Calls for change as six people die amid self-neglect
The Somerset Safeguarding Adults Board (SSAB) looked at how the man and five women had been supported to see how care can be adapted to reduce the risk of future deaths.
Professor Michael Preston-Shoot, SSAB's chair, said the review aimed to "learn lessons from the circumstances surrounding the tragic deaths, who had all experienced things within their lives that lead to them neglecting to care for themselves, resulting in their deaths".
The SSAB is calling for improved assessments and fresh training around self-neglect.
More news stories for Somerset
Listen to the latest news for Somerset
The review looked at the cases of six people who died between March 2020 and August 2023. They were aged between 58 and 79 and had a range of conditions including dementia, diabetes and motor neurone disease.
They had failing health, engaged in risky behaviour and neglected their personal health, with some living in squalid conditions and withdrawing from society.
Three repeatedly rejected offers of help.
There was a delay in acting, or working with families and in some cases the means of communication were not appropriate, the review ruled.
Self-neglect is slow to be picked up as a form of abuse or neglect and some agencies may not have training on recognising the signs, the review found.
It also found there are long waits for assessment, and many agencies provide "only short, time-limited interventions".
The review included a number of recommendations including development of guidance on engaging people who may refuse help.
Professor Preston-Shoot said: "We have to support practitioners until they are really confident in conducting mental capacity assessments.
"I think we also have to support practitioners more effectively to express compassionate inquiry... to endeavour to have conversations with an individual about what the history is, what lies behind the presenting issues."
SSAB bosses held an event last week to identify good practice and reflect on the review.
Follow BBC Somerset on Facebook and X. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630.
Council 'failed' in care of alcoholic man
'Better training needed' after death of woman
Somerset Safeguarding Adults Board
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
36 minutes ago
- Medscape
Bariatric Surgery: Who's Eligible Now?
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Bariatric surgery is a powerful tool for long-term weight loss, but it requires lifelong commitment to healthy eating, physical activity, supplements, and behavior change. When should you refer for bariatric surgery? The 2019 AACE/TOS/ASMBS guidelines recommend considering surgery for individuals with a BMI over 35 and at least one obesity-related condition — like type 2 diabetes, sleep apnea, or hypertension — or anyone with a BMI over also note that patients with a BMI from 30 to 34.9 and poorly controlled type 2 diabetes may be considered. The updated 2022 ASMBS guidelines recommend expanding eligibility to include a BMI over 30with weight-related conditions, especially for Asian populations who experience metabolic risk at lower most insurance plans still only cover surgery for a BMI over 35 with associated conditions or a BMI over 40. Because long-term weight loss is difficult due to biologic adaptations, I offer surgery as an option to all eligible patients so they can make an informed choice. Surgery may be especially appropriate for patients who prefer surgery over lifelong obesity medications — though they'll still need lifelong vitamin supplementation — those who have not achieved long-term success with lifestyle interventions and/or obesity medications, or those who have higher BMI, for whom obesity medications and lifestyle modifications may not be sufficient to lead to resolution of weight-related complications. Importantly, this does not have to be an either/or patients benefit from a combination of bariatric surgery and obesity medications to achieve meaningful, lasting weight loss and improvements in health. As always, shared decision making is key, including a clear discussion of risks, benefits, alternatives, and patient goals.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Kennedy Claims Doctors Profit Off Vaccines. In Fact, Many Lose Money on Them.
Dr. Stacey Bartell wanted to offer vaccines to her patients. But at her small family medicine practice in a Detroit suburb, she could not find a way to make the finances work. Stocking enough vaccines for her patients would cost thousands of dollars upfront, with no guarantee the sum would be recouped. She employed just one nurse practitioner, and would have to hire additional staff to manage the inventory and stay on top of insurance billing. And the special refrigerators required to store vaccines would cost another $1,000. She knew how much vaccines mattered to her patients' health. But it was money her practice, which was already operating on thin margins, couldn't afford to spend. 'We just haven't been able to shore it up here,' Dr. Bartell said. Instead she has to send her patients to pharmacies and the county health department for their shots — a concession that 'hurts my heart,' she said. So a few weeks ago, when Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health and human services secretary, claimed in an interview with Tucker Carlson that vaccine profits created 'perverse incentives' for pediatricians to push immunizations, Dr. Bartell was confused. Doctors widely consider vaccines to be a money pit. Research shows that most pediatricians either break even or lose money on shots. One 2017 study found that nearly a quarter of family medicine providers and 12 percent of pediatricians stopped purchasing vaccines because of prohibitive costs. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
TechCrunch
2 hours ago
- TechCrunch
Reddit rolls out age verification in the UK to comply with new rules
Reddit users in the United Kingdom are now required to verify their age as a way to prevent children from accessing inappropriate content. The new requirement comes after the U.K.'s Online Safety Act (OSA) introduced new steps for platforms to take to block children from encountering harmful content, like pornography and material promoting self-harm. Reddit will use the third-party service Persona to confirm a user's age, necessitating users to submit a picture of their government-issued identity documents or take a selfie. Reddit said it will not have access to these images, and will only save the person's verification status and their date of birth. Restricted content to be hidden from users under 18 includes sexually explicit posts, anything that encourages suicide and disordered eating, and posts that spread hate against other people based on their race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability, and gender, among other violent and harmful content. Critics have long warned of the security and privacy risks associated with private companies collecting and storing large amounts of people's identity documents. Last week, Bluesky announced that users in the UK will be required to verify their age in light of OSA's update.
