logo
The US is discovering what it means to have an isolationist  economy

The US is discovering what it means to have an isolationist economy

Irish Times11-05-2025
The world's economic policymakers, Ireland's included, are navigating a bewildering and exceptionally misguided change of course by their counterparts in Washington DC. The White House has opted for a set of over-reaching economic policy demarches that are likely to weaken its dominance in economic and financial spheres, as well as damaging the economies of its trading partners, including Ireland.
Thanks to the global, open, rules-based system that it has promoted and steered since the second World War, the US economy has been growing much more quickly than Europe's (though distributing the benefits very unequally). But now
Donald Trump's
administration has switched to a restrictive stance, relying on bilateral international negotiations backed up with threats.
This abrupt change of policy orientation is unlikely to be successful. For one thing, the United States is no longer the unchallenged hegemon of a unipolar system: its rivalry with China is incomparably more closely matched than a quarter century ago.
As a result of the barriers with which it is fragmenting the global trading system, the administration is discovering the vulnerabilities of an isolationist US economy as it scrambles to find substitutes for numerous inputs that it is not well-positioned to mine or manufacture at home quickly or at a reasonable cost. The challenges are becoming increasingly evident as container ships return half-empty across the Pacific.
READ MORE
Furthermore, growing corruption in circumvention of the prohibitive tariffs is inevitable.
[
EU opts for bigger tariff stick as Trump turns up nose at carrots
Opens in new window
]
US dominance in finance is also being undermined. The global financial system has long been built around the dollar, giving the US government the 'exorbitant privilege' (as former French president Valéry Giscard d'Estaing called it) of much cheaper financing for its persistent deficit, thanks to the dollar being seen as a safe haven. But the chaotic actions and pronouncements from the White House have shaken financial market confidence, leading now instead to a retreat from the dollar into other assets. Creditworthiness is built slowly, but lost quickly: if there is much more of this confusion, the reputation of US treasury securities may not fully recover, adding permanently to the cost of financing those large deficits. This could open financial opportunities for Europe, but more immediately likely is a period of exchange-rate turbulence. Already in just eight weeks in March and April, the market value of the euro rose from $1.02 to $1.15.
Other new dimensions of US policy are equally damaging to its economy. Large-scale deportation of immigrants, as threatened by the administration, will constrain US economic activity and increase prices. Undermining university autonomy and research programmes will weaken its academic leadership and hence the science-based innovation that has been an essential ingredient in the country's economic advance. Further aspects – for example, the suspension of measures protecting biodiversity and combating climate change, as well as issues relating to military security and political governance more generally – are even more alarming for the whole world.
There will be no easy return to the status quo ante. If the policy flip-flopping is intended to generate uncertainty as a negotiating tactic, this is bought at the price of long-term heightened market suspicion. By violating long-standing norms, the White House is effectively giving the green light to further and different violations by future incumbents. An apparent fragility in the much-vaunted restraints provided by the US constitution's separation of powers is thus revealed. Expectations and behaviour on all sides will inevitably respond. Even if the retreats from the worst of its excesses, much damage has been done, both to the US and to the economies of its trading partners.
[
No limits? Why the United States could be on the verge of a constitutional crisis
Opens in new window
]
On a realistic assessment, many of the objectives declared by the US president (not least the annexation of Canada) are out of reach. Several are mutually inconsistent. It is therefore unclear where the kaleidoscopic path of current US policy is headed.
The bilateral economic negotiations are being accompanied by a sharp increase in the use of varying forms of coercion including linkages to unrelated areas. Military assistance to Ukraine requiring access to minerals; a tariff reprieve for Japan only if it promises to hold US bonds; unspecified trade restrictions against Denmark unless it cedes some control over Greenland. Such linking of issues weakens the hand of a small country negotiating with a powerful entity.
On its own, Ireland holds few cards in terms of economic weight: only through the EU can that be brought to bear in a collective way. Ireland does have some soft power, based on the historic connections. But the fact that Ireland has had such good friends in the United States over the years seems little protection now. Indeed, close allies have been among the countries most affected by the tariffs. Less so for Ireland, but only because the tariff regime for pharmaceuticals – by far Ireland's biggest export to the United States – has not yet been finalised. Indeed, US pharma companies have accelerated their shipments from Ireland to get them delivered in advance of new tariffs (probably triggering a final boost to Irish corporation tax receipts from that sector).
Tariffs are not the only threat to Irish tax receipts, and in any case are a matter for the EU. There is the wider specific Irish vulnerability to changes in the US corporate tax regime – though these would have to be voted through Congress and are not fully controlled by the White House.
The centrality of the EU as the foundation of Ireland's economic relations is brought into sharp relief. That is not to ignore the need for greater governmental vigour in improving the social and physical infrastructure for supporting national economic prosperity. And it does not mean turning our back on the US or on the US-based firms that have established here. But it does mean contributing wholeheartedly to the common stance that will be taken by the EU. This applies both in economic negotiations with the Trump administration and as the EU attempts – as it must – to fill the leadership gap created by the US retreat from climate, security and other global public challenges.
Patrick Honohan was governor of the Central Bank of Ireland from 2009 to 2015
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

An Post chief ‘absolutely furious' at Cabinet leak as Taoiseach expresses ‘full confidence' in company
An Post chief ‘absolutely furious' at Cabinet leak as Taoiseach expresses ‘full confidence' in company

Irish Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

An Post chief ‘absolutely furious' at Cabinet leak as Taoiseach expresses ‘full confidence' in company

An Post has insisted its company balance sheet is 'strong, with little debt' following media reports saying Cabinet was briefed this week on a bleak financial situation facing the organisation. The State's postal service has said its finances and business strategy was 'seriously misrepresented' in parts of the media. As a consequence it published its annual results in advance of a planned announcement later this month. The 2024 annual statement shows its revenue exceeded €1 billion, representing a 10.6 per cent increase from 2023. Is debt reduced by €5 million to €34 million. An Post chief executive David McRedmond expressed his fury on Wednesday at an 'irresponsible leak' by 'a Government Minister' on the finances of the company. READ MORE Patrick O'Donovan, who holds one ordinary share in the company as Minister for Communications, later denied he was the source of the leak and insisted An Post is a 'very viable' and 'profitable' business. Reports in two newspapers said Cabinet was told on Tuesday that An Post would have made a substantial loss were it not for significant one-off revenue generated from election-related post last year when general, local and European elections were held. Mr McRedmond said this is 'simply not true'. 'It was an irresponsible leak from a Government Minister, which is wholly unacceptable. These are not the actions of a responsible shareholder. The company is doing really well,' he told RTÉ Radio 1 on Wednesday. 'I'm absolutely furious to read something like that. The company presented its results; the results were presented to Cabinet yesterday. They showed the highest revenue we've ever had, over a billion in revenues for the first time.' [ An Post €3 million branding campaign is first since 2019 Opens in new window ] Mr McRedmond acknowledged that An Post received a boost from the elections last year but said that if it had not been the elections 'it would be something else'. He also denied a claim that the organisation's cash reserves fell to below €1 million. Later, Mr O'Donovan denied he was the source of the leak and he said he agreed with comments made by Mr McRedmond that it was unacceptable. The Fine Gael Minister said he brought An Post's accounts to Tuesday's meeting and would not break 'Cabinet confidentialities'. He added that Mr McRedmond is 'absolutely right' and that 'An Post has been transformed over the last number of years under his leadership'. Asked why someone in Cabinet would brief journalists that An Post is in an 'awful state', Mr O'Donovan replied: 'Maybe if the person who said that put their name in the paper, you should be asking them.' In a statement, An Post said it is a 'self-sufficient' State company, receives no Government subsidy and 'never has'. [ David McRedmond: 'An Post has been brilliant. I've never been remunerated less and enjoyed a job more' Opens in new window ] The company has reduced its debt 'significantly in the past two years' – by €48 million – including the repayment of a Government loan of €30 million from its own resources, it said. 'At December 2024 year end the company had spare cash resources of €38 million and undrawn bank facilities of €30m, ensuring it had working capital facilities for its trading operations.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin said the leak 'wasn't good for the company'. 'I can understand [Mr Redmond's] anger and annoyance at what he read today, and I'm not apportioning blame anywhere, I just simply do not know,' he told reporters. 'What happened is wrong ... There was no discussion around An Post being on the brink, the company turned a profit last year and had improved the situation significantly from the previous year.' Mr Martin said his 'main message' was that the Government had 'full confidence' in An Post. 'So I was disappointed with the thrust of that story this morning, because I don't think it reflects the strength of innovation and resilience that is within the company,' he added.

Pharma is crucial to the Irish economy, Simon Harris tells US bosses in Zoom call
Pharma is crucial to the Irish economy, Simon Harris tells US bosses in Zoom call

Irish Independent

time26 minutes ago

  • Irish Independent

Pharma is crucial to the Irish economy, Simon Harris tells US bosses in Zoom call

Ireland's position is that it should be addressed in the course of general discussions on tariffs between the EU and USA - and not set aside for later attention. US president Donald Trump has threatened separate sanctions on pharma, which could be very great in light of his stated intention to put a 30pc tariff on European goods in genral. The online meeting was an opportunity for the Tánaiste to hear first-hand the views of the pharmaceutical sector, his officials said. The Zoom call comes at a critical juncture in EU-US trade talks. Mr Harris said it was "a chance to gain key insights." He added: "Ireland is clear that the integrated supply chain in pharma products between the EU and the US supports - rather than threatens - our collective transatlantic economic security. 'Ireland's position is that the treatment of pharma should be within negotiations with the EU on an agreement in principle and we have made this point on both sides of the Atlantic over the recent weeks and months,' Mr Harris said, adding that there is no doubt that pharma "is a crucial sector for our economy'. He repeated his argument that US pharmaceutical companies are here for many reasons rather than tax treatment alone. "They have access to a highly talented, skilled labour market, they have access too to an EU market of over 450 million people,' he said. "The value that the industry places on this access and their bases in Ireland was clear to me from the call." He added: "Ultimately when it comes to pharma, this is about achieving the best outcomes for patients and citizens on both sides of the Atlantic. 'It is because of that that the main focus at this stage must be on avoiding an escalatory higher tariff outcome that will be deeply detrimental to both the EU and the US." It is fair to say that the EU "has shown considerable constraint when it comes to counter tariffs" so far, Mr Harris said. "This h underscores our desire to reach a negotiated settlement that results in mutually beneficial transatlantic trade and investment as soon as possible before August 1,' he said.

Proposed €2tn EU budget would increase funding for defence
Proposed €2tn EU budget would increase funding for defence

Irish Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Proposed €2tn EU budget would increase funding for defence

A bigger European Union budget of nearly €2 trillion would see more money pumped into efforts to jump-start Europe's economic competitiveness, finance the defence industry and toughen border controls, while overhauling subsidies paid to farmers. The European Commission , the powerful executive that proposed the size and shape of the union's next long-term budget, said more funding was needed to meet major challenges facing Europe. In a significant revamp of how the EU's budget works, different funds for farmer subsidies, roads and other development projects in poorer parts of Europe, border control, fisheries and social policy, would be rolled into one large national pot for each country. Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said the proposed budget would 'ringfence' some €300 billion for subsidies paid to farmers. READ MORE The Common Agricultural Policy (Cap), which accounts for about a third of the EU's current €1.2 trillion budget, some €378 billion in total, is worth nearly €2 billion a year to Irish farmers. The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA), the main farming lobby group, criticised efforts by the EU executive to 'downgrade' the Cap in the next budget. The commission's proposal is the start of what will be a tense two-year negotiation between the EU executive body, the European Parliament and national governments, to hammer out a final budget. The next seven-year budget will run from 2028 until the end of 2034. The commission wants to set up a 'competitiveness fund' worth more than €400 billion to double research funding available under the EU's Horizon scheme, set more funds aside for digital investments, and significantly increase funding for defence and security. The EU's popular Erasmus scheme, which allows for university student exchanges, would also see its funding increase substantially. [ Trump's 30% tariffs would effectively cut off EU-US trade, Sefcovic says Opens in new window ] The commission has floated the idea of a 'crisis' lever that would allow up to €400 billion in funding be raised to finance loans to EU states, to cope with unforeseen future emergencies, similar to the Covid-19 pandemic. The commission's vision for the budget, which is the starting gun on what will be a protracted fight over its final size, was the result of marathon talks between the teams of Dr von der Leyen and the other 26 commissioners that ran through the night into the early hours of Wednesday morning. The budget does not propose increasing the contributions EU states pay into the union's budget. However, the commission proposed several ways it might raise money, including a tobacco excise duty and a charge on consumers to dispose of non-recycled electrical waste. The commission suggested the EU could introduce a money-raising levy on large companies, which the Irish Government and others are likely to oppose. The commission wants companies with an annual turnover of €100 million to pay the EU at least €100,000 a year, with higher rates charged for bigger firms. [ Farmers protest in Dublin over EU plans to merge Cap budget into single fund Opens in new window ] A majority of MEPs in the European Parliament need to approve the budget, as do all 27 national governments. Traditionally frugal states, such as the Netherlands and Sweden, have already signalled opposition to the increased size of the budget. The two biggest groups in the parliament, the centre right European People's Party (EPP) and the centre left Socialists & Democrats (S&D), pushed back on planned reforms of farm payments and regional development funding. Speaking in Brussels, Dr von der Leyen said the next EU budget would be 'larger, smarter, sharper'. 'Agriculture will be strengthened. What we have safeguarded is the direct payments to farmers, that is one part that is clearly safeguarded and secured,' the centre-right German politician said. The head of the commission said merging different EU funds into national pots could make it easier to divert money to housing, which was an area that did not fit neatly into any of the existing funding schemes. [ Ireland backs €150bn defence plan as EU moves to rearm Opens in new window ] EU commissioner for agriculture Christophe Hansen said the amount of funding set aside for direct payments to farmers would not be cut. 'What the farmers get remains stable and that was our priority,' he said. About €450 billion would be set aside for 'cohesion' funding for regional development, about half of which would be earmarked for poorer regions. Some €100 billion of the proposed budget would be put towards support for Ukraine. The budget will contain a clause allowing it to be renegotiated in the event a new country joined the union during the seven-year period. EU funding in the next budget will come with stricter 'conditional' strings requiring countries to respect the rule of law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store