Europe's human rights court delivers two rulings against Russia: MH17, Ukraine war
This is the first time that an international court has found Russia responsible for human rights abuses since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
The ruling over Flight MH17 was also the first one by an international court.
Judges at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg are ruling on four cases brought by Ukraine and the Netherlands against Russia over alleged violations of human rights since the start of the war, the kidnapping of Ukrainian children, and the MH17 tragedy.
ALSO READ | Vladimir Putin to skip BRICS summit in Brazil over ICC arrest warrant, Kremlin says
Families of the victims of the MH17 disaster termed the decision a crucial milestone in their 11-year-long journey of seeking justice.
Thomas Schansman, who lost his 18-year-old son Quinn in the tragedy, told the Associated Press, "It's a real step in understanding who was really responsible."
ALSO READ | Russia responsible for Malaysian airliner MH17 crash in Ukraine in 2014, says UN aviation agency
Schansman, who also brought an individual case to the European Court of Human Rights, said he has no plans to stop pursuing justice. "The worst thing we could do is to stop fighting. MH17 is not a case that will disappear for Russia," he added.
The Kuala Lumpur-bound Boeing 777 from Amsterdam was shot down on July 17, 2014, using a Russian-made Buk missile fired from eastern Ukrainian territory, which is controlled by separatist rebels. All 298 passengers and crew were killed, including 196 Dutch nationals.
Earlier in May, the United Nations aviation agency had also held Russia responsible for the crash of MH17. It said that the claims brought by Australia and the Netherlands were "well-founded in fact and law".
The ECHR is an important part of the European Council and is the continent's foremost human rights institution. Russia was expelled from the council over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. However, the court still deals with cases against Russia that date to the time before its expulsion.
In 2023, the judges had sided with Ukraine and the Netherlands, saying that the rebel-controlled areas in eastern Ukraine were "under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation", including providing weapons, and giving political and economic support.
Wednesday's ruling won't be the last from the court as Kyiv has other cases pending against Russia. Additionally, several individuals have brought nearly 10,000 cases against the Kremlin.
In 2022, the United Nations' top court had ordered Russia to stop military operations in Ukraine while a case is heard, a process that can last for many years. Russia has not taken consideration of the order by the International Court of Justice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Moscow Draws Hard Line Over Security Guarantees for Ukraine
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said any Western security guarantees for Ukraine in an eventual peace deal could only be enacted with Moscow's cooperation—essentially rendering them useless against another Russian invasion. Lavrov's remarks, at a Wednesday press conference with the Jordanian foreign minister, ran counter to the Trump administration's assertion that President Vladimir Putin agreed to European and U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine at the Alaska summit on Friday. They were also a potent sign that Moscow's position on the war hasn't shifted despite a surge in diplomatic engagement in recent days. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Lavrov, one of the two top Russian officials who participated in the Alaska talks alongside Putin last week, said any agreement on security guarantees should be based on the Russian proposal during the failed March 2022 peace talks between Russia and Ukraine. According to that proposal, which Lavrov erroneously described as approved by Kyiv at the time, Russia would have a veto power over any action by the other guarantors of Ukrainian security—making those assurances pointless. On Wednesday, Lavrov said China should also have equal powers in these guarantees. 'We will safeguard our legitimate interests in a firm and harsh manner,' Lavrov said. 'Seriously discussing issues of ensuring security without the Russian Federation is a utopia and a path to nowhere…The security of all the interested parties, including Ukraine's neighbors, should be guaranteed on an equal, indivisible basis.' Alexander Gabuev, director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, said Moscow is sending a signal that it won't accept anything that is precooked by the U.S. and Europeans in negotiations without the Russians at the table. 'Moscow's hope is that the meeting between Putin and Trump has established their personal rapport and that substantive negotiations over Ukraine will be lengthy, buying Russia time to continue pushing Ukraine on the front line,' he said. A soldier walked past Patriot air-defense systems at the military hub for Ukraine in Jasionka, Poland, in March. Russia, alongside the U.S. and the U.K., provided assurances of respecting Ukraine's territorial integrity and independence in the 1994 Budapest memorandum, under which Kyiv surrendered to Moscow the nuclear arsenal it inherited from the Soviet Union. With the full-scale invasion of 2022, Moscow also violated its other commitments under the 2015 Minsk agreements brokered by France and Germany. The White House portrayed Russia's supposed agreement to Western security guarantees as a major achievement of the summit with Putin. After a Washington meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump indicated his openness to U.S. military support for European troops that might be deployed in Ukraine after a peace deal. Senior U.S. and European military officials have been meeting in recent days to prepare plans for such a mission. On Tuesday, Trump signaled that the U.S. is prepared to use air power to support a European security force in Ukraine. Trump didn't specify the role the U.S. military might have in providing air support to a European ground force—whether it would include warplanes, air-defense systems or surveillance drones, for instance. 'When it comes to security, they are willing to put people on the ground,' Trump said in an interview with 'Fox & Friends,' referring to the Europeans. 'We're willing to help them with things, especially probably, if you talk about by air, because there is nobody has the kind of stuff we have.' The idea for these guarantees is to make any peace agreement stick—and to make it more palatable for Ukraine to agree to territorial concessions demanded by Putin. It is unclear if Lavrov's remarks on Wednesday mean that Russia is backing out of the understandings reached in Alaska—or that the Trump administration misunderstood what the Kremlin really meant. Putin, in his own statement in Alaska, only vaguely said that he had agreed with Trump that Ukraine's security needed to be assured. The White House also said on Monday that Putin has promised to have a direct meeting with Zelensky. There has been no confirmation of this from Moscow. Lavrov said Wednesday that Putin merely agreed to 'raise the level of representation' in talks that have taken place this year in Turkey between Russia and Ukraine, and to expand them beyond military issues to 'political aspects of a settlement.' Any summit between Zelensky and Putin will require 'thorough preparation' so that it marks a 'final point' in these negotiations, he added—a justification Russia has previously used to steer clear of meeting the Ukrainian leader. On Monday, Zelensky said that he was ready for any format of talks, including holding a bilateral meeting with Putin. 'We are ready for any formats at the level of leaders, because only at the level of leaders can we resolve all those complex, painful issues,' he said. Putin has repeatedly dismissed the Ukrainian president as a Western puppet and cast doubt on his legitimacy, questioning Zelensky's authority to sign a peace deal. The settlement in Ukraine, Lavrov said, would require removing the 'root causes' of the conflict, which he described as the rise to power of a 'Kyiv regime' in 2014 and 'the extermination of all Russian and Russian-speaking population on Ukrainian territory.' Write to Yaroslav Trofimov at and Georgi Kantchev at
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Russia: Oil supply to go on, 'special system' to deal with sanctions
Photo/ANI NEW DELHI: As external affairs minister S Jaishankar visited Moscow Wednesday for bilateral talks on trade and economic issues, Russian diplomats here defended energy ties with India and expressed confidence that both countries would handle challenges arising out of the US sanctions against India that they described as unjustified and extremely unfortunate. "It is a challenging situation for India. We enjoy trust in our partnership with India and are committed to addressing challenges in our energy ties," said Babushkin, adding Russia has a "special mechanism" to deal with any challenge on the sanction issue. Bloomberg quoted the Russian deputy trade representative here as saying that Moscow sells oil to India at about a 5% discount. Sanctions are hitting those who are imposing them: Babushkin The Russian embassy later said 'regarding oil import prices amid tariffs, a 5% swing is possible subject to negotiation'. The Trump administration has imposed an additional 25% tariff on India to penalise it for oil purchase from Russia. The tariff comes into effect on Aug 27 and despite hopes of a peace agreement emerging from the Putin-Trump Alaska summit, India continues to be targeted by US officials for 'profiteering' from Russian oil. 'Russia is the biggest supplier to India of crude oil and India's demands are growing. Certainly, this is a perfect case of mutual accommodation and complementarity of our economies,' said Babushkin. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo Last week, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent warned that the Trump administration may increase secondary tariffs on India if it continues to procure Russian crude oil. This week, he accused Indian companies of profiteering from Russian oil trade. 'The sanctions are hitting those who are imposing them. We are confident that India-Russia energy cooperation will continue notwithstanding the external pressure,' Babushkin said, accusing the West of behaving like neo-colonial powers. 'If hypothetically speaking, India refuses to procure Russian oil, it will not lead to mutually beneficial cooperation with the West,' the Russian diplomat said, adding bilateral trade is likely to reach $100 billion by 2030. Asked about American tariffs on Indian goods, he said the Russian market will welcome Indian exports. He also said the role of Brics as a stabilising force will increase amid the ongoing global turbulence. In terms of GDP, the size of the economy of Brics is about USD 77 trillion while it is USD 57 trillion for Group of Seven (G7) nations, he said, arguing that the Brics is emerging as a major economic power.
News18
33 minutes ago
- News18
Pentagon Signals Limited US Role In Ukraine Security As Europe Expected To Take Lead
Last Updated: Zelenskyy announced during a press briefing that Ukraine would purchase additional US-made arms. The Pentagon has once again reiterated its intention to play only a minimal role in providing security guarantees for Europe, according to a report by Politico citing a top defence officials. With the Trump administration signalling a reduced American contribution, the burden of long-term Ukrainian security guarantees is increasingly falling on Europe's shoulders. Elbridge Colby, the US Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, clarified Washington's stance during discussions concerning Ukraine's future security framework. He was responding to pointed questions from senior European military leaders during a closed-door meeting led by Joint Chiefs Chair General Dan Caine. Sources familiar with the recent talks between defence chiefs from key European nations revealed that the US was directly asked whether it would commit troops and air support to help enforce a peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia. Colby's response marked one of the clearest signals yet that Washington expects Europe to take the lead in any post-war security architecture for Kyiv. 'There's the dawning reality that this will be Europe making this happen on the ground," said a NATO diplomat who was briefed on the discussions. 'The US is not fully committed to anything." Initially, Trump declared on Monday that he was prepared to send US troops to Ukraine. However, by Tuesday, he had walked back that commitment, stating instead that he might consider offering air support for European forces. 'I don't know where that leaves us," one European official said. 'Pretty much back to where we were in the spring with the coalition of the willing." NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who participated in the White House meeting, briefed all 32 alliance members in Brussels on Wednesday. According to NATO officials, Rutte also initiated preliminary discussions on the broader framework for security guarantees, with alliance members now working to develop actionable plans for their political leaders. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
