Australia and UK to sign 50-year defense agreement
The AUKUS security partnership involves the US, UK and Australia, but the fresh treaty is only between London and Canberra. In opening remarks with UK leaders, Marles said the two nations' relationship might be Australia's most important partnership.
'We rely on each other in so many ways and obviously, combined, we are part of a system that gives us tremendous intelligence capability and military capability,' he said. While negotiations over the defense agreement were flagged before US President Donald Trump took power, the document's inking shows the UK and Australia are strengthening ties in the face of American tariffs and the Pentagon's yet-to-be-completed AUKUS review.
But the planned sale of US-built boats has been up in the air since the Trump administration launched a review of the deal to examine whether it aligns with his 'America first' agenda. Defence analysts believe a likely outcome of the US review will be a request for more money from Australia to support its submarine industrial base.
Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior analyst Alex Bristow said holding ministerial meetings every six months, rather than the traditional annual timeline, highlighted strengthened ties between the two nations. 'The tempo of it increasing, I think, is a signal that Britain is moving into an elite category,' he said.
The UK's Carrier Strike Group, led by the Royal Navy flagship HMS Prince of Wales, arrived in Darwin on Wednesday during Talisman Sabre multi-nation military exercises hosted by Australia. It's the first UK carrier strike group to visit Australia since 1997. The international task group includes five core ships, 24 jets and 17 helicopters, centered on the flagship aircraft carrier.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
24 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Amazon and Microsoft harming competition in cloud computing, finds CMA
The final report from an independent inquiry group of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has found that Microsoft and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are hurting competition in the cloud computing sector. Microsoft came under particular fire, with the panel's report saying it has 'significant market power' with some of its software products. It raised concerns over the way Microsoft charges Amazon and Google to use its software, which it said is driving up costs. The report recommends that the CMA uses new powers to give Microsoft and AWS so-called strategic market status in order to 'remedy the harms to competition that we have found'. 'This would enable the CMA to impose targeted and bespoke interventions to address the concerns we have identified, including with respect to features where there are specification risks around the design of effective market interventions,' according to the report. The CMA will now launch a probe into whether to hand them 'strategic market status', but this would not start until 2026 as it focuses efforts on proposals announced last week to assign this status to Google and Apple over their mobile platforms. The panel found that a lack of competition in the £9 billion cloud sector could be leading to higher costs, less choice and innovation, and a lower quality of services for businesses across the UK. AWS and Microsoft's Azure each have up to around a 40% share of consumer spend in the market, with Google lagging behind in third place. On Microsoft, the report said: 'Microsoft's licensing practices are adversely impacting the competitiveness of AWS and Google in the supply of cloud services, particularly in competing for customers that purchase cloud services which use the relevant Microsoft software as an input. 'As a result, Microsoft faces weaker competitive constraints from AWS and Google, its most significant competitors, which is reducing competition in cloud services markets.' Annual results from Microsoft on Wednesday showed booming sales in its Azure cloud computing business, with revenues for the division surpassing 75 billion US dollars (£57 billion) on an annual basis. A Microsoft spokesperson said: 'The CMA panel's most recent publication misses the mark again, ignoring that the cloud market has never been so dynamic and competitive, with record investment and rapid, AI-driven changes. 'Its recommendations fail to cover Google, one of the fastest-growing cloud market participants. 'Microsoft looks forward to working with the digital markets unit toward an outcome that more accurately reflects the current competition in cloud that benefits UK customers.' A spokesperson for AWS said the report 'disregards clear evidence of robust competition in the UK's IT services industry'. They added: 'The action proposed by the inquiry group is unwarranted and undermines the substantial investment and innovation that have already benefited hundreds of thousands of UK businesses. 'It risks making the UK a global outlier at a time when businesses need regulatory predictability for the UK to maintain international competitiveness.' But Google welcomed the findings and called for 'swift action'. Chris Lindsay, Google Cloud's vice president of customer engineering in the EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa) region, said: 'The conclusive finding that restrictive licensing harms cloud customers and competition is a watershed moment for the UK. 'Swift action from the (CMA's) Digital Markets Unit is essential to ensure British businesses pay a fair price and to unleash choice, innovation and economic growth in the UK.' The Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) cautioned there was a risk that the 'overly broad and prescriptive intervention' recommended could hamper investment in the UK and access to new technology. Matthew Sinclair, CCIA UK senior director, said: 'If the CMA goes ahead with these changes it would undermine the UK's competitiveness as business users here no longer get access to the latest cloud services.'
Auto Car
24 minutes ago
- Auto Car
The CEO of Jaguar and Land Rover is retiring after two years in the top job
In a recent interview with Autocar, Mardell revealed that he had driven the new GT and said it was the "most fun I've had" in his time as JLR boss. "It was stunning in terms of its speed, its acceleration, its performance, but also how it delivered the power with a real sense of character," he said. "The chassis team are really excited about the possibilities of the vehicle.' Speaking more generally about Jaguar's prospects as an all-electric luxury brand, Mardell said he was "certain we will have wait lists which are significant relative to the volumes we aspire for with the first product'. He continued: "In today's market conditions, I don't see anything which is going to concern me about the success of the new Jaguar in this new world at all, actually.' Mardell leaves JLR in a position of far greater stability than that it was in when he took the top job, but the company still faces strong headwinds. Chief among those is the imposition of new tariffs on foreign-built cars in the crucial US market, which accounts for a huge proportion of sales of JLR's most profitable models. The UK recently secured a trade deal that reduced the US import tariff on its exported cars from an initially mooted 25% to 10%, which is good news for the Solihull-built Range Rover models and the Halewood-produced Range Rover Evoque and Discovery Sport. But that levy only applies to the first 100,000 cars shipped to the US in a year, meaning any JLR models shipped above that number are liable to attract the higher 25% fee. Similarly, while the EU has now struck a deal with the US, cars shipped from the region to North America will still attract a 15% tariff, which will have significant implications for the Defender and Discovery, both built in Slovakia. Mardell's eventual replacement will also have to negotiate JLR's inevitable shift to a pure-electric line-up over the coming years, in the face of waning global demand for premium EVs.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Car finance mis-selling case deadline revealed as millions could be owed compensation
Millions of motorists may soon be owed major payouts as a key deadline for legal proceedings over widespread mis-selling of car financing is set revealed. The Supreme Court will be delivering a crucial judgement on Friday which could pave the way for a massive redress scheme potentially affecting millions. It will rule on a shock Court of Appeal ruling last autumn that all car finance agreements with hidden commission were unlawful. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has said it will set out exactly how an industry-wide redress scheme will work following the Supreme Court decision. Up to 90 per cent of new cars purchased in the UK are bought using motor finance, meaning millions could potentially be due payouts following the ruling. Anyone who bought a car before January 2021 using a car finance scheme could be eligible for compensation after the FCA found that many 'may have been charged too much' by their lenders. This is because some companies 'discretionary commission arrangements' with brokers, which gave them the power to adjust customers' interest rates on Personal Contract Purchase (PCP) and Hire Purchase agreements. Because these brokers earned more commission on higher rates, this created an incentive to maximise the rate given. An estimated 40 per cent of car finance deals were thought to be affected by the issue. The FCA outlawed this practice from 28 January 2021, but acknowledge that a 'high number' of people have now come forward to claim they had been overcharged before the ban. The financial regulator has confirmed that it will consult on a redress scheme and laid out the factors it will consider. In a statement in March 2025, it said: 'Firms would be responsible for determining whether customers had lost out due to their failings, but the FCA would set rules that firms must follow under the scheme and introduce checks to ensure they do.' However, the FCA is waiting for the upcoming Supreme Court judgement before finalising details, as the outcome of this case could expand the scope of the redress scheme much further. The shock Court of Appeal ruling last autumn found that if a car finance agreement didn't inform customers of all the details of commission, it was likely unlawful. This is a regular practice, with experts predicting 99 per cent of deals are affected by the issue. It is car finance firms Close Brothers and Motonovo are appealing this judgement in the Supreme Court, with the final judgement set to decide how many motorists will be due compensation. The FCA has said it will confirm within six weeks of this judgement if it is launching a compensation scheme. Money expert Martin Lewis said: 'This decision could have ramifications across the economy, far beyond car finance. 'If the Supreme Court doesn't overturn the Court of Appeal decision, the knock-on effects could be substantial on other forms of lending and the economy. It could shake the foundations of consumer lending (meaning less possible available credit for many). 'So much so, I have long said I worry it may do more harm than good for consumers. It's therefore unsurprising there's talk of the Chancellor overruling the decision if the Supreme Court follows the Court of Appeal.' The Money Saving Expert founder and FCA have both advised those who believe they may be affected to hold off on signing up to any claims management or law firms advertising their services over the issue. This is because these services will not be required if payouts are automatic, but may still be able to take payment. The regulator explains: 'Consumers should be aware that by signing up now with a CMC or law firm, they may end up paying for a service they do not need and having to pay up to 30 per cent in fees out of any award they may receive."
