US sanctions Brazil's Supreme Court justice overseeing case against Bolsonaro
De Moraes oversees the criminal case against Bolsonaro, who is accused of masterminding a plot to stay in power despite his 2022 election defeat to current President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
'De Moraes is responsible for an oppressive campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions that violate human rights, and politicized prosecutions — including against former President Jair Bolsonaro,' U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent said in a statement.
The Treasury cited the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, which targets perpetrators of human rights abuse and corrupt officials, as its authority to issue the sanctions.
The decision orders the freezing of any assets or property de Moraes may have in the U.S.
Brazil's Supreme Court and the Presidential Palace did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Wednesday's announcement follows the U.S. State Department's announcement of visa restrictions on Brazilian judicial officials, including de Moraes, on July 18.
It also comes after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 50% tariff on Brazilian imported goods that is set to come into effect on Friday. In a letter announcing the tariff, Trump explicitly linked the import tax to what he called the 'witch hunt' trial of Bolsonaro currently underway in Brazil.
Days later, Bolsonaro was ordered to wear an ankle monitor after being deemed a flight risk.
Bolsonaro's son Eduardo celebrated the Treasury's announcement on X, calling it a 'historic milestone' and a warning that 'abuses of authority now have global consequences.'
Eduardo Bolsonaro relocated to the U.S. in March and is under investigation for allegedly working with U.S. authorities to impose sanctions against Brazilian officials.
____
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russia says it abandons moratorium on deploying short and medium-range missiles
MOSCOW, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Russia no longer considers itself bound by a moratorium on the deployment of short- and medium-range missiles, the Russian Foreign Ministry said on Monday. The U.S. withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces treaty in 2019. Russia has said since then it would not deploy such weapons provided that Washington did not do so. However, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov signalled last December that Moscow would have to respond to what he called "destabilising actions" by the U.S. and NATO in the strategic sphere. "Since the situation is developing towards the actual deployment of U.S.-made land-based medium- and short-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, the Russian Foreign Ministry notes that the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have disappeared," the ministry said in its statement.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump's demand that India stop buying Russian oil puts Modi in tight spot
The relationship between India and the US is facing one of its most significant challenges in decades, as the Trump administration doubles down on its demands that India stop buying Russian oil or face punitive tariffs. The US president, Donald Trump, has refused to cut tariffs on Indian exports to the US, as he has for other countries, and on Monday said he would significantly raise them over its purchases of cheap Russian oil, which now account for one-third of its imported oil. 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine,' he said in a post to his Truth Social network, also accusing India of selling Russian oil 'on the Open Market for big profits'. In a previous social media tirade last week, he said of Russia and India: 'They can take their dead economies down together.' Appearing on Fox News on Sunday at the weekend, his hardline deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, did not hold back as he took direct aim at India, stating that Trump had made it clear it was 'it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this [Ukraine] war by purchasing the oil from Russia'. The whiplash the last days have caused in the corridors of New Delhi is palpable. It was only February when India's prime minister, Narendra Modi, was one of the first world leaders to be hosted by Trump and the two men embraced each other and hailed their 'great friendship'. Indian officials were adamant that Russia had not even come up in trade negotiations until Trump's public outburst. India had come to view the US as one of its strongest and most reliable partners, united by the bonhomie between its leaders and growing cooperation on everything from regional security and defence to bilateral trade, intelligence, technology and an increasingly powerful Indian diaspora in the United States. A united geopolitical ambition to counterbalance the power of China had only brought them further together under recent presidents. Yet it did not go unnoticed by India that China – the other big buyer of sanctioned Russian oil, which also has leverage over the US in the form of rare earths – has not received similar threats, and neither has Turkey. Trump's moves have been met with a frosty, if not outright defiant, reception among Indian officials. After Trump told reporters he that had heard India would 'no longer' be buying Russian oil, he was swiftly contradicted by Indian officials over the weekend, who said there would be no change in policy. Under India's 'non-alignment' foreign policy it has maintained a close partnership with Russia over decades while strengthening ties with the US; a position largely tolerated by Washington and reiterated by Randhir Jaiswal, the spokesperson for India's foreign ministry following Trump's threats. 'Our bilateral relationships with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country,' said Jaiswal. 'India and Russia have a steady and time-tested partnership.' In a column in the Indian Express, Shyam Saran, India's former foreign secretary, did not mince his words. 'Donald Trump was supposed to be good for India in his second presidency,' he said. 'He has turned out to be a nightmare.' Saran was among those who called for India to follow the example of China and Brazil and stand up to Trump. He insisted that although there would be 'pain in resisting Trump … we should be prepared to endure it'. 'Submitting to his exaggerated demands, which are now political as well as economic, would severely undermine India's national interests,' said Saran. 'We cannot give any country a veto over which countries India should or should not partner with.' It is widely agreed among analysts that Modi has now been put in an unenviable position by Trump; either acquiesce to Trump's demands and see loss of face domestically or reject them and face sky-high tariffs – and possibly other punitive actions – that would cripple the Indian economy. The Indian political scientist Pratap Bhanu Mehta said India was not the exception in mistakenly thinking that 'Trump is purely transactional and that by placating him, pandering to his ego and giving him good headlines, it will be enough to make him quietly dial back.' One of the major sticking points for Modi, he said, was the highly public nature of Trump's threats, which had complicated the possibility of backdoor negotiations over India quietly moving away from buying Russian oil and arms. He pointed out that Trump had already 'frankly humiliated the Indian prime minister' over the recent India-Pakistan conflict in May, where Trump had publicly taken the credit for negotiating a ceasefire – a position vehemently denied by the Modi government in the aftermath. Trump's recent embrace of Pakistan, signing deals with India's enemy on cryptocurrency, mining and oil – and even having the chagrin to suggest India may one day buy Pakistani oil – as well as hosting the Pakistan army chief for lunch in the White House, had only added insult to injury. Mehta said suspicions towards the US in New Delhi now resembled those of 1971, when President Richard Nixon and his national security advisor, Henry Kissinger, sent warships to India in what is considered one of the lowest points of the US-India relationship. 'The damage is already done,' said Mehta. 'No matter what deal they come to now, distrust of the US is only going to continue to skyrocket.'
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The elite status symbol ultra-wealthy are now using to set themselves apart from wealthy
The new indicator of ultra wealth isn't owning mansions or diamonds, it's flying private. Owning personal jets, or even chartering private planes, is incredibly expensive. But as the number of millionaires and billionaires grows, it's becoming increasingly common. The price of a private jet depends on size, model, age and custom features – but it's certainly no less than a few million dollars, and can cost as much as $100 million. As of 2023 there are between 22,000 and 23,000 private jets exist worldwide - with 15,000 of them being in the US, according to Blackjet data. There was a major increase in private jet usage after the pandemic because flyers were concerned about getting COVID-19 on crowded commercial flights. Kenn Ricci, pilot and chairman of private-jet company Flexjet, said that the 'frugal wealthy' class of people who earn a lot of money but don't splurge started splashing out on travel during the pandemic and never went back. Hours flown in private-jet hours flown hit record numbers in 2022 and have stayed up ever since. 'It's in vogue to be wealthy,' Ricci told the Wall Street Journal. 'Sometimes we love the rich. Sometimes we hate the rich.' Private jets are thought to be used by the rich and famous, but others climbing up the wealth ladder are joining them in this luxury. Indeed, having 'private-jet money' is the new goal amongst the wealthy, dividing the 1 percent from the 0.1 percent. The US added more than 1,000 millionaires every day last year on average, according to UBS, and the billionaire club grew over 50 percent between 2015 and 2024. It costs between $5,000 and $15,000 per flying hour to charter a private jet depending on its size, according to Wheels Up a private jet membership and charter company. Maxx Chewning sold his sour-candy business Sour Strips to Hershey for $75.5 million in 2024 and the first thing he did was fly his wife and six friends to Vail on Dassault Falcon 900 private jet. He spent $100,000 so that they could skip security lines and fly in the comfort of leather recliners within the wood-paneled cabin. Chewning's goldendoodle Dood sprawled at their feet. 'The joke is, I had to get a private plane so I could bring my dog,' the 35-year-old said according to the WSJ. 'I didn't really care what the price was.' Tennille Holt, 44, retired in 2023 and nowadays spends her time traveling the world with her husband and eight-year-old cavapoo Hudson. Hudson, who has his own Instagram account where he documents his travels, has grown accustomed to being fed grilled chicken on private jets. Holt and her husband spent $200,000 to from Hudson from Australia to Los Angeles to avoid hauling him on the 14 hour commercial flight. 'The goal was to create the freedom to live life on our own terms, which now includes plenty of travel and the ability to fly privately whenever we want, ' Holt says. 'It's the best and most comfortable option for Hudson.' It's not just the comfort, privacy and convenience of private aviation that appeals to the rich and famous, such jets offer luxuries in the way of fine dining, spa treatments and advanced entertainment systems. Chef Nobu Matsuhisa created an exclusive a menu for VistaJet passengers that includes a Nobu steamed salmon dry miso dish. On some flights, cabin staff are trained to give travelers facials in their with Dr. Barbara Sturm's luxury skin care line. Kevin Hooks, 63, is a Flexjet customers who spends around $800,000 each year on private travel, usually to cross the Southwest in a Praetor 600 midsize business jet that seats nine. Hooks has been flying private for two years and says he has noticed plane hangars around the country growing more crowded since the pandemic. He still takes commercial planes sometimes and recalls his four-year-old son getting on a Southwest Airlines flight and asking, 'Who are these other people on the plane?' Kim Kardashian is one of many celebrities who has her own private jet, which she paid $150 million for. The luxurious Gulfstream G650ER private jet, nicknamed 'Kim Air', features cashmere-covered seats, custom light wood finishes and two bathrooms. It reportedly has 10 beds on it and each of the seats has its own charging points. Canadian rapper Drake's private jet is even more expensive, with an estimated cost of $185 million. The plane has a luxurious lounge area, a bedroom and also features Drake's own OVO - October's Very Own - owl symbol on the exterior.
