Belarus disconnects unit at its nuclear power station after warning
The power plant in the city of Astravets, located in the western Grodno region, is situated 15 km from the border with Lithuania and has faced criticism over safety concerns, primarily from neighbouring countries and international organisations.
"The situation is routine and poses no threat to the safe operation of the plant," the Belarusian energy ministry said in a statement published on its Telegram messaging app.
"Radiation levels at the NPP (nuclear power plant) and in the surrounding monitoring zone have remained unchanged."
Reuters could not independently verify the report about the incident and radiation levels.
The plant's second unit was connected to the Belarusian grid in 2023. The first unit was launched in 2020. However, operations were interrupted by maintenance issues. The plant was built by Russian state-owned firm Rosatom and financed by Moscow.
The plant supplies about 40% of Belarus' electricity needs, according to information posted on the plant's website.
Baltic countries, which protested against the project, have banned imports of electricity from the plant, saying it was unsafe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
Australia's Santos commits Narrabri gas for domestic supply in deal with ENGIE
Aug 4 (Reuters) - Oil and gas producer Santos ( opens new tab on Monday said it will supply utility firm Engie ( opens new tab with up to 20 petajoules of natural gas a year from its Narrabri project in New South Wales that has been entirely committed to the Australian domestic market. Santos has yet to make a final investment decision on the A$3.6 billion ($2.33 billion) project so details including start date and pricing have yet to be agreed. Earlier this year, Santos received approval from a tribunal to proceed with project, which is expected to ease energy supply constraints on Australia's east coast. Paris-listed Engie operates wind farms, large-scale batteries and gas-fired power stations, and provides energy services to commercial and industrial customers across Australia. The supply agreement is subject to Santos making a final investment decision on the project, which it previously said it would make by the end of this year, among other conditions. ($1 = 1.5458 Australian dollars)
Telegraph
17 hours ago
- Telegraph
Sky-high energy prices destroying European industry, warns metal giant
Soaring energy prices will destroy what little heavy industry Britain and the EU have left, the boss of a metals giant has warned ahead of its London listing on Monday. Evangelos Mytilineos, the chief executive of Metlen, a Greek energy and metals company, has marked his company's new FTSE 100 listing with a dire warning about the disastrous impact of high energy costs. 'The UK and Europe have entered a period of high energy prices compared with our competitors,' he said. 'Countries like China, the US and others have maybe half or a third of the cost of power than we have, and this is the biggest problem for UK and European productivity going forward. 'A lot of [UK and European] companies are moving their plants to other parts of the world.' Mr Mytilineos cited German chemical giant BASF's 2024 decision to shut down 11 chemical plants in Germany and spend €10bn (£8.7bn) on a new mega-plant in southern China – partly linked to energy costs and green regulations. The Greek executive, who is also president of the European Metals Association, said the UK and Europe were fighting to retain the factories they had. 'A decade ago Europe had maybe 15 aluminium plants but now there are just four left so we are buying it from countries like China and Indonesia which make it by burning coal,' he said. That decline is partly down to the cost of renewables, the rollout of which is typically funded by subsidies that add levies to energy bills. Surging gas price followed Russia's invasion of Ukraine have also fuelled the problem. 'As long as Russian gas was around, we could be globally competitive,' Mr Mytilineos said. 'Now this is gone. This is geopolitics, and Europe is paying the price.' Addressing Ed Miliband and Sir Keir Starmer's race to decarbonise Britain's economy, Mr Mytilineos warned that green energy policies can come with a heavy price. 'If they want to take these decisions, they must also consider industry. You have to support your industries. Otherwise industries have to find new ways to survive. They have to move.' Metlen's core business is metal refining. It produces bauxite ore from its own mines in Greece where it also has a refinery and smelter. They annually produce 190,000 tonnes of aluminium and 860,000 tonnes of alumina, a vital ingredient in advanced ceramics. From the same ore it is now also extracting gallium, a strategically vital metal where China has long dominated global markets. Metlen is also increasingly involved in metal recycling, melting down scrap and targeting valuable metals like zinc and lead. The company has managed to avoid energy-induced shutdowns because its other key business is energy production: it owns around 14 wind farms, three solar farms and four hydroelectric plants, mostly in Greece, plus several gas fired power stations. It uses those generators to power its metal refining, giving it a near-unique level of immunity from the high energy prices that are wiping out energy-intensive industries across the UK and Europe. The comments come as Mr Mytilineos prepares to ring the London Stock Exchange opening bell at 8am on Monday as Metlen joins the market. The company, valued at close to £6bn, is set for inclusion in the FTSE 100 later this year when the index is re-evaluated. Metlen's move is a vote of confidence in London's beleaguered stock market, which has suffered from a dearth of new listings in the years following Brexit. Mr Mytilineos said: 'My shareholders ask me this – why London? We consider that despite London going through difficult times after Brexit, Amsterdam, Frankfurt or Paris have not managed to overtake the City as a financial hub. 'I think that having gone through this difficult period, the City will make a big comeback, and London Stock Exchange with it. So when choosing a European exchange with the biggest profile for our company, London was the obvious place.'
Telegraph
18 hours ago
- Telegraph
Trump is wrong to pick a fight with Powell – but is right about interest rates
Visiting Scotland last week, Donald Trump used a joint press conference to mock Keir Starmer. He castigated Labour's policies on immigration, energy and much else. The Prime Minister sat awkwardly, sporting his trademark rictus grin. Trump has lately dished out plenty of public humiliation – not least aimed at Jerome Powell, chairman of the Federal Reserve. The president has put huge pressure on the Fed to lower interest rates, to boost US growth and ease interest payments on America's massive $36trn (£27.6trn) national debt. This jars badly with the conventional wisdom that central banks should be independent, allowing technocrat economists to set interest rates to bear down on inflation. That's far better for the economy in the long-run, but this precious independence is jeopardised when vote-hungry politicians seek to keep borrowing costs too low. Such independence has become an almost sacred policy concept over the last half century. And no central bank matters more than the Fed, which sets the course for monetary policy across the globe. Yet Trump, astonishingly, has lately called Powell a 'numbskull', a 'stubborn mule' and worse. On a recent Fed visit, he rebuked him over the cost of a refurbishment project – a potential pretext to sack Powell, which may not be legally possible, but which Trump often floats regardless. Between September and December last year, the Fed's committee of twelve rate-setters voted to lower the US benchmark interest rate three times from its post-Covid-peak of 5.25pc-5.5pc, in increments down to 4.25pc-4.5pc. But much to the president's frustration, rates have since stayed put. The Bank of England, meanwhile, has cut rates four times since last summer, including as recently as May, while the European Central Bank has enacted no less than eight eurozone rate reductions over the same period, the latest in June. Having held rates since the start of 2025, the Fed just did so again when governors met last Wednesday (although two Trump-appointees voted against, the biggest intra-Fed rate disagreement in thirty years). Fed policymakers are rightly worried about price pressures, with headline inflation hitting 3.7pc during the year to June, up from 2.4pc the previous month and well above the 2pc target. And Trump's era-defining slew of tariffs – taxes on imports into the US – means we could see a lot more inflation yet. With the President's three-month moratorium expiring this weekend, and tariffs now set to bite on some of America's largest trading partners, the Fed is understandably concerned. Powell insists the US economy is strong enough for the Fed to wait before further rate cuts, as we see if Trump's tariffs really do aggravate inflation. And last week's GDP numbers – a 3pc expansion from April to June – was certainly way above consensus forecasts, reversing a 0.5pc contraction during the first three months of the year, the worst quarterly performance since early 2022. This January to March shrinkage, though, was largely due to the huge rise in US imports as buyers sought to get ahead of Trump's expected tariff onslaught. And since 'liberation day' in April, when the President unveiled his tariffs on the White House lawn, imports into the US have plunged. This artificially boosted April to June GDP growth as the first-quarter trend unwound. Yes, consumer spending rose 1.4pc during the second quarter, outpacing the 0.5pc increase over the previous three months, supporting Powell's argument the economy is coping without further rate cuts. But 'final sales to private domestic purchasers', a key demand metric that the Fed watches closely, grew just 1.2pc over the latest quarter, slower than the 1.9pc increase between January and March. High mortgage rates are also holding back the housing market and related construction, as Trump relentlessly points out, with residential investment down 4.6pc during the second quarter. But that's part of a broader investment slump as business leaders look to see how the president's tariffs play out. For now, the market consensus is that the US economy is showing resilience, but more rate cuts may be justified as long as inflation isn't further provoked. So Trump's attacks on Powell are based on legitimate economic analysis. Yet his language is way over the top. Some say the president is picking headline-grabbing fights with the Fed chair to detract from mounting criticism over his handling of the Epstein files. I suspect he simply wants lower rates and, for now at least, Powell stands in his way. Ironically, it was Trump who appointed Powell in 2017. But having repeatedly called for him to resign, the president seems certain to replace him when Powell's term expires next May. In the meantime, Trump's ceaseless undermining of central bank independence is deeply damaging. Yes, the Fed has a 'dual mandate' to pursue both price stability and full employment, unlike the solely inflation-focussed aims of most other central banks. But while Trump's arguments may be technically valid, it should absolutely not be him making them, nor anyone else near the top of government. Given the tone he has set, though, Powell's successor will be seen as the president's lackey. And with US and global inflation far from tamed, that could end up being a serious problem. My general view is that central bank independence is far more important than any individual central banker. Andrew Bailey, for instance, has shown seriously bad judgement at the Bank of England – endlessly insisting post-Covid inflation would be 'transitory', for instance, while deriding those of us who correctly predicted otherwise. His appointment was a mistake, but he should stay, free from the threat politicians might remove him, until his term expires in March 2028. The same applies to Powell and far more so – he should serve his full term.
