logo
Swiss village engulfed by landslide, 1 person missing

Swiss village engulfed by landslide, 1 person missing

Yahoo28-05-2025
A mass of rock and ice engulfed part of a mountain village in Switzerland on Wednesday, authorities said.
A local spokesman said one person was currently missing after the landslide near Blatten, in the southern Lötschental valley in the canton of Valais.
The massive landslide was caused after a glacier partially collapsed in the Swiss Alps.
"An unbelievable amount of material thundered down into the valley," said spokesperson, Matthias Ebener.
Authorities had warned days ago that up to five million cubic meters of rock and debris could break off at any moment.
The village's roughly 300 inhabitants were evacuated on May 19 after assessments from geologists established that a rockslide was imminent.
Buildings and other infrastructure in Blatten were hit hard by the rockslide, Ebener said.
BREAKING: Massive Glacier Collapse in Blatten, Valais (Switzerland) – May 28, 2025Over 3.5 million m³ of ice, rock, and snow collapsed from the Birch Glacier, putting 9 million tons of pressure on the glacier.The entire village of Blatten (approx. 300 people) was evacuated in… pic.twitter.com/ntmV35GL8o
— Weather Monitor (@WeatherMonitors) May 28, 2025
Video shared widely on social media showed the moment the glacier partially collapsed, creating an enormous cloud that obscured part of the mountain as rock and debris came thundering down into the outskirts of the village.
Drone footage showed the rubble of shattered wooden buildings on the flanks of the huge mass of earth in the drone footage.
Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter expressed her support for those impacted by the landslide.
"It's terrible to lose your home. I feel for the residents of Blatten at this time," Keller-Sutter said on X.
Es ist schlimm, wenn man seine Heimat verliert. Ich fühle in diesen Stunden mit den Bewohnerinnen und Bewohnern von Blatten. pic.twitter.com/BArZbIAQSn
— Karin Keller-Sutter (@keller_sutter) May 28, 2025
Edited by: Zac Crellin
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sutter's CPMC Debuts Sound Wave Therapy to Fight Hard-to-Treat Liver Tumors
Sutter's CPMC Debuts Sound Wave Therapy to Fight Hard-to-Treat Liver Tumors

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Sutter's CPMC Debuts Sound Wave Therapy to Fight Hard-to-Treat Liver Tumors

With Histotripsy, Sutter Enhances Its Advanced Organ Therapies Program And Sets A New Standard For Delivering Personalized Liver Care San Francisco, July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Physicians at Sutter's CPMC in San Francisco are using a leading-edge medical technology to care for people with liver tumors. FDA-approved histotripsy uses quick, highly focused sound waves to break apart unwanted tissue, such as tumors, without any incisions. These tiny, precise 'pulses' of energy, generated by a specialized machine, gently break down or 'dissolve' tumors inside the liver, which can be harder to treat give their location next to important blood vessels. This treatment can be a safer, less invasive option for some people for whom traditional surgical methods, chemotherapy or radiation have posed increased risks or have been ineffective. 'This really feels like the dawn of a new era,' said Dr. Casey Ward, transplant surgeon and CPMC's surgical director of Living Donor Liver Transplant and Transplant Oncology. 'Sutter's CPMC has always been a destination for exceptional care, offering game-changing treatments. Being one of the first in California to offer this new technology means we're pushing the boundaries of what's possible in organ therapies – and giving patients more options, and more hope, than ever before.' How it Works A highly skilled, multidisciplinary team at Sutter's CPMC uses Edison® System histotripsy, which features an ultrasound machine connected to a mobile robotic arm. The arm is positioned above the patient's abdomen to more precisely and safely target the liver tumor or tumors. After the procedure the patient will typically spend a night in the hospital before being discharged home. Dr. Ward, along with Dr. Olufoladare Olorunsola and Dr. Brian Bronzo, board-certified interventional radiologists at CPMC, are amongst the first physicians in Northern California trained to skillfully perform the procedure and deliver follow-up care so each patient heals and recovers. Training is currently underway with other CPMC physicians as well. Advantages of Histotripsy Histotripsy can support an easier recovery compared with traditional approaches like radiation, which uses targeted X-rays or energy to kill cancer cells, or ablation, which uses heat or cold to destroy tumors. The procedure can also serve as a 'bridge to transplant' for some patients, shrinking their tumor so it can be surgically removed before a new organ is required. Research shows that histotripsy may also stimulate the body's immune system to attack and kill tumor cells, known as the abscopal effect. This effect has been seen in patients following both radiation therapy and ablation, and can produce a similar effect with certain patients who have undergone histotripsy. Leading Advanced Organ Therapies and Cancer Care into the Future Histotripsy at Sutter's CPMC is part of its growing Advanced Organ Therapies program, which provides integrated, minimally invasive and multidisciplinary care to patients who have liver, kidney and pancreas diseases – as well as metabolic disorders that increase risk of cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes and stroke. The program supports patients at every stage of their care, offering proactive management before and after surgery, with a focus on preventing or delaying the need for transplants whenever possible. In addition to advanced surgical and interventional therapies like histotripsy, the program also includes specialized weight management services, an enhanced support clinic for patients with complex needs, dedicated transplant coordination, and substance use disorder programs, helping patients receive personalized, whole-person care. Additionally, histotripsy, as one of Sutter's newest treatments, is now a key part of transplant oncology services within the Sutter system, supporting patients whose aggressive cancers have spread to their liver. 'Whether it is through leading breakthrough research, harnessing the power of the latest technology or embracing the use of creative and complementary therapies, our team's singular focus is putting patients first,' said Dr. Amanda Wheeler, Sutter Health's Cancer Service Line chair. 'With Sutter's integrated system as the engine, we are driving toward higher-quality outcomes and better patient experiences.' Currently, histotripsy is only U.S. FDA-approved for tumors in the liver. For more information about histotripsy at Sutter's CPMC, call 415-600-1010 or visit: # # # CONTACT: Liz Madison Sutter Health 916-396-5156 in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Would this food label change how you eat?
Would this food label change how you eat?

Vox

time2 days ago

  • Vox

Would this food label change how you eat?

is a senior reporter for Vox's Future Perfect section, with a focus on animal welfare and the future of meat. Imagine, for a moment, that you're seated and ready to dine at one of Switzerland's many celebrated high-end eateries, where a prix fixe meal can run around $400. On the menu, the slow-cooked Schweinsfilet, or pork tenderloin, comes with a bizarre and disturbing disclosure: The pigs raised to make that meal were castrated without pain relief. Would it change what you order? That's a decision Switzerland's 8.8 million residents and millions of annual tourists will soon face. Effective last week — with a two-year phase-in — a new Swiss law requires food companies, grocers, and restaurants selling animal products in the country to disclose whether they came from animals that were mutilated without anesthetic. That'll include mutilation procedures like castration in pigs and cattle, dehorning in cows, beak searing in hens, and even leg severing in frogs. This story was first featured in the Processing Meat newsletter Sign up here for Future Perfect's biweekly newsletter from Marina Bolotnikova and Kenny Torrella, exploring how the meat and dairy industries shape our health, politics, culture, environment, and more. Have questions or comments on this newsletter? Email us at futureperfect@ The law will also require disclosures explaining that foie gras is made by force-feeding ducks and geese. Horrific as these procedures are, especially when performed without pain relief, they're standard practice in global meat, milk, and egg production. Male piglets, for example, are castrated to prevent their meat from giving off a fecal odor and taste — what the industry calls 'boar taint.' Piglets' teeth are clipped to prevent injuries to littermates or their mom's teats while nursing, but it can also cause painful dental issues and infections. Egg producers cut off part of hens' beaks because when they're tightly packed into factory farms, they tend to peck at each other, which can lead to injury and death. To make cattle easier for humans to handle, ranchers dehorn calves by sticking them with a hot iron or applying a caustic paste. A piglet being castrated at factory farm in Poland. The procedure is done without anesthesia, so one worker holds down the struggling, squealing piglet while the other makes an incision on the scrotum and pulls out the testes. Andrew Skowron / We Animals A calf with blood running down their face stands inside an individual enclosure on a farm in Czechia. This young animal has recently undergone a painful dehorning procedure. Lukas Vincour / Zvířata Nejíme / We Animals Meat production is a high-volume business, with tens of billions of mammals and birds — and over 1 trillion fish — churned through the system each year. Administering pain relief to the animals subjected to these painful procedures would be the least meat companies could do, but most don't because it would cost them a little extra time and money. And even when performed with pain relief, such procedures remain cruel — removing animals' tails, horns, and testicles, or shortening their beaks and teeth, reduces their ability to communicate or perform basic biological functions. Switzerland is one of a handful of countries where farmers are required to give animals pain relief before these painful procedures. But the small country still imports plenty of meat and other animal products from abroad. Swiss animal advocates have long advocated for banning imported products that come from animals mutilated without pain relief, but Swiss policymakers have rejected that idea and instead settled on increased transparency in labeling as a compromise. It's an unusual law, and although it falls short of what animal advocates want, it's refreshing to see a country take this step toward transparency. Switzerland's disclosure requirement pierces the veil of the shrink-wrapped slab of meat consumers see in the grocery store or prepared in dishes at restaurants, suggesting that meat is simply an inanimate product rather than the flesh of a once-living, feeling creature who suffered. A mere disclosure provides no respite from that suffering, but it's something. Because in the US and around the world, meat, milk, and egg companies go to great lengths to conceal the horrors of animal agriculture from the public. By requiring food companies and restaurants to slap what amounts to a warning label on their products, Switzerland is effectively treating meat produced with particularly cruel yet common practices as a vice — much like many countries do with tobacco products. Whether or not these labels steer consumers away from meat or push meat producers to change their practices might hold important lessons in what works to reduce animal suffering. The double bind of the meat industry's concealment and consumers' willful ignorance Mutilation without pain relief is, of course, just one of a litany of welfare issues that farmed animals suffer from birth to death. Animals raised for food are often overcrowded, forced to live in their own waste, exposed to disease, confined in cages, violently and artificially inseminated, roughly handled, inhumanely transported, and bred to grow bigger and faster, causing health and welfare issues. Problems at slaughterhouses abound, too. 'Significantly more products and production methods should be subject' to Switzerland's new labeling regulations, Vanessa Gerritsen, a lawyer for the Swiss animal advocacy organization Tier im Recht, told me in an email. The vast majority of the world's farmed animals are raised on factory farms with standard practices that would be illegal animal cruelty in many countries if done to a dog or cat. Yet most consumers — at least in the US — believe they don't buy animal products from factory farms. Cows stand in the milking parlor at the Lake Breeze Dairy farm in Malone, Wisconsin. Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images Turkeys in a Michigan factory farm. Rudy Malmquist Some of that disconnect can be attributed to industry deceit. Meat industry trade groups in the US and abroad have successfully lobbied for laws that make it a crime for activists to document animal cruelty on farms. And in the US, meat companies are allowed to claim just about whatever they want on their labels and in advertising. That's led to extensive 'humanewashing' in which brands mislead consumers into believing their animals are treated decently. But there's also the problem of willful ignorance: Some research has found that consumers prefer to avoid information about meat production. Switzerland's new regulation represents a massive experiment in pushing back against this inclination, forcing people to think about the cruelty that goes into their pork chops and egg omelettes at a particularly important time: the moment they're deciding what to eat at a restaurant or buy at a grocery store. But will it be enough to actually change what people eat? 'Hard to say,' Alice Di Concetto, founder and executive director of the European Institute for Animal Law & Policy, told me in an email. 'Studies tend to show that consumers base their purchasing choices almost exclusively on price.' But it could have an impact on the decisions of restaurants and grocery stores, she said, 'who might be reluctant to offer these products, anticipating that they won't sell well as a result of carrying a negative claim on them.' Switzerland implemented a similar law in 2000, requiring disclosure labels on imported eggs from producers that cage their hens (it was already illegal to cage egg-laying hens in Switzerland). After that law, Gerritsen told me, imports significantly declined. Di Concetto also pointed to a labeling law in the European Union, which requires that egg cartons on grocery store shelves include a code that corresponds to a specific production method, such as caged, indoor, outdoor, or organic. Di Concetto credits these egg-labeling requirements for helping initiate the EU egg industry's transition to cage-free production. But, she said, 'it's not so much that consumers wouldn't buy caged eggs. It's mostly due to manufacturers not liking the idea of selling products that indicated something so detrimental.' The new Swiss law, though, will require disclosures far more direct and visceral, and harder for the public to ignore. At bare minimum, for consumers to make more humane choices — whether that means eating less meat or buying from farms that avoid some of the cruelest factory farm practices — they at least need to be informed. Right now, meat, milk, and egg labels tell consumers little about animal treatment or actively lie to them. Switzerland's experiment will soon show us what happens when that's forced to change, if only a little.

New city garden grows veggies for Hamilton Food Share
New city garden grows veggies for Hamilton Food Share

Hamilton Spectator

time4 days ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

New city garden grows veggies for Hamilton Food Share

A brand-new, recently planted vegetable garden in Gage Park is helping to feed a hungry city. In the northern edge of the park, between the main fountain and Main Street East, lie several large vegetable patches containing neatly planted rows of kale, squash, carrot, zucchini, beans and tomatoes. Produce from the patches is harvested when ready and given to local food network and non-profit Hamilton Food Share (HFS), which collects and distributes mostly fresh and nutritious food to 23 local agencies daily. 'Our staff brought the idea to management a few years ago and thought it would be a nice thing for them to do for the city,' says Robyn Pollard, the city's manager of forestry and horticulture. Radish and Swiss chard were harvested recently and handed over to Hamilton Food Share. 'It's a great example of how local, community-led efforts are helping to address food insecurity in Hamilton,' says Radhika Subramanyan, CEO of the agency. The planning is meticulous at Gage Park, where the gardens typically feature flowers. Interspersed between rows of squash and zucchini lie flowering plants like alyssum. 'Squash and zucchini have flowers that need pollinating and alyssum does this for them,' says Pollard. While there are other gardens supported by the City of Hamilton, including the McQuesten Urban Farm, the Community Garden Network and a small patch near city hall, this is the only one where produce is donated entirely to the community. The plants are initially grown from seed in greenhouses at Gage Park and then transplanted when ready into the vegetable garden. 'It's a rule of thumb that everything gets installed around the May 24 weekend, but it's really just when the weather allows us to do so,' says Pollard. Thanks to the garden, this year's bounty promises to be even more substantial. 'In the past, with our other gardens, we've seen close to a thousand pounds of food donated over a season. So, we're expecting a significant increase over that this time around,' adds Pollard. The Gage Park garden couldn't have come at a more crucial juncture for a city whose population experiences chronic hunger. On average, 17,600 residents of the city visit Hamilton food banks each month, 6,200 of whom are children, according to Hamilton Food Share. 'The work happening at Gage Park really complements what we do. It brings food access right into the neighbourhood, especially in areas like Ward 3, where food insecurity is high,' adds Subramanyan. According to the city, more than one in four households (27.3 per cent) lived with food insecurity in 2023, compared to an average of 24.2 per cent in all of Ontario. Figures for 2024 are yet to be released. 'If we want long-term solutions to hunger, we need to combine efforts like ours with grassroots initiatives like Gage Park's,' adds Subramanyan. 'Community gardens not only help get food to people — they also build local resilience, teach growing skills and create real connection. That matters.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store