
House passes paid leave program with five Democrats voting against it
The Welcome Child and Family Wellness Leave Act, formerly the Paid Family and Medical Leave Act, passed the House floor by a vote of 38-31 on Friday. That's where the bill died by two votes last year, and it's already passed the Senate twice in past years, though the bill has significantly changed compared to its previous iterations.
All Republicans and five Democrats — Reps. Martha Garcia of Pine Hill, Patricia Lundstrom of Gallup, Wonda Johnson of Church Rock, Marian Matthews of Albuquerque and Joseph Sanchez of Alcalde — voted against the legislation. Republicans and business advocates have fiercely opposed the measure.
Rep. Christine Chandler, D-Los Alamos, called the bill "transformational legislation." She and other advocates have been pushing for such legislation at the Roundhouse since 2019.
"We're creating a safety net for people who may become ill or have these other life events that are significant where they need the support, for a very small amount of money," she said.
Much of the contention over the current bill comes from the mandatory contributions it would impose on workers and businesses. It proposes a 0.2% premium on employee wages — $2 for every $1,000 — and a 0.15% premium on employers' wages — $1.50 for every $1,000. Businesses with less than five employees would be exempt.
The contributions would go into a state fund that would pay employee leave for medical, bereavement, foster, military exigency or abuse victim safety purposes.
Those premiums are lower than the bill initially proposed, when employees and employers were also fronting the cost for parental leave. However, Democrats changed the bill a week-and-a-half ago to take that portion of the money from the state Early Childhood Education and Care Department instead.
The state agency would provide funding for a parent to get up to $9,000 for a new baby, delivering checks over the course of 12 weeks. HB11 would also ensure working parents keep their job while taking up to 12 weeks of time off for bonding.
If signed into law, the state will start assessing premiums on employers in January 2027 and on employees in July 2027. Workers could start getting the new baby rebates and using paid leave in 2028.
The House hit its three-hour debate limit Friday, with Republicans failing to change the bill. A primary concern from GOP members and business leaders around New Mexico is an inability to replace workers, particularly essential workers, while they take leave.
"We are creating a workforce nightmare," House Caucus Chair Rebecca Dow, R-Truth or Consequences, told the Journal before the floor debate.
She was preparing her talking points in her office while staff carted around large boxes, which Dow said were previously full of "over 100,000 unduplicated citizens who wrote in and said, 'Do not pass this.'" The towering stacks of paper sat on all the Republicans' desks on the floor during the debate.
Dow's first and ultimately only attempt to replace the bill failed on a 40-29 vote. She introduced a substitute bill that would've provided up to six weeks of paid parental leave, with money coming from an early childhood trust fund, and an option for workers to pay 0.5% of their wages to get an extra three weeks paid time off — a measure similar to her own parental leave bill that hasn't made it to its first committee.
"When we impose a mandatory tax on employers, the consumers pay the cost," she said.
The debate on her substitute bill took so long Dow didn't have time to introduce the other two amendments she had planned.
Dow told the Journal before the debate she didn't think any of her changes to the bill stood a chance. She's repeatedly asked when Republicans are going to compromise, she said, but "all we do here is compromise."
As for the bill moving onto the Senate, Chandler said "they should really embrace this."
However, Senate President Pro Tem Mimi Stewart, D-Albuquerque, expressed concerns to the Journal about the House changes to the bill and the feasibility of the state paying for parental leave. Chandler said she hasn't heard from the governor's office yet on the bill, though Rep. Linda Serrato, D-Santa Fe, another sponsor on the legislation, said it fundamentally supports "a stronger workforce."
"What's really important to see is the support received in the House floor," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Vance slams Newsom's efforts to ‘mimic' Trump — and touts DC crackdown: ‘You don't have to live with lawlessness'
Vice President JD Vance blasted California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's attempts to 'mimic' President Trump as inauthentic on Wednesday and touted new data suggesting the federal crackdown on crime in Washington, DC, is working. Vance's criticism of Newsom – a potential 2028 presidential candidate – comes as the Golden State governor's press office X account has been aping Trump's distinctive social media style and penchant for nicknaming political opponents. The vice president was asked about his thoughts on Newsom's bizarre strategy, and whether it might be a good idea for Democrats to copy Trump's tone, in an interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham. Advertisement Vance suggested that Newsom was being inauthentic by copying Trump's style. Getty Images 'This idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic Donald Trump's style – I think that ignores the fundamental genius of President Trump's political success, which is that he's authentic,' Vance argued. 'He just is who he is,' the vice president said of Trump, during his appearance on 'The Ingraham Angle.' 'You've got to be yourself. You've got, actually, to talk to people honestly about the issues.' Advertisement 'Gavin Newsom can mimic Donald Trump all that he wants to, they're still going to lose unless they get better policies that actually serve the American people,' he argued. His advice to Democrats? 'I don't think it's that complicated – Don't be a crazy person. Be authentic,' Vance said. 'If the Democrats did that, they'd do a hell of a lot better.' However, Vance argued that 'Democrats really can't help themselves' – citing the Democratic Party uproar over Trump's decision to federalize DC's police force, and deploy thousands of federal law enforcement officers and National Guard troops into the district to take on crime. Advertisement 'If you look at the crime issue, they're calling Donald Trump a fascist for taking action,' the vice president said. 'So part of sounding less crazy is being less crazy,' the veep argued. Vance said new data shows 'violent crime has dropped in DC, 35% in nine days' and 'robberies in DC have dropped 55% in nine days.' Fox News Vance had earlier revealed a 'crazy statistic' about Trump's crime crackdown showing that 'violent crime has dropped in DC, 35% in nine days' and 'robberies in DC have dropped 55% in nine days.' Advertisement Trump signed his executive order declaring a crime 'emergency' in the nation's capital on Aug. 11. The stats 'highlight the fact that living with lawlessness and disorder' is 'fundamentally a question of political will,' Vance told Ingraham. 'If you've got the political will to enforce the law, you can make even cities like DC safe again, and that's what we're demonstrating,' he continued. 'I hope the American people just recognize that you don't have to live with lawlessness,' the vice president added. 'You don't have to live with third-world murder rates.' 'If you just take control of these cities, you can make them safe places to live in.'


CBS News
24 minutes ago
- CBS News
California Supreme Court declines to stop Newsom's redistricting plan
Washington — The California Supreme Court will not prevent Democrats from moving forward Thursday with a plan to redraw congressional districts. Republicans in the Golden State had asked the state's high court to step in and temporarily block the redistricting efforts, arguing that Democrats — who are racing to put the plan on the ballot later this year — had skirted a rule requiring state lawmakers to wait at least 30 days before passing newly introduced legislation. But in a ruling late Wednesday, the court declined to act, writing that the Republican state lawmakers who filed the suit had "failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time." The California legislature is set to vote on the redistricting plan on Thursday, which would send the bill to California Gov. Gavin Newsom's desk for approval. Democratic state lawmakers in California introduced a set of bills to create new district boundaries in a way they hope would flip five congressional seats, a move made in response to President Trump and Texas Republicans' push to reshape five congressional districts in Texas to favor the GOP. Democratic state lawmakers in California, who have a supermajority in the legislature, want to pass the bills immediately so they can place the proposal in front of voters in a Nov. 4 special election Democrats' proposal in California would try to flip five of the state's nine districts currently held by Republicans and make them more friendly for Democrats. California has 52 congressional districts. The changes may require an amendment to California's state Constitution to override the independent commission that's currently responsible for the state's redistricting process. The battle over district lines may influence the midterm elections next year. Republicans hold only a slim majority in the House of Representatives, and they want to hold onto it, while Democrats are aiming to take back the House. Newsom, a potential 2028 contender, has been leading the charge. "Look, what we're doing neuters, neutralizes what's happening in Texas," Newsom told reporters Wednesday. "People have this chance with this ballot — Nov. 4 — is stand up to the rule of law, stand up for coequal branches of government, stand up to, yes, Donald Trump, but also stand up in the spirit that defines this moment to people being bullied and people being intimidated." In a statement to CBS News, the GOP state lawmakers who sued over the redistricting plan said the Supreme Court's ruling is "not the end of this fight." "We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians," the statement read.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk Must Face Fraud Lawsuit Over 2024 Election Sweepstakes
(Bloomberg) -- Elon Musk must face allegations that he defrauded voters when he promised them a chance to win $1 million for signing a petition in the days before the 2024 presidential election. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome A federal judge said Wednesday a woman from Arizona can proceed with her claims that she never would have signed Musk's America PAC petition and handed over personal identifying information if she knew she had no chance of winning. She said she believed, based on statements by Musk, that the winners would be picked at random. In fact, they were carefully selected to be spokespeople for Musk's pro-Donald Trump political action committee. US District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin, Texas, didn't rule on the merits of Jacqueline McAferty's proposed class-action case, but found that she plausibly alleged she didn't get 'what she bargained for — a random chance to win $1 million.' The district attorney in Philadelphia sued Musk and the PAC about a week before the November election to shut down the sweepstakes as an 'unlawful lottery,' but a judge denied the DA's request to halt the contest. Musk's representatives revealed at the time that the PAC picked registered voters from swing states to be public spokespeople for the committee, often based on their personal stories, and required them to sign employment contracts. In addition to seeking damages for fraud, McAferty can also pursue a breach of contract claim, Pitman said. The judge dismissed her claim under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Lawyers for Musk didn't immediately respond outside regular business hours to requests for comment. Musk spent hundreds of millions of dollars to elect Trump and Republicans in 2024, and when Trump defeated Kamala Harris in the election, he turned to Musk, the world's richest person, to lead an effort to slash the size and scope of government. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data