Pope Leo appeals for ‘reason' amid Israel-Iran airstrikes, calls for dialogue
VATICAN CITY : Pope Leo appealed today for authorities in Iran and Israel to act with 'reason' after airstrikes between the two countries killed dozens and sent civilians into shelters, and called on the nations to pursue dialogue.
Leo, in one of the strongest peace appeals yet of his five-week papacy, told an audience in St. Peter's Basilica he was following the situation with 'great concern'.
'In such a delicate moment, I strongly wish to renew an appeal to responsibility and to reason,' said the pope.
'The commitment to building a safer world free from the nuclear threat must be pursued through respectful encounters and sincere dialogue to build a lasting peace, founded on justice, fraternity, and the common good,' he said.
'No one should ever threaten the existence of another,' said Leo. 'It is the duty of all countries to support the cause of peace, initiating paths of reconciliation and promoting solutions that guarantee security and dignity for all.'
Leo was elected on May 8 to replace the late Pope Francis and is the first pope from the US. Unlike Francis, who often spoke off the cuff at public events, Leo is more cautious with words and almost always speaks from a prepared text.
The pope read aloud his appeal today in Italian from a piece of paper.
Israel launched a large-scale attack on Iran early on Friday, targeting commanders, military targets and nuclear sites in what it called a 'preemptive strike' to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapons programme.
Iran, which denies that its uranium enrichment activities are part of a secret weapons programme, retaliated by launching waves of missiles at Israel, killing at least two people and injuring dozens.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Lebanon warns against foreign meddling as Iran security chief visits
BEIRUT, Aug 14 — Lebanese leaders firmly rejected any efforts at foreign interference during a visit by Iran's security chief Wednesday, with the prime minister saying Beirut would 'tolerate neither tutelage nor diktat' after Tehran voiced opposition to plans to disarm Hezbollah. The uncharacteristically blunt remarks hinted at a changed balance of power in a country where Iran has long wielded substantial influence by funding and arming Hezbollah. The visit by Supreme National Security Council chief Ali Larijani comes after the Lebanese government ordered the army to devise plans to disarm the Tehran-backed group by the end of the year. Last week, an adviser to Iran's supreme leader had said the Islamic republic was 'certainly opposed' to the disarmament plan. 'We reject any interference in our internal affairs,' Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said Wednesday, adding that 'it is forbidden for anyone… to bear arms and to use foreign backing as leverage', according to a statement from his office. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam was equally firm, saying in a statement: 'Lebanon will not accept, in any form, any interference in its internal affairs, and expects from the Iranian side a clear and explicit commitment to respect these principles.' Hezbollah has been a key part of Tehran's so-called axis of resistance against Israel, but Iran and its allies have suffered a series of blows. Hezbollah experienced devastating losses, including the death of its leader Hassan Nasrallah, over more than a year of hostilities with Israel that ended with a November 2024 ceasefire. A month later, longtime Syrian ruler and Tehran ally Bashar al-Assad was ousted, depriving Hezbollah of its main conduit for weapons and supplies from Iran. And finally, Israel went to war with Iran itself in June, with the United States stepping in briefly to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities. Ever since last year's war, Hezbollah's firm grip on Lebanese politics has been slipping. 'Grave sin' Hezbollah has slammed the government's new disarmament push as a 'grave sin', while Tehran has also declared its opposition. But in Beirut, Larijani said that no foreign power should give orders to Lebanon, adding that it was not Iran but the United States that was intervening. Lebanon's cabinet recently considered a US proposal that included a timetable for Hezbollah's disarmament, with Washington pressing Beirut to take action. 'Any decision that the Lebanese government makes in consultation with the resistance is respected by us,' Larijani said. 'The one who interferes in Lebanese affairs is the one who plans for you, gives you a timetable from thousands of kilometres away. We did not give you any plan.' Salam, however, appeared to make clear the changed nature of the relationship, declaring that 'Lebanon's decisions are made by the Lebanese themselves, who tolerate neither tutelage nor diktat'. 'Lebanon, which was the first defender of the Palestinian cause and paid a heavy price in its confrontation with Israel, has no lessons to receive from anyone,' he continued. Iran's government has long portrayed itself as a defender of the Palestinians, with Hamas in Gaza another member of its axis. 'Stand by' Lebanon Before the latest war with Israel, Hezbollah was believed to be better armed than the Lebanese military. It long maintained it had to keep its arsenal in order to defend Lebanon from attack, but critics accused it of using its weapons for political leverage. In Beirut, Larijani vowed continued Iranian support. 'If… the Lebanese people are suffering, we in Iran will also feel this pain and we will stand by the dear people of Lebanon in all circumstances,' Larijani told reporters. In addition to meeting President Aoun and Prime Minister Salam, Larijani was due to sit down with parliament speaker Nabih Berri, who is close to Hezbollah. He was also expected to visit the grave of Nasrallah, who was killed in a massive Israeli bombing in south Beirut last year. — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
11 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
3 Colombian soldiers killed in guerilla drone attack
Authorities blame the attack on a FARC dissident group led by Ivan Mordisco, a former mid-level guerilla commander. (EPA Images pic) BOGOTA : Colombian Navy officials said three soldiers were killed and four others were injured Tuesday after a drone loaded with explosives attacked a vessel navigating a river near the country's Pacific coast. Colombia is experiencing its worst wave of violence since the signing of a peace treaty between its government and the now-defunct FARC guerilla group, with deadly drone attacks on the rise. Tuesday's attack occurred while troops were patrolling the Naya River, in a rural area near Colombia's main port on the Pacific Ocean, Navy officials said in a press release. The four injured soldiers were taken by helicopter to the city of Buenaventura for medical care. Authorities blame the attack on a FARC dissident group led by Ivan Mordisco, a former mid-level guerilla commander who refused to sign the 2016 peace agreement. Leftist president Gustavo Petro attempted to negotiate peace with Mordisco, but officials say the guerilla leader abandoned talks in 2024, after a year of negotiations.
The Star
17 hours ago
- The Star
Lebanon's Aoun tells top Iranian official: only state holds arms, no outside interference
BEIRUT (Reuters) -No group in Lebanon is permitted to bear arms or rely on foreign backing, President Joseph Aoun told a senior Iranian official on Wednesday, days after the cabinet approved the objectives of a U.S.-backed roadmap to disarm the Iran-aligned Hezbollah group. During a meeting in Beirut with Ali Larijani, secretary of Iran's top security body, Aoun warned against foreign interference in Lebanon's internal affairs, saying the country was open to cooperation with Iran but only within the bounds of national sovereignty and mutual respect. "The friendship we seek with Iran must be with all Lebanese, not through one sect or component alone," Aoun said, according to a statement from his office. He added that recent language used by some Iranian officials had not been helpful, and reaffirmed that the Lebanese state and its armed forces were solely responsible for safeguarding all citizens. (Reporting by Jana Choukeir and Ahmed Elimam; Editing by Toby Chopra and Aidan Lewis)
