferry contracts worth to £220m to Cemre Marin Endustri A.S (Turkey) - with Ferguson Marine again losing out. Transport secretary Fiona Hyslop confirmed a 'substantial subsidy' was needed to allow it to get a direct uncontested contract to build seven new small ferries and secure its future. But she admitted in correspondence with former community safety minister Ash Regan that that subsidy was not justified. Ms Regan has raised concerns that it was 'not the direct award that's the issue it's the unwillingness to put public money behind a public asset'. Ferguson Marine has been dogged with issues with the delivery of ferries Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa which were due online in the first half of 2018. The last estimates suggest the costs of delivery of the vessels for CalMac will have soared to more than five times the original £97m cost. The shipyard firm currently employs more than 400 staff including over 100 sub-contractors. Goodness knows how they must be feeling, knowing full well that the Scottish Government is in the process of sinking the yard once and for all. For all the arguments against nationalisation, no book on economics will ever list sheer incompetence by Government ministers as a reason it will fail. While there are very good reasons that the yard is struggling, one of the main reasons is the sheer complexity of the two ferries which have made them very difficult to build. As it was the current administration that insisted on the specifications of being dual fuel and 'green' then it seems extremely harsh for ministers to now throw the workforce under a bus. Sir Keir Starmer's Government has shown exactly how nationalisation should work for the benefit of the workforce and the economy as a whole. For it to be a success, there has to be a will, strategy and above all, economic competence amongst ministers. Ministers at Holyrood have shown none of that and the Ferguson's workforce and islanders have been left high and dry as a result.


North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Starmer urges Britons to contact Foreign Office for Israel evacuation flights
It comes after the US attacked three nuclear sites in Iran overnight and Tehran then launched a ballistic missile barrage against Israel. Speaking to Sky News, Sir Keir Starmer said: 'I urge all citizens to make contact with the Foreign Office so that we can facilitate whatever support is needed.' He added that the Government will help evacuate British citizens on charter flights 'as soon as we can'. Sir Keir said: 'Well for British citizens, we've been saying for some time to register their presence. 'And so far as Israel is concerned, just as soon as we can get charter flights off, we will do so.' The UK is preparing a flight to transport vulnerable British nationals and their dependants out of Israel and the OPTs early next week. British nationals in Israel and the OPTs should register their presence to receive the latest updates and register their interest in the… — Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (@FCDOGovUK) June 22, 2025 The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) has continued to urge British nationals to register their details and interest in evacuation flights, the first of which it said will take off early next week. It said further flights 'will be considered depending on demand and the latest security situation'. According to the Israeli Government, some 22,000 tourists are seeking to board evacuation flights. It is unclear how many of these are UK citizens. British nationals who have already registered will automatically be contacted and provided with a link to the booking portal, the FCDO said. Those eligible for the flight will be expected to pay for their seat – and payment will be taken on registration on the flight booking form. The FCDO added that those with 'greatest need' will be prioritised, and British nationals plus their non-British immediate family members travelling with them are eligible. All passengers must hold a valid travel document, and those non-British immediate family members will require valid visas/permission to enter or remain that was granted for more than six months, the FCDO said. The UK has been working on charter flights for Britons in Israel but none have so far taken off as the country's airspace has been closed. Business Secretary Jonathon Reynolds told Sky News on Sunday morning: 'We are in active conversations about chartering aircraft to get people out.' Asked if that will happen imminently, Mr Reynolds said: 'I believe our intention would be to do that as soon as possible… hours, not days.' Meanwhile, shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel told Times Radio the UK 'must not be behind the curve' in evacuating its nationals. 'The Government's got to start moving fast now in terms of British nationals in Israel,' Dame Priti said. 'They've been talking about this for days… Israeli airspace is shut down. 'The Americans are ready to evacuate 25,000 US nationals — we must not be behind the curve.' The FCDO has warned British nationals not to make their way to the airport unless they are contacted. Register your presence: — Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (@FCDOGovUK) June 22, 2025 A spokesperson said: 'This is a perilous and volatile moment for the Middle East. 'The safety of British nationals in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories continues to be our utmost priority – that's why the UK Government is preparing flights to help those wanting to leave. 'Working closely with the Israeli authorities, our staff are continuing to work at pace to assist British nationals on the ground and ensure they receive the support they need.' Commercial flights remain in operation from Egypt and Jordan to the UK, and international land border crossings to these countries remain open. The FCDO said the situation 'remains volatile' and the Government's ability to run flights out of Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories 'could change at short notice'. The portal to register presence in Israel as a Briton is available at:


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
New law change for everyone who parks on a driveway - with added income boost
The new rules are designed to make life easier for electric vehicle (EV) owners, and convince more to switch to electric. It could also allow households to make some extra money Motorists who use driveways have been hit with a significant legal shake-up. In an effort to make the switch to electric more appealing, new regulations mean that homeowners can now install electric vehicle (EV) charge points without the hassle of planning permission, in a bid to boost EV ownership. This legislative change is poised to simplify the process for driveway owners keen on fitting their own charge point, eliminating a major hurdle in joining the electric revolution. The timing is critical as it preludes the impending 2030 ban on sales of new petrol and diesel cars and comes amidst efforts to sway the public about going electric. Car pundits suggest this could be a crafty way for shrewd householders to earn a bit of extra income by leasing out their EV chargers. Andy Syrett, UK managing director at YourParkingSpace, praised the announcement: "This is welcome news." He elaborated on the benefits, saying, "By cutting planning red tape, the Government has made it even easier for people to install EV charge points at home and rent them out when not in use", reports Birmingham Live. Moreover, according to data from YourParkingSpace, households with a charge point are evidently making more money, with listings featuring an EV charger raking in 13% more income compared to those without, perhaps providing a tempting prospect for many homeowners. Andy remarked: "When you consider that many of our driveway listings in hotspot areas – such as near football stadiums, music venues, train stations, and airports – typically earn around £1,000 a year, that extra 13% can quickly cover the cost of installing a charge point." He added optimistically about uptake due to simplified procedures: "With installation now simpler and planning rules relaxed, we expect more homeowners to take advantage of this easy way to boost their income." Meanwhile, motorists could be slapped with a £100 fine and face "legal troubles" if they neglect simple driveway rules. Drivers who don't maintain their driveways risk damaging their vehicles and encountering further problems "down the line". Vehicle owners are being warned to address oil and fluid stains that can accumulate when a car is parked in one spot for extended periods. Neglecting such maintenance could result in spills, which insurers might attribute to negligence, potentially leading to rejected claims, experts caution. Insurers may also consider it a misrepresentation, impacting your insurance coverage. Graham Conway, managing director of Select Car Leasing, said: "People often forget about driveway maintenance when looking after their car, but it's usually the first place where small issues start to appear."