Tiranga Yatra held in Nandyal
Nandyal Collector Rajakumari Gania on Sunday said that the people of the country are living safely and happily due to the sacrifices and fighting spirit of our soldiers guarding the borders.
A Tiranga Yatra was taken out from Tekme Market yard to Gandhi Chowk in Nandyal district headquarters to honour the armed forces on the success of Operation Sindoor in response to the terror attack on tourists in J&K's Pahalgam. Speaking on the occasion, Ms. Rajakumari said Tiranga Rally is a symbol of unity in diversity and urged people to express their solidarity with the defence forces.
Nandyal MP Byreddy Shabari said the armed forces have shown the might of our military power to Pakistan and all those countries, opposing us, through Operation Sindoor. She said the women soldiers of the nation have taught a lesson to the terror elements who have killed innocent men in front of their wives through Operation Sindoor.
Ms Rajakumari and Ms Shabari also felicitated personnel serving the armed forces and those who have retired from service. Tributes were paid to slain army jawan Murali Naik, and others who were killed in Pahalgam terror attack.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Congress sees weakness, but India's diplomacy stands strong in chaotic world
As the world moves from one local war to another, it now seems so right that India stopped the battle with Pakistan at the perfect time. Even though the decision came as a shock to Indians, as each wanted the neighbour to suffer more. However, two months after the April 22 terror attack and the subsequent Operation Sindoor, the understanding for effecting a ceasefire was the perfect move towards the yet-to-come climax. The ceasefire understanding is not an end, as India has stated firmly that Operation Sindoor has not ended, and any act of terror emanating from Pakistan will be treated as an act of war. The end is open, and all depends upon Pakistan's conduct. Given the situation created by the wars happening in other places, the pause is complementary. Russia attacked Ukraine on February 24, 2022, and after three years, the two are still fighting. Several countries have tried to broker peace between the two, but every time the murmur happens, the two enter a virulent phase. Nobody knows what the actual number of dead is in both countries, and nobody knows the extent of destruction. Wars are only about death and destruction, and the two have been facing both. If Russia and Ukraine are hiding their pain, the war between Israel and Hamas is well televised and covered, with information flowing instantly. The conflict started on October 7, 2023, when Hamas and several other Palestinian militant groups launched coordinated armed incursions from the Gaza Strip into southern Israel. The barbarity of the attack shocked the world, and Israel rightly launched a counteroffensive. The counterattack has devastated Gaza and continues unabated, even as countries want Israel to stop. However, the conflict has now added a new dimension, which is an attack on Iran. Israel launched the airstrikes on Iran on June 13, and each passing day is witnessing an increase in intensity, and now the US has also entered the scene. The Israeli attack on Iran came unexpectedly as Iran-US talks were ongoing. Israel's midnight attack shocked the Iranians, and the casualties were significant and striking. After the initial shock, Iran has been fighting back, causing huge losses to Israel. With the US bombing three nuclear sites in Iran and threatening to attack more, the war scenario in the Middle East has completely changed. It can worsen, or Iran can just stop, which seems unlikely now. After US strikes, Iran again launched fresh missile attacks on Israel, and the latter also pounded back. Prospects for an immediate end to the Israel-Iran-US conflict appear dim, with all sides in a belligerent attitude. Though European countries and some Muslim-majority countries are trying to get Iran and Israel to stop, things now seem to be difficult. Thousands of people have been displaced, hundreds have died, and infrastructure in places has been badly affected in both Iran and Israel. The war continues, and even if it is halted, it will be a long way from peace and difficult terrain for rehabilitation for those directly affected. Besides, the loss in the economy for Israel, Russia, Ukraine, Iran and all those involved in wars and battles is huge. The lessons are stark, and India did right to halt Operation Sindoor. Wars are no longer about guns and powder. They have gone beyond and involve narrative setting and diplomacy dominance, with the former involving social media vibrancy. India launched Operation Sindoor against terror targets on May 7 in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and struck deep in Pakistan on May 10 after it tried to terrorise with a barrage of drone and missile attacks. Along with this, another fight was initiated, and this was of narrative and diplomacy. India did well in both, but on the internal front, the narrative was getting punctured as the Congress-led opposition has been consistently trying to demean the operation's success and the political decision. The statements of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and his party leaders were lapped up by Pakistan, which has been using these to counter New Delhi's claims. The Congress party has also questioned India's decision to halt Operation Sindoor and has attacked every action taken by the Centre, including diplomatic moves. It has even launched a social media campaign -- "Narendra Surrender" -- and is discrediting the Modi government for agreeing to a ceasefire understanding with Pakistan. The Congress leaders have also slammed the Centre for its diplomatic stance -- or perceived silence -- on international crises, particularly the humanitarian fallout in Gaza and now in Iran. Sonia Gandhi, former Congress president, penned an article criticising New Delhi's silence as a "disturbing departure" from India's moral and diplomatic traditions, urging stronger and more vocal leadership in West Asia. However, such rhetoric, especially when echoed by adversaries like Pakistan, risks undermining India's strategic credibility. In global diplomacy, every public statement is a signal -- not just to the domestic electorate but to allies, adversaries, and neutral observers. Foreign policy should be navigated with caution and consensus, not caught in the crossfire of electoral combat. India's diplomatic posture has traditionally been subtle, working behind the scenes, avoiding knee-jerk reactions, and projecting calm strength. New Delhi's diplomatic approach is often likened to the "duck policy", calm on the surface but paddling hard underneath. In a world ablaze with conflict, India's choice to pause its military campaign was not an act of surrender -- it was a reaffirmation of control. Operation Sindoor remains active in intent, and India's military remains on alert. But wisdom lies not just in launching a war but in knowing when to stop. The larger message is clear: restraint is not a sign of weakness; it is a sign of strategy.
Scroll.in
3 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Punjab: Two arrested on charges of spying for Pakistan
Two persons suspected of spying for Pakistan's intelligence agency were arrested by Amritsar Rural Police, an official said on Sunday. The two individuals accused in the case were identified as Gurpreet Singh and Sahil Masih, Punjab Director General of Police Gaurav Yadav said in a social media post. Singh was allegedly in direct contact with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence operatives. He is 'suspected of sharing sensitive information via pen drives,' Yadav added. The Pakistani intelligence handler involved in the case was identified as Rana Javed, claimed the director general of police. Two mobile phones allegedly used for communication with the intelligence operatives were also seized, he added. These arrests bring the number of persons apprehended in the state on similar charges to 12, The New Indian Express reported. On June 3, the Punjab police had arrested a man from Tarn Taran district for allegedly spying for Pakistan's intelligence agency and leaking sensitive information about Operation Sindoor. Yadav had said then that the man, identified as Gagandeep Singh, posed a 'a threat to national security' after allegedly sharing sensitive details about troop deployments and military locations in lieu of money during India's military strikes on Pakistan.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 hours ago
- First Post
How Turkey's interests in the Indian Ocean go beyond just Islamism
Like many other European nations, the US or China, Turkey has also seemingly concluded that the Indian Ocean is where the action is, and outsider nations should have a presence here if they have to be counted in, even as a wannabe global power read more In the post-Operation Sindoor domestic discourse, the strategic community in India, as well as sections of the nation's polity, have been targeting Turkey, along with China, for supporting Pakistan in what essentially was a cross-border terror attack in Pahalgam. In a simplistic way, many Indians have concluded that Turkey's support for Pakistan flowed from religious commonality. At times, it has been interpreted as Ankara's desire to recreate the Ottoman Empire spirit from a bygone era, where peripheral Muslim states in South Asia may be more malleable to inducements than nations from the Islamic heartland in West Asia and, by extension, Africa. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Such constructs are only partially and Pakistan have been friends and partners for over four decades, even as Ankara and New Delhi remained friends and trading partners. Turkey's backing for Pakistan, starting with the 'Kashmir issue' for some years now, is in fact a part of Ankara's two-decade-long plans for expanding beyond its immediate neighbourhood into the Indian Ocean. In a way, Turkey's ambitions in the matter are possibly older than those of China, which is also a non-territorial entity in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) but wants to have at least a piece of the cake. In comparison to both, the US, with its Diego Garcia military base, wants to be seen as an IOR entity. After the UK recently conceded Mauritius sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago, of which Diego Garcia is a part, the US has got a new 99-year lease, over and above the original 50 years plus an additional 20, the latter since 2016. France, with the Reunion Island not far away from Diego Garcia, can claim greater legitimacy in the IOR. Extending the argument, it can be said China's interest in acquiring a 99-year lease of Hambantota 'territory' in Sri Lanka has a legitimacy angle to it as much as the trade, transhipment and bunkering business that it entails. No other non-regional player can claim such legitimacy and access – though in the case of China in Hambantota, the lease agreement does not entail any military presence. Hence also the Indian reservations about China sending out 'spy ships' in the name of oceanic research in recent years. In context, Turkey does not have any base or 'territory' of the Hambantota kind in these parts. That, however, has not stopped Ankara from making friends and influencing nations in the IOR neighbourhood, especially because India anyway would not have partnered with Turkey in creating a shared strategic interest in these parts. Certainly, it would not have helped India in any way. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Thus, street calls in India for a boycott of Turkey, as happened in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, on the lines of the successful social media boycott call of Maldives two years back, over time can only be counterproductive, especially if Indians are going to act on them in a big way. Such street acts on the government are forced to fall in line when New Delhi has been handling issues in a mature way. Unique Animal In geopolitical terms, Turkey is a unique animal. It has had historic links both with Asia and Europe, which is only a geographical reality. In terms of its Asian connections, rather than the religious roots, the country is a member of the Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC). In geo-economic terms, Turkey is not a member of the EU. But in geopolitical and geostrategic terms, the nation signed up with the US-led NATO because it feared the erstwhile Soviet Union. For the same reasons, Ankara was also a member of the US-created Central Treaty Organisation (CENTO). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Because India did not yield to American persuasions and instead created the non-alignment movement along with like-minded erstwhile European colonies in the Cold War era, Pakistan signed up, precisely for the same reason. The CENTO did not have as much relevance or importance as NATO, but it was one more venue where Turkey and Pakistan interacted. In historic terms, the Ottoman Empire had its origins in Islam that was native to Asia at the founding stage. With a 99-per cent Muslim population, Turkey is also only one of the two member nations in NATO, other than Albania (60 per cent Muslim), that has strong Islamic roots and presence. As is otherwise acknowledged, NATO is incidentally a grouping of nations that cherish 'Christian values'. Incidentally, the new name, 'Türkiye', is of very recent origins. Ankara notified the new name, or spelling, from the original Turkey to the UN in 2021 and officially adopted it only in 2023. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Turkey had a 'Vision 2023 Project' for the centenary year of the post-Ottoman Republic. It also has a 'Türkiye 2053 Project', coinciding with the 600th anniversary of the 'Conquest of Istanbul', an important milestone in Islamic political history. Since 2005, Ankara has been following a 'Three Vision' foreign policy, with a focus on Europe, West Asia and Africa, with the aim to recreate the 'Ottoman spirit'. In fact, the country even sought EU membership, and the aim is to try to leverage it to sub-serve the nation's geo-economic, geopolitical and geo-strategic ambitions. Yet, Ankara also has a clearer vision than is acknowledged, especially in 'distant' nations like India. It wants to make its mark in technology, and that includes technology for military purposes. Friendly Nations Turkey's drones played a significant role in Ukraine's continuing war with Russia, making the rest of the world look up. It has also emerged as a dependable defence supplier for 'friendly nations', of which Pakistan is only one, even in these parts. It wooed incumbent Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu from his past as Male mayor, and Turkey was the first country he visited after assuming office in November 2023. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Turkey has since delivered three drones to the Maldives to replace India-gifted aircraft to survey the vast seas around the archipelago against international drug smuggling and possible terrorist activities. More recently, Turkey also donated a 40-plus-year-old missile-capable naval vessel to Maldives, which is said to be a 'gas-guzzler' – but Ankara's message stood conveyed. In between, Turkey's 'TCG Kinaliada', a naval vessel, paid a goodwill visit to Maldives last year. During President Muizzu's maiden overseas visit to Turkey, his 'friend' Erdogan also seemingly promised to deliver the Maldives' full year's rations of essentials, including rice, sugar and wheat flour. The aim, whether of Muizzu, Erdogan or both, was to cut off Maldives' near-exclusive dependence on India in this department. Blame it on the Houthis' attack on shipping in the Red Sea or whatever; that did not happen. Maldives had to then go back to India quietly for continuing the supplies, for which Muizzu had bravely declared he 'will not depend on only one source'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Multi-polar World Plain and simple, Turkey's Indian Ocean outreach goes beyond Islam. Rather, the nation has regional and global ambitions like many others, especially in the post-Cold War era, when a multipolar world has caught the imagination of many nations. Turkey visualises itself as a 'middle power' of some kind and hopes to exploit its location advantage in political, economic and geo-strategic terms, using Islam as one more chip, or trump card, where it works. It suits the incumbent government of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. He and his ruling party have made 'Islamic nationalism' a steady staple in domestic politics. Erdoğan is facing re-election next year and street protests at present. The protests in March followed the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, a possible challenger in next year's presidential poll. The issue of democracy may play a key role in the polls, but it does not necessarily mean that Turkey will overnight give up national ambitions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Wannabe Power From an Indian perspective, this is important. Turkey's support for Pakistan on the 'Kashmir issue' flows from 'Islamic nationalist' and 'expansionist' tendencies. Under Erdoğan, it has vocalised and become louder – and also as frequent as Islamabad has wanted. But Turkey's national ambitions and a global role, centred also on the 'distant' Indian Ocean, remain. Like many other European nations, the US or China, Turkey has also seemingly concluded that the Indian Ocean is where the action is, and outsider nations should have a presence here if they have to be counted in, even as a wannabe global power. The writer is a Chennai-based Policy Analyst & Political Commentator. Email: sathiyam54@ Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
