China sanctions two EU banks hitting back at Europe's measures
China included UAB Urbo Bankas and AB Mano Bankas in its countermeasure list, the Ministry of Commerce said in a statement on Wednesday. The move bans organizations and individuals in China from transactions, cooperation and other activities with the institutions.
In a separate statement, the ministry said it hoped the EU would cherish its relationship with China, correct its wrongdoing and stop harming the nation's interests.
Last month, the European Union sanctioned two Chinese banks and five companies based in the Asian nation as part of the latest round of measures against Moscow. The EU said the banks were listed for providing cryptocurrency services that were frustrating the purpose of the sanctions.
China's close ties with Russia had subjected its banks to similar sanctions from the US before, prompting them to re-evaluate businesses and clients. Some of its state-owned banks tightened curbs on funding to Russian clients early last year, after the US authorized secondary sanctions on overseas financial firms that aid Moscow's war effort.
China and Lithuania have been at odds in the past. Last year, Lithuania expelled three Chinese embassy employees, saying they weren't accredited.
Beijing had earlier downgraded its diplomatic ties with the Baltic nation in response to Lithuania's decision to allow the opening of a Taiwan representative office in Vilnius.
Ties between Beijing and Brussels have been strained in recent years, largely due to China's support for Russia's war in Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
an hour ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
New Zealand MP Who Called Opponents Spineless over Gaza Is Ejected from Parliament a 2nd Time
A New Zealand lawmaker who was thrown out of Parliament for calling her opponents spineless during a fiery debate about a Palestinian state was ejected again on Wednesday when she refused to apologize for the remark. Chlöe Swarbrick, co-leader of the left-leaning Green Party and part of the opposition bloc, was ordered to leave parliament on Tuesday over a speech in which she called for government lawmakers 'with a spine' to endorse her proposal for New Zealand to impose sanctions on Israel over the war in Gaza. She was hit with a three-day ban — lengthy by New Zealand parliamentary standards — but returned the next day only to be ejected a second time. Her censure came amid fraught scenes in Parliament in Wellington on Tuesday as opponents rebuked the government for not moving to recognize an independent Palestinian state, days after neighboring Australia pledged to do so. Countries including France, Britain and Canada are also expected to recognize a state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September. 'We are one of the very few countries in the world who so far refuse to acknowledge the absolute bare minimum,' Swarbrick said. The Green party lawmaker was abruptly ejected from the debating chamber when she urged government politicians to join her in a proposal to sanction Israel, which currently wouldn't have enough votes to pass into law. 'If we can find six of 68 government MPs with a spine, we can stand on the right side of history,' Swarbrick said, referring to other Members of Parliament. 'That is completely unacceptable to make that statement,' Speaker Gerry Brownlee interrupted. 'Withdraw it and apologize.' The Green politician refused. Brownlee told her to leave the debating chamber for the rest of the week. 'Happily,' Swarbrick said. The standoff resumed when Swarbrick took her seat again on Wednesday despite the ban and Brownlee asked again if she would apologize. Swarbrick declined and was ejected once more, yelling 'free Palestine' as she went. Brownlee took the serious step, rare in New Zealand's Parliament, of taking a vote to 'name' Swarbrick for her misconduct, a ruling that means a legislator is formally suspended with their pay docked. The vote passed, with all government lawmakers endorsing it. Opposition lawmakers claim double standards The measure provoked fresh debate in Parliament about punishments for unruly behavior. Government lawmakers voted in June to enact unprecedented lengthy bans of opposition Māori Party lawmakers who performed a haka chant to protest a controversial vote. On Wednesday, opposition politicians decried Swarbrick's penalty as unusually severe, with lawmaker Willie Jackson highlighting his own ban of just 30 minutes for calling one of his colleagues a liar, before he was allowed to resume his seat without an apology. In another recent example, a government politician used an eye-watering expletive without censure, supporters of Swarbrick said. Several others had escaped punishment in recent years when using the word 'spineless' about their opponents. Opposition leader Chris Hipkins said it was unprecedented for a lawmaker to be ejected from Parliament for a second day over the same offense. Brownlee, however, said he had drawn a line when Swarbrick directed a personal insult at all 68 government lawmakers, including him. 'We have so many threats and other stuff being directed at Members of Parliament,' he said. 'If we don't change the behavior in here, nothing will change outside.' Meanwhile, the government continues to mull recognition of an independent Palestinian state. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon Wednesday made his most strident rebuke yet of Benjamin Netanyahu, saying the Israel leader 'has lost the plot' on the 'human catastrophe' in Gaza. 'I think Netanyahu has gone way too far,' Luxon told reporters. 'He is not listening to the international community and that is unacceptable.' While senior New Zealand officials, including Luxon, have said recognition of Palestine from their government was 'a matter of not if, but when,' his Cabinet has yet to endorse a change of position. A decision will be made in September after further consideration, Luxon said Monday.
Asharq Al-Awsat
an hour ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
German Chancellor Says European Leaders and Zelenskyy Had ‘Constructive' Meeting with Trump
European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had a 'constructive' discussion with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday, two days ahead of Trump's planned meeting in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said. Speaking alongside Zelenskyy, Merz said after the videoconference that 'important decisions' could be made in Anchorage, but stressed that 'fundamental European and Ukrainian security interests must be protected' at the meeting. Merz convened the virtual meetings in an attempt to make sure European and Ukraine's leaders are heard ahead of the summit, where Trump and Putin are expected to discuss a path toward ending Moscow's war in Ukraine. Zelenskyy and the Europeans have been sidelined from that summit. German government spokesperson Steffen Meyer said the intention of Wednesday's meetings was to 'make clear the position of the Europeans.' Zelenskyy is due to meet with European leaders first, in preparation for a virtual call with Trump and Vice President JD Vance about an hour later. A call among leaders of countries involved in the 'coalition of the willing' — those who are prepared to help police any future peace agreement between Moscow and Kyiv — will take place last. The Ukrainian leader on Wednesday said his government has had over 30 conversations with partners ahead of the summit in Alaska, but reiterated his doubt that Putin would negotiate in good faith. Writing on his official Telegram channel, Zelenskyy said there was 'currently no sign that the Russians are preparing to end the war,' and urged Ukraine's partners in the United States and Europe to coordinate efforts and "force Russia to peace.' "Pressure must be applied on Russia for an honest peace. We must take the experience of Ukraine and our partners to prevent deception by Russia,' Zelenskyy said. The stakes for Europe Trump has said he wants to see whether Putin is serious about ending the war, now in its fourth year, describing Friday's summit as "a feel-out meeting' where he can assess the Russian leader's intentions. Yet Trump has disappointed allies in Europe by saying Ukraine will have to give up some Russian-held territory. He has also said Russia must accept land swaps, although it was unclear what Putin might be expected to surrender. European allies have pushed for Ukraine's involvement in any peace talks, fearful that discussions that exclude Kyiv could otherwise favor Moscow. Trump on Monday ducked repeated chances to say that he would push for Zelenskyy to take part in his discussions with Putin, and was dismissive of Zelenskyy and his need to be part of an effort to seek peace. Trump said that following Friday's summit, a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders could be arranged, or that it could also be a meeting with 'Putin and Zelenskyy and me.' The Europeans and Ukraine are wary that Putin, who has waged the biggest land war in Europe since 1945 and used Russia's energy might to try to intimidate the European Union, might secure favorable concessions and set the outlines of a peace deal without them. The overarching fear of many European countries is that Putin will set his sights on one of them next if he wins in Ukraine. Land concessions a non-starter for Kyiv Zelenskyy said Tuesday that Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that it still controls as part of a ceasefire deal, a proposal the leader categorically rejected. Zelenskyy reiterated that Ukraine would not give up any territory it controls, saying that would be unconstitutional and would serve only as a springboard for a future Russian invasion. He said diplomatic discussions led by the US focusing on ending the war have not addressed key Ukrainian demands, including security guarantees to prevent future Russian aggression and including Europe in negotiations. Three weeks after Trump returned to office, his administration took the leverage of Ukraine's NATO membership off the table — something that Putin has demanded — and signaled that the EU and Ukraine must handle security in Europe now while America focuses its attention elsewhere. Senior EU officials believe that Trump may be satisfied with simply securing a ceasefire in Ukraine, and is probably more interested in broader US geostrategic interests and great power politics, aiming to ramp up business with Russia and rehabilitate Putin. Russian advances in Donbas Russian forces on the ground in Ukraine have been closing in on a key territorial grab around the city of Pokrovsk, in the eastern Donbas region comprises Ukraine's eastern industrial heartland that Putin has long coveted. Military analysts using open-source information to monitor the battles have said Ukraine's ability to fend off those advances could be critical: Losing Pokrovsk would hand Russia an important victory ahead of the summit and could complicate Ukrainian supply lines to the Donetsk region, where the Kremlin has focused the bulk of military efforts. Meanwhile, Ukrainian forces struck an oil pumping station in Russia's Bryansk region overnight on Wednesday, according to a statement from Ukraine's General Staff. Ukrainian drones struck the Unecha station which supplies the Russian army, the statement said, adding that damage and a large fire was reported in the area around the pumping station. Unecha transports oil to two pipelines with an annual capacity to pump 60 million tons. The operation was carried out by units of the Unmanned Systems Forces of Ukraine's army and the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Defense Ministry, the statement said.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Former British officer sues Ministry of Defense over handling of Afghan data breach
LONDON: A former British military officer is suing the Ministry of Defense for constructive dismissal after speaking out about the handling of a data leak that exposed the personal details of thousands of Afghans seeking relocation to the UK. The Times reported that an unnamed individual was contracted to assist with Operation Rubific, a secret mission addressing the fallout from a massive data breach. The former officer worked on Afghan cases for under two years before his role ended unexpectedly after he threatened to become a whistleblower. He was then reassigned to another area in a position for which he was overqualified. 'He complained they are letting in people they shouldn't and not letting in those he should,' a source close to the former officer suing the MoD told The Times. He also raised concerns that the government was not prioritizing those most at risk among the tens of thousands of Afghans identified for resettlement in Britain. He assisted four Afghan individuals in relocating to Britain after their details were revealed on the leaked list. The MoD is facing scrutiny over a superinjunction that blocked public and parliamentary oversight after a spreadsheet leaked containing the names, telephone numbers and email addresses of Afghans seeking relocation to Britain. The former officer allegedly threatened to alert other departments about the superinjunction and was subsequently 'managed out,' according to the source. The individual is suing the MoD and his third-party recruiter, for whom he worked as a contractor after leaving the military. The case is set to be heard next year. Officials argued that the data breach should remain secret for nearly two years, claiming it put 100,000 Afghans at risk of Taliban retribution, including death and torture. However, the superinjunction was lifted in July after a government review deemed it 'highly unlikely' that Afghans on the leaked spreadsheet were at risk. Ministers reduced the number of Afghans brought to Britain from 42,500 to 24,000, including family members, based on their presence in the country or prior invitations. Concerns have also been raised about the motive behind the secrecy order, questioning if it aims to protect the MoD's reputation and prepare for potential mass applications from affected Afghans, The Times reported. Adnan Malik, the head of data protection at Barings Law, is now representing 1,400 individuals from the leaked list; a number that continues to grow daily. He told The Times that the MoD's 'attempt to silence one of their own whistleblowers is another shameful development' after tens of thousands of Afghans had their data breached without their knowledge. A source from the MoD said that the individual's contract had concluded.
