South Korea's former first lady imprisoned after court issues warrant
SEOUL--South Korea's former first lady Kim Keon Hee has been arrested after a court late on Tuesday issued a warrant to arrest her following accusations of graft that she denies, a special prosecutor leading a wide-reaching probe said.
Kim is South Korea's only former first lady to be arrested, joining her husband, ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol, in jail as he faces trial following his ouster in April over a botched bid to impose martial law in December.
Earlier in the day, Kim, wearing a black suit, bowed as she arrived at court, but did not answer reporters' questions or make a statement. After the hearing ended she left to await the ruling at a detention center in Seoul, the capital, in line with customary practice.
The court issued the warrant for Kim's detention, the special prosecutor appointed in early June said in a brief message. The prosecutor's office did not provide further details.
The charges against her, punishable by years in prison, range from stock fraud to bribery and illegal influence peddling that have implicated business owners, religious figures and a political power broker.
She has been accused of breaking the law over an incident in which she wore a luxury Van Cleef pendant reportedly worth more than 60 million won ($43,000) while attending a NATO summit with her husband in 2022.
The item was not listed in the couple's financial disclosure as required by law, according to the charge.
Kim is also accused of receiving two Chanel bags together valued at 20 million won and a diamond necklace from a religious group as a bribe in return for influence favorable to its business interests.
The prosecution sought Kim's arrest because of the risk of her destroying evidence and interfering with the investigation, a spokesperson for the special prosecutor's team told a press briefing after Tuesday's hearing.
The court accepted the argument on the risk of destroying evidence, Yonhap news reported.
The spokesperson, Oh Jeong-hee, said Kim had told prosecutors the pendant she wore was a fake bought 20 years ago in Hong Kong.
The prosecution said it was genuine, however, and given by a domestic construction company for Kim to wear at the summit, Oh said.
Kim's lawyers did not immediately comment on Tuesday but they have previously denied the accusations against her and dismissed as groundless speculation news reports about some of the gifts she allegedly received.
Yoon is on trial on charges of insurrection, which could result in life imprisonment or even the death penalty.
The former president, who also faces charges of abuse of power among others, has denied wrongdoing and refused to attend trial hearings or be questioned by prosecutors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan to Launch Demining Initiative in Africa, Looking to Boost Agricultural Output on the Continent
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba plans to announce a new framework to support demining in Africa at the Ninth Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD 9), which will be held on Aug. 20-22 in Yokohama. The initiative aims to leverage Japanese technology to accelerate mine clearance, which has been a major obstacle to post-conflict reconstruction and development across the continent. By clearing landmines and unexploded ordnance, Japan hopes to boost agricultural productivity in Africa. Under the new framework, Japanese companies with expertise in mine clearance technology will cooperate with the U.N. Mine Action Service to provide seamless support, from initial clearance to community rebuilding and victim assistance. Japan will use its official development assistance to provide African nations with Japanese landmine detectors and database hardware for managing minefield data, facilitating quick progress on clearance efforts. In collaboration with the Cambodian Mine Action Center, which Japan has long supported, the initiative will also train personnel on clearance techniques, with the trainees coming from African nations coping with landmines and unexploded ordnance. More than 20 African countries continue to suffer from the legacy of civil wars, with landmines and other undetonated explosives restricting land use and disrupting shipping. The initiative will support agricultural development on cleared land, contributing to regional stabilization. It will also help improve the production of prosthetic legs for victims by using the 3D printing technology of Japanese firms. This year, Japan is serving as the president of the meeting of states signed on to the Ottawa Convention, or the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty, with Zambia set to take over the presidency next year. The treaty is facing challenges, as Russia, which is not a signatory, has laid many landmines in the occupied territories of Ukraine. In response, Ukraine has cited the need to use mines defensively and has indicated it wants to withdraw from the treaty, reflecting a growing movement in Europe to abandon the framework. Through its new initiative in Africa, the Japanese government hopes to build international momentum for the treaty.
The Diplomat
5 hours ago
- The Diplomat
It Was an Uprising, Not a Revolution, Says Bangladesh's ‘July Declaration'
On August 5, Chief Advisor of Bangladesh's interim government Muhammad Yunus read out the much-awaited July Declaration in a public program at the South Plaza of the National Parliament. The July Declaration calls for justice for victims, recognition of July martyrs as 'national heroes,' and implementation of reforms to ensure democracy, rule of law, and sustainable development. It also seeks constitutional recognition of the uprising and envisions a future free from fascism, corruption, and inequality, reflecting the aspirations of a broad-based anti-fascist movement. Interestingly, the Declaration does not describe the July protests that culminated in the ouster of the Sheikh Hasina government on August 5 last year as a 'revolution.' Rather, it frames the events as a mass uprising. By calling it an uprising, the interim government sidesteps the deeper questions of legitimacy and structural change that a revolution demands. The Declaration attempts to legitimize the Yunus-led interim government as a constitutionally mandated government. The July Declaration states that the Twelfth National Assembly was dissolved following the July mass uprising and 'an Interim Government was formed constitutionally under the leadership of Dr. Muhammad Yunus on August 8, 2024, under Article 106 of the Constitution and in light of the opinion given by the Supreme Court.' Yunus was thrust into executive authority following the ouster of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. The circumstances of Hasina's removal were anything but constitutional. It was a revolutionary act, one that bypassed legal procedures and institutional norms. To then retroactively declare Yunus' government as constitutionally legitimate feels intellectually dishonest. It's a classic case of using constitutional language to mask extra-legal power shifts — a tactic often employed in hybrid regimes to lend a veneer of legality to what is essentially a political maneuver. Only a revolutionary framework can properly legitimize this government. Another troubling aspect of the Declaration is its crediting of the military for the success of the July movement. The July Declaration states that 'the armed forces gave support to the movement at its final stage,' although there is much evidence to show that the military deployed force to put down the mass protests. In the words of a key coordinator of the movement who spoke to The Diplomat, 'the military had no option but to support us as our numbers were a hundred times bigger than the number of bullets they had.' The July Declaration blames the Awami League for constitutional distortions, human rights abuses, and economic mismanagement over the past 16 years, and also for Bangladesh's democratic backsliding over the past 54 years. It also blames the military dictatorship of General H. M. Ershad, founder of the Jatia Party. It carefully bypasses the negative roles of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and the Jamaat-e-Islami, two main parties that participated in the July movement, in the history of Bangladesh. What the Declaration chooses to leave out is revealing. There is no mention of the 2013 Shapla Square massacre, the 2009 BDR mutiny, or the controversial judicial killings of BNP and Jamaat leaders. These events are not minor footnotes in Bangladesh's contemporary history but defining moments that shaped public trust, institutional integrity, and the trajectory of political dissent. Their absence from the Declaration suggests a deliberate effort to sanitize the historical record, perhaps to avoid implicating powerful actors, including the judiciary. The National Citizen Party (NCP), which was formed recently by student leaders of the mass protests, has demanded inclusion of several events for 'historical recognition.' These include the Pilkhana Carnage of 2009, the Shapla Square massacre, judicial killings, the anti-VAT movement of 2015, the Quota Reform Movement of 2018, Safe Road Movement of 2018, the murder of Abrar Fahad, an engineering student, by Awami League student wing members for criticizing the government over a water-sharing deal with India, and the Anti-Modi Movement of 2021, when Hefazat-e-Islam protested the Indian prime minister's visit to Bangladesh. It has also questioned the number of martyrs cited in the Declaration and has slammed the interim government for failing to determine the correct number. Hefazat-e-Islam, a Deobandi Islamist advocacy group, has also criticized the interim government for the omission of the Shapla killings, and accuses it of historical erasure and selective memory. The Jamaat too has criticized it due to the omissions of these historical events. In addition, Jamaat also wants the Declaration to include reference to the Partition of the Indian subcontinent in 1947, which it calls 'the Azadi of 1947.' Regarding how the Declaration will be incorporated into the Constitution, the NCP wants it to be the Preamble of a 'new Constitution.' The Jamaat also demanded a legal basis for the July Declaration, 'either through an ordinance, a legal framework order, or a referendum.' The BNP, the largest political party since the Awami League's fall, has not officially responded to the July Declaration. However, a member of its Standing Committee, Salahuddin Ahmed, has welcomed the Declaration. 'We are committed to granting the declarations made in the July Declaration formal recognition at both the state and constitutional levels,' he told journalists. Without a broad consensus and transparent mechanisms, the July Declaration risks becoming another symbolic gesture — potent in rhetoric but hollow in substance. Bangladesh stands at a crossroads. The challenge now is not just to draft new declarations, but to build a political culture that values truth, accountability, and inclusive dialogue. Only then can documents like the July Declaration move beyond performance and contribute to genuine democratic transformation.
The Mainichi
5 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Japan and China commemorate World War II anniversary on different dates
BENXI, China (AP) -- Eighty years after the end of World War II, Japan and China are marking the anniversary with major events, but on different dates and in different ways. Japan remembers the victims in a solemn ceremony on Aug. 15, the day then-Emperor Hirohito announced in a crackly radio message that the government had surrendered, while China showcases its military strength with a parade on Sept. 3, the day after the formal surrender on an American battleship in Tokyo Bay. Japan occupied much of China before and during WWII in a devastating and brutal invasion that, by some estimates, killed 20 million people. The wartime experience still bedevils relations between the two countries today. A museum in the Chinese city of Benxi highlights the struggles of anti-Japanese resistance fighters who holed up in log cabins through fierce winters in the country's northeast, then known as Manchuria, before retreating into Russia. They returned only after the Soviet Union declared war on Japan and launched an offensive into Manchuria on Aug. 9, 1945 -- the same day the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki -- adding to the pressure on Japan to surrender. Nowadays, it is China's military that raises alarm as it seeks to enforce the government's territorial claims in the Pacific. When Japan talks of building up its defense to counter the threat, its militaristic past gives China a convenient retort. "We urge Japan to deeply reflect on its historical culpability, earnestly draw lessons from history and stop using hype over regional tensions and China-related issues to conceal its true intent of military expansion," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said last month. Japan's surrender broadcast Hirohito's prerecorded surrender broadcast on Aug. 15, 1945, was incomprehensible to many Japanese. He used arcane language and the sound quality was poor. What was important, historians say, was that the message came from the emperor himself. Hirohito was considered a living god, and the war was fought in his name. Most Japanese had never heard his voice before. "The speech is a reminder of what it took to end the wrong war," Nihon University professor Takahisa Furukawa told The Associated Press in 2015. The current emperor, Hirohito's grandson Naruhito, and the prime minister are set to make remarks at the annual ceremony in Tokyo on Aug. 15, broadcast live by public broadcaster NHK. At last year's event, Naruhito expressed deep remorse over Japan's actions during the war. But on the same day, three Japanese cabinet ministers visited Tokyo's Yasukuni shrine, drawing criticism from China and South Korea, which see the shrine as a symbol of militarism. China marks Victory Day Japan surrendered on Sept. 2, 1945, in a ceremony on board the American battleship USS Missouri. The foreign minister, in a top hat and tails, and the army chief signed on behalf of Hirohito. The signatories on the other side were U.S. Gen. Douglas MacArthur and representatives from China and other nations that had fought Japan. China designated the next day, Sept. 3, as Victory Day. Eleven years ago, the Communist Party stepped up how China marks the anniversary. All of China's top leaders, including President Xi Jinping, attended a commemorative event on Sept. 3. The renewed focus came at a time of rising tension with Japan over conflicting interpretations of wartime history and a still-ongoing territorial dispute in the East China Sea. The next year, China staged a military parade on the 70th anniversary of the end of the war. A decade later, preparations are underway for another grand parade with missiles, tanks and fighter jets overhead. Russian President Vladimir Putin is among those expected to attend.
