&w=3840&q=100)
Sudan's RSF launches drone strikes on Port Sudan targeting military airbase, civilian fcailities
Smoke rises from the airport of Port Sudan following reported attacks early on May 4, 2025. AFP
Sudan's paramilitary Rapid Support Forces conducted a drone strike Sunday on a military airbase and civilian facilities in the coastal city of Port Sudan, according to the military.
There were no deaths recorded in the Rapid Support Forces' first documented raid on the Red Sea city. Port Sudan has acted as the government's temporary seat since the conflict between the military and the RSF paramilitary organisation began more than two years ago.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Brig. Gen. Nabil Abdullah, a spokesman for the Sudanese military, said RSF drones hit an ammunition warehouse in the Osman Digna airbase, causing explosions. The attack also hit a cargo warehouse and civilian installations, he said in a statement.
Video footage posted on social media appeared to show plumes of thick smoke rising above the airbase.
The attack briefly halted air traffic at Port Sudan's airport, according to the Sudanese civil aviation authority.
The city's airport has been the country's entry point since the RSF occupied the Khartoum international airport at the start of the war. The miliary retook the capital's airport earlier this year but the facility has yet to be functional.
There was no immediate comment from the RSF.
The rebel group has stepped up its drone attacks on civilian facilities in military held areas in Sudan. Last month, the paramilitaries hit a major power plant in Atbara, a railway city, north of Khartoum.
The drone attacks came after the military re-took Khartoum earlier this year, pushing the RSF to their stronghold in the western region of Darfur.
As the military consolidated its positions in the capital, the RSF advanced in other areas in the county's peripheries, capturing Sudan's largest camp for displaced people in North Darfur and a key town in West Kordofan province.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Activists accused the RSF of committing atrocities, including street killing and rape, in the two areas where hundreds of people were reported killed.
Sudan's ongoing war broke out on April 15, 2023 after simmering tensions between the military and the RSF exploded into open warfare across the country.
Since then, at least 24,000 people have been killed, though the number is likely far higher. The war has driven about 13 million people from their homes, including 4 million who crossed into neighboring countries. It also pushed parts of the country into famine.
The fighting has been marked by atrocities including mass rape and ethnically motivated killings that amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, especially in Darfur, according to the U.N. and international rights groups.
'No safe place'
Sudan's government has accused the United Arab Emirates of supplying the paramilitaries with advanced drones.
The UAE has long denied reports from UN experts, US politicians and international organisations that it provided support to the RSF.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Satellite imagery analysed by Yale University's Humanitarian Research Lab, which tracks the conflict, shows six advanced drones at the RSF-controlled Nyala Airport in Darfur.
In an April report, it said the Chinese-made drones 'may be capable of long-range surveillance and strikes'.
Saudi Arabia, which previously mediated truce talks, Sunday condemned RSF attacks 'on vital facilities and infrastructure in Port Sudan and Kassala'.
Egypt said the attacks undermine 'efforts to restore stability' in the war-torn country.
Sunday's was the latest RSF drone attack on military and civilian infrastructure deep in army-held territory.
A retired Sudanese army general told AFP on condition of anonymity such attacks 'serve to send a message' that 'there is no safe place' for the RSF's rivals.
'Their other objective is to halt air traffic,' he said, and to 'impact the armed forces' supply chain'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
2 days ago
- The Print
Pakistan signs $1.5 billion deal to sell lethal combat weapons to Sudan's junta
Islamabad's planned arms sales will draw it into a toxic competition between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, as well as a maze of Western sanctions designed to end the civil war. The deal was signed during a visit to Islamabad by 'Pilot' El Tahir Mohamed El Awad El Amin, the head of the SAF's air force, during which he reportedly held talks with Pakistan's defence minister, air force chief, and other senior military figures. New Delhi: Pakistan has signed an agreement to supply $1.5 billion worth of military equipment to the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the internationally sanctioned military junta fighting to control the war-torn north-east African country. The deal, believed to be paid for by a third nation, will give the regime of General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan access to light attack aircraft, engines, armoured fighting vehicles and a range of unmanned aerial vehicles. According to Swiss government sanctions, El Amin was responsible for the indiscriminate aerial bombing carried out by the air force of the SAF in densely populated residential areas, notably in Khartoum, Omdurman, Nyala (South Darfur) and North Kordofan, documented by the United Nations Integrated Transition Assistance Mission in Sudan. The indiscriminate air strikes, the sanctions documents reveal, caused the 'destruction of critical infrastructures, including medical facilities such as the East Nile Hospital in Khartoum in May 2023 and the Babiker Nahar Paediatric Hospital in El-Fasher in May 2024'. Earlier this year, the United States Treasury Department also imposed sanctions on the head of the SAF, Al-Burhan, holding that he had command responsibility for 'lethal attacks on civilians, including airstrikes against protected infrastructure including schools, markets, and hospitals'. The SAF is also held responsible for the routine and intentional denial of humanitarian access, using food deprivation as a war tactic. The Treasury Department had also indicted Ahmed Abdalla, a Sudanese-Ukrainian dual national, for routing Iranian-made UAVs through Azerbaijan to the SAF through his Hong Kong based firm, Portex. An arms embargo and asset freeze is also in place against both sides, enforced by the UN Security Council. However, both sides have continued to receive supplies of arms through third countries, while the Rapid Support Forces is alleged to have been using mercenaries recruited on its behalf by the UAE from Colombia. Fuelled by competition between Saudi Arabia and the UAE, the conflict in Sudan, which began in 2023, has claimed more than 70,000 lives, and left several hundred thousand people on the edge of starvation. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has backed the SAF, hoping to shut out Iran, and also bring stability to the Red Sea, where instability directly threatens key projects, like the city of Neom, and Yanbu Terminal expansion, which aims to diversify oil export routes away from the Strait of Hormuz, expert Elfadil Ibrahim explains. For its part, the UAE seeks to block jihadist groups, who were overthrown in 2019, from riding on the SAF's back to retake power. The Pakistani supplies—10 K8 Karakorum light attack aircraft, engines for MiG21 aircraft, HQ-9 and HQ-6 air defence systems, armoured fighting vehicles, and hundreds of various kinds of drones—would give a significant edge to the junta. Large numbers of countries, including India and Pakistan, had participated in UN peacekeeping operations in Sudan, which concluded in 2024. There have been inconclusive discussions since then on redeploying international forces to protect civilians. (Edited by Mannat Chugh) Also Read: Can Syria's tiny Druze minority survive West Asia's new storms? There's little hope
India Today
3 days ago
- India Today
Sudan's RSF shells famine-hit camp in Darfur, killing at least 17: Report
Sudanese paramilitary forces shelled the besieged North Darfur capital, El-Fasher, on Saturday, killing at least 17 civilians and injuring 25 others, reported news agency to the report, these figures only account for those who reached the facility. Others were buried by their families, unable to access medical centres due to ongoing security May last year, El-Fasher has been under siege by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which have been engaged in a deadly conflict with Sudan's army since April The local resistance committee, one of numerous volunteer groups documenting atrocities during the war, reported that the Saturday attack involved heavy artillery shelling across multiple residential neighbourhoods."The bombardment began early Saturday and continued well into the afternoon," the committee said in a statement. "It is one of the deadliest recent attacks on the city, resulting in numerous casualties and severe damage to property and infrastructure."CIVILIANS HIT AT DISPLACEMENT CAMPSA few kilometres north of El-Fasher, RSF paramilitaries shelled the famine-stricken Abu Shouk displacement camp, killing several civilians, including a community leader, and injuring at least 20 people, according to the camp's Emergency Response Room, which coordinates frontline attacks come after the RSF's loss of Sudan's capital, Khartoum, to the army in March. Since then, El-Fasher and nearby displacement camps have faced multiple assaults. In April, a major RSF offensive on the nearby Zamzam camp displaced tens of thousands, many of whom sought refuge in ongoing war between Sudan's army and the RSF has killed tens of thousands, displaced millions, and triggered what the United Nations describes as the world's largest displacement and hunger CRISIS WORSENS IN EL-FASHERThe conflict has divided Sudan, with the army controlling the north, east, and central regions, while the RSF holds much of Darfur and parts of the south. Last year, famine was declared in three camps near El-Fasher, including Abu Shouk and Zamzam. The UN warned the crisis would spread into the city by May, though a lack of reliable data has prevented an official famine month, the World Food Programme (WFP) warned that thousands of families trapped in El-Fasher are at 'risk of starvation.' WFP officials said staple food prices, including sorghum and wheat, are up to 460 percent higher in El-Fasher than in other parts of and clinics have been attacked, while community kitchens that once fed displaced families have largely shut down due to 40 percent of children under five in El-Fasher are acutely malnourished, with 11 percent suffering from severe acute malnutrition, according to UN figures.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Starvation is a war crime, but will justice ever be done?
Calls to prosecute the war crime of starvation are becoming louder and more frequent. "[Famine] is a weapon of war being wielded across the globe at the moment. But this has to stop, it's against international humanitarian law," Shayna Lewis, senior adviser on Sudan for the US-based group PAEMA (Preventing and Ending Mass Atrocities) told DW recently. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now She was talking about the Sudanese city of El Fasher, which has been under siege for a year now and where food is running out for around 30,000 people trapped there. "It is a crime internationally and it needs to be prosecuted as such," Lewis argued. Human rights groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have said similar about Israel's blockade of aid and food into the Gaza Strip. "Israel is starving Gaza. It's genocide. It's a crime against humanity. It's a war crime," Michael Fakhri, the United Nations' special rapporteur on the right to food, told UK newspaper the Guardian last week. Food as a weapon of war Experts say that part of the reason there are now more calls to prosecute starvation of civilians as a war crime, is that there is more famine being caused by conflict. Over the first decade of this century, there was very little famine, researchers at the World Peace Foundation, or WPF, wrote in a 2022 collection of essays, "Accountability for Starvation." But more recently that has changed. "This is an ancient phenomenon, warring parties have been using it for centuries," Rebecca Bakos Blumenthal, a legal adviser with the Starvation Accountability project run by Netherlands-based law foundation, Global Rights Compliance, or GRC, says. After 2015, this kind of tactic has re-emerged, she noted. Over the past decade, there have been conflict-related famines in Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Food security experts suggest Russian attacks on Ukraine's agricultural sector could also be seen as criminal attempts to weaponize food. Basically there's just more of this war crime happening again, they argue. "Even while global food security is improving, the incidence of famines is increasing," Alex de Waal, a professor at Tufts University in the US and head of the WPF's research into mass starvation, wrote last week. "This tells us that the global food security is more volatile and unequal. That's consistent with hunger being used as a weapon." The deliberate withholding of food or other essentials needed for civilians' survival is categorized as a war crime by many nations as well as in various iterations of international law, including the Geneva Conventions and the Rome Statute (which is applied by the International Criminal Court, or ICC). But so far, those who wield that "weapon" have never been brought to trial: The war crime of starvation has never been prosecuted in an international court on its own, only as a part of around 20 other war crimes cases. And just because civilians are going hungry in a conflict, doesn't mean a crime was committed. "One of the issues in law is the question of intent," de Waal told DW. "The war crime of starvation requires that the perpetrator is acting with intent." Starvation happens over the longer term, de Waal points out, and some legal scholars have argued it must be proven that a perpetrator intended to starve people from the very beginning of, for example, a siege or blockade. But most legal experts believe there could also be "indirect intent," de Waal explains. That is, it's clear that starvation will occur "in the normal course of events," and the perpetrator knows that, they've had opportunities to prevent it, but didn't do so. Another issue for any legal case involving starvation is the lack of precedent, and which international or national courts have jurisdiction over the alleged war criminals. Changing views on starvation as war crime Up until a couple of years ago, starvation was often seen as a developmental or humanitarian issue, GRC's Blumenthal explains. But now there is more attention being paid to its criminal aspects. "I've worked on this issue for quite a few years now and these things do move slowly," concedes Blumenthal, who's been looking at the topic since 2020. "But I do think the needle is moving and there have been some consequential steps taken over the past 10 years." In 2018, the UN Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 2417, "condemning the starving of civilians as a method of warfare." In 2019, changes were made to the Rome Statute, making starvation a war crime in non-international armed conflicts too, rather than just international. There have also been UN commissions of inquiry on conflicts in South Sudan and Ethiopia-Tigray specifically focusing on the topic of starvation as a war crime, Blumenthal points out. "We're seeing a lot more international and local organizations, together with accountability mechanisms, calling this out and certain striking examples, like the case of Gaza today, have really amplified awareness around the crime as well," she notes. In fact, the ICC warrants issued against Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant in November 2024, which specifically mention the war crime of starvation, are a "historic milestone," Blumenthal notes. It's the first time that international warrants have been issued for starvation as a stand-alone crime. The ICC also has an open investigation into Sudan going, she adds. "The issue has undoubtedly gained more attention over the last 10 years," de Waal confirms. "The legal frameworks are all in place. What's lacking is the political will to act." Will perpetrators of starvation ever end up in court? There are still jurisdictional challenges, de Waal told DW. "But I am confident that there are many cases for which conviction is possible. It just requires getting the accused in court." Blumenthal agrees. "There are misconceptions around this and so many people think [starvation] is an inevitable part of war," she says. "But during our in-depth investigations, it's surprising how quickly it becomes clear that actually these patterns are very stark and in many situations, you can discern a deliberate strategy." Blumenthal is cautiously optimistic that one day soon those who deliberately starve civilians will face justice. "That is certainly the hope," she concludes. "That's what we are all working towards."
