Nkosana Makate's ongoing fight for justice in the Please Call Me case: Constitutional Court's latest ruling
Image: File
Nearly two decades of struggling to receive compensation for his Please Call Me (PCM) invention, and yet there is no end in sight for Nkosana Makate, as the Constitutional Court on Thursday ruled that the matter must be reconsidered by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA).
Following a legal battle of more than 18 years, Makate is ready to fight on. Following the latest ruling by the apex court, Makate said the SCA must once again hear the matter and make a new finding.
Acting Deputy Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga said the SCA failed to deal with all the matters that were presented before it during the appeal.
'The jurisdiction of the court is confined to constitutional issues. In this judgment, we dealt with factual issues, without deciding them, purely to demonstrate the SCA's failure to comply with the duty of proper consideration,' Judge Madlanga said.
He added that the Constitutional Court cannot suddenly determine the factual issues.
'The matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court of Appeal for a proper determination of the appeal, and it must be heard by a differently constituted panel.'
In a unanimous judgment, the judgment penned by Judge Madlanga before he retired on Thursday, the court found that the SCA had committed several errors in assessing Vodacom's appeal against a previous high court decision.
The high court initially ordered Vodacom to pay Makate between 5% and 7.5% of the revenue generated from Please Call Me over 18 years. Makate has been fighting for what he said is fair compensation for his invention, which he believes should be at least R10 billion. Vodacom, on the other hand, estimated a fair compensation at around R50 million.
Although he has received yet another setback, Makate said he is confident that he can convince the SCA to recognise his entitlement to billions of rand for his Please Call Me concept.
Makate has consistently maintained that his intellectual property was unfairly taken and that he deserves fair compensation.
'I believe I still have a strong case. I am hopeful that the SCA will see the justice in my claim and order Vodacom to pay me what I am owed for my invention,' he said.
The Constitutional Court in April 2016 declared that Vodacom is bound by the agreement concluded with Makate and ordered it to commence negotiations in good faith with Makate for determining a reasonable compensation payable to him in terms of the agreement.
The CEO accordingly awarded Makate compensation for his product in the amount of R47 million. Dissatisfied, Makate instituted review proceedings in the high court against the amount of compensation.
The high court found in favour of Makate but remitted the determination of the amount of compensation back to the CEO.
This order was coupled with certain directives that the CEO was required to follow in his redetermination.
The parties resumed the negotiations, but there was no fruitful outcome. Makate at one stage made a settlement proposal of R20 billion. The figure was determined based on a formula multiplying the effective rate per minute, PCM minutes of use, and the returned call conversion rate. Vodacom presented a counteroffer of R10 million.
These final negotiations failed. Vodacom, meanwhile, turned to the SCA to appeal the high court's order that Makate should receive more compensation.
The SCA subsequently rejected the appeal and ordered Vodacom to compensate Makate between 5% and 7.5% of the revenue generated from the invention. Vodacom ultimately turned to the Constitutional Court as it said the SCA did not properly determine the issues before it.
Judge Madlanga found that the SCA breached its duty of properly considering all the facts, such as, for example, whether the R47 million offer by Vodacom was not unjust.
He also said the SCA disregarded certain issues and merely highlighted the parties' arguments, but it did not engage with the evidence before it. Therefore, the judge said, the matter must be reconsidered by the SCA.
zelda.venter@inl.co.za
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
HOW did Gayton's son raise R50m to buy soccer club?
Gayton McKenzie's son Calvin Le John has revealed how he raised R50 million to purchase soccer club Siwelele FC, previous SuperSport United last month. The businessman is the firstborn of the Minister of Sport, Art and Culture who has taken over the family businesses. Le John – who uses his mother's maiden name – is hoping his new club fills the void left behind by Bloemfontein Celtics, which later became Royal AM. Speaking in his first interview, Calvin Le John answered burning questions about acquiring the 'new' PSL club, Siwelele FC. One of them was how he managed to raise R50 million to buy the club. Another was how and when the business transaction occurred. Gayton McKenzie's son revealed that the sale took place via an auction, and he bid R50 million for the club, which was ultimately accepted. 'I don't have 50 million lying around. I sold some properties to fund the project', Le He added that he sold shares to the family's diamond mine to a consortium to the sum of a whopping R90 million. Calvin Le John also shot down rumours the money was raised through corrupt tenders or via Gayton McKenzie's right-hand man, Kenny Kunene. He continued: 'I saw a rumour that I got a tender for R70 million, and that's a blatant lie.' 'I don't have any friends, associates, or family members who are doing any work in the city or the department of sports, for that matter. I don't do tenders. I tried, but seeing people being arrested is scary. 'I'm in different businesses, but I don't deal with the state'.. He added: 'If anybody has information about me receiving R70 million, let them bring it out. I have nothing to hide'. Le John added that SuperSport United required him to 'prove' how he acquired the funds to purchase the club. On Saturday, 9 August – which marks Women's Day in South Africa – Siwelele will make their debut in the league with a Betway Premiership match against Golden Arrows. The club will play in their home turf in Bloemfontein at the Dr Petrus Molemela Stadium in Mangaung. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Apex Court's surprise ruling extends Makate's Please Call Me Battle
Nqolokazi Nomvalo ss Head of Legal: Operations at Life Healthcare Group. Image: Supplied FOR nearly two decades, South Africans have watched the legal saga between Vodacom and its former employee, Nkosana Makate, unfold like a courtroom drama with no final act. The latest twist, a unanimous Constitutional Court judgment handed down on Thursday, has reignited public interest and legal debate. In a development that stunned many legal observers and defied predictions of finality, the apex court has remitted the case back to the Supreme Court of Appeal. It will now be reconsidered by a freshly constituted bench. This move injects fresh uncertainty into a saga long believed to be approaching its conclusion. But what does this mean, and why does it matter? It is important to clarify that Makate's original idea was a simple yet powerful proposition: a mobile user with no airtime should be able to 'buzz' another user, prompting them to call back. Vodacom, recognising the creativity, developed the concept into the now-famous "Please Call Me" free message. This version allowed for costless transmission and universal utility. That difference matters, especially when assessing the various compensation models, which have ranged from employee-equivalent remuneration to revenue-sharing frameworks. The Supreme Court of Appeal had previously affirmed the Gauteng High Court's decision in Makate's favour and went further, controversially substituting its own compensation formula and awarding Makate 5 to 7.5 percent of Please Call Me revenue. Vodacom challenged this ruling, arguing that the SCA overstepped its bounds as an appellate court, particularly because Makate had not lodged a cross-appeal. The Constitutional Court, being the highest court in the land, granted Vodacom leave to appeal and upheld its challenge. Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, writing for a unanimous bench in what is widely regarded as his swan judgment before retirement, agreed. The Constitutional Court held that the SCA had impermissibly ventured into terrain that required a cross-appeal and had disregarded the true issues before it. This resulted in a failure of justice, specifically a breach of Vodacom's right to a fair public hearing as guaranteed under section 34 of the Constitution. The Constitutional Court has directed that the case return to the SCA, where a different panel of judges will now consider it afresh. It marks a rare judicial reset in a case that has already passed through every major court in the country. The legal significance of this moment cannot be overstated. The Constitutional Court has reinforced the boundaries of appellate authority and revived critical scrutiny around the quantum of fair compensation. The referral order compels the SCA to take a fresh look, with a new bench and a sharper lens, at the determination originally made by Vodacom's CEO. That figure was R47 million, reached after extensive modelling and expert input. It followed a failed negotiation between Makate, who proposed R20.2 billion, and Vodacom, which offered R10 million. Makate has challenged the CEO's determination as woefully low, especially in light of the widespread success of the Please Call Me service. Beyond the courtroom, this case has come to represent the struggle for equitable recognition of intellectual contributions, especially by employees in corporate ecosystems. The 'Please Call Me' litigation has gripped the public imagination. It's not just because of the staggering figures involved. It speaks to something profoundly South African: the courage to claim one's voice and the power of innovation born in unlikely places. As the legal process restarts again, one hopes that the eventual outcome will honour not just the merits of law but the deeper values it serves—justice, fairness, and transformative equity. That would be a fitting tribute to Justice Madlanga's legacy of principled clarity and constitutional fidelity. (Nomvalo is Head of Legal: Operations at Life Healthcare Group. She began her career in corporate litigation and commercial law at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc. Her expertise also encompasses traditional arts, heritage preservation, transformation, and the promotion of women's and children's rights. Her views don't necessarily reflect those of the Sunday Tribune or Independent Media) SUNDAY TRIBUNE
The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
#CaxtonCares: Pad a girl's future this Women's Month
This Women's Month (August), The Boksburg Advertiser, Caxton Local Media East Rand and the Pick n Pay Towers are stepping up to fight period poverty, one sanitary pad at a time. According to Breadline Africa, more than a third of SA girls miss an estimated 20% of their academic year due to a lack of access to basic menstrual products like sanitary pads. To help address this issue, donations of sanitary pads can be dropped off at the Pick n Pay Towers. Community support is warmly welcomed and greatly appreciated. Help Caxton Local Media empower our future queens by donating a packet of sanitary pads. Also Read: #CaxtonCares: [Video] Caxton shows support for Mandela Day All donated products will be distributed by our publication to selected local schools to make a meaningful and empowering event for the learners. Pick n Pay Towers owner Antoni Rangousis said the store has pledged R10 000 towards the initiative. 'I believe this is an incredible project that will assist many young women. I know many girls have to stay home and miss school due to a lack of access to sanitary products,' said Rangousis. The Advertiser thanks the Pick n Pay Towers for its generous support. Also Read: Caxton Cares: School shoe project brings hope to vulnerable children
