Musk explains why he changed his stance on Trump
Musk made the comments in a thread on X when asked by a user what prompted him to go from 'loving' Trump 'as much as a straight man can' to opposing the president and attacking his policies.
'Increasing the deficit from an already insane $2 [trillion] under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country,' Musk replied.
Musk was a key supporter in Trump's return to the White House last November. Following the president's inauguration, the tech billionaire became a key figure in the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which was established to cut federal spending and costs.
The Trump-Musk honeymoon turned out to be short-lived, after the billionaire stepped down from his post last month. Since then, Musk has been critical of Trump's flagship legislation – the One Big, Beautiful Bill – which envisions massive increases in spending, cuts to social programs, and a sharp increase to the budget deficit limit.
The two have been locked in a war of words, with the president accusing his former ally of receiving more government subsidies 'than any human being in history,' while openly considering the potential deportation of the South African-born entrepreneur.
This week, the One Big, Beautiful Bill narrowly passed the Senate and House, and was signed into law by Trump on July 4.
Musk, having pledged to launch his own political party if the bill passes, announced on Independence Day the creation of the America Party, representing the '80% in the middle.'
Musk has said he wants to make his new party active by the midterm elections next year, suggesting that he will focus on a handful of seats to take advantage of 'the razor-thin legislative margins' and therefore have 'the deciding vote on contentious laws.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Tulsi Gabbard explains why fight against ‘deep state' is slow
US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has voiced frustration over what she described as a slow-moving effort to dismantle entrenched 'deep state' elements within the federal government. Long-standing bureaucratic interests are actively obstructing President Donald Trump's agenda, according to her. Gabbard's remarks came after the Trump administration's controversial decision not to release the 'Epstein list'. Officials have denied the existence of any document naming alleged high-profile associates of the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The decision has drawn criticism from some commentators, who see it as evidence of the deep state's enduring influence. 'They exist within every single agency of the federal government and the national security state and the propaganda media,' Gabbard said at a student conference on Sunday, hosted by the conservative nonprofit Turning Point USA in Tampa, Florida. 'I feel the same frustration that I see many of you expressing [online],' she added. 'Why aren't things going faster? Why aren't we getting results more quickly? The deep state is fighting us every step of the way.' Gabbard's comments followed a speech by former Trump campaign strategist Steve Bannon, who called on the audience in Tampa to wait for the eventual 'full release' of documents related to the Epstein case. Bannon argued that a special counsel would be appointed to probe efforts to undermine Trump and his MAGA movement, and could bring the materials to light. 'Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things – not just individuals, but also institutions,' Bannon said. 'Intelligence institutions, foreign governments, and who was working with him on our intelligence apparatus and in our government.' Epstein died by apparent suicide in 2019 while in federal custody, awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. The administration's recent refusal to release additional records related to his case has drawn criticism from some Trump allies, including Bannon. Trump defended Attorney General Pam Bondi's handling of the matter, saying the idea of the Epstein files had been exaggerated or fabricated by his political adversaries.
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
US sets record for child deportation orders
More than 8,300 undocumented immigrant children, aged 11 or under, were issued deportation orders in the US in April, the highest monthly figure on record, The Independent reported on Sunday, citing court data. Many face immigration judges alone, without lawyers or guardians, according to the outlet. US President Donald Trump has made immigration a central policy since returning to office, accusing his predecessor Joe Biden of enabling mass illegal migration. Since Trump's inauguration in January, immigration judges have reportedly ordered the removal of more than 53,000 minors, most of them in elementary school or younger. Deportations of teenagers have also risen but remain below the peak seen during Trump's first term in 2020. Some of the children are reportedly unaccompanied minors without a guardian in the US, with immigration authorities no longer tracking the exact number of such cases. Lawyers told The Independent that children often do not understand the legal process. In one case, a six-year-old was reportedly separated from his father, detained for four months, and deported without legal aid after federal funding was cut. Data from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) shows children under 11 now face the highest removal rates of any age group. In May, 75% of cases for this group resulted in deportation – compared to 45% in January. For children under four, that number reportedly rose to 78%. A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told The Independent that claims Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) targets children are 'false,' saying families are given the option to stay together or designate a caretaker. Trump's immigration policies have sparked nationwide protests. In Los Angeles, National Guard troops were deployed following unrest in June. Earlier this month, Trump signed a bill allocating $100 billion to ICE for detentions, deportations, and completing the border wall with Mexico.
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
US could ‘immediately' start deporting migrants to unsafe countries
The US could begin deporting migrants to third countries 'immediately' without confirming whether the destination is safe for them, the Washington Post reported on Saturday, citing an internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) memo. US President Donald Trump has made immigration a core issue of his policy since returning to office, accusing his predecessor Joe Biden of enabling mass illegal immigration. According to the document seen by the outlet, a recent Supreme Court decision is being interpreted as allowing deportations even if the destination country hasn't offered 'diplomatic assurances' against torture or persecution. In standard cases, migrants will receive 24 hours' notice before being deported and ICE officers won't ask deportees their view on where they're being sent. If a migrant claims to fear the destination, a screening will be carried out, which could allow a person to access legal counsel and provide a ten-day challenge window. However, if the screening concludes that there are no grounds to challenge the deportation in court, the migrant may then be deported elsewhere. 'In exigent circumstances,' however, deportations reportedly could occur just six hours after a notice is given. The memo did not clarify what qualifies as exigent. Moreover, if the State Department considers a country's safety assurances credible, migrants can be deported there with no prior notice or chance to appeal, the memo stated. Immigration attorneys criticized the policy as rushed and dangerous. 'It puts thousands of lives at risk of persecution and torture,' Trina Realmuto, head of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, told the outlet. Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, who won a case reversing the deportation of a Salvadoran man earlier this year, said the procedures outlined in the memo are 'clearly inadequate' to prevent unlawful removals. Neither ICE nor the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) responded to requests from the Washington Post for comment. In February, on Trump's orders, DHS expanded fast-track deportations to third countries. That sparked a class-action lawsuit, and in April, a federal judge ruled the policy unconstitutional. However, last month, the Supreme Court lifted that ruling, allowing deportations to continue. Trump's policies have sparked nationwide protests and violent riots in Los Angeles, prompting him to deploy National Guard troops to the city. Despite the protests, earlier this month Trump signed a bill allocating $100 billion to ICE for detentions, deportations, as well as for finishing the Mexico border wall.
