Stay vigilant to safeguard Constitution: PM on Emergency
Prime Minister Narendra Modi
on Sunday recalled the 'dark chapter of Emergency' imposed 50 years ago and urged citizens to remain vigilant to safeguard the Constitution.
In his monthly
Mann Ki Baat
radio address, the PM quoted three prominent politicians from different ideologies, including two former prime ministers, to showcase how people from all walks had joined hands against imposition of Emergency in 1975.
Modi played archival audio recordings of speeches by former prime ministers Morarji Desai and Atal Bihari Vajpayee, and former home minister Jagjivan Ram, recounting the atrocities faced by people during the Emergency period.
The PM quoted Desai as saying, 'The oppression that happened for two years... reached its peak when Emergency was imposed on people and people were treated inhumanely.'
Modi added, 'This is the voice of the former PM of the country, Morarji Bhai Desai, who spoke about the Emergency in a brief but very clear manner.'
'You can imagine what that period was like. Those who imposed Emergency not only murdered our Constitution but also had the intention to keep the judiciary as their slave,' he said.
The PM noted that over one lakh people were jailed, and politicians like George Fernandes were chained, with many enduring 'severe torture' under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA).
He mentioned Jagjivan Ram, who called the post-Emergency election 'a great campaign to strengthen the foundation of democracy', and Vajpayee, who described it as 'a peaceful revolution' that 'threw the killers of democracy into the dustbin of history'.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
식후 혈당, "이것" 하나면 고민 필요없다. 단 2주만에..!
당뇨 관리
더 알아보기
Undo
Shifting to other issues, the PM also mentioned the 10th International Day of Yoga (IDY) on June 21, which saw global participation.
He highlighted events like three lakh people practising yoga on Visakhapatnam beach, 2,000 Adivasi students performing 108 surya namaskars, and ITBP soldiers practising in the Himalayas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC seeks clarity on govt's move on Kaleshwaram project report
1 2 Hyderabad: The Telangana high court on Thursday sought clarity from the state govt on whether it intends to place the Justice PC Ghose Commission report on the Kaleshwaram project before the assembly first or whether it will act on the report and then lay it before the House for discussion. "This is a crucial question. We need clarity before proceeding further. We need not observe anything more without your answer," a division bench of Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice GM Mohiuddin told advocate general A Sudarshan Reddy, who appeared for the state. On his request to obtain instructions, the court adjourned the matter to Friday. The bench was hearing petitions filed by former CM K Chandrasekhar Rao and former minister T Harish Rao, who challenged the commission's notices and findings. Their counsels argued that the notices issued were defective as they were only summons and not notices as mandated under section 8B of the Commissions of Inquiry Act. They contended that this denial of due process vitiated the proceedings. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad 'Violation of rights' The petitioners further alleged that the report was already widely circulated in the media and on govt platforms, even before being formally placed in the assembly. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Passive Income Ideas Sitting at Home Mone Click Here Undo They produced photographs of newspaper articles, press conferences by the CM and other ministers, and even a power-point presentation given by a minister, all based on the commission's findings. They stressed that they were not given an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses who deposed before the commission, a violation of their rights. "The commission was tasked with inquiring into the planning, design, and execution of the project—not into allegations of corruption or irregularities. Yet, imputations against the petitioners are being made public without due process," the counsels argued. Citing judgements in the cases of inquiries held on former IPS officer Kiran Bedi and former Union home minister LK Advani, the counsels sought to strike down the notices and also the findings of commission report. Countering these arguments, the AG submitted that the petitioners were well aware of the notices and even sought documents from the commission, which were duly provided. "A notice does not become invalid merely because a specific section is not cited," he argued. He also contended that since both petitioners are members of the state assembly, they would have the opportunity to participate in the debate on the commission's report once it is tabled in the House. Any judicial intervention at this stage, he cautioned, could impede legislative proceedings. "The commission was set up in the larger interest of the state to identify what went wrong. Its report must first be debated in assembly. Any orders here may pre-empt that process," the AG told the bench. Public domain controversy On the petitioners' grievance that the report had already entered the public domain, the AG denied it. He assured the court that the cabinet has decided to place the report before the assembly shortly for discussion. The petitioners, however, pressed for court protection, alleging that their reputations were being irreparably harmed. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
India.com
34 minutes ago
- India.com
Not Aadhaar, PAN Or Voter ID: So What Really Makes You An Indian Citizen?
New Delhi: Citizenship has become a topic of intense discussion after the Bombay High Court clarified that having an Aadhaar card, PAN card or voter ID does not automatically make someone an Indian citizen. These documents serve only as proof of identity, the court said. This raises an important question: if PAN, voter ID or Aadhaar are not proof of citizenship, what officially establishes Indian nationality? Legally, India does not mandate a single document to prove citizenship. The Constitution lays down specific conditions. Anyone meeting these conditions qualifies as an Indian citizen. Add Zee News as a Preferred Source Citizenship matters because it defines the legal bond between an individual and the nation. It grants rights and privileges. These include fundamental rights, voting rights, legal protections, employment rights and a sense of belonging. Laws determine who qualifies as a citizen. The Constitution of India, in Articles 5 to 11, outlines the rules. On January 26, 1950, all individuals living in India qualified as citizens if they were born in India, had at least one parent born in India or had resided in India for the preceding five years. Certain groups who migrated from Pakistan also qualifies. They include those whose parents or grandparents were born in undivided India, individuals who returned to India after moving to Pakistan and persons born abroad to Indian parents or grandparents. The Citizenship Act of 1955 expanded these provisions. It defines the circumstances under which citizenship can be granted or revoked. Citizenship can be acquired through birth, descent, registration, naturalization or integration of new territories into India. Birth-Based Citizenship Section 3 grants citizenship to individuals born in India between January 26, 1950 and July 1, 1986 or those born later with at least one Indian parent. The Citizenship Amendment Act of 2003 further refined the rules, covering children born after its enactment. Descent-Based Citizenship Section 4 allows individuals born outside India to claim citizenship if one parent is an Indian citizen. Registration within a year of birth at an Indian mission is required for those born abroad after December 3, 2004. Registration And Naturalisation Foreign nationals meeting specific criteria can apply for citizenship under Section 5. They must renounce previous citizenship once approved. Section 6 allows long-term residents to apply through naturalisation, following a set procedure. Citizenship Through New Territories Section 7 covers cases where foreign territories become part of India. Legal procedures confirm citizenship, and an official government notification lists eligible residents. Proof Of Citizenship India does not issue a single, universal document as proof of citizenship. Birth certificates serve as evidence for individuals born in India, issued by local municipal or panchayat authorities. Applications can be made online or offline, and approved certificates record the place of birth, confirming eligibility for citizenship. Those granted citizenship through registration or naturalisation receive a certificate signed by an Indian government official of under-secretary rank or higher. This certificate serves as official proof of Indian citizenship. Documents such as passports, Aadhaar, PAN, voter ID or ration cards are not legal proof of citizenship. They serve as identity documents or residency proof and cannot confer citizenship. Lack of these documents does not strip a person of Indian nationality.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
USAID didn't give $21 million for poll turnout: US embassy to Centre
Representative image NEW DELHI: USAID did not provide funding of $21 million for voter turnout in India between 2014 and 2024, the US embassy has informed the Indian govt, according to a reply by ministry of external affairs in response to a Parliament question. US President Donald Trump had earlier questioned the alleged funding, saying he suspected "they were trying to get someone else elected". MoS for external affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh said that on July 2, 2025, the US embassy shared data that, it said, covered USAID funding in India from 2014 to 2024, including details of implementing partners, objectives and key accomplishments of each activity undertaken. "The embassy also maintains that USAID/India did not receive or provide funding of $21 million for voter turnout in India from fiscal years 2014 to 2024, nor has it implemented any voter turnout-related activities in India," said the minister, in response to a written query in Rajya Sabha. "On July 29, 2025, the US embassy conveyed to MEA that it plans to bring all USAID operations to a close by Aug 15, 2025," he added. The MEA had earlier requested the embassy to urgently furnish details of expenditure incurred on all USAID-assisted/funded projects in India over the last 10 years (other than those being implemented under the seven partnership agreements with Indian govt). MEA also sought a list of NGOs/implementing partners through which such initiatives were executed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Filipinos don't know about this! Read More Undo Trump had earlier accused USAID of working to effect a change of govt in India. Reports later suggested that the funding might have been meant for Bangladesh. "Why do we need to spend $21 million on voter turnout in India? I guess they were trying to get somebody else elected. We have got to tell the Indian govt... Because when we hear that Russia spent about $2,000 in our country, it was a big deal. They took some internet ads for $2,000. This is a total breakthrough," Trump had alleged.
