Trump administration moves to lift Biden-era mining restrictions near Boundary Waters in Minnesota
The decision, announced Wednesday by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, threw a lifeline to the proposed Twin Metals Minnesota mine near Ely.
Democratic administrations have tried to kill the project because of what they called the threat of acid mine drainage into Boundary Waters, the country's most-visited federally designated wilderness area.
Twin Metals is owned by Chilean mining giant Antofagasta. President Barack Obama's administration declined to renew the company's mineral rights leases in the area in 2016. The first Trump administration reinstated those leases in 2019.
President Joe Biden's administration canceled the leases again in 2022 and imposed a 20-year moratorium on mining known as a 'mineral withdrawal' in a 350-square-mile (900-square-kilometer) area of the Superior National Forest upstream from the wilderness that includes the proposed underground mine site.
Trump has singled out copper as a focus of his domestic minerals policy and promised during a campaign stop in St. Cloud, Minnesota, last year that he would quickly reverse the moratorium.
The Boundary Waters is managed by the U.S. Forest Service, which is part of the Agriculture Department, putting it under Rollins' purview, and the leases are controlled by Burgum's Interior Department.
'After careful review, including extensive public input, the US Forest Service has enough information to know the withdrawal was never needed,' Rollins posted on X. 'We look forward to working with Sec. Burgum to pursue American Energy Dominance and reverse the costly and disastrous policies of the Biden Administration.'
Twin Metals spokesperson Kathy Graul praised the Trump administration for beginning the process of reversing the Biden administration's decision, which she said was 'based on a deeply flawed assessment' that failed to consider environmental safeguards the company built into its project design.
The company argues that its mine design will prevent acid discharges, and that the best way to determine whether it's safe is by allowing it to undergo a formal environmental review process, which the state canceled in 2022.
'Overturning the mineral withdrawal will allow Minnesota the opportunity to become a global leader in the much-needed domestic production of minerals under some of the most rigorous environment and labor standards in the world,' Graul said in a statement.
But critics disputed her claim about public input, pointing out that the Trump administration has not conducted a formal public comment process on the policy reversal.
'The announcement by Secretaries Burgum and Rollins is shocking,' Ingrid Lyons, executive director of Save the Boundary Waters, said in a statement. 'They claim to have consulted with the people of Minnesota about the Boundary Waters when they clearly have not.'
Democratic U.S. Sen. Tina Smith of Minnesota scoffed at the secretary's claim about a 'careful review,' saying on X that the administration is 'using pseudoscience to justify bad actions' and predicting that the decision will be challenged in court.
'Not this mine. Not this place. The Boundary Waters are too precious,' Smith said.
Republican U.S. Rep. Pete Stauber, who represents northeastern Minnesota and has championed the region's iron and copper-nickel mining industries, said the Biden-era decision was a 'massive wrong' that only 'further cemented our reliance on Communist China' for critical minerals.
'As the demand for critical minerals continues to skyrocket, I look forward to seeing Minnesota's skilled miners safely deliver our vast mineral wealth to the nation using the best labor and environmental standards in the world,' Stauber said in a statement.
Twin Metals is separate from two other proposed copper-nickel mines in Minnesota, the NewRange project formerly known as PolyMet, near Hoyt Lakes, which remains stalled by regulatory and court setbacks, and Talon Metals, near McGregor, which the Biden administration supported.
Steve Karnowski, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
24 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
WKHS Stock Alert: Halper Sadeh LLC Is Investigating Whether the Merger of Workhorse Group Inc. Is Fair to Shareholders
Halper Sadeh LLC, an investor rights law firm, is investigating whether the merger of Workhorse Group Inc. (NASDAQ: WKHS) and Motiv Electric Trucks is fair to Workhorse shareholders. Upon completion of the proposed transaction, Workhorse shareholders will own approximately 26.5% of the combined company. Halper Sadeh encourages Workhorse shareholders to click here to learn more about their legal rights and options or contact Daniel Sadeh or Zachary Halper at (212) 763-0060 or sadeh@ or zhalper@ The investigation concerns whether Workhorse and its board violated the federal securities laws and/or breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders by failing to, among other things: (1) obtain the best possible consideration for Workhorse shareholders; and (2) disclose all material information necessary for Workhorse shareholders to adequately assess and value the merger consideration. On behalf of Workhorse shareholders, Halper Sadeh LLC may seek increased consideration for shareholders, additional disclosures and information concerning the proposed transaction, or other relief and benefits. We would handle the action on a contingent fee basis, whereby you would not be responsible for out-of-pocket payment of our legal fees or expenses. Halper Sadeh LLC represents investors all over the world who have fallen victim to securities fraud and corporate misconduct. Our attorneys have been instrumental in implementing corporate reforms and recovering millions of dollars on behalf of defrauded investors. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Globe and Mail
24 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Obstacles to peace remain, regardless of Trump's impatience to broker a settlement
A dud, followed by a date. The dud was the nearly three-hour meeting between two combative presidents seeking to convince each other, and the world, that they want peace in Ukraine. The date is the Monday meeting now scheduled between Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. And while there was no swift agreement at the Alaska summit, there's the potential for a second date — a possible additional meeting between Mr. Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin — which might wipe away the notion the session at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson was anti-climatical. Trump says no summit deal with Putin over Ukraine war, but talks were 'very productive' Zelensky to meet Trump on Monday after U.S.-Russia summit failed to secure ceasefire What emerged early Saturday was the sentiment, shared by the Russian and American presidents but not by the Ukrainians and European leaders, that, as Mr. Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, 'the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' That revealed a clear advantage to Mr. Putin and a clear rebuke to Mr. Zelensky. One of the other few discernible signals emerging from the session that began with a red-carpet greeting and military flyover salute was yet another split between Mr. Trump and longtime American allies. The leaders of Great Britain, France, Germany, Finland, Italy, Poland, the European Union, and the European Council issued a threat to increase economic pressure on Russia 'as long as the killing in Ukraine continues,' adding, 'We will continue to strengthen sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressure on Russia's war economy until there is a just and lasting peace.' Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene accused Mr. Putin of 'more gaslighting and veiled threats.' All this, especially the prospect of further meetings, gives 21st century meaning to the 20th century term 'shuttle diplomacy,' the effort that Henry Kissinger pioneered more than a half-century ago when — like the old Eastern Airlines air travel in the northeast corridor of the United States between Washington and New York, itself a metaphor from the way a needle carries yarn in a weaving loom — the American envoy shuttled between Middle East capitals in his effort to end hostilities growing out of the Yom Kippur War. And like the Kissinger episode — starring a figure known for dark intrigue and quiet, informal assurances made, warped, broken, and reshaped — what is occurring on the surface in the effort to bring the Ukraine combat to a close almost certainly represents only a fraction of what is occurring in hushed meetings, back-channel communications, and fevered private negotiations. Shribman: Trump and Putin in Alaska is a study in contrasts But amid all the confidences and code, the clearest indications may have come from the master of obfuscation himself, Mr. Putin. It came at the end of what appeared to be — continual warning: surface appearances in moments like these almost always obscure real developments, though not necessarily progress — a bland meet-and-greet in a faraway venue that, over the decades, has been controlled by both countries. It does not require the tools and cynical eye of the veteran Kremlinologist to understand the meaning behind this Putin remark: 'We are convinced that in order to make the settlement lasting and long-term, we need to eliminate all the root causes of the conflict.' It is a contemporary example of the phrase ('riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma') that Winston Churchill employed to describe Russia's unpredictable, often inscrutable, conduct in the early years of the Second World War. The riddle/mystery/enigma quote is often employed by journalists and historians examining Russia. But what is almost never quoted from that Churchill broadcast from London on Oct. 1, 1939, are the dozen words that follow, a more prosaic but continually relevant insight from Great Britain's wartime leader: 'But perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.' In Mr. Putin's reckoning, Russian national interest is both historical (the role of Ukraine in various incarnations of Russia, including the Soviet Union) and geopolitical (the desire of Kyiv for association with the European Union and NATO and to stand separate from Moscow). There remain many obstacles to peace and transforming the world order, regardless of Mr. Trump's lightning-fast experience in transforming American domestic life and his impatience to broker a settlement as part of his thinly veiled attempt to win a Nobel Peace Prize. One is a vital part of the 'historic life-interests of Russia' that Churchill went on to set out in his 'enigma' remarks 86 years ago: control of, or at least the establishment of, a sphere of influence within the broad plain of Eastern Europe. Opinion: Trump meets like-minded Putin, while the West watches Another is the notion, seldom expressed but widely acknowledged, that Putin understands that the very act of continuing the fighting is an element of his leverage. And a third is Ukraine's reluctance — in a way an historic life-interest of its own — to swap land for peace. Relinquishing what Ukrainian military personnel have fought and died to hold onto, and what more than 13,580 civilians have died for, according to the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, would be harsh medicine and not a cure in Kyiv. On the other hand — more obscurantism from the master — Mr. Putin is the only principal in these negotiations who knows fully the cost of the nearly three-and-a-half-year war against Ukraine in terms of military casualties, economic distress and public support in Russia. It is, of course, conceivable there might be a surprise. Mr. Trump loves surprises. Perhaps he will broker a deal — he loves deals, too — for Kyiv to trade Ukrainian membership in the European Union (but not NATO) for minor geographical losses that will save face for Mr. Putin and save deaths for Ukrainians. Maybe something else is in the works. Who knows? The smart betting is that right now the troika of Mr. Trump, Mr. Putin and Mr. Zelensky don't know either — but that the Ukrainian, as the American president put it in his contentious February Oval Office meeting, doesn't hold the strongest cards. The wisdom in cases like these often comes from the Chicago sportswriter and satirist Ring Lardner (1885-1933). As he put it in his short story 'The Constant Jay,' published in The New Yorker exactly a century ago, 'The race is not always to the swift nor the battle to the strong — but that's the way to bet.'
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
1 Reason to Buy Robinhood Markets (HOOD) Stock
Key Points Robinhood is attracting new customers at a rapid clip. Revenue grew 45% in Q2, yet Robinhood still offers a limited range of services compared to big brokers. As it continues to roll out new features, Robinhood could see an avalanche of asset growth. 10 stocks we like better than Robinhood Markets › Robinhood Markets (NASDAQ: HOOD) is breaking a new mold in the fintech market. The stock has rocketed 490% higher over the past year, sending its market cap toward $100 billion. While the stock might look overbought after such a steep rally, its customer assets are still very small compared to other leading financial service companies, which leaves plenty of room for the company (and stock) to grow in value over the long term. The more services Robinhood brings customers, the more it grows Robinhood's platform assets have increased from $89 billion in the second quarter of 2023 to $279 billion in Q2 2025. With fee-generating services like Robinhood Gold continuing to gain traction, revenue grew 45% year over year in the second quarter to $989 million. This is why the stock is still a buy at these highs. Robinhood is seeing this much growth while offering limited services compared to big brokers like Schwab. As it catches up, Robinhood could grow into a multitrillion-dollar financial services company. Robinhood's pace of new announcements has been remarkable. In the first quarter, it rolled out index options to all customers, and it followed that up in the second quarter with the launch of stock tokens in Europe, allowing those customers to trade over 200 U.S. stocks in the form of tokenized contracts on a blockchain. By the end of the third quarter, Robinhood plans to launch its new banking service too. These are just a few of the many announcements the company has made recently. As it continues to launch new trading products, including its Cortex AI -powered trading tool later this year, its platform assets will likely continue to grow. There are several products, including fixed-income securities, that Robinhood can eventually tap into to further support its growth. For perspective, Schwab has over $10 trillion in client assets. I wouldn't bet against Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev's ability to grow Robinhood into one of country's largest brokerage services. The stock still offers tremendous long-term upside. Should you invest $1,000 in Robinhood Markets right now? Before you buy stock in Robinhood Markets, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Robinhood Markets wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Charles Schwab is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. John Ballard has positions in Robinhood Markets. The Motley Fool recommends Charles Schwab and recommends the following options: short September 2025 $92.50 calls on Charles Schwab. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
