‘Weapons' public review: Horror fans praise the film and performances, call it 'a genre masterclass'
Blending mystery, horror, and sharp social commentary, the film tells a story through interconnected events and characters, with each chapter peeling back more unsettling layers. It's a slow burn packed with jaw-dropping moments, haunting visuals, and unexpected emotional weight.
Early public reviews have been overwhelmingly positive — though not without debate.
One viewer summed up the buzz: 'I have not seen a single bad Weapons review… horror fans, we are really eating good this year (sic).' Others highlighted the film's most terrifying scene, with one post saying: 'Everyone was screaming for 30 seconds when this scene happened in Weapons. Literally an all-timer scare (sic).'
Veteran actor Amy Madigan has also received high praise for her role, with one fan stating: 'Her performance was unforgettable. She secured a spot in the horror hall of fame with this character (sic).'
But not everyone sees Weapons as a straightforward horror film. One user commented: '#Weapons is NOT a horror movie. Especially not the way it was advertised. #WeaponsMovie IS a dark comedy (sic).'
Still, most agree that Zach Cregger has delivered something bold. 'Weapons has changed the game,' one post reads. 'A genre masterclass of genuine fear and soul-rocking imagery. Cregger is firing on all cylinders (sic).'
For many, it's a film worth returning to. 'Weapons is the kind of movie where you're already planning your second viewing the moment it ends (sic),' shared one excited viewer.
'Weapons' is a 2025 American mystery-horror film created by Zach Cregger, who serves as writer, director, producer, and co-composer. The film features an ensemble cast including Josh Brolin, Julia Garner, Alden Ehrenreich, Austin Abrams, Cary Christopher, Benedict Wong, and Amy Madigan.
The story centres on a chilling event in which seventeen school children vanish without a trace on the same night, all from the same classroom. As the investigation unfolds, it becomes clear that a strange, unseen force may be behind the mass disappearance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
'Hollywood was ugly': 80s star Kelly LeBrock reveals why she ran away from fame and vanished into the wilderness
Kelly LeBrock, the iconic star of 1980s hits 'The Woman in Red' and 'Weird Science', has opened up about why she turned her back on Hollywood at the peak of her fame and chose a quieter life away from the spotlight. Now 65, the British-American actress began modelling at the age of 16 before making the transition to film, quickly rising to stardom. In 1987, she married action star Steven Seagal, with whom she shared the screen in Hard to Kill (1990). The pair had three children before divorcing in 1996. Following the highly publicised split, LeBrock walked away from the entertainment industry and moved to a ranch near Santa Barbara, California, dedicating herself to raising her family. In a recent interview with Fox News Digital, she candidly reflected on that life-changing decision. 'I was never impressed with myself or Hollywood. I never really cared about it. And I did the right thing,' LeBrock said, explaining her choice to retreat from fame in favour of family life. "You know, I could always go back to a career, but I couldn't go back to my children," she added. "And that was the most important thing to me was raising my children, because I grew up in boarding school. At five [years old], I was sent away. And I didn't want to have that story for my children." LeBrock, who was born in New York and raised in London, is mother to Annaliza, 38, Dominic, 35, and Arissa, 32. During the interview, she gave a rare update on their lives: Annaliza is currently serving as a deputy sheriff in Siskiyou County, California, while Dominic has recently started working on a film production in Russia. "And I have my lovely youngest daughter who can do whatever she likes," LeBrock said of Arissa, who appeared alongside her mother in the 2017 Lifetime reality series 'Growing Up Supermodel'. LeBrock described her current life as peaceful and grounded, far removed from the fast pace of Hollywood. "I have a bevy of animals, which is what I was doing," she said. "I was taking care of the chickens and the sheep and the goats and the horses and the dogs and the cats." Reflecting further, she added, 'So, I really ran away. I mean, the hardest thing for me is not putting on makeup or trying to look nice. It's trying to get those chin hairs out of my chin. And it's a whole new world. What can I say? But I'm excited about my future. I'm developing a Kelly Care product, which is going to help people with their wounds for their pets and grooming. And I'm excited about that, but not interested in Hollywood.' "The crowd is very ugly, and I didn't want any part of that," she said. "I'm really quite shy, and I'm a homebody. I spent the two years of COVID completely by myself, pretty much in the wilderness. And you learn a lot about yourself when you're not in the noise." "And yeah, life's good now," LeBrock added. Though her departure from the entertainment industry followed her divorce, LeBrock admitted that she had always felt out of place in the world of fame and celebrity.
India.com
9 hours ago
- India.com
Rise of TikTok in US: How TikTok sparked short-form video race…and won
Rise of TikTok in US: How TikTok sparked short-form video race…and won The rise of TikTok in the US, which has over 1.12 billion monthly active users globally, not only pioneered the now-prevalent short-form video content, but also sparked a race in the sector. Advertisement Representational Image TikTok is arguably the most widely-used social app in the United States, with American users spending about 108 minutes on the app on average per day, according to various reports, The rise of TikTok, which has over 1.12 billion monthly active users globally, not only pioneered the now-prevalent short-form video content, but also sparked a race in the sector, which it seems to be winning by huge market. How TikTok pioneered short-form videos? TikTok's rise in the US due to its innovative use of short-form videos, reshaped the social media landscape across the world, forcing US giants like Meta and Google to jump into the race and launch their own versions of short-form video content, such as Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts. Advertisement === But despite aggressive marketing and pouring in billions, TikTok's competitors lag behind, primarily because of the unique algorithm employed by the ByteDance-owned app, and its goal-oriented focus on youth and trending topics, as per experts. 'It is the center of the internet for young people. It's where they go for entertainment, news, trends, even shopping. TikTok sets the tone for everyone else,' a CNBC report quoted Jasmine Enberg, vice president and principal analyst at Emarketer, as saying. Advertisement === Notably, TikTok's main competitors, Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts, have introduced new features such as creator tools for users, and are even considering launching separate apps, but have not been able to catch up to the Chinese-owned app. Why TikTok rise poses health concerns? However, the rising popularity of short-form video content driven by TikTok, has a vicious dark side with experts flagging rising mental-health concerns and shortened attention spans, especially among younger users. 'Infinite scrolling and short-form video are designed to capture your attention in short bursts,' says Dr. Yann Poncin, associate professor at the Child Study Center at Yale University, according to CNBC. 'In the past, entertainment was about taking you on a journey through a show or story. Now, it's about locking you in for just a few seconds, just enough to feed you the next thing the algorithm knows you'll like,' he notes.
Scroll.in
11 hours ago
- Scroll.in
‘So That You Know': In Mani Rao's new book of poetry, formal precision meets playfulness and depth
The poems of Mani Rao, one of today's renowned poets, are known for their astute lines, closely observed details, and striking poetic images. They often leave readers smiling, wondering, awed, perhaps, with a sense of having discovered something elemental about 'the human condition,' or about themselves. Their concrete images and crystal-clear coherence stay with readers long after. Her latest collection, So That You Know, launched at the 2025 Bengaluru Poetry Festival, carries all her signatures – and more. The book carries new work as well as selected poems from eight previous collections, and avant-garde pieces, such as a staggering poem-essay on the life and work of noted American poet Lorine Niedecker, published elsewhere. It is a fascinating journey through Rao's new and selected poems, written over almost 40 years. Poetic truths Curiously, the Preface begins with Rao recollecting an incident where a reader asked her whether, in real life, she was like the speaker of her poems. She clarifies that the somewhat mysterious, multi-layered relationship between life and art, and more importantly, between the speaker in poems and the writer of poems, cannot be reduced to a simplistic yes or no binary. Artistic or poetic truths often, though not always, expand upon and transcend the truths of their makers. Which is not to say that their makers lack truthfulness. Only that the writer of a poem may not have the same purchase, or power to reach a reader – emotionally, morally, temporally – as the speaker of the poem will, or indeed, a poem itself does. To my mind, that reader's troublesome question stemmed from a fundamental human impulse – to know what a poem means. And reducing the poem to the imperfect, flesh and blood person of the poet is one way, perhaps the easiest way, to mitigate this ambivalence of knowing, that 'good poems' often cause in our hearts. Rao ends the Preface by expressing her 'need for privacy'. This perhaps means, she wants, like any other poet, for the reader to search for, engage with, and rely on the poems themselves to know what they mean. Hence a lot of her new poems in the book explore what it is to 'know', and how that knowledge often transforms the knower, and if not the knower in the poem, then at least the reader of the poem, who, at any rate, is the other half of its meaning-making machine. One of the facets of existence where this need to know – both the Other and oneself – manifests most strongly is in romantic relationships. Thus, Rao offers us a series of compelling, what I call 'about love' poems (I borrow this term from a title of a poem in Arundhati Subramaniam's book, When God is a Traveller). These 'about love' poems are, by turns, exuberant, playful, seductive, or melancholic, depending on which page you land on. In 'This Marriage', seven lines capture the politics, through the image of an overcoat, of a marriage that has grown lukewarm with time. It starts with, 'It's not too cold, I know, / but I had nowhere else / to keep this overcoat', and ends with, 'So I just let it sit / upon my shoulders'. In seven lines, she captures the security, safety, and even obsolescence of marriages that often outlive their necessity, or fail to redress new necessities with time. The voice of the poem, in its confessional earnestness, is reminiscent of the speaker of William Carlos William's famous poem, ' This is just to say '. If the questioner from the Preface were to ask Rao, what does it mean, then? Is she supporting or critiquing the institution of marriage? Rao would have perhaps replied, 'make what you will of it'. This ability to either remain open to interpretation, or open new ways of interpretation, is one of the powerful characteristics of most poems in the book. One also observes sudden changes of scale in poems, which lead to unexpected turns, and juxtaposition of disparate images, that, as a result, unexpectedly surprise the reader. In 'So Yes, but No', a poem about two 'about lovers' who also happen to be poets, in the first line the reader stares at 'two rivers laden / with lands and legends', and suddenly, 'Like two celestial objects / may we revolve around each other', but then we are, 'In any room, there's only room / for a single poet. Take turns'. Throughout 12 of the 14 lines of the poem, these lovers do not meet, and the last two lines reveal that it was never feasible for them to meet, given that they are 'poets'. Does it mean that poets are incapable of love, or egotistic, or worse, misanthropic? One wonders. Interestingly, the poem prescribes 'taking turns', suggesting the importance of recognising, respecting, and mutually giving each other space. We would never know for sure. And perhaps, that is the point. Rao's poems complicate what 'knowing' means, by destabilising the way we arrive at knowledge. To be precise, the poems challenge our elemental need for certainty in texts, in arguments, in narrative. They seem to be saying, that ambivalence too, is part of the human condition. Taste it, feel it, embrace it. Take turns. Such ambivalence exists, most tellingly, in poems which contradict themselves, sometimes consciously, formally, and other times, through their argument structures. 'Just Looking' uses anaphora, in the form of the phrase 'there is no love', to foreground what one is looking for, i.e. love, but that such love is not to be found anywhere (in my right pocket, left pocket, shopping cart, behind curtains, in the freezer, on the cutting board etc), and in this failure to 'find love' the poem ultimately performs the paradox that love often eludes our grasp, existing in the spaces between, or beyond, our searches and desires. Such a poetics reflects a profound understanding of human emotions, inviting readers to engage with ambivalences interwoven in human emotions. Likewise, 'Story Moon' is a hyperbolic, exaggerated meditation on the role of essential love-objects, or objects we think of as essential, in romantic narratives. In the poem, this object happens to be the moon, a staple cliché in love narratives across cultures. The poem begins with, 'Pair of lovers coupled with a full moon – formula for romance', but soon enough, after, 'Silhouetted faces cradled in a generous moon curve – Pregnancy.', we realise, 'If there is no moon, oh no moon, there is no moon at all, where is the moon, there is no moon… moon what's a poet to do without moon', The poem ends playfully, hysterically, exaggeratedly, making the reader wonder whether it is possible to conjure love, write about love, think of love, testify to love's existence, without its associated objective correlatives. And suppose it is indeed possible to conjure love beyond the concreteness of its objects, what roles did such objects – love letters, old photographs, the first trinkets and souvenirs – play in concretely marking, manifesting, and objectifying love? Conversely, the poem may simply be mocking the overuse of clichés or critiquing the unnecessary emphasis on rituals and clichéd patterns of representation in love narratives, when in fact, love requires a very different dynamic to sustain. Read either way, most of Rao's poems invite readers to delve into the ambivalences, the in-betweenness, the liminal spaces that lie between human emotions, experiences and what we make of them. The dualities Consider the poem, 'Happily M', which likens a 'happily m / couple' to an apple who 'blushing / for the tableau / shows no sign' of a worm eating its insides. Such precision! The poem ends with, 'secrets buried / in the back garden/ ferment'. The word 'marriage' is reduced only to its initial letter, m. Is there some symbolism in this? Perhaps. Working as a companion piece to 'This Marriage', the poem realistically foregrounds the ambivalences and difficult spaces in any marriage. The tableau motif indicates the performative nature of marriage. There is blushing too, and concealing of things that cannot be shown to the public. But whatever these secrets are, they are buried, they are fermenting. Reading along the grain, one could easily read the poem as a critique of marriages made merely to gain societal approval through show-off and performance of shallow rituals. However, to my mind, the last three lines, 'Secrets buried / in the back garden / ferment', indicate change, transformation. Fermentation, as a process, entails breaking down complex sugars to simpler compounds. Later, new materials emerge from this process – bread, yoghurt, beer. Perhaps, the metaphor suggests that beneath the pressure surface of societal expectations lies the potential for growth and renewal for any marriage, much like the fermentation process that transforms ingredients into nourishing staples. Another facet of the collection that stood out to me was the 'place poems', such as 'Waiheke Within', 'Vacay at Myrtle Beach', 'Kashi Triptych', and 'Tiruvannamalai'. Rao reconstructs space by chiselling images from words. Precision and clarity of her descriptions allow readers to immerse themselves in the landscapes she evokes, creating a vivid sense of place that resonates with emotional depth. Gaston Bachelard, in this regard, has written in his book, The Poetics of Space, that 'space that the imagination has seized upon cannot remain indifferent to the measures and estimates of the surveyor. It has been lived in, not in its positivity, but with all the partiality of imagination'. In 'Kashi Triptych', the city of Kashi is reconstructed through meditations on the cycle of loss and rejuvenation that are imposed upon it by the images of the poem. In Kashi, where, 'shadows hover anxious like dogs marking corners of terraced ghats as lovers drink mirrors a curly soot rains upon the free bereft and pundits claim ashes still warm from midnight pyres for altar coffers at dawn' The quest for salvation commingles with concern for altar coffers. The poem sharply captures the duality of existence that is performed each day in the city, whose funeral ghats are busy 24x7. But it turns upon itself and expands what it set out to say, with the end lines, 'Ash can't swim Hangs on to algae on hulls Falls into arms of corals Scraped and bitten by fish Shat along gorges and flats Why else do river beaches shine' Thereby showing how the act of dying becomes the prerequisite of living/sustenance. The poem is rich with dualities: dying–living, human world–natural world, movement–stasis, and so many more. This act of expanding upon itself, transcending its own boundaries, provides the poem with the potential to capture 'fuller', 'deeper', 'higher' truths about human existence. And perhaps, that is why in the Preface, Rao subtly urges the reader to seek the meaning of a poem in the poem itself. As she writes, 'You are multitudes'. And so is 'good' poetry. Mani Rao's poems offer the space to encounter multitudes of meanings and possibilities of being, in all their rich, in-between ambivalences. Read them. Ankush Banerjee is a poet, a masculinities studies research scholar, and Reviews Editor at Usawa Literary Review. His book of poems, Field Notes on Kindness, is forthcoming.
