Ask the Amys: Sabotaging Bosses, Irritating Employees, and More
Transcript
What do you do when your request for professional development seems to annoy your manager? Or when you're aiming for a bigger role but keep hearing that you're
'too in the weeds'? Or when a team member's behavior undermines others but you're not sure whether to call it out because it feels like part of their personality?
The Amys offer advice for advocating for yourself without setting off alarm bells, shifting from tactical execution to strategic thinking, and confronting behavior that's corrosive but hard to pin down.
Other listener questions they respond to:
How can I push for a more robust and effective feedback and review system at my company?
How do I decide which workplace battles are worth fighting?
How do I remain professional and confident when my soon-to-depart manager is belittling me?
How can I raise gender equity issues in a department that favors male colleagues?
Resources:
' How Managers Can Make Feedback a Team Habit,' by Helen Tupper and Sarah Ellis
' Get the Boss to Buy In,' by Susan (Sue) Ashford and James R. Detert
HBR Guide to Building Your Business Case, by Ray Sheen and Amy Gallo
' How to Push for Policy Changes at Your Company,' from Women at Work
' How to Pick Your Battles at Work,' by Amy Gallo
' Manage Your Energy, Not Your Time,' by Tony Schwartz and Catherine McCarthy
Speak Up, Speak Out (HBR Women at Work Series)
' How to Advance in Your Career When Your Boss Won't Help,' by Kristi Hedges
' You Can't Move Up If You're Stuck in Your Boss's Shadow ' by Rebecca Knight
Thriving in a Male-Dominated Workplace (HBR Women at Work Series)
' 4 Ways to Improve Your Strategic Thinking Skills,' by Nina Bowman
How to Demonstrate Your Strategic Thinking Skills,' by Nina Bowman
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Daunting work revelation turns sour as boss reacts poorly: 'The law is on your side'
Welcome to legal column where lawyers Alison and Jillian Barrett from Maurice Blackburn tackle problems everyday Aussies face — whether it be consumer, property, money matters impacting relationships or work. This week, a worker has had an uncomfortable encounter with her boss. Question "I work for a small company and recently got pregnant. My boss is quite an odd man and I've been dreading telling him I'm pregnant but I need to be able to go to appointments and want to start the ball rolling with maternity leave as I know he will make it difficult. When I told him I was pregnant, instead of saying congratulations he seemed to take it as a personal attack and said he'd need proof from my doctor before allowing me to go to daytime medical appointments. Then when I asked about maternity pay and other benefits he said he needs proof once the baby has been born before committing to anything. Are his demands fair? I need my job now more than ever so I don't want to rock the boat.." Answer Navigating pregnancy at work can be daunting, especially when your boss reacts poorly to the news. But if you're working in Australia, the law is firmly on your side. Pregnant employees are protected under federal legislation and various state and territory laws. These protections ensure you can access medical care, plan for parental leave, and continue working without being treated unfairly. Let's start with medical appointments. RELATED Gen Z with $100,000 in savings reveals 'common' money traps Aussies waste cash on Hidden $3,000 per year cost of cashless revolt as record number of banknotes hoarded ATO $2,548 tax refund cash boost for 2.6 million Aussies If you need time off during work hours to attend pregnancy-related appointments, you may be entitled to use personal leave if your contract or enterprise agreement provides for that. Otherwise, you're entitled to request to use your annual leave to cover those absences, which your employer cannot unreasonably refuse. You are also entitled to request a flexible work arrangement while pregnant, which could enable you to condense your hours so you can attend appointments on one particular day each month, for example. Your employer must genuinely try to reach agreement with you on that request and can only refuse it on reasonable business you are unfit for work because of your pregnancy, you can use your accrued personal (sick) leave, just like you would for any other illness. Your employer can ask for reasonable evidence, such as a medical certificate, before approving that leave. When it comes to maternity leave, if you've worked as a permanent employee for your employer for at least 12 months, you're entitled to 12 months of unpaid parental leave, with the option to request an additional 12 months. You must give at least 10 weeks' written notice before starting your leave and confirm the details at least four weeks before your intended start date. Your employer can ask for a medical certificate confirming the expected date of birth and can request medical evidence that you are fit to continue working once you are within six weeks of the baby's due date. However, they cannot delay planning, or deny your entitlements, until after the baby is born. In addition to unpaid leave, you may be eligible for government-funded Paid Parental Leave, which provides up to 20 weeks of pay at the national minimum wage. Your employer plays a role in administering this payment, but they don't control your eligibility. You apply through Services Australia, and once approved, your employer must process the payments if they're participating in the scheme. If your boss is making things difficult, by withholding information, questioning your rights, or treating your pregnancy as a burden, you're not alone, and you don't have to accept it. This kind of behaviour may amount to pregnancy discrimination, which is unlawful. You can seek help from the Fair Work Ombudsman, your union, or a community legal centre. They can guide you through your options and help you protect your rights without jeopardising your job. This legal information is general in nature and should not be regarded as specific legal advice. If you need legal advice, you should consult a solicitor.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
PARKER: Companies on the move to escape California blues
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is upset with Texas. There's a reason he should be upset. California companies are pulling up in droves and moving to the Lone Star State and elsewhere. But that isn't what's bothering him. Newsom cares about politics and power, not markets and business. He's upset that the Texas state legislature is moving to redistricting, which could add up to five Republican seats in 2026. So, Newsom wants to redistrict, which could add another five Democratic seats in California. California's congressional districts are already gerrymandered to death to favour Democrats — 17% of the State's 52 congressional seats are held by Republicans in a state in which Donald Trump garnered 38% of the popular vote in 2024. In ballot initiatives in 2008 and 2010, Californians amended the state constitution to establish an independent redistricting commission, with five representatives from each party and four unaffiliated, to take rote politics out of the process. But removing rote politics for Gavin Newsom is like asking the L.A. Dodgers to show up for a game without bats, balls and gloves. Newsom wants to circumvent the commission by putting new district maps for 2026 before voters in a special ballot initiative this November. It is too bad that Newsom's obsession is with accumulating power rather than improving his state. Just listen to Orange County resident and much-followed economist and blogger Scott Grannis. From Grannis' latest post, which he calls California Leavin': 'Between 2020 and 2025, approximately 500 companies have moved their headquarters out of California or shifted significant operations elsewhere, with a notable spike in relocations since 2019. From 2018 to 2021 alone, the Hoover Institution reported 352 companies relocating their headquarters out of the state.' Grannis continues: 'Government has become increasingly lazy and dysfunctional; the roads are a mess, traffic is the bane of everyday existence, taxes and regulations are oppressive, and modest cottages start at $1 million.' U-Haul annually reports its U-Haul Growth Index. This ranks the 50 states according to 'each state's net gain (or loss) of customers utilizing one-way U-Haul equipment in a calendar year.' Which state was first in one-way departures out of the state for the last five years? Yes, you're right. California Leavin'. And what state was number two in the nation in arrivals into the state in 2024? Yes, Texas, the Lone Star State. Texas has ranked first or second every year since 2016. According to of the top five cities in the U.S. with new corporate headquarters openings from 2018 to 2024, three are in Texas — Dallas, Austin and Houston. The other two are in Nashville and Phoenix. All five are in red states in 2024. In the top five cities for corporate headquarters closures from 2018 to 2024, three of the five are in California. San Diego, Greater Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area. The other two are Chicago and New York City. All five are in blue states in 2024. Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies documents which states had the largest migration gains from 2014 to 2024 and which states had the largest losses. Of the top 10 that gained over this period, seven of the 10 were red states in 2024. Of the top 10 losers over this period, seven of the 10 were blue states in 2024. Needless to say, Texas is in the top 10 gainers. It is a state that is booming because it provides a tax and regulatory environment conducive to those who want to work and grow. It makes all the sense in the world, with the huge influx of businesses and people, that the Texas population landscape has changed dramatically since the last census. There is a rationale for the redistricting initiative in Texas. But in California, Newsom just wants to institutionalize failure. Let's hope, in the interest of Californians, that he doesn't manage to get this misguided initiative on the ballot. And if he does, that it fails.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AT&T's $17 Million Data Breach Settlement Offers Payouts Up To $7,500, Here's How To Claim
AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) customers, both present and past, stand to receive up to $7,500 as part of a proposed $177 million settlement. This settlement is in response to two significant data breaches that affected millions of AT&T customers. What Happened: AT&T Inc. has suggested a settlement amounting to $177 million. This sum includes $149 million for the initial class-action lawsuit and an additional $28 million for the second one. The first data breach, revealed in March 2024, impacted 73 million account holders, with hackers obtaining personal information and disseminating it on the dark web. A subsequent breach in July 2024 compromised the call and text records of almost all AT&T customers. According to the report by New York Post, the settlement is yet to receive approval, with a final hearing set for December 3 in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Customers who had their data compromised can apply for compensation before the hearing. They will be notified via an email from Kroll Settlement Administration and must submit a claim form by November 18. Also Read: GameStop to Pay $4.5 Million Over Alleged Privacy Violations Involving Facebook Data Sharing Customers affected by the March 2024 breach can claim up to $5,000, while those impacted by the July breach can claim up to $2,500. Customers who were affected by both breaches could be eligible for up to $7,500. AT&T will require evidence of losses associated with the breaches. Payouts are anticipated to commence by the end of the year, but may be postponed if appeals are lodged after the hearing. Why It Matters: This settlement proposal comes as a significant development for AT&T customers who were affected by the data breaches. The proposed compensation not only acknowledges the inconvenience and potential harm caused by the breaches, but also serves as a reminder of the importance of robust data security measures for companies handling sensitive customer information. The outcome of the final hearing will be closely watched, as it could set a precedent for future data breach settlements. Read Next Wall Street's Most Accurate Analysts Give Their Take On 3 Tech And Telecom Stocks Delivering High-Dividend Yields UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? AT&T (T): Free Stock Analysis Report This article AT&T's $17 Million Data Breach Settlement Offers Payouts Up To $7,500, Here's How To Claim originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
