
Trump administration orders states to halt EV charging programs
In a memo released Thursday, the Federal Highway Administration ordered states to halt a $5 billion program to build fast EV chargers on highways nationwide — an initiative that President Donald Trump cited as an example of the 'Green New Deal.'
The letter informs state transportation directors — who are in charge of administering the program — that any plans approved by the Biden administration are now suspended until the Transportation Department provides new guidelines in the spring. 'Effective immediately, no new obligations may occur under the NEVI formula program,' the letter reads.
The order, which comes as many states are still working to build out their public chargers supported by $5 billion in grants, could strike a major blow to an industry that has experienced slower-than-expected sales and could lose critical federal tax incentives in coming months. On Wednesday, Ford Motor Co. projected it could lose as much as $5.5 billion this year on its EV and software business.
Just 55 charging stations have been built so far, according to data from the analytics firm Paren.
'I don't believe FHWA has the authority to do this,' said Loren McDonald, the firm's chief analyst and an expert on the charging program, in an email.
The memo was first reported by InsideEVs.
The program, which Congress approved under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, is known as the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program. It was intended to help fill gaps in the nation's EV charging network and boost consumer confidence to buy electric vehicles. The law also provided another $2.5 billion for chargers in communities and neighborhoods.
States had to submit plans to the Transportation Department on how they would use the funds; once their plans were approved, they could begin building out stations. To date, approximately $3.3 billion has been allocated to states, according to Paren.
But the new memo puts that funding in jeopardy. Even states that have approved plans do not have the money in hand — as part of the program, they send invoices to the federal government after meeting key milestones. 'The states don't get the money that's been obligated to them until they submit an invoice to FHWA,' McDonald said.
According to the memo, states will continue to receive 'reimbursement of existing obligations.' Experts said that indicates states that already have a contract with a charging company will be able to fulfill it — but any unfinished contracts will probably be on hold.
Trump has long railed against what he calls an EV 'mandate,' and he criticized the Biden administration's attempts to create programs to boost electric vehicle sales. In an executive order on the first day of his presidency, Trump ordered the federal government to terminate 'the Green New Deal,' 'including but not limited to funds for electric vehicle charging stations.' Charging station grants were the only specific clean energy program called out in the executive order.
The president has continued to target electric vehicles, even while he maintains a close alliance with Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla. Tesla has been a key recipient of charging grants, and it has the largest fast-charger network in the country. But Musk has previously said that cuts to EV benefits, such as the $7,500 EV tax credit, will be more painful for the company's rival automakers than Tesla, even if his company might suffer in the short term.
Some states, including Rhode Island, Missouri, Alabama and Oklahoma, had already publicly confirmed that they were pausing their EV charger programs before the memo was released.
Barbara LaBoe, the deputy communications director for the Washington State Department of Transportation, said the new order affects most of the $102 million the state had been promised for EV chargers. 'We are still seeking more information about all specifics of this suspension,' she said in an email.
The state has no outstanding invoices with the federal government, she added. 'Due to the uncertainty of funding we held off on making any decisions regarding project awards at this time,' she said.
Ryan Gallentine, managing director at the national business association Advanced Energy United, said that states 'are under no obligation to stop these projects based solely on this announcement.'
'We call on state DOTs and program administrators to continue executing this program until new guidance is finalized,' Gallentine added.
Fewer chargers may affect consumer appetite to buy electric vehicles in the long term, said Gil Tal, director of the Electric Vehicle Research Center at the University of California at Davis. But the Trump administration has already dealt a more immediate blow to the EV market, he added — by moving to roll back rules on car emissions that would have effectively required auto companies to make more electric cars.
Some said they believe that the Trump administration's move may provoke legal action. 'I'm assuming the lawsuits from states will start soon, and this will go to court and Congress,' McDonald said. 'But the Trump administration will succeed in just causing havoc and slowing things down for a while.'
Maxine Joselow contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Worried about a stock market crash? The Big Short's Michael Burry was…
The UK and US stock markets are once again approaching all-time highs. Markets have truly rebounded since Trump shocked the world with his trade policy. However, this rebound concerns me. These stock markets are trading near all-time highs despite a huge increase in the average effective US tariff, despite worsening geopolitical tensions, and despite sovereign debt concerns. Personally, I'm not sure investors have truly factored in the full impact of recent tariff increases on corporate earnings. Over the past year, average effective tariff rates have risen significantly, reaching levels not seen since the late 1930s. Under the Biden Administration, the average effective tariff rate was around 2.5%-2.7%. In May, that figure had risen to almost 20%. These tariffs have introduced new costs for businesses that rely on international supply chains. However, I just don't believe we've really seen the impact of them yet. After all, 'Liberation Day' took place at the beginning of Q2, and we're still in Q2. The full earnings impact of these tariffs is expected to become more visible in the second half of 2025, as companies report on their financial results and adjust to the new cost structures. Michael Burry, best known for predicting and profiting from the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis — a story retold in The Big Short — sold nearly all positions at Scion Asset Management in the quarter ending 31 March 2025. This move, alongside concentrated bearish bets through put options — bets that a stock will go down — on major tech and Chinese stocks, seemingly reflected his conviction that the market was sinking. Burry's only notable long was Estée Lauder, suggesting a defensive stance. However, 13F filings only show holdings as of 31 March, so his actions after that date remain unknown. As we know, the market slumped in early April but has since recovered. Within this context, I'm increasing looking at defensive options. I could look at farming stocks like Pilgrim's Pride, for example, which could outperform in a downturn. However, one option closer to home is the National Grid (LSE:NG.). The company recently reported strong financial results for the fiscal year 2025, with statutory and underlying pre-tax profit up 20%. The company is also investing heavily in its infrastructure, with a capital expenditure plan of £10bn aimed at modernising the energy grid and supporting the transition to renewable energy sources. This investment is part of a broader strategy to expand its regulated asset base, which is expected to grow by around 10% annually over the next few years. It does, however, introduce additional execution risk. Net debt is already £47.5bn — very sizeable. It's also not particularly cheap on face value. The stock trades at 14 times forward earnings, which may be a little demanding when we consider debt is on par with market capitalisation. Nonetheless, the forward dividend looks strong at 4.6%. The National Grid is not a stock I'd normally watch, but given my concerns about the potential overheating of the market, it's something I'm adding to my watchlist. It may be worth considering. The post Worried about a stock market crash? The Big Short's Michael Burry was… appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool James Fox has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended National Grid Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Boston Globe
38 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Stay strong, Harvard
Peabody Sadly, it is not surprising that the Trump White House is crying antisemitism at Harvard while simultaneously trying to oust Harvard's two most prominent (and Jewish) leaders. I fervently hope that Harvard, Garber, and Pritzker continue to stand strong. Dana Holmberg Middleborough The Trump administration has anonymously stated that 'no deal' can be made with Harvard as long as Alan Garber and Penny Pritzker remain in their positions. Both Garber and Pritzker are Jewish. To the best of my knowledge, no other university in the country is facing the same levels of harassment from the federal government as Harvard. It is time stop hiding behind the masquerade the government is using: claiming it is protecting Jewish students. This has been a lie from the first day the government took aim at Harvard. Advertisement Ed Mann Framingham
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Former White House doctor: Biden physician should have tested for cognitive decline
A former doctor for the White House under the Obama administration said former President Biden should have been tested for cognitive decline in his final year in office, given his age. Jeffrey Kuhlman said performing such a test on Biden would have shed light on the former president's mental state and ability to serve another four years. 'Sometimes those closest to the tree miss the forest,' Kuhlman told The Washington Post. Biden's long-term doctor, Kevin O'Connor, didn't perform a cognitive test on the leader during his fourth year in office, as White House officials said formal results weren't needed to prove the former president's mental soundness. 'The president's doctor has said, if you look at what this president, who is also the commander-in-chief — he passes a cognitive test every day — every day, as he moves from one topic to another topic, understanding the granular level of these topics,' former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said during a February briefing last year. 'You saw him talk about fighting crime today. Tomorrow, he's going to go to the border. Next week, he's going to give a State of the Union Address,' she added. O'Connor was recently subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) to address why a cognitive test wasn't given. Biden traveled often while serving, including taking two international trips prior to his first presidential debate with President Trump. 'This is a very rigorous job. And the president has been able to do — do this job every day for the past three years,' Jean-Pierre previously told reporters from the podium. However, Kuhlman said the public deserved to have evidence that Biden was mentally sharp, arguing that health reports should include a total overview of a president's well-being. 'It shouldn't be just health, it should be fitness,' Kuhlman said. 'Fitness is: Do you have that robust mind, body, spirit that you can do this physically, mentally, emotionally demanding job?' Months after leaving office, Biden was diagnosed with prostate cancer amid reports alleging he suffered from mental decay while serving as commander-in-chief. 'Cancer touches us all. Like so many of you, Jill and I have learned that we are strongest in the broken places,' he wrote in a post on X. 'Thank you for lifting us up with love and support.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.