Huge solar farm will cause major harm, says council
Botley West Solar Farm would cover about 1,000 hectares (2,471 acres) of countryside at three sites in west Oxfordshire.
In its final written representation to the government, the district council will say the proposals are "detrimental" to the area.
Developer PVDP said it "disagreed" with the local authority and had made several changes to the proposed locations of solar panels.
The project - which would see panels installed in countryside north of Woodstock, west of Kidlington and west of Botley - is considered a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project.
This means the application must be considered by the government, not local councils.
West Oxfordshire District Council's local impact report, written in conjunction with other local authorities that cover the proposed sites, listed 10 areas that it believes the farm would negatively impact.
These include the historic environment, visual effect on the landscape, noise and vibration and public rights of way.
None of the 17 areas listed were given a potential impact rating of "positive", but seven, including hydrology and flooding, were rated as "neutral".
Speaking at the council's planning meeting, Rosemary Lewis, chair of Stop Botley West, said: "It is vital to have the support of the local council.
"It is good to know here in west Oxfordshire, at least, democracy is alive and well".
However, Witney resident Jonathan Ford urged the council to reverse the verdict of their report.
"What is the issue of our time if not climate change... [the council should] acknowledge the clear truth, that Botley West will aid climate change mitigation."
Speaking to BBC Radio Oxford, council leader Andy Graham said: "If developers listen to the mitigations that could be put in place, we could actually have a win-win."
Mr Graham said he wanted to see the proposed site reduced in size by "at least half".
"I think the developers have stopped listening... I'm a little disappointed that they just didn't continue the dialogue."
However, Mark Owen-Lloyd, director of developer PVDP, denied that his company had not engaged with the council.
"We have consistently bowed to what we've been told and removed panels from [several areas].., I think that's unfair to say we haven't listened," he said.
Mr Owen-Lloyd added that 30% of the total site would be "mitigation, wildflower meadows and community growing".
If approved, PVDP hopes construction of the solar farm will begin in early 2026, with electricity being connected to the National Grid in 2028.
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Public inquiry into huge solar farm to begin
Huge solar farm plan 'positive and negative'
Why is the Botley West solar farm so controversial?
Botley West Solar Farm
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
09-07-2025
- Yahoo
UK Eastern Green Link 2 project secures $939m from SEK
The Swedish Export Credit Corporation (SEK) has announced a €800m ($939m) loan facility with National Grid Electricity Transmission for the UK's Eastern Green Link 2 (EGL2) project. The EGL2 project includes the development of a 525kV, 2GW high-voltage direct current (HVDC) subsea transmission cable from Peterhead to Drax in Yorkshire. It is being developed by a partnership between National Grid Electricity Transmission (NGET) and Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks Transmission (SSENT). Overall expenditure for EGL2 is projected to be €5bn ($5.8bn). The EGL2 subsea link is expected to be operational by 2029. The project will support the decarbonisation of the UK's electricity grid, aligning with the government's net zero strategy. SEK is funding Swedish and European exports for National Grid's portion of the project, including supplies from Hitachi Energy. The financing is designated as a Green Loan under international standards, signifying its contribution to climate improvement and alignment with global sustainability objectives. The financial arrangement includes a partnership with Société Générale (SocGen) and BNP Paribas, with funding from SEK supported by a Green Export Credit Guarantee from EKN. SEK global trade and export finance director Marica Bixo stated: 'This is a strategically important investment that strengthens the UK's renewable energy infrastructure. We are proud to contribute by financing Swedish technology with global impact. 'Green and sustainable financing is a priority area for us, and this project clearly supports the transition to a low-carbon economy.' SSENT and NGET commenced construction work on the EGL2 project in September 2024. "UK Eastern Green Link 2 project secures $939m from SEK" was originally created and published by Power Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
New York Times
02-07-2025
- New York Times
Heathrow Shutdown Caused by Problem With Transformer, Report Says
The fire at an electrical substation that forced London's Heathrow Airport to close for more than 12 hours this year was caused by a short circuit in a transformer part that did not get needed maintenance for nearly eight years, British government regulators said in a report released early Wednesday. More than 1,000 flights were disrupted at Heathrow, one of the world's busiest travel hubs, during the March 21 shutdown after the fire cut electricity to much of the airport, disabling critical safety systems and forcing officials to stop all incoming and outgoing flights for most of the day. Officials had previously said that the outage was caused by a spectacular fire at the nearby substation and had largely ruled out terrorism or other foul play. But until Tuesday, officials had not said how the fire started in the first place. The 77-page final report found that problems with a bushing — an insulated conductor in the transformer — had been detected in 2018 but not resolved. Instead, officials said, the issue went untreated for years, including when maintenance on the transformer was deferred in 2022. They added that basic maintenance on the transformer, called SGT3, was last performed by National Grid Electricity Transmission, the company that operates the substation, in July 2018. 'Evidence provided to the review revealed that multiple attempts were made to schedule basic maintenance on SGT3, none of which went ahead,' the report said. The loss of power at Heathrow prompted questions from travelers, airline officials and some of Britain's political leaders about the vulnerability of the country's electrical grid. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said at the time that he was 'deeply concerned' about the airport's closure, adding that there were 'questions that need to be answered in relation to what happened.' The report released on Wednesday also concluded that Heathrow's internal power systems, which were disrupted by the fire, were not designed to quickly take advantage of power from two other nearby substations that were not affected. The report said that airport officials had not expected to have to deal with a catastrophic power outage. 'The loss of supplies from a supply point was not assessed to be a likely scenario' by the airport company, the report said, 'due to its expectation of the resilience of the wider network.' The report added that the airport's 'internal electrical distribution network was not designed or configured to take advantage of having multiple supply points to provide quick recovery following such a loss and relied on manual switching.'
Forbes
13-06-2025
- Forbes
Why Tech Startups Are Essential To Bridge The Energy Innovation Gap
Steve Smith, President of National Grid Partners and Chief Strategy and Regulation Officer at National Grid. getty At what point do companies grow so large that it becomes too hard for them to innovate? Corporate structure and protocols can create enough red tape that it's easy for the largest companies to stall out on innovation. This is especially true in highly regulated industries, where implementing new technologies often requires painstaking review—and sometimes can take years to move forward. Take the energy sector, where innovations frequently get stuck in pilot purgatory. According to a survey of more than 200 utility innovation leaders across the U.S., just 24% of the industry's innovation projects ever get off the ground. It's of course important to be deliberate about new technology, as the main responsibility of utilities is to provide reliable, affordable power for billions of people every day. But the energy grid has grown far more complex in recent years—asked to accommodate huge increases in electricity demand as consumers and companies adopt artificial intelligence (AI), electric vehicles and electric heat. And utilities must meet that swelling demand while also incorporating renewable energy sources like wind and solar, which are often intermittent. Add it all up, and utilities must do more today than simply keep the lights on; they have to plan and build the grid of the future. Just how much power AI, EVs and the like will require is a matter of some debate. The International Energy Agency estimates a 4.4% global electricity demand. No matter the final number, it's clear the energy sector will need to expand supply rapidly after years of incremental growth. We also need better processes to bring that new energy supply to end users. Storage, solar and wind projects face a permitting backlog of years to connect to the grid—during which time these valuable assets are sitting on the sidelines. To make clean energy work, we'll need solutions that create a more dynamic grid—one that can toggle effectively between power sources depending on weather conditions, demand and supply. We'll also need smarter and more powerful transmission lines that can route this increased energy to where it's needed. We have our work cut out for us. So what's holding us back? To meet this moment, it's time to flip the figurative switch on how the energy sector approaches innovation. And that starts with the ones controlling the switch: utilities. Government priorities will play a pivotal role in accelerating the transition; 72% of survey respondents said innovation at their companies is driven by regulation and compliance. Yet no matter the regulatory environment, utilities can't afford to wait when it comes to providing the service levels customers require. With 45% of surveyed leaders calling improved customer experience a top measure of success, it's imperative to innovate. Faced with the need to change more rapidly than ever, utilities need to partner with more nimble companies to develop and deploy technologies for tomorrow's grid. Yet just 26% of utility innovation leaders surveyed said they identify fresh ways of thinking and operating from startups—which routinely drive the most disruptive new ideas and aren't bound by existing ways of doing business. Instead, those leaders said 82% of new ideas come from their own employees. To be sure, ideating internally is valuable; but outside perspectives are even more so to meet these systemic energy challenges. How do we bridge this innovation gap? Utilities can create dedicated groups to help them engage with innovators, unpack critical insights and drive the use of new technologies at scale. They can also offer direct financial investment: National Grid Partners, my company's venture capital arm, has funded nearly 50 startups since 2018—and 80% of those have been strategically engaged in some capacity with our parent utility. Leaders seeking to drive innovation should target areas that promise maximum organizational impact. This will help internal stakeholders better understand where to seek out innovation. At National Grid Partners, our investment strategy centers on four pillars: future electric networks, customer-first approaches, innovation-driven efficiency and gas decarbonization. These pillars help us align investments with startups addressing critical energy transition challenges. Most utilities want to innovate in order to provide more power than ever while still ensuring reliability and affordability. But most simply don't have the culture or effective processes to team with startups. Utilities must appoint leaders charged with bridging these gaps who can underscore that innovation is a strategic priority. And they should offer startups both financial and hands-on support while creating an internal environment that embraces innovation. Once you have a happy internal champion, help them spread the word and drive adoption across the organization via in-house channels, meetings and calls with other business units. We've seen progress from utilities deploying startup technology in pilots or proofs-of-concept. Now it's time for innovative leaders to double down on these successful approaches and scale the technologies we need to transform our energy system. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
