Drake Wants to See Universal Music Group's Emails About Kendrick Lamar's Diss Track
A federal judge on Tuesday denied UMG's bid to pause discovery in a defamation lawsuit accusing it of launching a campaign to create a viral hit out of the song. The order was issued a day after Drake moved for permission in Texas state court to depose a UMG representative and the production of certain documents relating to whether the label was actually a clearinghouse for promoting the track or actively schemed to promote it by covertly paying radio stations.
More from The Hollywood Reporter
Carl Dean, Dolly Parton's Husband of Nearly 60 Years Who Inspired 'Jolene,' Dies at 82
Tate McRae Earns First U.S. No. 1 Album With 'So Close to What'
Chappell Roan Duets With Elton John on 'Pink Pony Club' for Electric Oscar Party Performance
Drake's bid for discovery follows his settlement with iHeartMedia last week to resolve a petition to take the depositions of executives at the company. Terms weren't disclosed, though a monetary payment wasn't involved.
'In exchange for documents that showed iHeart did nothing wrong, Drake agreed to drop his petition,' a company spokesperson said in a statement.
Drake (Republic Records), who declined to comment, and Lamar (Interscope Records) are represented by different divisions of UMG. In a lawsuit filed earlier this year in New York federal court, the Toronto rapper claimed that UMG, which holds exclusive control over licensing of 'Not Like Us,' spread defamatory allegations that he's a pedophile by making secret payments and offering reduced licensing rates to third parties to promote the song, among other things.
'According to confidential sources recently made known to Drake, certain UMG labels have engaged in pay-for-play arrangements with radio and streaming services to boost the popularity of specific songs, and used bots to artificially inflate streaming numbers,' wrote Michael Gottlieb, a lawyer for Drake, in the complaint.
In Texas state court, UMG moved to dismiss Drake's petition under the Texas Citizens Participation Act, which provides for the early dismissal of legal actions intended to chill free speech. It said that its promotion of the song is protected activity under the First Amendment.
Citing the same law, Drake argues that he's entitled to discovery to test whether UMG is actually covered by the TCPA. This includes the deposition of a UMG representative who will be asked about the company's promotion strategy for 'Not Like Us,' the terms of any deals the label had with iHeartMedia and streaming services, promotional agreement with influencers and financial records showing revenue earned from the song, among other things.
'Without this discovery, Drake cannot fairly test or refute the factual basis for UMG's claims that, for example, it was acting merely as a 'clearinghouse' in promoting the song, or that it was not doing so in its 'capacity as a seller' of goods or services,' writes John Zavitsanos, another lawyer for the singer, in the motion.
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas also turned down UMG's motion to stay discovery. The label had argued that the case shouldn't proceed until the court considers its bid to dismiss the lawsuit.
And in a move that could support Drake's claims against iHeartMedia, the Federal Communications Commission last week said it was looking into whether the company is compelling artists to perform at its upcoming country music festival for free or reduced pay in exchange for more favorable airplay, which could violate government rules requiring broadcasters to disclose payments for airing certain programming.
In his lawsuit against UMG, Drake said that UMG violated so-called 'payola' rules by making illegal payments to radio statements to promote 'Not Like Us' without disclosing it to listeners.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started
Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023
Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
2 hours ago
- Engadget
The White House now has a TikTok account
The White House has joined TikTok, the social media app that President Trump wanted to ban during his first term. Its first post shows clips of Trump in various events with Kendrick Lamar's track playing in the background. The New York Times notes that it references a popular video edit of Creed, a boxing movie starring Michael B. Jordan, on the app. In the TikTok post, Trump could be heard saying "I am your voice," while the caption reads "America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?" Trump's administration believes TikTok helped him win over young voters in the 2024 Presidential election, with the account he used to campaign having over 15 million followers. "President Trump's message dominated TikTok during his presidential campaign, and we're excited to build upon those successes and communicate in a way no other administration has before," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. The president wasn't always fond of the platform. He once vowed to ban the app in the US and signed an executive order to outlaw any transaction between the app and its China-based parent company ByteDance for national security reasons. TikTok's "data collection threatens to allow the Chinese Communist Party access to Americans' personal and proprietary information — potentially allowing China to track the locations of Federal employees and contractors, build dossiers of personal information for blackmail, and conduct corporate espionage," the executive order read. After taking office earlier this year, however, Trump quickly put a pause on the law that was supposed to ban TikTok in the US. He even delayed the ban a couple more times to give ByteDance more time to sell its US business. Trump previously claimed that a "very wealthy" group is poised to buy TikTok, but the administration has yet to reveal the identities of the people in it.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alex Warren's 'Ordinary' actually is the song of the summer — but nobody wants to admit it
According to the charts, Alex Warren's hit single "Ordinary" is the undisputed song of the summer. The song has reigned at No. 1 on the Hot 100 for nine weeks, but fans and critics remain unenthused. The love song has taken off on pop radio and is perfect fodder for relationship montages on TikTok. Where is this year's song of the summer? It's the question that's haunted road trippers and pool partiers for months now. But like so many low-stakes mysteries, the answer has been hiding in plain sight (or, in this case, earshot) all along. If we're going with cold, hard facts — Billboard chart data — there's one song that's dominated the airwaves as the weather has warmed. It's just that a soaring love ballad a 24-year-old TikToker wrote about his wife is not exactly the ideal soundtrack for your day at the beach. Released in February, Alex Warren's "Ordinary" took a few months to take off, becoming a bona fide commercial juggernaut by June, when it ascended to No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100. It's remained atop the all-genre chart for nine weeks so far, and continues to dominate Billboard's Songs of the Summer chart, where it hasn't budged from its No. 1 position since Memorial Day. Though it makes every attempt to sound momentous, "Ordinary" is a love song that's true to its name. Dedicated to Warren's wife, Kouvr Annon, the song uses vaguely spiritual lyrics to describe their connection. His vocals backed by hymnal echoes and a pounding drum line, Warren insists "the angels up in the clouds are jealous" of his marital bliss and compares his wife to a sanctuary, a vineyard, and a sculptor. If the song's theme of divine love wasn't clear enough, the couple also costars in the music video, and Warren later released a "wedding version" of the song paired with footage from their real-life nuptials. That the song is generically gooey has worked to its advantage in the airplay department. "Ordinary" owes much of its longevity to companies like iHeartMedia, America's biggest radio network, which allocates tens of thousands of spins to the song each week. In its most recent week atop the Hot 100, "Ordinary" tallied over 73 million radio airplay audience impressions, according to Billboard, compared to only 12.4 million streams and 6,000 copies sold. The song's lack of specificity also makes it a broadly appealing soundtrack for lovey-dovey moments on TikTok, where both versions of "Ordinary" have been used in millions of videos with billions of cumulative views. Annon's own uses of the song, usually featuring sweet moments with Warren, frequently collect over 1 million likes. Call it the home court advantage: As a former YouTuber who joined Hype House, a flashy collective for big-name TikTokers, in 2020, Warren learned and then perfected the art of getting engagement. He and Annon briefly lived in the Los Angeles mansion together, constantly creating content, orchestrating David Dobrik-style pranks, and sharing glimpses of their lives together; Warren described the experience as "college, but for social media." "It helped me learn how to create content that resonates with an audience and can captivate people," he told Variety. Warren's self-conscious positioning as America's top new "wife guy" offers the media a tidy narrative to push while reporting on the song's success — and helps cement "Ordinary" as a favorite song choice for romantic montages and relationship content across the internet. But the differential between the song's commercial utility and its artistic value has perplexed critics and fans alike. "Genuinely WHO is listening to this," reads a recent tweet with over 27,000 likes. Even r/popheads, a Reddit community for recreational pop scholars whose self-appointed mission is to take the merits of the genre seriously, is full of cold contempt for the song's dominance. "I don't think you can deeply hate the song by itself," one commenter wrote, "because it's so fucking boring." Rolling Stone's Larisha Paul coined the phrase "'The Voice' Audition Core" to characterize the musical formula that "Ordinary" follows: ideal for soundtracking a throwaway emotional moment on reality TV, but devoid of any real personality. Indeed, Warren performed the song on the "Love Is Blind" season eight reunion special, slotting easily into a generic vision of happily ever after literally accompanied by a montage of couples. Still, there's no denying that "Ordinary" is the summer's defining hit. Remaining atop the Hot 100 for over two months is no small feat, and even as late-season challengers have emerged — most recently in the form of a fictional K-pop group from a Netflix film — there isn't enough time before the autumnal equinox for another song to challenge Warren's reign. It's just a shame that many excellent summertime jams actually have been released this year, they just lacked the radio push or market power to challenge "Ordinary" at the top of the charts. Addison Rae is Warren's fellow former TikToker-turned-singer, but the similarities end there; her cool-girl collaborators and creative curiosity resulted in a debut album, "Addison," that toes the line between nostalgic and eccentric. (The appropriately named "Summer Forever" is a standout.) Lorde's latest album, "Virgin," includes gems like "Shapeshifter" and "Favorite Daughter," which wrap arresting lyrics in melodic, highly accessible packages, the ghost of last year's "Brat summer" hovering on the margins. Care for something a little less personal, a little more irreverent? Tinashe and Disco Lines have you covered with the freshly remixed "No Broke Boys." And forget song of the summer, Haim's "Relationships" may be the song of the year. Danielle Haim and her sisters manage to spin the agony of indecision into flippant, funky magic. As the season winds down, a new Taylor Swift album draws closer, and the charts begin to change shape, may "Ordinary" serve as a reminder that summer trends may disappoint or underwhelm — but they never last forever. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword
Forbes
11 hours ago
- Forbes
Drake/UMG Dispute: Transparency In The Streaming Age
Amid his highly publicized rap battle with Kendrick Lamar, Drake filed a series of lawsuits aimed at Universal Music Group, owner of his label Republic Records. Among other allegations, Drake accuses UMG of manipulating streams to favor Lamar's tracks over his own, causing him financial harm. These are just allegations for now, but they open the door to broader conversations about how major labels leverage their relationships with streaming platforms. These aren't niche issues: global paid streaming subscribers are projected to reach 827 million in 2025, according to research by Goldman Sachs. With that kind of scale, small shifts in visibility or recommendation algorithms can have enormous financial implications. Bots, Algorithms, and Playlist Visibility A significant issue at the heart of this lawsuit and the industry as a whole is the lack of regulation of 'bots,' software accounts that are programmed to repeatedly stream a song or album and, in the process, inflate streams. A Financial Times article found that as much as 10 percent of all music streams are derived from bots or streaming farms. According to allegations in Drake's lawsuit, 'Kendrick Lamar's 'label' (i.e., Interscope) paid him via third parties to use 'bots' to achieve 30,000,000 streams on Spotify in the initial days following the Recording's release with the goal of 'jumpstarting' its spread and turning it into 'a crazy hit' on the platform.' The lawsuit further stresses Spotify's failure to prevent the issue, as the platform itself acknowledged the presence of bots in response to Drake's pre-litigation filing in New York State court. The issue goes far beyond play counts, exposing systemic flaws in algorithms and playlist placements that serve as the industry's real digital gatekeepers for artist exposure. In 2020, the Federal Trade Commission scrutinized promotional practices in the streaming era, examining how labels influence playlist placement and algorithmic recommendations. Streaming was supposed to remove gatekeepers, but playlist algorithms have instead created new ones. It's hard enough for many of them to break into a platform's curated playlist, let alone reach the level of clout necessary to access customized licensing terms with that platform. Even well-established artists struggle to break through without curated playlist placement, let alone access to preferential licensing terms with DSPs. Streaming has reshaped music promotion, concentrating leverage around algorithms and data feeds. That shift affects everyone from bedroom producers to stadium headliners. Among Drake's other allegations, he claims UMG charged '...Spotify lower than usual licensing rates for the Recording in exchange for Spotify affirmatively recommending the Recording to users who are searching for other unrelated songs and artists,' and that UMG partnered with Apple's Siri to play Kendrick's track unprompted in response to unrelated voice requests. Tom Gray, founder of the #BrokenRecord campaign, echoed this sentiment in his testimony to the UK Parliament's Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, stating: 'The reality is that playlisting is the new payola. The gatekeepers have changed, but the game remains the same.' Without major label backing, independent artists face an uphill battle. Playlist inclusion can feel like a lottery, and without it, algorithmic momentum is hard to build. That cycle of fewer playlists, less visibility and lower per-stream rates makes it tough to break through, even for artists with strong followings or touring chops. This isn't just a visibility issue; it's an economic one. Goldman's reporting shows that recorded music revenue growth has slowed dramatically, missing 2024 projections by over 4 percentage points. When top-line growth slows, competition over playlist slots and per-stream payouts only intensifies. Metrics, Trust, and Power Royalties used to flow from physical CDs or iTunes downloads. Now, the industry runs on clicks, skips, and saves. And with that shift, power has moved to the platforms themselves, a setup that makes manipulation easier and oversight harder. Streaming payouts are complicated even in the best-case scenario. But when bots and backend deals enter the picture, things get murkier. It's not just a transparency problem. It's a trust problem. Even well-known artists say streaming numbers don't always mean financial sustainability. And for independent creators trying to make a living, inflated data hurts twice: they get buried in discovery algorithms and shortchanged in payout models. As Drake's legal team puts it, 'Streaming platforms, like Spotify, use streaming data to proportionally allocate and disperse payments, which means streaming fraud diverts funds from artists whose songs are legitimately streamed by real consumers to those who use automation to falsely create the appearance of legitimate streaming.' This isn't a new complaint. Artists, indie labels, and advocates have been calling for transparency for years. Groups across Europe and the U.S. have pushed for access to backend data and more clarity around algorithmic curation. Without it, the market remains tilted and opaque. Streaming data now functions as career currency. It shapes touring budgets, brand deals, sync placements and almost every downstream opportunity. And for the artists who don't have a label machine behind them, the opacity of that system makes it harder to compete on anything close to a level playing field. That imbalance also locks artists out of fast-growing income opportunities. Goldman estimates that if just 20% of paying subscribers worldwide are 'superfans' (meaning those willing to spend 2x the average fan) it could unlock over $4.2 billion in additional revenue. But if that growth depends on algorithmic exposure and playlist favor, it's not likely to benefit those who need it most. The stakes aren't limited to the U.S., as Goldman projects that 70% of all new streaming subscribers by 2030 will come from emerging markets. If algorithmic opacity remains the norm, these regions risk replicating the same inequities seen in the current system, just on a bigger scale. As the dust continues to settle from Drake's filings, the bigger question is whether the industry will start demanding real transparency – or whether we'll just keep optimizing for the algorithm. Legal Entertainment has reached out to representation for comment, and will update this story as necessary.
