Supreme Court allows Trump to dismantle education department
Granting an emergency request from the administration over three dissents, the justices put on hold a federal district court ruling that said Mr Trump's purge would leave the department unable to perform duties required under US law. The Supreme Court order will apply while the case continues on appeal.
The court's three liberals dissented. Writing for the group, Justice Sonia Sotomayor blasted the decision as 'indefensible' and said it gave the president 'the power to repeal statutes by firing all those necessary to carry them out.'
'The majority is either wilfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naive, but either way the threat to our Constitution's separation of powers is grave,' said Justice Sotomayor, who was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
The ruling reinforces the Supreme Court's decision last week to let Mr Trump broadly move ahead with a push to dramatically reduce the size of the federal workforce. The July 8 decision didn't address the lawfulness of individual agency plans, and the latest ruling could boost the administration as it defends against legal challenges to those actions.
Trump has 'ultimate authority'
Linda McMahon, the education secretary, said in an emailed statement: 'Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious.
'The president of the United States, as the head of the executive branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organisation, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies.'
Ms McMahon announced on March 11 that the department was cutting half its staff through a reduction in force. Mr Trump followed with a March 20 executive order that said McMahon should 'to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law, take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the department of education.'
The effort is being challenged in two lawsuits, one brought primarily by states led by Democrats and the other filed by several Massachusetts public school systems and unions.
Skye Perryman, the president of Democracy Forward which represents schools and unions, said: 'Without explaining to the American people its reasoning, a majority of justices on the US Supreme Court have dealt a devastating blow to this nation's promise of public education for all children.'
The New York attorney general's office, which led the coalition of states, didn't immediately return requests for comment.
US District Judge Myong Joun in Boston ruled in May that the personnel cuts would 'likely cripple the department.' He said the challengers would probably succeed in showing that Mr Trump was effectively dissolving the department by getting rid of its employees, closing regional offices and moving programmes to other federal agencies.
'A department without enough employees to perform statutorily mandated functions is not a department at all,' Mr Joun wrote. 'This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself.'
The Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Joun's ruling, paving the way for Mr Trump's Supreme Court request.
The case is the latest to address Mr Trump's authority to dismantle entities created by Congress, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the US Agency for International Development and the US Institute of Peace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘It's a concentration camp': Everything we know about Trump's new ‘Alligator Alcatraz' in the Florida Everglades
The name given by Donald Trump and his allies to Florida 's new barebones immigrant detention camp is ghoulish enough: 'Alligator Alcatraz'. Critics, however, argue that it is nothing less than a concentration camp on American soil, designed to round up disfavored minorities even if they have committed no crimes. Rapidly built and opened in the space of just two weeks on a remote and rarely used airstrip in Florida's reptile-rich Everglades, the camp is intended to hold up to 5,000 people arrested by U.S. immigration authorities while they await deportation. Numerous detainees, their families, and their lawyers have already alleged inhumane and unsafe conditions, including maggoty food and overflowing toilets. Polling suggests that almost half of all Americans disapprove of the facility, with only 26 per cent of independent voters being in favor. So what exactly is Alligator Alcatraz, and what will happen to the so far 700-odd people detained there? Surrounded by alligators and pythons Long before his 2024 election victory, Donald Trump and his team were drawing up plans to deport millions of people every year — and hold them in vast new detention camps while their cases were processed. Alligator Alcatraz is a preview of that potential future. Rather than being the federal government, it's actually a project of Florida's Republican governor — and former Trump election rival — Ron DeSantis, who invoked emergency powers to seize the land last month. Who funded this remains unclear. DeSantis has said he will be reimbursed by the federal government, and Trump's homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem, has said it will be "largely funded" by FEMA. Yet in court filings, the U.S. Justice Department has claimed that "not implemented, authorized, directed, or funded Florida's temporary detention center" — despite the fact that immigration enforcement is handled by the federal government. Regardless, Republicans have made no secret of their rationale. "You don't need to invest that much in the perimeter," claimed Florida's attorney general James Uthmeier. "If people get out, there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons." And yes, 'Alligator Alcatraz' is now its official name. It's even emblazoned on road signs that lead to the facility. 'Packed into cages' The facility's construction is extremely basic — and its conditions are allegedly brutal. Detainees are kept in metal cages, with dozens of people packed into each one, housed inside gigantic heavy-duty tents in the sweltering heat. Even the staff appear to be based in temporary prefab huts and mobile trailers parked nearby. Detainees and their families have reported worm-infested food, routine medical neglect, unreliable air conditioning, and inadequate toilets that overflow and cover the floor with feces. Government officials have adamantly disputed these accusations, but have provided few details and have denied access to the media. In total, there are currently around 3,000 beds. 'They have no way to bathe, no way to wash their mouths, the toilet overflows and the floor is flooded with pee and poop,' said the wife of one 35-year-old Cuban detainee. "They eat once a day and have two minutes to eat. The meals have worms." At one point, detainees "all went on a hunger strike" in protest against the conditions, she said, adding that her calls with him were interrupted every three minutes by an automated voice saying the conversation was recorded. Lawyers have also reported being refused access and prevented from speaking to their clients. Leamsy 'La Figura' Izquierdo, a Cuban reggaeton artist arrested last week in Miami-Dade County for assault with a deadly weapon and transferred to Alligator Alcatraz, likewise told CBS News: 'There's no water to take a bath, it's been four days since I've taken a bath. "They only brought a meal once a day and it has maggots. They never take off the lights for 24 hours. The mosquitoes are as big as elephants." Another detainee said guards had taken away his Bible and told him that "here there is no right to religion". Democratic legislators who visited the camp say they're deeply concerned. While a bipartisan group was allowed to visit on July 12 — as required by state law — they were given a "sanitized" tour of still-empty areas with no detainees. Even then, their review was harsh. 'They are essentially packed into cages, wall-to-wall humans," said Florida congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. 'This place needs to be shut the hell down. They're abusing human beings." A spokesperson for the Florida state government said, "The reporting on the conditions in the facility is completely false. The facility meets all required standards and is in good working order." Who is detained there? In early July, Donald Trump claimed that the Florida facility would "handle the most menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet" — and said he wants to see similar facilities built in "many states". But what we know of Alligator Alcatraz's inmates conflicts with his description. According to The Miami Herald and Tampa Bay Times, only one-third of the 700 people currently being held there have any criminal conviction whatsoever. 250 detainees have been judged to have broken immigration law, which is a civil offence and not a criminal one. One detainee, who described the conditions as potentially "a form of torture", told CBS: "A lot of us have our residency documents and we don't understand why we're here." That fits the general pattern of Trump's detentions so far. Despite promising to prioritize "the worst of the worst", data suggests that only 8 percent of the estimated 185,000 people detained by ICE between October 1, 2024 and May 31, 2025 had been convicted of a serious crime. One-third of detainees had some kind of criminal conviction, but among that group, 75 percent had only committed low-level crimes such as traffic offenses. How long detainees will stay at Alligator Alcatraz is unclear, but immigration court proceedings can take months or years, and the Trump administration has said it will deny bail en masse. Hence, it could be a long time for some. Is it a concentration camp? Some critics believe so. Among them is the journalist Andrea Pitzer, author of One Long Night: A Global History of Concentration Camps, who made her case in a recent op-ed for MSNBC. "This facility's purpose fits the classic model: mass civilian detention without real trials targeting vulnerable groups for political gain based on ethnicity, race, religion or political affiliation rather than for crimes committed," Pitzer wrote. "We're still in the early stages of this arc, but... the history of this kind of detention underlines that it would be a mistake to think the current cruelties are the endpoint. America is likely just getting started." While the term 'concentration camp' is most associated with the Nazis, such camps have been widely used by numerous nations, including the U.K., the U.S., Spain, and the Soviet Union. Immigration lawyer Raul A. Reyes likewise argued in The Los Angeles Times that Alligator Alcatraz is a "national disgrace" that "will place detainees in life-threatening conditions". He further claimed the facility "appears intentionally designed to inflict suffering on detainees", citing supporters' "gleeful" attitude to the idea of federal detainees being eaten by alligators. The Florida Republican Party, and Uthmeier himself, are even selling Alligator Alcatraz merchandise, including baseball caps, water bottles, and beer koozies.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Putin has just discovered the scale of his latest miscalculation
President Donald Trump has finally lost patience with Vladimir Putin. Having promised a 'major' announcement on Russia, Trump has now confirmed that the US will dramatically increase weapons supplies to Europe for use in Ukraine and threatened 100 per cent secondary tariffs on Russia's trade partners. Trump would only provide Russia with an off-ramp if Putin agreed to a ceasefire in Ukraine within 50 days. The announcement should put to bed any remaining speculation that the president was prepared to unilaterally surrender Ukraine to Russia. These concerns reached a fever pitch after his disastrous February Oval Office meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky and subsequent temporary moratorium on intelligence sharing and arms deliveries to Ukraine. Since Kyiv repaired trust with the Trump administration by agreeing to a 30-day ceasefire in Jeddah on March 11, the White House has viewed Russia as the primary obstacle to peace. Initially, Trump evidently believed that he could steer Russia towards peace through constructive dialogue. He regularly called Putin, and his envoy Steve Witkoff expressed openness to legitimising Russia's occupation of Ukrainian territory. But Putin treated these conciliatory gestures as displays of weakness and decided to escalate the war. Russia's record-setting drone and missile barrages on Ukrainian cities reflected Putin's confidence in his impunity and in Trump's unwillingness to escalate. Much like his underestimation of Ukrainian resolve and Western military assistance after his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Putin's bombast has been caught cold. Trump's new measures do not satisfy all of Ukraine's expectations, but have the potential to deal serious harm to Russia's war machine and faltering economy. As Joe Biden's administration had only provided Ukraine with a small number of ATACM long-range missiles, these stocks were reportedly depleted by late January. Ukraine has been forced to largely rely on its drone innovations to strike targets deep inside Russian territory and its June 1 Operation Spiderweb attack on Russian strategic bombers was a signature triumph. While new US missiles will not unilaterally change the course of the war, they could broaden Ukraine's ability to strike Russian military and economic infrastructure. Even without additional US support, reports suggest that Ukraine was recently able to strike a major gas pipeline in Langepas in Russia's Tyumen Oblast that supplies military facilities in Chelyabinsk, Orenburg and Sverdlovsk. With more US aid, Ukraine's possibilities grow significantly. Much depends on the nature of the technology that the US is willing to export. Ukraine hopes that Trump will approve the delivery of the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM), a newly minted upgrade on ATACMs that is compatible with Himars systems. The PrSM has a strike radius of approximately 500km which is significantly higher than the 300km range for ATACMs. As the PrSM has not been authorised for delivery even to close Nato allies, F-16 compatible JASSM-ER missiles are more plausible options for Ukraine. These missiles can strike targets up to 925 km away and could fulfil Trump's braggadocio about approving strikes on Moscow. Even if he settles simply for more ATACMs, he will signal to Putin that he is no longer afraid of the Kremlin's nuclear bluff. Trump's secondary tariffs on Russia's main trade partners may be difficult to enforce without undermining other aspects of his economic agenda. Imposing tariffs on the United Arab Emirates, a key financial hub for Russian business elites, for example, might compromise the investment influx pledged during Trump's May trip to Abu Dhabi. These tariffs would also risk an escalation spiral in the US trade war with China and derail final-hurdle trade negotiations with India. As Russia has already largely decoupled itself from Western-dominated financial networks, the short-term economic repercussions for US trade partners in the developing world may be worse than for Russia itself. Nonetheless, any new tariffs will restrict Russia's import supply chains and compound rising inflation. If they are paired with new sectoral and individual sanctions, the damage to Russia's war economy could be profound. At the June 2025 St Petersburg Economic Forum, Russian Minister of Economic Development Maxim Reshetnikov signalled a recession might be imminent. That risk has just jumped significantly. Trump has finally realised that Putin can only be stopped by intensifying economic and military pressure on his war machine. This realisation might not quickly end the war, but will be a relief to Ukrainians facing Russia's daily bombardments.
The National
34 minutes ago
- The National
Yes supporters need to avoid the rhetoric of nihilism and despair
I want to state quite categorically that placing Scotland within that anti-colonial radical tradition is a nonsense. Why? From 1707 around 50-plus MPs have been sent down to London to warm the green benches of Westminster as the lawful political representatives of an acquiescent 'nation'. READ MORE: Legal arguments grounded in international covenants remain symbolic So calling Scotland a colony of the UK or England is intellectually absurd. (Martinique sends deputies to the French Parliament so it is a 'departement of France', not a colony.) Scotland has participated in the colonial 'British' historical process managing and 'book-keeping' the Empire. However, the British parliament under devolution exercises sovereignty over Scotland with the authority of parliamentary power within British law (see the Supreme Court decision). This Westminster power leaves Scotland dormant with a wholly subaltern status within the UK, even with Holyrood and its neo-colonial devolutionary settlement. This neo-colonial occupation of Scotland by the British imperial Westminster Parliament is a damaging reality. So the focus of political action is not Scotland's colonial status but rather its subaltern position vis a vis the UK. There are three subaltern characteristics that help shape Scotland's current dilemma. One is the cultural resistance movement led by numerous public intellectuals, writers, artists and progressive academics. But this is a resistance that participates in a challenging oppressive cultural ambience, characterised by London-centric power and lack of serious liberating funding. This bleak outlook can only be resolved when cultural resistance takes on a political role rather than obscuring the political challenges with idealism. READ MORE: Would a Scottish sovereign wealth fund be possible after independence? The second task within the current climate is the urgent need to avoid the rhetoric of nihilism and despair. Avoidance of surrender is critical. Too many independence 'supporters' have succumbed to the nihilism of helplessness or sought solace in the weedy pastures of tiny protest organisations. This leads on to the third role for the broad independence movement under the current oppressive British state represented by the failed British Labour Party. How, and in what political manner, can pro-indy people understand and cope with the psychological stresses provided by the failure to gain sovereignty? Subjection is the dominant mode within nation semi-states like Scotland and can only be resolved by winning sovereignty. Hope, redemption, resolution, 'positive futurism' are all urgent priorities in this subordinate time. Yet we cannot frame the current struggle within a wholly negative paradigm of oppression. Arguing that Scottish history is all misery and degradation simply ads to the negative paradigm that needs overthrowing. WE CAN WIN even if we accept the condition of subjection; it can be defeated. Scotland needs to overcome negative tropes and become something new and positive with much greater focus on the future rather than the past. That is a task of a devolved Scottish Government led by the SNP. READ MORE: Explosive new poll puts Corbyn-Sultana party level with Labour Time is not on our side. Global capitalism will not sit back and admire Scotland's vulnerability of size; rather it consumes fragile states. Asserting sovereignty is the urgent requirement that will need young people to move on from their virtual-game-based world and work to build their real future. Our current 'phoney-sovereignty' will only make our country poorer and our future darker . London only funds Scotland sufficiently to let it fail. Only by harnessing the social and political energy of our young people (and others) will we be able to overcome the present political malaise. Unfortunately the flawed engine of renewal, hope and redemption is the SNP. It is the only political engine that can drive the independence movement to sovereignty. There are some who might need the 'peg on the nose', but 2026 is the last-chance saloon. Objectively, only the SNP and the Scottish voters can deliver independence with the support of progressive patriots. Thom Cross Carluke
