Budget 2025: Depreciation on the rise in positive change for businesses
This article was prepared by Robyn Walker for Deloitte and is being published by the New Zealand Herald as advertorial.
Budget 2025 has given businesses a welcome boost to tax deductions for investing in assets.
While speculation has been rife in the last week that the Budget would include full expensing of assets, for many the idea of such a change was absurd due to the corresponding fiscal cost.
With an estimated annual cost of $1.7 billion, Budget 2025 has delivered on depreciation changes, not as generously as some would have liked, but more generously than many would have predicted.
What is proposed: Investment boost
Effective immediately, businesses will be able to deduct 20% upfront of the cost of any new assets (or improvement to existing assets). The balance of the asset cost will continue to be depreciable (if depreciation deductions apply). While commercial buildings remain non-depreciable, they will be eligible for the 20% investment boost.
Urgent Budget legislation in the form of the Taxation (Budget Measures) Bill (No 2) ('the Tax Bill') will be quickly enacted to give businesses the certainty they need about what is or isn't eligible.
The Government estimates that increased investment in assets will lift GDP by 1% and lift wages by 1.5% over the next 20 years. It is understood officials advised the Minister of Finance a 20% expensing regime was the most optimal solution to boost investment.
What is eligible
Investment Boost will apply to most new assets that are depreciable for tax purposes; it will also apply to commercial buildings. Critically, the assets must be new, or new to New Zealand; second-hand assets will not qualify.
In the year an asset is acquired, 20% can be claimed upfront and depreciation can be claimed on the balance.
For example, if an asset costing $100,000 with a 10% depreciation rate is acquired on the first day of the tax year, an immediate deduction is available for $20,000, and a depreciation deduction of $8000 (being 10% of $80,000). This gives total deductions in year one of $28,000, as compared with $10,000 under existing rules.
What isn't eligible
More detail will be included with the Tax Bill commentary, but it's anticipated certain assets will be ineligible:
· Assets that have been previously used in New Zealand
· Land (but land improvements will be eligible)
· Trading stock
· Residential buildings (there will be exceptions for hotels, hospitals and rest homes)
· Fixed-life intangible assets (such as patents)
· Assets that are expensed under other rules (for example, low value assets below $1000)
Other important details
· The new rule will be optional;
· There are no limitations on who can use the rules, it applies to businesses of all sizes, and assets of any value;
· The rules will apply to assets which were first used or available for use on or after May 22, 2025. This will create some boundary issues for businesses who were in the process of purchasing or constructing assets to understand when something is eligible. This should be made clear in the Tax Bill commentary.
· Capital improvements of existing assets (for example, seismic strengthening of buildings) should be eligible.
· Depreciation recovery rules will apply to claw back the Investment Boost deduction if an asset is sold for more than its book value.
· The rules will also apply to assets which have deductions under separate taxation regimes which are akin to depreciation. This includes improvements to farm and forestry land (such as fencing), planting of listed horticultural plants, improvements to aquacultural businesses, and certain kinds of petroleum development expenditure and mineral mining development expenditure.
· The Investment Boost deduction can be included in R&D tax incentive calculations.
Overall, this is a really positive change for businesses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
More claim social development benefits during May
Unemployment is at 5.1 percent through May. Photo: JES2UFOTO Latest numbers show 27,243 more people received a benefit in May, compared to the year before. The Ministry of Social Development's monthly update shows the number of people on a benefit in New Zealand rose by just over seven percent to 403,311 in that time. The unemployment rate is 5.1 percent. Most of the increase is due to people accessing JobSeeker support - there was an 11 percent rise of just over 21,000, to a total 213,831. In May, 9.5 percent more people found work, compared to the same time last year, but eight percent more benefits were cancelled than a year ago - a total of just over 6000 - for other reasons, including sanctions. The Government aims to reduce the number of people on the Jobseeker Support benefit by 50,000 by 2030, introducing a traffic-light system and new non-financial sanctions , and changing the re-application for job seekers to every six months, instead of each year.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Do I Have To Pay For My Partner's Care?
RNZ's money correspondent answers your questions. Send your questions to If one person in a de facto relationship needs permanent medical care, does the Government require the other partner to pay for the care once the unwell patient's funds run out? The basic answer to your question is that when your partner is being assessed for their ability to pay for their care, your income and assets will usually be taken into account. If you're referring to medical care in a rest home setting, your assets and personal income affect whether your partner will qualify for a residential care subsidy. 'People who need residential care are required to pay for it themselves, if they can afford to do so. If they cannot afford it, they may be eligible for a residential care subsidy, which Health New Zealand pays directly to the care provider,' said Ministry of Social Development group general manager for client service delivery Graham Allpress. 'MSD's role is to check whether people qualify for this subsidy by performing a 'financial means assessment'. 'To get the subsidy, a person's income and assets must be under a certain amount. If they are in a relationship, the combined income and assets of both parties must be under a certain amount.' People can qualify for the subsidy if they are 50 to 64, single and without dependent children, or over 65 and meet the income and means test. That means, even if your partner's funds have run out, your assets could still be taken into account. If only one partner needs care, the couple combined need to have assets of no more than $155,873 not including the family home and car, or $284,636 if you do want the home and car in the assessment. If it's other types of care that you're thinking of, it could be a good idea to contact Health NZ for a needs assessment. There are options such as the supported living payment but eligibility for this is assessed on a household income basis, too. I'm currently a NZ tax resident living in NZ, but previously lived in Australia (over a decade ago) and purchased shares on the ASX that I continue to own and receive dividends for (which I declare as part of my income). If I sold these shares now, worth about $150,000, what taxes would they be subject to? Specifically, would I have to pay a capital gains tax on the increased share value (as I would if I were an Australian tax resident). This is probably a question for an accountant with expertise in Australian tax. Based on information available online, it seems that you potentially should have paid tax on the shares in Australia when you stopped being an Australian resident. Assuming that didn't happen, the Australian Tax Office is likely to be expecting capital gains tax to be paid on them when they are sold. You aren't likely to have any New Zealand tax obligations. Tax experts tell me that the authorities have access to a lot of data these days so it's possible that the Australian Tax Office will find out about any share sale and might get in touch with you. I am 78 years of age and still work part time and also still contribute to my KiwiSaver. Am I eligible for the government contribution? Sorry, no. While the government said it was going to start making contributions to 16 and 17-year-olds' accounts, it hasn't budged on the upper limit of 65.
Newsroom
10 hours ago
- Newsroom
What Kiwis want to know about the economy
Getting around the country chatting to client groups always provides a valuable window into the key uncertainties, concerns, and opportunities the business community is grappling with. So, for something different, we thought we'd share some of the more frequently asked questions from our recent travels in Auckland, Canterbury, Tauranga, the top of the south, and Otago. Our overall sense is that pessimism is continuing to slowly lift, consistent with what we're seeing in the numbers. But caution still abounds, particularly in the North Island. The South remains much less downbeat, and this inter-island divergence seems to be widening. There's concern about erratic US trade policy with the associated uncertainty particularly problematic. At the same time there was more of a sense of 'getting on with it' than we might have expected. Tariffs, trade, and exports Can high NZ commodity export prices be sustained in light of the global trade and tariff fiasco? It will be a challenge. Disrupted global trade and slowing global growth are hardly supportive ingredients. At the same time, there are some buffering factors to stir into the mix. The starting point is strong. Prices are currently skirting record highs in NZ dollar terms. Global supply in meat and dairy markets is also relatively tight, a steadying factor for prices even if demand tails off a bit. Overall, we expect some easing in prices for our major primary exports over the rest of the year, albeit to levels that would still be higher than a year ago. Rural incomes are looking healthier than the past couple of years. Costs are also much higher, but where do you think any surplus cash flow will be directed? A good chunk appears to be going towards debt reduction, or, more generally, parked at the bank. That's the thrust of the anecdote and it's in the numbers too. Total bank lending extended to the agriculture sector has been declining since January while deposit growth from the sector has jumped up. There are nevertheless some signs spending and investing appetites are thawing. For example, both farm sales and fertiliser imports are now clearly trending upwards, from admittedly low levels. Surveyed profitability and investment intentions, meanwhile, have climbed to multi-decade highs. That's not to say those intentions will be acted on, but Fonterra's strong $10.00 opening 2025/26 season Milk Price forecast must increase the odds of such. Ditto the tax incentive from Budget 2025's 'investment boost'. Will the policies of the White House spell the end of the US dollar? The US dollar will very likely remain the world's reserve currency, mostly because TINA (There Is No Alternative). What's being hotly debated is the extent to which the long-term trend diversification out of the US dollar speeds up now that trust in the US is on the wane and prior economic exceptionalism has all but disappeared. We agree that reduced capital inflows will pose a challenge for the greenback. Indeed, we see both structural and cyclical headwinds. The weakening USD has already pushed the NZD/USD back up to 0.6000 and we've recently lifted our year-end forecast to 0.6500, albeit with exceptionally wide error-bands around that forecast. How will the US and Chinese economies cope with much-reduced trading activity? It's too early to tell, not least because tariff rates are still far from settled. Interestingly, some high frequency indicators point to only a weak recovery in trade volumes in the wake of recent de-escalation moves (chart below). For the US, the biggest impacts to date have been via shaken confidence, the curtailing of investment and employment plans, the front-loading of imports (driving the fall in Q1 US GDP) and increased inflation and inflation expectations. Chinese growth prospects have been less dented, in part thanks to some re-routing of exports. We note that consensus forecasts for Chinese GDP growth this year have recently been marked back up to where they were prior to 'liberation day', around 4.5%y/y. Interest rates How much further will interest rates fall? We're still forecasting the Reserve Bank (RBNZ) to deliver two more 25bps cuts to the cash rate, taking it to a cycle low of 2.75 percent. There was a slight 'less is more' tilt in the RBNZ's language last week though, which has lifted market pricing now to nearer a 3.00 percent low point. The evolution of global trade risks seems likely to have the final say here (the word 'tariff' was mentioned in the RBNZ's Statement 176 times), and we're no more enlightened on that front than anyone else. The broader point is that the rate-cutting cycle appears to be entering its final stage. If that holds true, and unless another shock turns up, it suggests only floating and relatively short-term interest rates can be expected to fall much further from here. So that's the likes of six-month and one-year fixed mortgage rates which we still expect to dip into a 4.50-5.0 percent range over the second half of the year. You're forecasting hikes in the cash rate from late 2026. What's the story there? They're pencilled in, yes, mostly as a nod to the fact that the OCR cycle will turn at some point. In other words, a 'neutral' or below-neutral cash rate setting won't last forever. The timing is wildly uncertain. But by the end of next year, at least on our forecasts, we would have had around a year of respectable economic growth which will have soaked up some of the spare capacity that currently abounds. How long does the Reserve Bank usually keep the cash rate at its cyclical low point, whatever that turns out to be? Since the OCR was introduced in 1999, the cash rate cycle has troughed six times and been held at the low point for an average of 18 months. That may not be particularly instructive for this cycle though. The tariff fog means the Reserve Bank is going to be feeling its way. Also bear in mind that the length of the lows in the cash rate over the past few decades have been extended by major shocks such as the GFC and the Covid pandemic. The big question is whether the trade war be as impactive as these previous shocks. Population, housing, and construction Are people still moving south? Yep, internal migration patterns still have a 'head south' flavour to them. That's at least according to now slightly out-of-date Stats data (year to June 2024). And even if we don't have up-to-the-minute numbers, the ongoing economic outperformance of the South Island hints at a continued relative boost from people inflows (both short-term i.e. tourists, and longer-term movers). On one occasion (2019) the 'trough' gave way to another easing cycle The rates at which people are relocating have eased from the pandemic-era heights, but the general direction remains consistent: out of the Auckland, Wellington, Southland and Gisborne regions, and into Northland, Otago, Canterbury and Waikato. How will the gap between the cost of building a new home and that of buying an existing one close? Build costs appear to have plateaued but not fallen, meaning there's still a wide gap to the cost of buying the average existing home. Our back-of-the-envelope estimates put the 'new build premium' for the average consented stand-alone house at 180-200k. That's down a touch from north of 200,000 last year, but still more than double the long-run average. We could see some small falls in build costs from here but bear in mind labour costs are a major input and they're not going to come down. It brings us back to the view that more of the narrowing in the build vs. buy gap is likely to come via rising existing home prices. National house prices have lifted a cumulative 1.3 percent over the past six months, and we expect a slightly faster pace of gains over the coming six months. Is the rising house sales/flattish house prices thematic the same right around the country? Pretty much. There are some exceptions – Wellington and Gisborne most obviously. There's also been more of a price response in South Island regions. Growth in Otago sales activity is not as strong as elsewhere but that entirely reflects the fact house sales in Otago were more elevated to begin with. Others How aggressively is the government cutting? Budget 2025 revealed a bunch of reprioritisations but with overall core Crown expenses still growing. They're forecast to be up 2.3 percent in the 2025 fiscal year, after 9 percent growth last year. As a share of GDP, expenses are running at 32.7 percent, down from the 34.3 percent 2022 peak but still north of the 28 percent average in the five years prior to 2020. Government consumption, in inflation adjusted terms, is expected to stay basically where it is now for the foreseeable future. In other words, general government activity won't be a massive drag but it won't be an active participant in the recovery either. It's a big growth gap to fill for the private sector. But aren't we doing okay on government debt compared to some of the others? Better than most, yes, although it's risen a lot. The issue is that we may need to maintain a lower debt position than many due to our significant disaster risk profile and the growing future burden of escalating health and superannuation expenses. Why have the Aussies done so much better? We dissected the performance of the antipodean economies in a note last year (find it here). Suffice to say, there wasn't a lot to cheer about from a NZ perspective. But things might be changing. Our forecasts imply Australia's relative growth advantage may be peaking around now. Some NZ catch-up is expected over the next few years as NZ's economy climbs out of the mire and Australia slows up. Should that pan out, a reduction in the pace of Westward-bound migration outflows could be expected. Disclaimer: This publication has been produced by Bank of New Zealand. This publication accurately reflects the personal views of the author about the subject matters discussed, and is based upon sources reasonably believed to be reliable and accurate. The views of the author do not necessarily reflect the views of BNZ. No part of the compensation of the author was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to any specific recommendations or views expressed. The information in this publication is solely for information purposes and is not intended to be financial advice. If you need help, please contact BNZ or your financial adviser. Any statements as to past performance do not represent future performance, and no statements as to future matters are guaranteed to be accurate or reliable. To the maximum extent permissible by law, neither BNZ nor any person involved in this publication accepts any liability for any loss or damage whatsoever which may directly or indirectly result from any, opinion, information, representation or omission, whether negligent or otherwise, contained in this publication.
