Police foil J&K Congress protest march demanding statehood restoration
A large police contingent barricaded the Congress headquarters on Maulana Azad Road, preventing leaders and workers from proceeding with the march, according to officials.
The march was intended to culminate at the Divisional Commissioner's office, where party leaders planned to submit a memorandum on statehood restoration to be forwarded to the government.
A heavy police deployment was visible in the area, with an armored vehicle stationed at the entrance of the Congress headquarters, effectively blocking the party's efforts to stage the protest.
However, a large contingent of police barricaded the Congress office in Srinagar and prevented leaders and workers from proceeding and taking out the march. A heavy police deployment was made in the area, with an armoured vehicle stationed at the entrance of the Congress headquarters.
J&K Congress president Tariq Karra and AICC general secretary G.A. Mir, along with other senior leaders, were leading the protest, which was foiled by the police. Earlier, the J&K Congress president alleged that police stopped its workers and leaders from various districts en route to Srinagar.
'They are not being allowed to reach the Congress headquarters in Srinagar, from where the march was scheduled to start,' senior Congress leader Tariq Hameed Karra told reporters. 'This is an undemocratic act by the administration and shows they are in a state of panic.'
Congress MLA Irfan Hafeez Lone was stopped by police near Lawaypora in Srinagar. He and his workers were not allowed to proceed.
'We want to ask the government under which law they stopped us,' Lone said.
The Jammu and Kashmir Police, which functions under the administration of the Lieutenant Governor, did not respond to the allegations of halting the protest march.
The Congress has decided to step up the campaign for restoration of statehood in Jammu and Kashmir and they are also planning to stage a sit-in at Delhi's Jantar Mantar on July 22, a day after the Monsoon Session of Parliament begins.
The protest comes just days after party president Mallikarjun Kharge and Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to act swiftly on restoration of statehood.
Kharge and Rahul Gandhi appealed to the Prime Minister to introduce legislation for the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood in the upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament.
Jammu and Kashmir was stripped of its special status and downgraded to a Union Territory on August 5, 2019, following the abrogation of Article 370. Since then, political parties have consistently been demanding restoration of statehood.
In a joint letter, the Congress leaders said that downgrading a state to a Union territory lacks precedent in independent India and reminded the Prime Minister of his promises of restoring J&K's statehood.
The Prime Minister has "on multiple occasions, personally reiterated the government's commitment to restoring statehood," the letter read, pointing out at least two instances last year when PM Modi promised to restore the region's status.
The Congress leaders said that for the past five years, the people of Jammu and Kashmir have consistently called for the restoration of full statehood, the Congress leaders said, calling their demand both legitimate and firmly grounded in their constitutional and democratic rights.
UNI MJR AAB
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Kanhaiya Kumar at Idea Exchange: ‘In the Opposition, you will see a reluctance to protect their base vote'
Congress leader and NSUI in-charge Kanhaiya Kumar on his political journey, retaining his Left ideology, revision of electoral rolls in Bihar and student activist Umar Khalid. This session was moderated by Asad Rehman, Senior Correspondent, The Indian Express. Asad Rehman: Could you talk about your political journey that began as a member of All India Students' Federation (AISF) at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU). You contested an election for the CPI in Begusarai (Bihar) and are now with the Congress as NSUI in-charge. I believe that my political journey started even prior to my birth. The moment you are born in this country, you are assigned a caste, religion and gender. These three are the strongest premises of politics. Politics begins with birth, identity — so it's right to say one's political journey also begins at birth, which comes with certain privileges and drawbacks. Talking specifically about my active political role, I joined AISF during my Plus Two. I wasn't very aware of ideologies but the place I come from is politically quite active. Begusarai was called 'Mini Moscow' because the CPI continuously won in our home constituency for 50 years. There were also many factories, so slogans of labour movements were common. When I went to college, I didn't understand politics and since I wasn't very good at protesting, the AISF gave me work that suited me, which was to organise film screenings every Friday. I then came to Delhi to prepare for UPSC. I didn't come to JNU to do politics. I always say this: being part of politics in JNU was by chance, being in the Congress is by choice and being against the BJP is by choice. In JNU, we were student activists, people elected me because they felt like. The government arrested me because they felt like. This was by chance. After being released from jail, I continued to fight. To advance that fight, I need the support of Rahul Gandhi and his party. This is by choice. So you can say my journey in electoral politics started from JNU. I lost two elections in JNU first, then won one. I've also lost two elections now, let's see when will I win one. Asad Rehman: What should be the Opposition's strategy regarding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, especially since the Congress is opposing it? This issue is both political and legal, so it should be fought in both ways. The Opposition has filed a petition in the Supreme Court and is also protesting on the streets. This is the first time in 11 years that the Election Commission (EC) has admitted it made a mistake. They haven't issued a statement but they have been forced to acknowledge that a mistake occurred and that there is a discrepancy in the voter list. They are planting news that people from Bangladesh, Nepal and Myanmar have been found in Bihar. The other dangerous aspect is that the EC is not handling its own responsibilities; it is taking on responsibilities of other departments. Verifying citizenship is not the job of the EC, it is the job of the Ministry of Home Affairs. The EC's job is to identify voters and include their names in the voter list. It must accept any certificate issued by the government. We are not saying don't correct the voter list but the Chief Election Commissioner himself should also be corrected. The whole question is about transparency, integrity and intention. The government has eliminated the role of the Supreme Court in the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner. Now only three people will choose: the Prime Minister, Home Minister and Leader of the Opposition. When the election is always by majority, the government will have an influence. Now, it is up to the EC to save its integrity. They should not work in a hurry with this three-month timeline. If you want to correct the voter list, do it thoroughly. On SIR of Electoral Rolls | The EC must first admit that there was a discrepancy in the voter list… Don't create more discrepancies while fixing the existing ones. Take your time. Prepare the voter list, don't start doing the NRC instead There is a specific kind of problem in Bihar. It's related to birth certificates and caste certificates. No one has a genuine birth certificate. When we talk about caste certificates, not a single person from the general community gets a caste certificate made. It is only the SC, ST, OBC who make caste certificates, but now that process is also so lengthy that people in Bihar don't want to take government benefits. Does the EC know Bihar's actual population? The last census was in 2011. The EC must first admit that there was a discrepancy in the voter list… Don't create more discrepancies while fixing the existing ones. Take your time. Prepare the voter list, don't start doing the NRC instead. Asad Rehman: Several Congress leaders are concerned that in Bihar the INDIA Alliance and Congress have been unable to attract other communities beyond Muslims and Yadavs. There are also concerns regarding over-reliance on the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD). What is your opinion? It's not entirely correct but it's not entirely wrong either. It's not entirely correct because we are trying. The first guarantee we have launched is Mai Bahin Maan Yojana. It is for poor women from all communities — Muslims, Yadavs, Brahmins, Dalits, other backward classes. We are reaching out to every section of society and our guarantees will be for all communities. What you said is not entirely wrong because many leaders are entirely dependent on their base vote — I don't know what difficulty the Opposition has in accepting this. About the SIR issue in Bihar, in Patna they started accepting Aadhaar before the Supreme Court's direction. In Seemanchal, they were not accepting it. BJP protects its base vote. However, in the Opposition you will see a reluctance to protect their base vote. Will the BJP not keep saying Hindu-Muslim? BJP will do whatever benefits them. We won't make our strategy according to the BJP but our strategy is that the Congress is a party for everyone… We should protect our base vote and expand it. I disagree that there is dependence on RJD. In the chemistry of politics, a lot depends on the proportion of many things and the Congress must play its role. Other than the RJD, which has a base vote that is the same as the general base vote of the Opposition, the Congress party's job is to bring other people along. Teamwork is important. Manoj CG: In the 2024 Lok Sabha election, Congress could only win 99 seats. Since you have come to the party from outside, I wanted to ask, where do you see it failing? I was one of the biggest critics of the Congress when I was in university, especially of the Manmohan Singh government. I used to think that things were getting worse. But when PM Modi came, I thought, 'No, abhi toh party shuru hui hai (the party has just begun); a lot more is yet to happen to us.' That's when my perspective changed. My training is from the Left, so I first look at the economy. I realised that both neoliberalisms are not the same. There is a difference between the neoliberalism of the Congress and that of the BJP. I was observing what was wrong from earlier, but I came to the party because of what is right. One of that is Rahul Gandhi's integrity. Even if speaking the truth leads to immediate electoral loss, it should still be spoken. So when he made a major attack on the BJP at the policy level, whether it was the Rafale issue or the Adani matter, he would speak but many other leaders wouldn't. This situation still exists. So it is very important to convey what is being said at the top to the rank-and-file at the grassroots. Seva Dal, Youth Congress, Mahila Congress, NSUI should work as a mass front. The Congress has brought a big policy-level change with the appointment of district presidents and their direct communication with the party leadership… We want to build an organised team of ideological people at the polling stations. Jatin Anand: You have contested two high-profile Lok Sabha elections, one against Giriraj Singh in Begusarai and the other in Delhi, against Manoj Tiwari. Did you try to assess why you didn't win either? Both elections were different, so the ways of contesting them were different. I fought this one entirely in an urban demography and that one was rural demography. In Delhi, I'm just a Bihari, but in Bihar I am known by my caste. The timing is also important. When I contested that election, I had just been awarded my PhD in 2018. I had come out of university and was fighting from a Left party, so its content was a bit different. When I was contesting the Delhi election, I was fighting in an urban area in 2024. The content of that election was different. But the intent was one: to defeat the BJP. I was contesting against heavyweight candidates both the times, and on both occasions Modiji came to my constituency. On Over-dependence of the congress on RJD in Bihar | I disagree… Other than the RJD, which has a base vote that is the same as the general base vote of the Opposition, the Congress party's job is to bring other people along Jatin Anand: Many parties in the INDIA Alliance feel it is the responsibility of the Congress to take it forward. What is your view? It is true that the Congress party is a large Opposition party, so it has the responsibility of keeping everyone together. But this is one aspect. The other aspect is that everyone has their own interests. Deeptiman Tiwary: Student activist Umar Khalid has been in jail for almost five years. Why is no political party protesting? Why is no one speaking about him? It seems everyone has abandoned him. These allegations are false. He has not been abandoned. There are people who care for him, his family members — they are continuously raising the issue in every possible way. Along with Umar, many others are imprisoned. There are many whose names no one even mentions. For example, no one mentions Meeran (Meeran Haider), and he was the president of RJD's youth wing in Delhi. Umar and I were together in university but we were never in the same party… Regarding this specific case, I have openly said everywhere that this is a very dangerous conspiracy of this government, not against any individual but fundamentally against democracy. The aim is to scare you so much and make you a symbol so that no one else dares to speak up. Deeptiman Tiwary: You left the Left camp and said that Congress was your choice. I haven't left the camp, I left the party. Just because I have changed my party doesn't mean I have changed my ideology. Liz Mathew: Many Congress MPs feel that Rahul Gandhi does not take up issues that resonate with people. What is your view? There isn't any problem here. If we attack the root cause, it is a good thing because there are many people who talk about superficial things. They don't talk about the root cause because there is danger in that. They may have to incur heavy losses. If we say that people aren't getting facilities at the airport, then who has the proprietary rights to the airport? Who decides the policy regarding how the management behaves with the consumers? I agree that this is complex communication and transactional things are understood more easily, but it's important (to ask) who is the policy being made for, how is it affecting the public sector and the general public. Liz Mathew: Several politicians have left the Congress while others have criticised the party and some have been critical of the leadership. The latest is Shashi Tharoor, who is extremely popular. What do you think about his recent rifts with the party leadership? I was a Left party member and if anyone spoke outside the party forum, they were removed. They expelled veteran leaders such as Somnath Chatterjee, PC Joshi. Now I am in the Congress and the party has a certain beauty that you can continue to be in the party even if you say anything against the Gandhis. There is that much freedom. Second, yes, he (Tharoor) is popular, no doubt. That is why Modiji has sent him instead of his own leaders. Thirdly, whether he will leave the party or not is his decision. I would want him to stay. Apart from him, the people who have left, that is their call. Vikas Pathak: Since Rahul Gandhi emerged as the face of the Congress over a decade ago, should the blame for the party's decline rest on him or on the party workers for not having taken his message to the people? I am against the politics of faces. Politics of faces is the bankruptcy of this era, both ideologically and theoretically. Who is considered a leader? The one who wins elections, who distributes tickets, or the one who neither wins elections nor distributes tickets, yet their poster is put up? This is a very complex question in today's era for the Congress party. It was a party born out of struggles, it remained in power for a very long time, and due to that, many problems naturally arise in any party… My belief is that not being able to convey that message — one with which the Congress party was formed and grew — to the grassroots is a very big reason. If that message had continued to reach through action, not speeches, then this situation would not have emerged. On Congress' Responsibility in INDIA Alliance | Congress is a large Opposition party, so it has the responsibility of keeping everyone together. But this is one aspect. The other aspect is that everyone has their own interests Muzamil Jaleel: The Congress can have an alliance with the Shiv Sena but not (Asaduddin) Owaisi. The party clearly hesitates to speak on Muslim issues. Would you agree? I think one should avoid putting Thackeray on one side and Owaisi on the other because I have never heard Owaisi say that he wants to make India an Islamic nation. This is the effect of that repeated lie that now we too are saying what the BJP wants to hear. If we do this, we will ultimately lose the battle for citizenship in this country and the Congress should avoid this dichotomy. And it tries to avoid it. For us, saving every citizen is important. The idea of India should be clear: that no person living in this country shall be discriminated against based on their identity. To protect that idea of India, whoever becomes an ally, we take them along. It doesn't mean that we have complete ideological similarity with the political party with whom we are forming an electoral alliance. Saman Husain: During the North-East Delhi election campaign, I followed all your public speeches closely. You spoke about a larger sense of unity that you would want in the country and the prevailing communal disharmony but there was no direct mention of the 2020 Delhi riots. North-East Delhi was hit badly by communal riots. What do you have to say about this? Maybe you missed some speeches. Or sometimes what happens is that we only hear what we want to hear, or what we are able to hear. Perception is so powerful that it even impacts hearing power. I myself don't remember how much I spoke. But my entire fight is against rioters. So, how can I not speak against the riots? Asad Rehman: But did you talk about the riots in your campaign? Obviously, I did, I must have. I have been talking about the same thing for 10 years. Saman Husain: You spoke about the prevailing disharmony and a larger idea of secularism that all Congress leaders talk about but you hardly made any direct mention of the Delhi riots. It is not like that. If you think so, then it is your opinion but I have been defying it, denying it. This is how perception is built… If you assert yourself as a Muslim, then you will assert me as Hindu as a byproduct… I am a very straightforward and direct person. I am saying that when we talk about harmony, is it not against rioters? If we have been speaking for so long, have we been speaking in favour of the BJP? Aakash Joshi: In the Congress, unlike the BJP or Left parties, ideological clarity is tough — it has many leaders who speak in many voices. How do you think this should be addressed? First of all, when we talk about ideological integrity or ideological communication, it's not that parties with the same ideology haven't split. Several cadre-based, ideologically driven parties have split in the past. This is the first time in India that right-wing ideology has come to power in this way. They haven't split up yet, but it's not that they won't. Congress is a bit different in this matter. Here, people with different ideological connotations also stay in one party.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Adhir Ranjan seeks PM's intervention in harassment of Bengali migrant workers
Former Congress MP Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury has written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, raising serious concerns about the alleged harassment and detention of Bengali-speaking migrant workers in Maharashtra and Odisha. He said the workers are facing "harassment, humiliation, physical torture, and uncalled-for detention" based solely on their language and a letter sent on Sunday, the former Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha urged PM Modi to intervene immediately and ensure the safety and dignity of these workers, many of whom are daily wage earners from West alleged that the migrant workers are being targeted simply for speaking Bengali, which is reportedly being mistaken for Bangladeshi. "It is with immense anguish and a great deal of concern that I am seeking your kind intervention that a large number of Bengali migrant workers are being subjected to," he Congress leader added that the issue is deeply disturbing as these workers are Indian citizens, contributing significantly to the local economies of the states where they work."What is deeply saddening is the fact that migrants who belong to the poor and down-trodden section of society and are bonafide Indian citizens are being harassed under the pretext of the fact that their physical appearance and accent of language spoken are similar to the people of Bangladesh," Chowdhury the situation "inhumane," he said that targeting a linguistic group on such grounds must not be allowed to continue. Chowdhury urged the Prime Minister to direct the Union Labour and Home ministries to take immediate steps to protect these workers."The Union Government under your Leadership is bestowed with the responsibility of protecting the lives and livelihood of the country's citizens," he wrote."I eagerly look forward to your kind intervention, as the Head of the Government, in protecting the lives of its Bengali-speaking citizens, who belong to the poorer section of Indian society and are interstate migrant workers," the letter read on July 13, Chowdhury had also written to President Droupadi Murmu, drawing her attention to the same on Friday, members of a Trinamool Congress-affiliated workers' union staged a protest march in Siliguri against the National Register of Citizens (NRC), condemning the reported harassment and pushback of Bengali-speaking migrant workers from BJP-ruled states.- EndsMust Watch
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Maharashtra responds to MLA's concerns, grants fee waiver to orphan students
Mumbai, July 20 (UNI) In a landmark decision to bolster educational opportunities for vulnerable children, the Maharashtra State Government has issued a Government Resolution (GR) granting a full waiver of tuition and examination fees for orphaned students enrolling in approved higher and technical education courses starting from the academic year 2024-25. Issued by the Women and Child Development Department, this progressive move aims to eliminate financial hurdles for orphaned youth pursuing professional education, promoting inclusive growth and social justice. The development followed concerns raised by Samajwadi Party MLA Rais Shaikh in the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly regarding hardships faced by orphan students, who were previously compelled to depend on NGOs and charitable sources for educational expenses. In response, the state government committed to immediate implementation of the full fee waiver. Speaking to UNI on Sunday, Shaikh thanked the government for addressing his concern "immediately" and issuing the GR promptly. However, he noted: "There are some minor shortcomings in this GR which should be addressed. The income limit set at 8 lakh is inappropriate." The fee waiver applies to orphan children certified as either "institutional" or "non-institutional" by the competent Women and Child Development authority. Beneficiaries include students admitted to government colleges, government-aided colleges, partially aided (step grant) colleges, permanently non-aided colleges, technical institutions, state public universities (excluding private or self-financed universities), and recognized sub-centers of public universities offering professional courses. Eligibility requires an annual family income of 8 lakh or less, with submission of an income certificate mandatory. The scheme covers both newly admitted students and those continuing courses, including renewals through the Centralized Admission Process (CAP) and government-sanctioned protocols. To avail benefits, students must present a valid orphan certificate and Maharashtra domicile certificate. The scheme excludes distance education, open learning, virtual, or part-time courses. The exemption continues uninterrupted until course completion for persistent students but is revoked if studies are discontinued. Strict operational guidelines mandate transparency: Institutions must provide fee facilities immediately and cannot bar eligible students from education/exams due to delayed government disbursals. Institutions submitting false claims will face recovery of disbursed amounts with interest, overseen by the Commissioner of Women and Child Development (WCD). The Commissioner (WCD) in Pune will coordinate the scheme. Where orphans cannot produce income certificates due to absent parents, competent authorities will facilitate verification/replacement. Students may claim other eligible social category benefits, but dual claims are prohibited. The government reserves the right to modify provisions without notice. This policy builds on Maharashtra's existing 1 per cent reservation quota for orphans in government/aided professional courses. Previously, only EWS, SEBC, and OBC girl students received 50 pc fee relief – orphans now get 100 pc exemption acknowledging their unique vulnerabilities. The measure is expected to provide critical financial relief to thousands of orphaned students, enabling pursuit of higher education without economic strain and setting a precedent for equitable education access. UNI AAA RKM
