
Coal-dependent communities in Colorado consider nuclear transition after new state law
Economies in Colorado that have relied on coal for decades are now searching for
another energy option
as a new Colorado law pushes them away from coal energy production and mining.
Craig, a city of about 10,000 people in the northwest corner of the state, is among those looking for an energy transition. City officials expect to lose around 700 jobs in the next few years, as coal mining and energy plants go offline.
"First of the units closing by the end of 2025," Chris Nichols, mayor of Craig, said. "Units two and three will be closing in '28 and mid-year '28. So it'll be completely offline. One of the two coal mines that is closing at the end of this year as well."
"What it really means- these are high-paying jobs for our community," Nichols said. "We have the heritage for the last 50 years or so in coal mining and power production, and a proud heritage of being able to supply power for the country. Now, we're evaluating anything we can, which will have a significant impact on the economy for the community."
Alongside geothermal energy production, Nichols believes nuclear energy could be a solution too, but there's more to learn before the city simply says "yes." It's now a real possibility, thanks to a new Colorado law, which started as the bipartisan-sponsored
House Bill 25-1040
, that adds nuclear energy to the definition of "clean energy" in Colorado, allowing it to qualify for retail utility to meet the 2050 clean energy target in the state.
Democratic State Sen. Dylan Roberts, a co-sponsor of the bill that's now law and whose district includes Craig, believes nuclear energy is worth exploring if it's the right option for these kinds of communities facing a financial cliff in their future.
"They want to be energy producers, they know that it can't be coal moving forward or it won't be coal because of those decisions that the companies have made, but it could be these modern nuclear generators that are very safe and smaller scale and but still do produce good jobs and produce a lot of energy that can be sent throughout the region," Roberts said.
The small generators he's referencing are called small modular reactors, which have been used in Russia and China at this point. The smaller footprint of the processing of nuclear energy is only part of the sales pitch; the other being a new conversation about the reliability and environmental concerns that nuclear energy has brought into the equation in the past.
"We're not talking about the giant smokestacks that we saw in Three Mile Island or Chernobyl," Roberts said. "These modern nuclear technologies are still being developed and being tested across the country and across the world. But we know that nuclear can be very safe, and it is used in 27 other states in our country. You have nuclear as part of their energy portfolio, and other countries like France get over 70% of their electricity from nuclear."
Diversifying where Colorado gets its energy is a part of the process, Roberts explained, while trying to hold to the state's climate action goals.
"We are not going to get to 100% carbon-free electricity with just solar and wind," Roberts said. "So we need to add something else to the mix or a few other things to the mix, and these produce really high-paying jobs. It is proven to be safe, and it can give us the electricity that we need. So that is the point, not to force this on anybody, but to let's let's have that conversation.'
Nichols said it's not something the city is sold on right now, but absolutely something it wants to look into, considering the job growth, high-paying wages, and energy production that already runs in the natural fabric of the culture in Craig, with a new nuclear approach: "The new nuclear cycle is what we're looking at actually, everything from enrichment to generation, using the fuel to storing, to possibility recycling that fuel, re-enrichment. So it's a full cycle which does not exist today."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US regulators push through last-minute delay to new private fund reporting rules
By Chris Prentice NEW YORK (Reuters) -U.S. regulators scrambled on Wednesday to extend a deadline for new data reporting requirements for investment advisers to private funds, just one day before they were due to take effect. The rules, adopted by two U.S. markets regulators in February 2024, will require advisers to disclose more information to regulators in a bid to boost the government's ability to spot risks from private markets that have swelled in size in recent years. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission extended the deadline for compliance to later this year in a 3-1 vote on Wednesday, less than 24 hours before firms had to comply. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission also voted in favor of an extension, marking the second time the regulators decided to push back the deadline after previously postponing it in January. "Additional time is required for dialogue with filers, review of the reasonableness of the data demands, and review of the actual utility of the information collected," SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said during Wednesday's open meeting. Private funds have pressed the SEC to review this rule, among others, and have warned the new requirements are unnecessary and costly. The firms now have until October 1, 2025 to comply. The new data, which includes disclosure of events pointing to significant stress within 72 hours, would be accessible to the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which gathers top financial regulators across the U.S. government to monitor systemic risks. Regulators have cautioned for years that growing private markets could pose increasing risks, particularly as they are more opaque and less vigorously regulated than traditional markets. Federal agencies have begun a push to loosen regulations as part of Republican President Donald Trump's agenda since he took office in late January. "The SEC and other regulators, including FSOC, depend on these detailed data to better comprehend when the private markets may be experiencing turbulence that could affect our entire financial system, because these entities generally operate outside our regulatory purview," said Caroline Crenshaw, the lone Democratic SEC commissioner.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings' protest organizer calls Texas National Guard deployment an overreaction by Governor
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A protest planned to occur at the Texas Capitol Saturday comes after Texas Governor Greg Abbott's deployment of the state's National Guard to Austin and other Texas cities following a Monday night protest in the state's capital city. Andrew Mahaleris, press secretary for the Governor's office, said in a statement that 'peaceful protests are part of the fabric of our nation,' but that Texas cities need soldiers to 'uphold law and order.' 'Soldiers are on standby in areas where mass demonstrations are planned in case they are needed,' reads part of Mahaleris's statement. 'Texas will not tolerate the lawlessness we have seen in Los Angeles. Anyone engaging in acts of violence or damaging property will be swiftly held accountable to the full extent of the law.' Mayor: Texas National Guard on standby to assist DPS during protests in Austin The Monday night protest, organized by the Party for Socialism and Liberation, was held to show solidarity with protesters in Los Angeles. Saturday's protest, 'No Kings/Kick out the Clowns,' is part of a nationwide action against a military parade in Washington DC, also on Saturday. The Austin rally is organized by Hands Off Central Texas (HOCTX), a coalition of liberal activist groups such as 50501, Indivisible Austin, Indivisible Rosedale, Third Act Texas and ResistAustin. Sophia Mirto, Hands Off Central Texas' president, said that the rally will feature speeches by activists and locally elected politicians, as well as performances. '[The idea is] to point out the extreme ridiculousness of government waste that the regime will be using on Saturday, spending over $30 million of our tax money on a what's tantamount to a birthday party and a very tacky parade,' she said. 'It's extraordinarily concerning that they are wasting so much tax money that they are seeking to intimidate citizens and residents of America, especially here in Texas, where we love to use our constitutional freedoms.' Democratic Congressman Greg Casar is one of Saturday's scheduled speakers. He said that the protests bring attention to concerning deportations of children and lawful migrants. 'These are concerning things that people should be allowed to bring up without the governor trying to crush that message and intimidate people by sending in the National Guard,' he said. Casar also said the 'needless' deployment makes National Guard soldiers into political pawns. He has spoken at some of the coalition's prior rallies and said that the events have been peaceful and without incident. 'I've done multiple rallies … where there's hundreds or a few thousand people peacefully assembled … with zero incident at all. Unfortunately, right now, Trump and Abbott want to stoke chaos,' he said. 'They aren't just pouring gasoline onto the flames. They're starting the fire themselves and then pouring gasoline onto the fire because they want there to be division. They want to dominate the news stories by helping stoke up a confrontation or stoke up a problem.' The organizers' hope is that the event will be non-violent, but that security will be in place to isolate instigators in necessary. They have previously organized rallies at the Capitol in coordination with the Texas Department of Public Safety, according to Mirto. 'DPS has actually removed instigators and people threatening unlawful action. We work with DPS, we work with APD for all of our events,' she said. 'We will not be marching anywhere, and if ordered to disperse, we will be very calmly, safely leading people to their vehicles.' Those reasons are why Mirto said she thinks the Guard's deployment in Austin is unnecessary. 'It is incredibly unwarranted and unnecessary that the governor of Texas is threatening to deploy National Guard on civilians utilizing their First Amendment,' Mirto said. 'Threatening to deploy law enforcement against non violent, peaceful, permitted displays of American patriotism is incredibly alarming.' While Mirto stressed the difference between her coalition's tactics and others, she said that law enforcement 'rapidly escalated violence' Monday night. She also called on Texans to pay attention to the actions of law enforcement during protests. 'Deploying chemical weapons on the streets of our city is absolutely unacceptable. It is a violation of our constitutional rights, and it is a violation of morality to deploy chemical weapons on civilian streets,' she said. During the Monday night march, Texas DPS troopers deployed tear gas against protestors. Saturday's rally at the Capitol starts at 5 p.m. and lasts until 8 p.m. In addition to Casar, State Rep. John Bucy, D-Austin, attorneys Pooja Sethi and Sara Spector, and HOCTX board member Melody Tremallo are also scheduled to speak. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DNC boots David Hogg and another vice chair from their roles
Democratic National Committee members removed David Hogg his vice chair position — discharging the 25-year-old activist and another vice chair from national party posts amid his threats to take on 'ineffective' Democratic incumbents in primaries. The virtual vote, which concluded on Wednesday and the results were obtained by POLITICO, vacated its two vice chair positions, stemming from a procedural complaint unrelated to Hogg's primary activities, and put forth a plan to hold a new election. Hogg and Pennsylvania state Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta must now run again for their positions next week. The election offers a potential reset for a party that's dealt with a series of Hogg-related controversies in recent weeks. In April, Hogg announced the group that he co-founded, Leaders We Deserve, planned to drop $20 million on safe-seat Democratic primaries, hoping to oust 'asleep-at-the-wheel' Democrats. The move triggered a wave of anger from elected officials and DNC members alike, who vented that Hogg's role as a party leader conflicted with the decision to take on incumbents. The internal drama exploded again over the weekend, when POLITICO reported on leaked audio from a DNC meeting in which Chair Ken Martin told Hogg and other DNC leaders that his leadership has suffered due to the clash. The vice chair, Martin said, had 'essentially destroyed any chance I have' to show national leadership. Several of the DNC leaders who participated in the call expressed support for Martin and accused Hogg or his supporters of leaking it. Hogg, for his part, denied he shared it. Now, the DNC will hold a new elections for the two vice chair roles — the vote for the new male vice chair will take place from June 12 to June 14 and then vote for a second vice chair of any gender from June 15 to June 17.