logo
Neronha co-leads coalition of AGs suing Trump over agency closures

Neronha co-leads coalition of AGs suing Trump over agency closures

Yahoo07-04-2025
Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha speaks at an April 1, 2025, press conference on his role co-leading a coalition of 24 attorneys general in filing a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., for terminating nearly $11 billion in public health grants to the states. (Photo by Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current)
Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha and his counterparts in New York and Hawaii are the lead plaintiffs in a complaint filed Friday against the Trump administration seeking to stop the dismantling of three federal agencies that support public libraries and museums, workers, and small businesses.
In all, 20 Democratic attorneys general are participating in the April 4 lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Providence challenging a portion of a March 14 executive order targeting seven agencies, including three mandated by Congress: the Institute of Museum and Library Services; the Minority Business Development Agency and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
The executive order placed almost the entire staff of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) on administrative leave and will mean cutting hundreds of grants for state libraries and museums. The executive order also slashed the labor organizing staff and programs of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) and forced the Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) to cut its grant programs that support small business owners.
'This order continues the reduction in the elements of the Federal bureaucracy that the President has determined are unnecessary,' President Donald Trump wrote.
'As the President and his Administration continue their attempts to dismantle the federal government, Americans would do well to consider their priorities,' Neronha said. 'What do these three agencies have in common? At first glance, maybe little. But if you take a closer look, you may realize that all three agencies empower everyday people in this country to access their full potential, whether it be through knowledge, workers' rights, or small business support. By unlawfully attacking these agencies, they are attempting to stifle the American dream. We won't let them, and neither should you.'
IMLS administers the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) which last year invested $180 million in libraries nationwide under its Grants to States Program. The Rhode Island Office of Library and Information Services (OLIS) received over $1.4 million in fiscal year 2025.
The funding supported core services and programs for Rhode Island libraries, including the Talking Books Library program for blind and print-disabled Rhode Islanders, the statewide summer reading program, statewide interlibrary book delivery services, and funding for nearly half of the state's OLIS staff positions, according to a statement from the Rhode Island Library Association.
'The Rhode Island Library Association opposes the cutting of federal funding to IMLS and stands in support of IMLS, museums and libraries nationwide,' the association wrote. 'RILA also strongly opposes the reduction of IMLS staff to a level that makes it unable to fulfill its statutory duties. As library workers, we are concerned about the implications that the elimination of IMLS funding and staffing will have on Rhode Island libraries and its residents.'
The FMCS has slashed its staff from roughly 200 to fewer than 15 individuals and announced the termination of several of its core programs, making it harder for unionized workers to secure their rights, according to the lawsuit.
By unlawfully attacking these agencies, they are attempting to stifle the American dream. We won't let them, and neither should you.
– Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha
Many of Rhode Island's collective bargaining agreements rely on mediation through FMCS, which slashed its staff from about 200 to fewer than 15 individuals. DCYF and one of its unions used the services of FMCS last year, avoiding a strike that could have compromised DCYF's ability to ensure stability and security for children in their care.
The Trump administration has cut the number of MBDA staff from 40 to five and has effectively stopped issuing new grants, hurting vulnerable small businesses across the country. The MBDA provides many valuable services to Rhode Island's small businesses, including one-on-one guidance and expertise on business strategies and resources, Neronha's office said. The MBDA also provides grants for incubators such as Rhode Island's Small Business HUB.
The coalition argues the executive order violates the Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act by eliminating the programs of agencies without any regard for the laws and regulations that govern each source of federal funding. The AGs say the president cannot decide to unilaterally override laws governing federal spending, adding that the executive order unconstitutionally overrides Congress' power to decide how federal funds are spent.
The two other lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit are Attorney General Letitia James of New York and Attorney General Anne Lopez of Hawaii. Joining the lawsuit are the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.
'We had to sue to stop Trump from defunding our schools and cancer cures, from defunding energy assistance and vaccines, from defunding disaster relief and the police. Now, we have to sue again to stop him from defunding summer reading programs and audiobooks for disabled veterans,' Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said in a report by Connecticut Mirror.
The Connecticut State Library receives $2.2 million in annual funding from IMLS, Tong said.
The other four agencies affected by the president's executive order but not the subject of the lawsuit are the United States Agency for Global Media, the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in the Smithsonian Institution, the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness, and the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gavin Newsom's Odds of Beating AOC for 2028 Nomination Widen
Gavin Newsom's Odds of Beating AOC for 2028 Nomination Widen

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Gavin Newsom's Odds of Beating AOC for 2028 Nomination Widen

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Governor Gavin Newsom's chances of beating New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) to win the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028 are increasing. According to online betting website Polymarket, a platform where users can place "yes" or "no" bets on the likelihood of world events, Newsom is leading the progressive firebrand by 7 percentage points in a hypothetical matchup that also includes other high-profile Democratic figures. This is 3 percentage points more than earlier this month, when he was 4 percentage points ahead of AOC. Why It Matters While neither Newsom nor AOC have formally announced their candidacy in the 2028 Democratic primaries, they have not ruled it out. They have both been mentioned as figures who could lead the Democratic Party into the next election, following then-Vice President Kamala Harris' loss to Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election. California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025, in Los Angeles. California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025, in Los Angeles. AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez Whoever emerges as the next party leader will shape the Democratic narrative for change and hold a lot of responsibility for healing internal divisions in the party and leading it to electoral success. What To Know Newsom has sparked speculation that he might run for president because he has delivered a number of speeches around the country and he has been among the leading candidates in most polls of the 2028 primary. Meanwhile, AOC has posted campaign-style social media videos and toured the country with Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders earlier this year. The betting odds also showed former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has a 9 percent chance of winning the nomination while Maryland Governor Wes Moore is on 6 percent. Harris is at 5 percent. What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek, Mark Shanahan who teaches American politics at the University of Surrey in the U.K, said: "We are incredibly early in the presidential election cycle with campaigning proper still years down the line. But everything Gavin Newsom is doing suggests he's serious about running in 2028. This started last year when he didn't put his hat in the running once Joe Biden relinquished the Democrat nomination, and has continued through building a sizeable war chest, building his public profile beyond California through everything from the regular media round to launching his own podcast, presenting California as a bastion against presidential overreach, and now mocking Trump through memes and X posts. "At this stage in the cycle, it's all about getting yourself known, both personally and by what you stand for. AOC is well known but currently her left-leaning makes her less attractive to center-right voters who could be wooed away from Trump. Resolutely branding himself as centrist, Newsom could reach the parts of the electorate never open to AOC. He's flying his kite high at the moment and all the signs are this will lead to a serious run in 2028." In June 2025, Newsom told the Wall Street Journal: "I'm not thinking about running, but it's a path that I could see unfold." In April, AOC told a Fox News Digital reporter: "Frankly, what people should be most concerned about is the fact that Republicans are trying to cut Medicaid right now and people's healthcare. It's a danger and that's really what my central focus is." What Happens Next Whether or not Newsom and AOC run remains to be seen. Candidates don't tend to announce presidential runs until after the midterm elections which, in this cycle, are slated for November 2026. Meanwhile, a number of other high-profile Democrats are rumored to be considering a presidential run, including Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego, New Jersey Senator Cory Booker and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer.

SCOOP: Stacy Garrity launches Republican campaign for Pennsylvania governor
SCOOP: Stacy Garrity launches Republican campaign for Pennsylvania governor

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

SCOOP: Stacy Garrity launches Republican campaign for Pennsylvania governor

FIRST ON FOX: Pennsylvania State Treasurer Stacy Garrity announced her Republican campaign for governor Monday, teeing up what could be a competitive race against incumbent Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro in 2026. Speaking exclusively with Fox News Digital ahead of her campaign launch, the Republican candidate said she is challenging Shapiro in next year's gubernatorial election because he "has failed the state," on critical issues, including energy production, education and job creation. She said the state's vast oil and gas resources are the keys to its economy. "I have a much different vision for the Commonwealth," Garrity, 61, said in a phone interview before announcing her campaign for governor. "We really need to take advantage of what we have right under our feet, which would create a lot of financial breathing room for the Commonwealth that we desperately need." Garrity said her position on energy puts her right in step with President Donald Trump and Sen. Dave McCormick, who both called for unleashing American energy in battleground Pennsylvania during the 2024 presidential election. "We have so much natural gas under our feet," Garrity said, calling the energy "billions of dollars in economic opportunity." Pennsylvania, a reliable swing state, experienced a red wave in 2024, as Trump won at the top of the ticket and McCormick unseated former longtime Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., on the Senate line. Garrity said Pennsylvania voters delivered a message loud and clear last year. Pennsylvanians want "more money in our pockets" and less of the "government's hands in our pockets," the treasurer, who said she travels to all 67 counties in the Commonwealth each year, said. Keystone State residents also want school choice, safe communities and no "boys competing against girls in sports," Garrity said. The Republican hopeful took aim at Shapiro's policies on school choice, arguing that "he might be able to play political games with education, but our kids certainly can't." Shapiro recently told reporters that the Commonwealth doesn't need "extremist politicians" trying to legislate student participation in sports, in reference to a recent bill in the Pennsylvania legislature that would prevent transgender athletes from playing in women's sports, according to WITF. "He's with radical liberals that are pushing a political agenda," Garrity said, before adding, "As far as I'm concerned, that's not fairness, and it's not leadership. It's really, in my opinion, a betrayal of common sense and the integrity of women's athletics." Garrity also criticized Shapiro for what she described as flip-flopping on school choice and "fail[ing] the state" in delivering a state budget. Shapiro, who presides over a politically divided state legislature, missed the Commonwealth's deadline to pass its budget this year. The Democratic governor captured national attention last year when he was short-listed as a potential running mate for former Vice President Kamala Harris, after former President Joe Biden suspended his re-election campaign. "I'm not as well polished as Josh Shapiro," Garrity admitted to Fox News Digital. "I'm definitely not as good of a politician as Josh Shapiro, and he's a prolific fundraiser. This is going to be a tough race." But despite Shapiro's potential advantage as an incumbent governor with national recognition, Garrity said, "I am a really tough worker." Garrity touted that in her first race for state treasurer, she managed to upset a popular incumbent, and "then the second time around, I got more votes for this election than any statewide candidate in Pennsylvania's history, including Josh Shapiro." "I have been an underdog my whole life, in the army and in business and in politics, and that's why I've been able to succeed when the odds are stacked against me," Garrity said. "State treasurer is my first role in public office, but not my first in public service," the Republican hopeful said. "I did spend 30 years in the Army Reserves. I was deployed three times to the Middle East." Garrity also served in the private sector, at Global Tungsten & Powders, where she worked her way up to becoming one of two female vice presidents. Now, as state treasurer, Garrity said, "Every day that I get to wake up and serve hardworking Pennsylvanians is truly a blessing." Garrity has been teasing her gubernatorial run for months. Fellow Trump-ally Rep. Dan Meuser, R-Pa., was considered a potential Republican candidate as well. His announcement last month that he would not run for Pennsylvania governor cleared a path for Garrity's announcement on Monday morning. Pennsylvania's gubernatorial primary is set for May 19, 2026, and the midterm election is slated for Nov. 3, 2026.

Trump's AI plan is a bulwark against the rising threat from China
Trump's AI plan is a bulwark against the rising threat from China

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Trump's AI plan is a bulwark against the rising threat from China

In July, some of the brightest minds in American technology descended on Washington to celebrate a major milestone: the launch of President Donald Trump's bold initiative to ensure the United States remains the world's unrivaled leader in artificial intelligence (AI). Let me be blunt: the AI arms race is no longer theoretical. It's here. And we cannot afford to come in second place. In business, if you don't constantly adapt and innovate, you lose. Nations are no different. If we fail to lead in AI, we risk surrendering our economic and national security edge to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) — a regime that seeks to challenge American technological supremacy and reshape the global order in its authoritarian image. Trump understands this. That's why his vision for American renewal is laser-focused on innovation, particularly in AI and emerging technologies that will shape our economy and define the nature of future conflict. We have to stop being complacent with a slow, outdated and reactive government. The future demands urgency, ambition and a commitment to putting America first at every turn. This is about building a trusted AI ecosystem that is private-sector led, American-built, and decisive in its capacity to defend freedom. There's a quote from Christian Brose's book, "The Kill Chain," that has stayed with me: "Over the past decade, in U.S. war games against China, the United States has a nearly perfect record: We have lost almost every single time." That's a wake up call for every American. The CCP is not just trying to compete. They're trying to dominate. From economic espionage and cyber infiltration to exploiting our supply chains and siphoning off our data, the CCP is engaged in full-spectrum technological warfare. The next conflict will not look like the last. It will be a battle of data, autonomy, and algorithmic superiority — and the side that controls the best AI will win. \ This isn't just a defense imperative; it's an economic one. The AI infrastructure boom will generate thousands of high-paying jobs across the country. From building advanced data centers to manufacturing chips, American workers are at the center of this effort. And making sure every family in this country has the opportunity to get a good job is how we win. That's why Trump's action plan doesn't just emphasize innovation; it prioritizes workforce development, energy modernization and secure supply chains. Wyoming's vast energy resources will be absolutely critical to winning this race. AI data centers require massive amounts of reliable, baseload power — the kind that Wyoming's abundant coal and natural gas can deliver, 24/7, 365 days a year. While other states struggle with expensive, intermittent energy sources, Wyoming offers both the dependable power and affordable rates that give American companies a decisive advantage. Our state stands ready to power America's AI revolution with the energy infrastructure that will keep our systems running affordably when national and economic security is on the line. American manufacturing is at the heart of this effort, and that includes making sure our critical data stays right here at home. Let's ask a simple question: do you want your personal data stored on American soil, protected by American workers and American laws — or housed in China, where it's subject to Communist surveillance and exploitation? This isn't a hypothetical. It's already happening. And that's exactly why American companies are investing billions to build state-of-the-art facilities here at home. These aren't just buildings filled with servers. Data centers are the digital backbone of everything from telehealth and e-commerce to our intelligence agencies and defense systems. They are a critical piece of the AI puzzle and a national security asset we can't afford to outsource. But they're also massive energy consumers — which makes Wyoming's affordable, dependable energy production essential to keeping these facilities running 24/7. Trump's plan rightly focuses on removing barriers and burdensome regulations to allow for the rapid buildout of data centers. His America First AI agenda is the roadmap. But it's up to all of us, from the private sector to Congress, to take the action necessary to propel us forward. We cannot afford to be naïve about the economic and national security risks of falling behind. We must ensure that the future of AI is developed in the U.S.A., powered by American energy, and guided by our enduring values of freedom, innovation and hard work. The AI arms race is on — and America doesn't lose races. Let's win this one, together.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store