Expect Quad to appreciate India stand, says EAM
terrorism
, and it expects Quad partners to understand and appreciate that, external affairs minister S Jaishankar told his Quad counterparts in Washington.
Going into the Quad foreign ministers' meeting - ahead of the summit that India will host later this year - the minister drew attention to the recent Pahalgam terrorist attack, saying the world must display zero tolerance.
"Victims and perpetrators must never be equated. And India has every right to defend its people against terrorism, and we will exercise that right. We expect our Quad partners to understand and appreciate that," the minister said in his opening remarks. tnn
Won't deal with terrorists as proxies: EAM
Victims and perpetrators must never be equated, EAM Jaishankar said while speaking alongside American secretary of state Marco Rubio and his Australian and Japanese counterparts, Penny Wong and Takeshi Iwaya, respectively.
Jaishankar's comments about India's expectations from Quad partners on the issue of terror are significant in the light of recent remarks by US President Donald Trump that seemed to draw an equivalence between India and Pakistan. Also, while Quad countries individually condemned the attack, India would have ideally liked them to do so in a joint statement.
Earlier, in a conversation with US magazine Newsweek, the minister bluntly said India would not let the West's fear of a nuclear conflagration constrain its response to future Pakistan-backed terror attacks.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
"We are very clear there will be no impunity for terrorists, that we will not deal with them any longer as proxies and spare the govt which supports and finances and, in many ways, motivates them. We will not allow nuclear blackmail to prevent us from responding," he said.
"We've also heard this for too long... therefore the other guys will come and do horrible things, but you must not do anything because it gets the world worried.
Now, we are not going to fall for that. If he is going to come and do things, we are going to go there and hit the people who did this. So no yielding to nuclear blackmail, no impunity to terrorists, no more free pass that they are proxies. And we will do what we have to do to defend our people," Jaishankar said.
Speaking about Quad, the minister said it was committed to ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific. "To that end, our endeavours are devoted to promoting a rules-based international order.
It is essential that nations of the Indo-Pacific have the freedom of choice, so essential to make right decisions on development and security," he said.
Even as India and others deny that Quad is a security alliance, both Beijing and Moscow see the grouping's primary objective as containment of China. In his remarks, The EAM highlighted progress in Quad initiatives, including in the maritime domain, logistics, education and political coordination. "India plans to host the next Quad summit. We have some proposals on how to make that productive. I am sure, so do our partners," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
13 minutes ago
- The Wire
A New Political Alliance Offers an Inkling into BJP's Plans on J&K's Statehood
Jehangir Ali a minute ago Some political analysts believe that international focus on the region as a result of the recent military conflict between India and Pakistan in May this year and the offer of mediation on Kashmir by the United States has changed the regional scenario. Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Conference (JKPC) President Sajad Lone addresses a press conference regarding the formation of 'People's Alliance for Change', a new political front comprising JKPC, People's Democratic Front and Jamaat-e-Islami-backed Justice and Development Front, in Srinagar, Monday, June 30, 2025. Photo: PTI Srinagar: Amid speculation on the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood, a new alliance has taken shape in the Union territory between the Peoples Conference led by Sajad Lone, the Justice and Development Front, a splinter group of the outlawed Jamaat-e-Islami and Hakim Yasin's People's Democratic Front (PDF). Some political analysts believe that international focus on the region as a result of the recent military conflict between India and Pakistan in May this year and the offer of mediation on Kashmir by the United States has changed the regional scenario in South Asia. It may also spark some political changes in Jammu and Kashmir. Srinagar-based political analyst and senior human rights activist, Sheikh Showkat Hussain, said that the changed scenario may make the Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP)-led Union government extend 'some concessions' to the political parties in J&K. 'One of them could be the restoration of J&K's statehood." Hussain, who retired as head and dean of the School of Legal Studies at the Central University of Kashmir, said, 'As a preemptive measure, they may go for fresh election and would like a fractured mandate in Kashmir so that they (BJP) can go an alliance of the type they had with PDP previously'. All eyes on parliament session Speculation is rife that the Union government could bring a bill restoring J&K's statehood in the parliament which will convene for the monsoon session from July 21. While the contours of the bill remain in the realm of speculations, The Wire has previously reported that it could pave the way for fresh assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir. Although the three political parties have limited electoral influence with only one member (Lone) in the J&K assembly, some analysts believe that their coming together was part of a design to fracture the mandate in the Kashmir Valley. Rekha Chowdhary, senior academic and former professor of Political Science at the University of Jammu, said that the alliance indicates that the Peoples Conference led by Lone was playing on a weak wicket. The alliance's ability to stage electoral upsets in case of fresh election largely depends on its ability to convince the Jamaat sympathisers to cast their votes in their favour and embrace the mainstream. The Jamaat's advisory council including its chief Abdul Hameed Fayaz are languishing in jail along with several other Jamaat leaders and activists. Turbulence in Jamaat The Jamaat's splinter group, which has formed the alliance with Lone's PC, has only two well-known faces from the outfit in its ranks – former general secretary Ghulam Qadir Lone from north Kashmir, whose son, Kalimullah Lone, unsuccessfully contested from Langate constituency in 2024 assembly election, and Ghulam Qadir Wani, a basic member (rukun) from south Kashmir's Pulwama. Peoples Conference's Irfan Sultan Pandithpuri lost the Langate assembly seat by some 1,500 votes in a triangular contest with Sheikh Khursheed, the brother of Engineer Rashid who won the seat by polling 25,625 votes while Lone came in distant fifth place with just 3463 votes. A Srinagar-based political analyst, who has written extensively about the Jamaat said that Lone and Wani were not part of the outfit's Majlis-e-Shora or the advisory council when it was banned by the Union home ministry. 'The Jamaat has hundreds of basic members and its constitution doesn't allow the formation of a parallel party. Only the council can take a call on participating in elections,' he said, referring to the expulsion of late Hurriyat hawk Syed Ali Geelani, his political secretary Pir Hissamudin and others from the outfit in 2004. The expulsion of Geelani and others took place in the backdrop of allegations that the Jamaat had tacitly enabled the coming to power of the PDP led by late Mufti Mohammad Sayeed in the 2002 assembly election. Hissamudin was killed by unknown gunmen soon after the Tehreek-e-Hurriyat, a parallel political outfit, was floated and headed by Geelani against the Jamaat. Hussain said that following the ban in 2019, some former and present Jamaat members may have developed political ambitions. 'They used the name of the Jamaat in the 2024 assembly election. They have assumed a different name now because of resistance from the (Jamaat) cadre. One can only speculate at this point because the Jamaat leaders are in jail but the name change in itself is an indication of the differences within the group,' he said. Fracturing the mandate While the new alliance aligns with the BJP's broader strategy of having a third political force capable of competing with the two dominant parties in the Kashmir Valley – the ruling NC and the PDP, it is for some a stark reflection of Sajad Lone's dimming fortunes. 'Despite trying to strengthen his party, Lone lost one seat in the 2024 assembly election and won only one and that too with a narrow margin. He has not been successful in expanding his constituency and instead ended up on the losing side. This alliance reflects how badly the PC is requiring external support for expanding its ground base,' Chowdhary said. Hussain, however, said that the BJP would like to divide the voters in Kashmir 'so that there are so many parties that it becomes easy for them (BJP) to manage the outcome (in case of fresh assembly election)'. A leader of the new alliance, who spoke with The Wire on the condition of anonymity, rejected the speculation, saying that the three parties had reached an understanding that they could cash in on the 'widespread sentiment against the NC due to its refusal to take a tough stand against New Delhi while failing to fulfil its electoral promises'. 'The alliance's electoral ambitions also don't overlap. For instance, the PC is strong in Kupwara and Pattan while the JDF has presence in south Kashmir, parts of Budgam and Baramulla districts,' he added. Chowdhary also said that there was 'some volatility' in the political atmosphere in Kashmir with the narrative of Omar Abdullah versus Syed Aga Ruhullah gaining traction in recent months amid growing resentment against the party's performance after it came to power last year. 'Whether this is only a narrative remains to be seen but the situation is more unsettled now rather than being settled and it seems anything is possible. In case of fresh elections, there could be defections within the parties and who knows which parties are going to be hit,' she said. BJP's road to power? Chowdhary said that the BJP would aim for a repeat of its 2014 performance if a fresh assembly election was held in Jammu and Kashmir. The saffron party swept the Jammu region after riding the Modi wave and formed a coalition government with the PDP which emerged as the single largest party. In Kashmir, the party would ideally seek support this time from smaller parties other than NC and PDP. Hussain said that the BJP's policies have pushed the whole country on the 'wrong side of history' including in the Middle East, recent developments vis-a-vis the India-Pakistan conflict and US president Donald Trump's claims of having brokered a ceasefire might force a change. 'These experiments (new alliances) are aimed to create electoral divisions in Kashmir so that people vote for local parties. Their basic purpose is to create a situation in which the mandate in Kashmir remains tied to the party which comes to power in Jammu, be it the BJP or the Congress'. Chowdhary said that the Jamaat has been an ideological rival of the NC but in terms of electoral politics, it hasn't been able to put up a good show in its history. 'The alliance feels more like a pressure tactic and the coming together of odds rather than a factor that could change the situation on the ground. In its history, the Jamaat has performed well only with the blessings of the Union government. It was a proxy for the Congress in 1972 when it put up its best performance by winning five seats. Whose proxy it was in the 2024 election and whether it will continue to remain a proxy, given the prevailing ban, remains to be seen.' The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
'PM who travelled the most on taxpayers' money': Mahua Moitra targets Modi's five-nation tour; cites Munir-Trump meet
NEW DELHI: Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra launched a scathing critique of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's five-nation foreign tour, questioning its diplomatic value and raising concerns about India's international standing under his leadership. In a video shared by PTI, Moitra said, 'Honourable Prime Minister has left yet again on another very long foreign tour. Few questions for the Honourable Prime Minister for the globe-trotting Prime Minister.' She questioned the effectiveness of PM Modi's diplomacy, saying, 'Mr. Prime Minister, you've probably been the one Prime Minister who's travelled the most on taxpayers' money apparently cementing India in the global world order and making sure that we are in prime position.' Referring to recent international developments, Moitra pointedly asked, 'How is it that after all your diplomatic outreach and after all of India's efforts that today the leader of the free world is openly professing love for what is known as a terror hub, is having meals with its army chief and worst of all India and Pakistan have been hyphenated together — something that was unthinkable even 10 years ago. Today the Prime Minister of India and the Prime Minister of Pakistan are being spoken of in the same breath. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo ' She further asked why India's foreign policy had failed to isolate Pakistan globally. 'How is it after all your efforts Mr. Prime Minister and after the efforts of our external affairs ministry, after all diplomatic efforts, we have been unable to diplomatically isolate Pakistan?' Moitra also targeted the PM over US president Donald Trump's repeated claims of brokering the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. 'This Operation Sindoor that was carried out with much fanfare in which 140 crore Indians including all opposition parties backed you 100%, came to a ceasefire with the President of the United States announcing this was the operation of success — was the operation a failure? At what timing was it decided that a ceasefire would be called? And at whose decision was this?' She further by pointed at the ongoing international financial support for Pakistan. 'Multilateral organisations like the World Bank, like the IMF, are bailing out Pakistan with billions of dollars. In the face of them doing what they have to India, we have either been completely unable to convince them or Pakistan's just done a better job than we have.' Prime Minister Modi departed on July 2 for a five-nation tour to Ghana, Trinidad and Tobago, Argentina, Brazil, and Namibia.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban
The Wisconsin Supreme Court 's liberal majority struck down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban on Wednesday, ruling 4-3 that it was superseded by a newer state law that criminalizes abortions only after a fetus can survive outside the womb. State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other than the mother "intentionally destroys the life of an unborn child." It was in effect until 1973, when the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nullified it. Legislators never officially repealed the ban, however, and conservatives argued that the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe reactivated it. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul , a Democrat, filed a lawsuit that year arguing that the ban was trumped by abortion restrictions legislators enacted during the nearly half-century that Roe was in effect. Kaul specifically cited a 1985 law that essentially permits abortions until viability. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation. Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, defended the ban in court, arguing that the 1849 ban could coexist with the newer abortion restrictions, just as different penalties for the same crime coexist. Live Events Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide - which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother's consent - but not consensual abortions. Abortions have been available in the state since that ruling but the state Supreme Court decision gives providers and patients more certainty that abortions will remain legal in Wisconsin. Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court to overturn Schlipper's ruling without waiting for a decision from a lower appellate court. It was expected as soon as the justices took the case that they would overturn the ban. Liberals hold a 4-3 majority on the court and one of them, Janet Protasiewicz, openly stated on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights . Democratic-backed Susan Crawford defeated conservative Brad Schimel for an open seat on the court in April, ensuring liberals will maintain their 4-3 edge until at least 2028. Crawford has not been sworn in yet and was not part of Wednesday's ruling. She'll play pivotal role, though, in a separate Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban's constitutionality. The high court decided last year to take that case. It's still pending.
