logo
Reminder of 'devastating impact of hate...urgent need for justice': Birmingham church-bombing survivor speaks at Anna Maria

Reminder of 'devastating impact of hate...urgent need for justice': Birmingham church-bombing survivor speaks at Anna Maria

Yahoo12-02-2025
PAXTON — Sarah Collins Rudolph did not see the moment her life changed forever. She did not see the crater in the floor of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama, where she was getting ready for church on the morning of Sept. 15, 1963. She did not see the hole blown out of the back wall of the church — and she did not see the bodies of the four girls including her sister Addie Mae Collins, who were so utterly destroyed by the explosion that one of the girls could only be identified by a ring she was wearing.
Rudolph didn't see any of this — she was blinded by over 20 pieces of broken glass cutting into her eyes, which left her in the hospital for months. Rudolph eventually regained vision in one eye after multiple surgeries.
"When I got to the hospital, I asked where Addie was and I was told she was hurt up bad, but she was going to visit me tomorrow," Rudolph said. "When I came back from surgery, my mother told me that all of the girls were dead. All I could think about was why they would want to kill little girls? I wanted to cry, but I couldn't because my eyes were filled with glass."
Rudolph is the only surviving victim of the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing, one of the most infamous moments of domestic terrorism in United States' history and a landmark tragedy of the civil rights movement. Now a motivational speaker, Rudolph visited Anna Maria College Monday afternoon to speak as part of the college's Black History Month programming.
"Sarah Collins Rudolph is not just a witness to history, she is a part of it," Sherman Cowan, chief diversity officer at Anna Maria, said. "Sarah's story does not end with that horrific event. Despite the trauma, physical pain and injustice of never receiving proper restitution or even an apology, she chose to speak out, tell her story and honor the lives of those who were lost, and to remind us all of the devastating impact of hate and the urgent need for justice."
Rudolph was 12 years old when she sat in the basement of the 16th Street Baptist Church, alongside her 14-year-old sister Addie, and Cynthia Wesley (14), Carole Robertson (14) and Carol Denise McNair (11).
"We had no idea what we were headed into that day. We had just gone downstairs to freshen up before church," Rudolph said.
"Growing up, the entire city was segregated. When we went to try on shoes at the shoe store, we had to wrap pieces of paper around our feet because Black people were not allowed to try on shoes in the store."
Sarah Collins Rudolph, only surviving victim of 16th Street Baptist Church bombing in Alabama in 1963
Birmingham had been at the center of the civil rights movement for a number of years. Earlier in 1963, the city had been home to a major protest where hundreds of Black residents were arrested while protesting for their right to vote. The city had gained national notoriety for its enforcement of segregation, led by Public Safety Commissioner Eugene "Bull" Connor and Alabama Gov. George Wallace.
"Growing up, the entire city was segregated. When we went to try on shoes at the shoe store, we had to wrap pieces of paper around our feet because Black people were not allowed to try on shoes in the store," Rudolph said.
The 16th Street Baptist Church had become a meeting place for civil rights organizations in the city, with Martin Luther King Jr., as well as other prominent activists from the Baptist community such as Ralph Abernathy and Fred Shuttlesworth, frequently using the church as a meeting place.
Bombings in the city of Black houses and public gathering spaces was common in Birmingham. The Washington Post reported that there were at least 21 separate incidents where Black-owned properties were bombed in the city in the eight years prior to the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing.
When Rudolph speaks, she does not use the energized rhetoric of a college professor or the passionate fury of a practiced minister. Instead, she talks in a very easy, comfortable style, ripped straight out of her hometown of Birmingham, where she still lives today. She credits her faith in God for allowing her to survive that awful day.
"By the grace of God I am here today, a walking miracle," Rudolph said.
In the aftermath of the bombing, Rudolph was able to finish high school and attempted to ignore the trauma that had been inflicted on her by the bombing, while her family sought to seek justice for her sister.
For Rudolph, that justice was delayed. Despite the fact that the FBI had identified four known Ku Klux Klan members, Thomas Edwin Blanton Jr., Herman Frank Cash, Robert Edward Chambliss and Bobby Frank Cherry by 1965 as the primary perpetrators of the bombing, there were no convictions until 1977, when Chambliss was convicted of first-degree murder.
Blanton and Cherry would be convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in 2001 and 2002, respectively, while Cash died in 1994 and was never tried for his alleged involvement.
"It took such a long time to bring these men to justice and I was angry for a long time because the City of Birmingham knew who they were. Bob Chambliss' daughter said that he would brag at the dinner table about how he blew up four (N-words)," Rudolph said.
Rudolph said that despite the lack of immediate justice, she has been able to forgive the perpetrators for what they did and credits her faith for allowing her to move on with her life.
"I just had this angry look on my face, all the time, and people would ask me what was wrong and I would say that, 'I just look like this,'" Rudolph said. "I knew that in my heart, I had to forgive those men for what they had done because I couldn't go around being so angry all the time."
Rudolph, 74, now spends her time crisscrossing the country and telling her story, alongside her husband, George and sharing her story. She recently published a book, "The Fifth Little Girl" about her experience which is available for purchase.
When asked about living during a time that saw civil rights gained and the recent policies by President Donald Trump that have drawn criticism for rolling back civil rights, Rudolph said she is frustrated but optimistic about the future.
"They are trying to take our rights back. We've got someone in office right now, I don't want to even say his name, but I want to tell all of you, we are not going back," Rudolph said.
This article originally appeared on Telegram & Gazette: Birmingham church-bombing survivor speaks at Anna Maria
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

On This Day, July 29: Italian King Umberto I assassinated
On This Day, July 29: Italian King Umberto I assassinated

UPI

timea day ago

  • UPI

On This Day, July 29: Italian King Umberto I assassinated

July 29 (UPI) -- On this date in history: In 1588, off the coast of Gravelines, France, Spain's "Invincible Armada" was defeated by an English naval force under the command of Charles Howard and Francis Drake. In 1794, the first African Methodist Episcopal Church, Mother Bethel, was dedicated in Philadelphia. The church was founded by Black members of St. George's Methodist Church who left the congregation due to racial segregation at the church. In 1848, at the height of the potato famine in Ireland, an abortive nationalist revolt against English rule was crushed by government police in Tipperary. In 1900, Italian King Umberto I was shot to death by Gaetano Bresci, an Italian-born anarchist who resided in the United States before returning to his homeland to kill the king. In 1958, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signs into law the National Aeronautics and Space Act, which creates the National Aeronautics and Space Administration -- NASA. In 1967, a fire aboard the USS Forrestal killed 134 U.S. service members and injured another 161. The super carrier was in the Gulf of Tonkin launching aircraft in missions against targets in North Vietnam. File Photo courtesy of the U.S. Navy In 1976, David Berkowitz, the so-called "Son of Sam," fatally shot two people in the Bronx, the first in a series of shootings that would terrorize New York City for months. Berkowitz pleaded guilty to the murders and was sentenced to more than 300 years in prison. In 1981, British Prince Charles, son of the queen, married Diana Spencer at St. Paul's Cathedral in London. The royal couple divorced in 1996 after having two sons. In 1999, a federal judge in Little Rock, Ark., fined U.S. President Bill Clinton $89,000 for lying about his relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky in his deposition in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case. In 2004, Democrats nominated Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts to oppose Republican incumbent George W. Bush in the November presidential election. File Photo by Roger L. Wollenberg/UPI In 2008, U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, was indicted by a federal grand jury on seven felony counts accusing him of failing to disclose gifts from an oil services company. Stevens died in a 2010 plane crash. In 2019, "Old Town Road" by Lil Nas X featuring Billy Ray Cyrus broke the record for longest-running Billboard Hot 100 No. 1. The previous record was set by Mariah Carey's "One Sweet Day." In 2024, a 17-year-old attacked young girls at a dance studio in Southport, England, killing three children and injuring 10 others. The perpetrator, Axel Rudakubana, pleaded guilty to murder charges and was sentenced to life in prison.

Asking Eric: Niece excludes one branch of large family tree at wedding
Asking Eric: Niece excludes one branch of large family tree at wedding

Chicago Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Asking Eric: Niece excludes one branch of large family tree at wedding

Dear Eric: My husband is one of eight siblings. A few live on opposite sides of the country, but they do remain in contact, and we all get together occasionally. One of my brothers-in-law is married and has a stepdaughter. The stepdaughter became engaged, and we were told that since she was paying for her own wedding, they had no say in the invite list and we all may receive an invite or not. Mind you this daughter was invited to any event we had, including my kids' weddings. At my daughter's wedding she responded that she was coming but was a no show. The save the dates went out and we were not invited along with one sister-in-law. Everyone else was invited and attended. I feel excluded and snubbed. I have been dwelling on this way too much but don't understand. There were never any words or any rift. My brother-in-law who is the stepfather is close with my husband. When I spoke to a few of his siblings, I was told she wanted a small wedding (there were 150 people that went) and I should be happy because of the expense of the hotel. I was going to have a 70th birthday party for my husband but have decided to have a quiet dinner with my kids and grandchildren. I would also like to have no contact with them moving forward and I told my husband this. He feels I'm too sensitive, which added salt to the wound. He can have any relationship he wants with them, but I want out, personally. Am I in the wrong? I just can't see myself in their company and feeling comfortable. – Excluded Dear Excluded: You have every right to feel the way you do. And, to your point, it seems pointed to invite six out of the eight siblings. But – and this is a big but – the family is large, even without considering the niece's mother's family, the father's family, her friends and the family of the person she married. Even with 150 guests, options start to narrow. So, grant her a little grace. And, more importantly, don't take her wedding invite list out on her parents. They told you they didn't have any control over the invites and it's best to take that at face value. While you've been kind to the niece, you and she don't have as close a relationship as you do with others in the family. That's OK. It's also OK to have bruised feelings about it. You reached out your hand and she didn't reach back and that can hurt. It also sounds like other members of the family are trying to offer comfort and sympathy by telling you you didn't miss anything. Try to accept that. And then try to let it go, for your sake and for your husband's. Going no contact with branches of the family, who also didn't have control over the invites, is only going to hurt him. Dear Eric: My wife and I are a white couple in our mid-70s. We have numerous Black friends and acquaintances we see frequently at our church and workplace. Everybody is very cordial, and our conversations share insights into each other's goings-on (family, friends, et cetera). What is discomforting to us is we are often addressed as 'Miss Jane' and 'Mr. John' rather than simply Jane and John. We're sure all intentions are respectful. We hate to think there is a racial element involved and hope it is just a matter of cultural mannerisms. We don't notice this 'title' formality with one Black person to another, even among those in our age bracket. We don't want to be rude if addressing this issue would be somehow offensive. Any thoughts on this? – Informal Request Dear Request: Don't be afraid to ask people to call you what you're most comfortable being called. For instance, 'It would mean so much if you'd just call me John; it's how I know we're friends.' Something short and sweet like that. It's unclear to me whether the formality is related to your particular region, a particular subculture or even your standing in your community. Or all of the above. But, if you're noticing that these honorifics aren't universally applied, it stands to reason you have the power to do away with them without being thought rude. Now, if your friends and acquaintances protest, that's an opportunity for you to dig a little deeper, with respect. 'Would you mind telling me more about why you'd feel more comfortable with Mr. John rather than John?' And then listen to what they have to say. Even if you don't agree with the reasoning, it might give you insight into how you're seen and how you and your friends can better see each other.

Niece excludes one branch of large family tree at wedding
Niece excludes one branch of large family tree at wedding

Boston Globe

time2 days ago

  • Boston Globe

Niece excludes one branch of large family tree at wedding

The save the dates went out and we were not invited along with one sister-in-law. Everyone else was invited and attended. I feel excluded and snubbed. I have been dwelling on this way too much but don't understand. There were never any words or any rift. Advertisement My brother-in-law who is the stepfather is close with my husband. When I spoke to a few of his siblings, I was told she wanted a small wedding (there were 150 people that went) and I should be happy because of the expense of the hotel. Get Love Letters: The Newsletter A weekly dispatch with all the best relationship content and commentary – plus exclusive content for fans of Love Letters, Dinner With Cupid, weddings, therapy talk, and more. Enter Email Sign Up I was going to have a 70th birthday party for my husband but have decided to have a quiet dinner with my kids and grandchildren. I would also like to have no contact with them moving forward and I told my husband this. He feels I'm too sensitive, which added salt to the wound. He can have any relationship he wants with them, but I want out, personally. Advertisement Am I in the wrong? I just can't see myself in their company and feeling comfortable. EXCLUDED A. You have every right to feel the way you do. And, to your point, it seems pointed to invite six out of the eight siblings. But — and this is a big but — the family is large, even without considering the niece's mother's family, the father's family, her friends, and the family of the person she married. Even with 150 guests, options start to narrow. So, grant her a little grace. And, more importantly, don't take her wedding invite list out on her parents. They told you they didn't have any control over the invites and it's best to take that at face value. While you've been kind to the niece, you and she don't have as close a relationship as you do with others in the family. That's OK. It's also OK to have bruised feelings about it. You reached out your hand and she didn't reach back and that can hurt. It also sounds like other members of the family are trying to offer comfort and sympathy by telling you you didn't miss anything. Try to accept that. And then try to let it go, for your sake and for your husband's. Going no contact with branches of the family, who also didn't have control over the invites, is only going to hurt him. Q. My wife and I are a white couple in our mid-70s. We have numerous Black friends and acquaintances we see frequently at our church and workplace. Everybody is very cordial, and our conversations share insights into each other's goings-on (family, friends, et cetera). Advertisement What is discomforting to us is we are often addressed as 'Miss Jane' and 'Mr. John' rather than simply Jane and John. We're sure all intentions are respectful. We hate to think there is a racial element involved and hope it is just a matter of cultural mannerisms. We don't notice this 'title' formality with one Black person to another, even among those in our age bracket. We don't want to be rude if addressing this issue would be somehow offensive. Any thoughts on this? INFORMAL REQUEST A. Don't be afraid to ask people to call you what you're most comfortable being called. For instance, 'It would mean so much if you'd just call me John; it's how I know we're friends.' Something short and sweet like that. It's unclear to me whether the formality is related to your particular region, a particular subculture, or even your standing in your community. Or all of the above. But, if you're noticing that these honorifics aren't universally applied, it stands to reason you have the power to do away with them without being thought rude. Now, if your friends and acquaintances protest, that's an opportunity for you to dig a little deeper, with respect. 'Would you mind telling me more about why you'd feel more comfortable with Mr. John rather than John?' And then listen to what they have to say. Even if you don't agree with the reasoning, it might give you insight into how you're seen and how you and your friends can better see each other. R. Eric Thomas can be reached at .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store