logo
Researchers make critical discovery that could change the future of seafood: 'Working relentlessly to find solutions'

Researchers make critical discovery that could change the future of seafood: 'Working relentlessly to find solutions'

Yahoo21-04-2025
Delicious and a great source of protein and omega-3 fatty acids, fish is a wonderful dietary option for the health-conscious diner, but keeping up with rising demand is a major challenge that comes with a high ecological cost.
Promising new research could fix the core issue standing in the way of sustainable seafood, however.
A team of researchers at the University of California, Santa Cruz has created a new aquaculture feed made from microalgae called Nannochloropsis sp. that promotes the same growth and nutritional value as fish reared with traditional feed.
The breakthrough came after previously unsuccessful experiments to create alternatives. It turns out that popular fish such as trout and salmon are picky eaters.
Explaining that about half the fish we consume comes from fish farms, assistant professor Pallab Sarker, the lead author of the research, explained to Phys.org: "Aquaculture can help to feed our growing population, but right now, it too often comes at a surprising cost to wild fish. So we and others across the industry have been working relentlessly to find solutions that don't put further stress on ocean ecosystems."
Fish meal, essentially ground-up wild fish, is used to raise livestock on fish farms. So aquaculture is still tied to the problems caused by commercial fishing. These include overfishing and habitat destruction.
The process also damages the ocean's biodiversity because of bycatch — the unintended capture of marine animals such as dolphins and turtles.
Disputes over fishing rights can also lead to geopolitical tensions between countries. The United Kingdom and Iceland "fought" multiple conflicts in the 20th century over fishing rights in the North Atlantic.
The research could eventually lead to the decoupling of aquaculture and commercial fishing, but there is some way to go before Nannochloropsis sp. can be produced at scale. It's still too expensive to make from scratch, but Sarker hopes this latest breakthrough can pave the way for further innovations to make seafood more sustainable:
"We hope that this type of research, showing the promises of microalgae, can lend further motivation to help the industry solve that problem of cost," he said.
Which of these groups has the biggest role to play in reducing food waste?
Grocery stores
Restaurants
Individuals
The government
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Two Thirds Of Trash Found In Global Rivers Is Plastic, Study Finds
Two Thirds Of Trash Found In Global Rivers Is Plastic, Study Finds

Forbes

time11 hours ago

  • Forbes

Two Thirds Of Trash Found In Global Rivers Is Plastic, Study Finds

Pieces of plastic, including bottles, bags, straws and cutlery, make up two thirds of the rubbish found in rivers around the world, according to a new analysis. The research by experts at the University of California, Santa Barbara, used on-the-ground data from Mexico, Jamaica, Panama, Ecuador, Kenya, Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia. Over the three-year period, local teams collectively removed and analyzed 3.8 million kilograms of river debris, the equivalent to 380,000,000 single-use plastic water bottles, with 66% classified as microplastic. The researchers also found substantial variation in the amount of plastic pollution intercepted in rivers studied, but all contained plastic debris of some sort. Based on their findings, researchers now estimate 1.95 million metric tons of travels down rivers worldwide every year. The study has been published as negotiators in Geneva failed to reach an agreement on an international treaty to curb plastic pollution. Lead author, Chase Brewster, a project scientist in University of California, Santa Barbara's Benioff Ocean Science Laboratory, said it was largest continuous dataset, which has ever been produced on the subject of plastic pollution in rivers, in an interview. Brewster added the research helps underline and scope and the scale of the issue around the world. 'This problem is not going away and it is global,' he told me. 'We should not be ignoring in this day and age the fact two thirds of everything coming down our rivers is now plastic.' Brewster said the researchers on the project also engaged with local communities and he hoped the data would help them take targeted action 'The more involved and engaged people are, and the more empowered they feel in their communities, the more likely they are to change behavior and influence legislation in their areas. 'More often than not, these communities are not trying to pollute. It's the larger institutions who are failing them. There's no access to waste management services, or other options.' Brewster said the report makes a number of recommendations, including creating more of a value for plastic waste to discourage people from throwing it away and letting it go to waste. He added one of the big problems is that it is still cheaper to produce virgin plastic than it is to make recycled plastic, so there need to be incentives like bottle deposit fees, and virgin production caps to create better market conditions for a circular economy. The study also calls for greater support for the informal waste-picking sector in certain parts of the world and more investment in waste management and recycling infrastructure and services. It also recommends more consistent and more transparent monitoring and data collection to inform targeted upstream actions. In addition, it calls for well-designed local and national policies as well as ambitious international frameworks to address the different scales of the problem. 'Negotiators and country officials can use this data to assess the river plastic pollution problem in real life, look at differences in pollution in different places, and test ideas about what policies and systems are working,' Brewster added. Anthony Merante, senior plastics campaigner at Oceana Canada, said the oceans have become the dumping grounds for the world's plastic waste, in an email. Merante added people have over-plasticized their lives and invested in single-use, disposable systems hoping that recycling will save us. 'Not a single river studied was free from plastic, emphasizing that this is a planetary problem we all must act to correct,' he said. 'The solution is clear; we need to reduce plastic production and use and invest in solutions that actually work like refill and reuse.'

Scientists Identify a New Glitch in Human Thinking
Scientists Identify a New Glitch in Human Thinking

Gizmodo

timea day ago

  • Gizmodo

Scientists Identify a New Glitch in Human Thinking

Good news, everyone! Scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, have coined a new term to describe our brains being dumb. In a recent study, they provide evidence for a distinct but common kind of cognitive bias—one that makes us reluctant to take the easier path in life if it means retracing our steps. The researchers have named the bias the 'doubling-back aversion.' In several experiments, they found that people often refuse to choose a more efficient solution or route if it requires them to double back on the progress already made. The findings suggest that people's subjective fear of adding more to their workload and their hesitance to wipe the slate clean contribute to this bias, the researchers say. 'Participants' aversion to feeling their past efforts were a waste encouraged them to pursue less efficient means,' they wrote in their paper, published this May in Psychological Science. The 12 cognitive biases that prevent you from being rational Psychologists have detailed all sorts of biases related to digging our feet in when faced with important new information. People tend to stick to the status quo in choosing dinner at a favorite restaurant, for example, even when someone recommends a potentially tastier option. There's also the sunk cost fallacy, or the reluctance to veer off a disastrous path and choose another simply because they've spent so much time or resources pursuing it. The researchers argue that their newly named bias is certainly a close cousin to the sunk cost fallacy and similar biases, but that it ultimately describes a unique type of cognitive pitfall. In their paper, they provide the example of someone whose flight from San Francisco to New York becomes massively delayed early on, leaving them stuck in Los Angeles. In one scenario, the traveler can get home three hours earlier than their current itinerary if they accept the airline's offer of a new flight that first stops in Denver; in the second, the person is instead offered a flight that will also shave three hours off, but they'll first have to travel back to San Francisco. Despite both flights saving the same amount of time, people are more likely to refuse the one that requires going back to their earlier destination, the paper explains (some people might even refuse the Denver flight, but that would be an example of the status quo bias and/or sunk cost fallacy at work, they note). To test their hypothesis, the researchers ran four different types of experiments. The experiments collectively involved more than 2,500 adults, some of whom were UC Berkeley students and others who were volunteers recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk. In one test, people were asked to walk along different paths in virtual reality; another asked people to recite as many words starting with the same letter as possible. Across the various tests, the researchers found that people routinely exhibited this aversion. This Is What Your Brain Looks Like When You Solve a Problem In one experiment where people had to recite words starting with 'G,' for instance, everyone was asked midway through if they wanted to stay with the same letter or switch to reciting words starting with 'T' (a likely easier letter). In the control condition, this decision was framed as staying on the same task, simply with a new letter, but in the other, people were asked if they wanted to throw out the work they had done so far and start over on a new task. Importantly, the volunteers were also given progress bars for the task, allowing them to see they would perform the same amount of work no matter the choice (though again, 'T' would be easier). About 75% of participants made the choice to switch in the control condition, but only 25% did the same when the switch was presented as needing to double back. 'When I was analyzing these results, I was like, 'Oh, is there a mistake? How can there be such a big difference?'' said lead author Kristine Cho, a behavioral marketing PhD student at UC Berkely's Haas School of Business, in a statement to the Association for Psychological Science, publishers of the study. Other researchers will have to confirm the team's findings, of course. And there are still plenty of questions to answer about this aversion, including how often we fall for it and whether it's more likely to happen in some scenarios than others. But for now, it's oddly comforting to know that there's another thing I can possibly blame for my occasional stubbornness to take the faster subway train home.

AI-powered brain implant restores speech in paralysis patient after 18 years
AI-powered brain implant restores speech in paralysis patient after 18 years

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

AI-powered brain implant restores speech in paralysis patient after 18 years

Eighteen years after a brainstem stroke left her with near-total paralysis, Ann Johnson heard her voice again, thanks to a brain-computer interface (BCI) that decodes speech directly from brain activity. Johnson, then 30, was a high school teacher and coach in Saskatchewan, Canada, when the 2005 stroke caused locked-in syndrome, a rare condition in which a person remains conscious but unable to speak or move. Since then, she has communicated using an eye-tracking system at just 14 words per minute, a far from natural conversational speed of about 160 words per minute. In 2022, she became the third participant in a clinical trial led by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, and UC San Francisco aimed at restoring speech for people with severe paralysis. The team used a neuroprosthesis that records signals from the speech motor cortex, bypassing damaged neural pathways to produce audible words. Turning thought into voice The device relies on an implant placed over the brain's speech production area. When Johnson attempts to speak, the implant detects neural activity and sends the signals to a connected computer. An AI decoder then translates these signals into text, speech, or facial animation on a digital avatar. Originally, the system used sequence-to-sequence AI models that required an entire sentence before producing output, creating an eight-second delay. In March 2025, the team reported in Nature Neuroscience that they had switched to a streaming architecture, allowing near-real-time translation with just a one-second delay. To personalize the experience, researchers recreated Johnson's voice from a recording of her 2004 wedding speech. She also selected an avatar to match her appearance, which can mimic facial expressions such as smiling or frowning. Engineering for everyday use Lead researchers Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Gopala Anumanchipalli (UC Berkeley), neurosurgeon Edward Chang (UCSF), and Berkeley Ph.D. student Kaylo Littlejohn say the goal is to make neuroprostheses 'plug-and-play,' turning them from experimental systems into standard clinical tools. Future improvements could include wireless implants, eliminating the need for direct computer connections, and photorealistic avatars for more natural interactions. The team envisions digital 'clones' that replicate not just a user's voice but also their conversational style and visual cues. The breakthrough could help a relatively small but highly vulnerable population, including people who lose the ability to speak due to stroke, ALS, or injury, reclaim faster, more natural communication. Researchers emphasize that the system only works when the participant intentionally tries to speak, preserving user agency and privacy. For Johnson, the trial was life-changing. 'I want patients to see me and to know their lives are not over now,' she said in a statement to UCSF. She hopes to one day work as a counselor in a rehabilitation center, using a neuroprosthesis to talk with clients. With latency down to about a second and ongoing advances in AI modeling, the researchers believe practical, real-time speech restoration could arrive within just a few years, reshaping how technology gives voice to those who have lost their own. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store