
New NCERT textbook explains how ‘colonial powers stole India's wealth'
Chapter 4 of the new NCERT textbook Exploring Society: India and Beyond states that, '…the Industrial Revolution in Britain, which required investment, was made possible at least partly by the 'stolen wealth from India'.' 'Stolen wealth from India' is a phrase used by U.S. historian Will Durant, it states.
'The general thrust of Britain's dominance in India was plunder, exploitation, trade dominance, imposition of educational, administrative and judicial systems, and Christianization,' Michel Danino, Head, the NCERT's Curricular Area Group for Social Science, told The Hindu.
An official statement released by the NCERT said, 'All the facts presented in this textbook are based on well-known primary and secondary academic sources. However, in order to avoid generation of any prejudice and misunderstanding, 'A note on history's darker period' at page 20 has been added.'
The note states, 'While those happenings cannot be erased or denied, it would be wrong to hold anyone today responsible for them...'
The fourth chapter goes on to include a quote by William Digby which states, '...Modern England has been made great by Indian wealth, ...wealth always taken by the might and skill of the stronger.'
'A recent estimate for the wealth extracted out of India given by Indian economist Utsa Patnaik, in the period from 1765 to 1938, coming at 45 trillion U.S. dollars or about 13 times Britain's GDP in 2023. Had this wealth remained invested in India, it would have been a very different country when it attained independence,' the chapter states.
'This was extracted not just through taxes, but by charging Indians for the colonial power's expenditures on building the railways, the telegraph network and even on wars!' the chapter further states.
'In India, it is common to find the colonial period portrayed as a positive one, with the British bringing industries, railways, the telegraph, modern education, and so on. We have tried to correct this perspective by showing what really happened — the destruction of India's indigenous industries and educational system, the enormous revenue extraction from the Indian population to finance railway and telegraph, etc,' Mr. Danino stated. 'Of course we have also shown the other side — the opening up of India to the world and Europe's discovery of India's ancient culture, among others,' he further added.
The chapter also states that converting indigenous populations to Christianity was a powerful motivation (for territorial expansion of European powers). Colonisation led to loss of independence, exploitation of resources by the colonisers, destruction of traditional ways of life and the imposition of foreign cultural values, the new NCERT textbook states.
Portugese navigator Vasco da Gama 'seized, tortured and killed Indian merchants, and bombarded Calicut from sea,' the chapter states. 'The Portuguese presence was characterised by religious persecution... of Hindus, Muslims, Jews and Christian converts...,' the chapter further says. It also highlights the destruction of Pondicherry's original Vedapurishwaram temple, ordered by Joseph François Dupleix, Governor General of French India in 1748.
The chapter states that the British systematically dismantled indigenous governance systems of village communities and replaced them with a centralised bureaucracy. 'While presented as modernisation, this imposition of a foreign system unsuited to India alienated Indians from the judicial system, creating courts that were expensive, time-consuming and conducted in a foreign language,' it states.
Traditional versus modern systems of education
The chapter states that diverse educational traditions such as padashalas, madrasas and viharas transmitted not only practical knowledge but also cultural values and traditions. It quotes from British reports which stated that hundreds of thousands of village schools were present across India (for instance, 1,00,000 to 1,50,000 of them in Bengal and Bihar) 'where young natives are taught reading, writing and arithmetic, upon a system so economical ... and at the same time so simple and effectual...'
Also, the chapter states that the system education proposed by the British became a powerful tool for the creation of a class of Indians who would serve British interests; it quotes Thomas B. Macaulay who emphasised that 'Indians needed British education... to create a class of Indians who would be Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, opinions, morals and intellect.'
The chapter goes on to say that while a few prominent British Orientalists argued that Indian students should be left to study in their own languages, Macaulay's policy gained the upper hand and India's traditional schools slowly disappeared, while English became a language of prestige associated with colonial masters. This resulted in lasting divisions in Indian society between English-educated elites and the masses.
'It also sidelined traditional sources of knowledge and authority, creating generations of Indians disconnected from their own cultural heritage,' the chapter states.
Addition of a chapter on the Maratha Empire
The new NCERT textbook, unlike the earlier ones that made a passing reference to the Marathas, has now introduced an entire chapter dedicated to 'The Rise of the Marathas'.
'In effect, the British took India from the Marathas more than from the Mughals or any other power,' the NCERT textbook states. Marathas have been described as 'a powerful political entity that will alter the course of India's history'. The chapter talks about Shivaji's need to establish a navy as a 'revolutionary step' and his exploits as 'legendary'.
The chapter goes on to state that when Shivaji attacked Surat, which was a wealthy port city in Mughal Empire, he obtained an enormous treasure of almost one crore rupees, but was careful not to attack religious places. In contrast, the Mughal rulers (like Babur, Akbar and Aurangzeb) have been described as 'brutal' in the previous chapter titled 'Reshaping India's Political Map'. The chapter says they 'destroyed temples' and their rule was fraught with 'religious intolerance.'
In contrast, Shivaji has been described as 'a devout Hindu... who rebuilt desecrated temples, promoted Sanskrit and Marathi literature, religious institutions and traditional arts'.
Ahilyabai Holkar, an 18th century Maratha ruler, has been described as 'a devout person who built and restored hundreds of temples, ghats, wells and roads throughout India, from Kedarnath in north to Rameswaram in south. She rebuilt the Kashi Vishwanath temple in Varanasi that had been destroyed by Aurangzeb and Somnath temple in Gujarat destroyed by Mahmud of Ghazni,' the chapter states.
'Evolution of India'
'Class 8 being the last year of the middle stage, the students are expected to acquire a broad multi-perspective understanding of our past between 13th to mid-19th century and how the various events of that period have helped shape and influenced the evolution of India of today,' a official statement from the NCERT said.
'This textbook attempts to provide an idea about the geography, history (medieval & modern), economic life and governance of the country, from a multi-disciplinary perspective in an integrated way,' it says.
'Our aim has been to consistently avoid attempting to load the child with too much information and to develop a critical understanding of the subject. Hence , the various facts, have been presented in a comprehensible manner to promote holistic learning in this textbook,' the statement further said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Watch: Gangaikonda Cholapuram: PM Modi to visit Rajendra Chola's lost capital
On July 27, Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit Gangaikonda Cholapuram in Tamil Nadu's Ariyalur district. This town, a few kilometres away from the Kollidam River, is steeped in history. A thousand years ago, it was the capital of a global empire— one that sent its navies across the Indian Ocean and built monuments to last the ages. Gangaikonda Cholapuram was established by King Rajendra Chola I (1012–1044 CE), the son of the legendary Rajaraja Chola, to mark a triumphant military expedition to the Gangetic plains. The campaign lasted less than two years. To mark this victory, Rajendra shifted the capital from Thanjavur to the newly established city: Gangaikonda Cholapuram, which means, 'the city of the Chola who conquered the Ganga.' The city boasted grand markets and a sprawling palace said to cover 60 acres. Today, other than the temple, little of that remains. Remnants of the palace were found at Maligaimedu (the mound of the palace), just two kilometres behind the famous Brihadeeswarar Temple. The temple is a replica of the Thanjavur Big Temple. The outer wall was demolished by the British to build the Lower Kollidam Anaicut. Much of the temple's granite sculptures were dismantled, and the wall was almost entirely destroyed to obtain construction materials. When locals resisted the demolition, a promise was made to replace it with a brick wall. Despite the destruction, the temple remains a masterclass in Chola architecture. Its sculptures are both intricate and unique. Around the temple are ruins of smaller shrines, broken down to build the dam. A few kilometres behind the temple lies the Chola Gangam lake, dug by Rajendra Chola. Once, it stretched 25 km and brought water from the Kollidam to the palace and city. Now, it is dry, cracked, and a shadow of its past. The canals that fed it are long gone. It relies solely on rainwater and is dry for most of the year. Four days after The Hindu's report on the derelict state of the lake, the Tamil Nadu government, earlier this week, has promised to restore this 1000-year-old lake at a cost of ₹12 crore. PM Modi's visit during the Aadi Thiruvadhirai festival, which marks the birth anniversary of Rajendra Chola, once again throws a spotlight on this once-mighty seat of power. Locals hope the visit will draw the nation's attention to this historical town. The Chola emperor's capital city may be in ruins — but its story still stands, carved in stone, waiting to be told. Credits: Reporting: B. Kolappan Camera: Jothi Ramalingam B. M. Moorthy Voiceover: Sharmada Venkatasubramanian Production: V. Nivedita
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
10 minutes ago
- First Post
From aspiration to agency: India redefines its global role
India seems to have resolved a complex arithmetic: diplomacy without submission, trade without compromising sovereignty, tech engagement that does not sacrifice agency, and multilateralism that negotiates interest, not ideology read more It is not the India of aspiration alone; it is the India of agency, reframing between autonomy and engagement, between principle and pragmatism. File image/ AP In the rapidly shifting global political architecture, few nations stand at as pivotal a juncture as India, caught in the confluence of normative aspirations, strategic autonomy, economic opportunity, and diplomatic realignment. From international tech rule‑setting to high‑stakes trade negotiations, from balancing sanctions pressure to recalibrating relations with China, the past few weeks have made clear that it's India's real moment. This is not mere reactivity but about India stepping forward to set the narrative, even under the weight of great power tensions and domestic imperatives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Take the sharp warning from Nato Secretary‑General Mark Rutte, a diplomatic salvo that carries real consequences. In statements delivered in Washington and to Congress, Rutte emphasised that 'secondary sanctions', including tariffs up to 100 per cent, could be deployed against major economies like India, China, and Brazil should they continue to trade with Russia. The intent: leverage global economic ties to pressure Moscow toward a peace settlement over Ukraine. The declaration is a clear signal that India's commercial engagements are being scrutinised through the lens of Western security priorities. Delhi's swift rebuke, citing 'double standards' and asserting its sovereign right to conduct its trade, reveals India's determination to resist external dictates, even as it shoulders the complexity of geopolitical entanglements. Yet, this episode does not simply reflect Indian defiance. Rather, it underscores a rare and consequential exercise of normative sovereignty. India is not tethered to any bloc; it takes pride in being a multi-aligned and principled actor. Domestic energy security demands, its long‑standing commitment to global South solidarity, and cautious calibration with both West and East place it in a strategic sweet spot or jeopardy, depending on perspective. When Rutte urged these countries to 'make the phone call to Vladimir Putin' or face sanctions, he emphasised pressure, but India refused to be boxed into Western frameworks, opting instead for a calibrated diplomacy. This is not a retreat; this is self‑definition in action. World Trade Organisation (WTO) reform, gaining traction ahead of the Cameroon Ministerial, is another arena where India is quietly influencing multilateral rules. Talks now hinge on thorny compromises: easing 'consensus' gridlocks, demanding proof for industrial subsidies, and revisiting the special status of countries like India and China. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pushed by the US and Europe to revive a stalled WTO, these shifts could undermine developing country carve-outs. While India remains restrained, its backroom diplomacy is active. The challenge lies in securing meaningful exceptions without stalling reform, testing not just India's trade stance but also its broader role in global rule-making. This is more about realigning trade with development than resistance. At the same time, New Delhi finds itself on the cusp of a potentially transformative bilateral trade agreement with the US, ahead of a hard August 1 US tariff deadline. An article of faith in India's political economy has been bilateralism as an antidote to protectionism, and Washington has signalled expansiveness: from high‑tech to supply‑chain resilience. Yet this is no yawning liberal fixture; it is a negotiation circumscribed by domestic concerns on both fronts. For India, offering tariff concessions or regulatory liberalisation might invite debate around industrial policy and food sovereignty; for the US, access to Indian markets must be matched by deeper procurement commitments and intellectual property standards. If last week's Nato‑sanctions episode underscores Indian autonomy, this trade narrative highlights its readiness to play a constructive, collaborative role, so long as reciprocity and national interest underpin any deal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, India's pivot toward China, marked by Jaishankar's first visit to Beijing since the 2020 standoff, is a calculated move. At the SCO summit, his meeting with Wang Yi focused on de-escalation, a border resolution, and reviving trade minus 'restrictive measures'. China called normalisation 'hard-won', underscoring mutual interest in quiet diplomacy and regional stability. Beneath the optics, India is asserting agency: addressing boundary disputes, restoring critical supply chains, and preserving open trade. It's a calibrated framework—friendship without illusion, cooperation without compulsion. Now, juxtapose these developments with India's stealth campaign in global AI norm‑setting. While less visible to the world's press, New Delhi has been earnest, partaking actively in the Unesco‑led 2025 AI Action Summit and championing inclusive, transparent, and sustainable AI frameworks. Internally, the government's Shinrin hush, its hallmark IndiaAI mission, has enabled the creation of the India AI Safety Institute and the public‑sector BharatGen model, announced earlier this year. This reflects a coherent, outward‑looking narrative: one where India is not merely a consumer of Western AI but a producer and ethical interlocutor in its own right, framing a normative trajectory for the Global South. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This junction of AI, trade, sanctions, and diplomacy reveals an Indian posture defined by complexity rather than simplification. India is neither a protectable emerging market nor a fearful collateral of competition; it is instead a multifaceted actor shaping its lane, steering norms, and anticipating friction. If India is being squeezed by trade reform at the WTO, by diplomatic pressure over Russia, and by bilateral negotiations with large economies, it is responding with a choreography of normative offers, negotiation discipline, and diplomatic nuance. Strategic autonomy is no longer a slogan; it is a tactical posture. India's message comes across loud and clear: we will trade responsibly, not opportunistically; we will engage in global initiatives, not deflect them; we will assert our interests, not surrender them. This posture is especially critical because India's multilateral footprint is expanding with institution‑shaping spaces. In 2025, it has convinced even sceptics that its voice is consequential and its initiatives, from AI safety to trade alliances, are worth centralising. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD None of this is without strain. The geo‑economic environment is a maze of competing pressures: pressure to align with Western sanctions regimes, to commit to bilateral trade deals, to accelerate AI governance, and to stabilise border diplomacies. But India seems to have resolved a complex arithmetic: diplomacy that does not buy influence with submission, trade that does not cost sovereignty, tech engagement that does not sacrifice agency, and multilateralism that negotiates interest, not ideology. The key test lies ahead: can India engineer a degree of coherence across ministries, Commerce, Finance, External Affairs, and IT? Can it manage stakeholder friction between business communities aligned to greenhouse tech corridors and those tied to legacy energy relations with Russia? Can it maintain credibility on the world stage while cultivating domestic legitimacy? These questions are not rhetorical; they are strategic deadlines directed at policymaking systems, where alignment and execution define success. Ultimately, this is more than policy choreography; it is India redefining its global centre of gravity. When the US Congress debates whether India is aligned enough to merit exemption from sanctions, Delhi's internal coordination across diplomatic, economic, and strategic lines becomes part of its national security calculus. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When WTO multilateralism teeters, India can offer constructive reform, leadership or resistance. When AI norm debates emerge, India doesn't merely have a seat; it has proposals. India projects the kind of policy confidence few states of its standing enjoy. India stands assertive, multi‑alignment‑centric, normatively engaged, and institutionally responsive. It is not the India of aspiration alone; it is the India of agency, reframing between autonomy and engagement, between principle and pragmatism. Amal Chandra is an author, political analyst and columnist. He posts on 'X' at @ens_socialis. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump in Scotland: US President on 'working trip'; golf business, bid for British Open and more
President Donald Trump has begun his fourth overseas visit of his second term, heading to Scotland, his mother's birthplace, where he plans to spend several days at his family-owned golf resorts. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He is expected to visit the Trump Organization's two existing Scottish golf courses, in Turnberry and Aberdeenshire, with a third course at the Aberdeenshire site set to open soon. This will be Trump's second presidential visit to Turnberry, following his first in 2018. In 2020, ABC News reported that then-US Ambassador to the UK, Woody Johnson, told colleagues he had been asked by Trump to urge the British government to hold the British Open at Turnberry. While the UK government said no such request was made to Scottish officials, Trump also denied having made the request. Following the January 6 Capitol attack, the Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews, organisers of the world's oldest golf tournament, the Open, announced it had "no plans" to bring the event back to Turnberry and "will not do so in the foreseeable future." 'We will not return until we are convinced that the focus will be on the championship, the players and the course itself and we do not believe that is achievable in the current circumstances,' the R&A's chief executive said in a statement at the time. During a 2023 interview at Turnberry with British politician and media personality Nigel Farage, Trump claimed, 'Everyone wants to see the Open Championship here. The players, it's their favorite course, number one rated in Europe.' More recently, R&A chair Mark Darbon admitted there are 'logistical challenges' to holding the tournament at Turnberry, which last hosted the Open prior to Trump's purchase of the property in 2014. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He also confirmed that the organisation met with Eric Trump and other Trump Golf executives a few months ago to explore the possibility. Earlier this year in May, Trump visited Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates on his first overseas visit of his second term, aiming to strengthen ties with Gulf nations. His family's business interests have also expanded in the region, with partnerships on new projects in Saudi Arabia, Doha and the UAE, and involvement in a cryptocurrency venture linked to an Emirati government-affiliated fund. According to his latest financial disclosure, Trump reported hundreds of millions in income from his businesses, including golf clubs and the Mar-a-Lago estate, as well as from products such as watches and fragrances. Despite this, his Aberdeenshire resort reportedly lost £1.4 million last year, per BBC reports. Ethics experts have raised concerns over Trump's overseas travel, suggesting potential conflicts between his presidential duties and private business. Trump's assets are placed in a trust overseen by his children, and officials in his administration have repeatedly dismissed claims of any conflict of interest. 'At this point, he's essentially using the White House as an extension of the Trump Organization and letting the taxpayers pick up the bill,' said Jordan Libowitz, Vice President for Communications at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, speaking to ABC News. The White House described Trump's trip to Scotland as a 'working trip.' The president is expected to hold a bilateral meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and may address the press during his stay. 'President Trump's working trip to Scotland will include a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Starmer to refine the historic US-UK trade deal. Donald J Trump has built the best and most beautiful world-class golf courses anywhere in the world, which is why they continue to be used for prestigious tournaments and by the most elite players in the sport,' said White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers in a statement to ABC News.