Goa Students Paraded In Underwear In '3rd Degree' Competition, Notice Issued
The Goa State Human Rights Commission has issued notice to the vice-chancellor of Goa University over an alleged incident in which male students were paraded in their underwear during a cultural festival at the institution earlier this year, an official said on Friday.
The commission on Thursday issued a notice to Vice-Chancellor Harilal B Menon, asking him to appear before it and submit a reply by July 23.
A senior official from the University said the incident occurred during an inter-departmental festival called "Frolic" held in February.
"During a competition called 'Third Degree', the jury asked the participants to strip to their underwear," he said.
The rights panel took suo motu cognisance of a report about the incident that appeared in a newspaper this week.
The commission, in its notice, stated that it was taking suo motu cognisance of the matter, which prima facie makes out violations of the human rights of the students.
Condemning the incident, National Students Union of India (NSUI) leader Naushad Chaudhury said that female students were part of the crowd that attended the festival.
"Students were not allowed to leave. It was an embarrassing situation for both male and female students present there," he said.
The NSUI has planned protests against the event.
The opposition Goa Forward Party (GFP) was the first to bring the incident to the fore in the media.
GFP chief Vijai Sardesai said that his party had questioned the authorities about the incident.
Goa University, meanwhile, announced a "discretionary holiday" on Friday.
"All the teaching and non-teaching staff and students of the University are hereby informed that Friday has been declared a discretionary holiday," university registrar S N Dhuri said in a circular.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Inquiry committee unearths gross irregularities in appointment of professors in University of Madras
An inquiry committee has found gross irregularities in the process of making appointments to the post of professor in different departments of the University of Madras (UoM) in 2014-15. The committee's report, which was placed before the Syndicate on Monday (August 18, 2025), unearthed several discrepancies, including violation of eligibility criteria and University Grants Commission (UGC) norms for the recruitment of professors. The Syndicate has resolved to send show-cause notices to the persons concerned under Section 17(b) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, sources in the University said. On June 1, 2014, the University advertised for 22 posts of professors in different departments, which appeared in an English newspaper circulated in the State, a local language daily, and a political party's news outlet. The report held that as per the procedures followed, the advertisement should have appeared in national newspapers. Going into further details, the report stated that barring three candidates, none of the other applications were scrutinised by the Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC), a body mandated by UGC/NAAC guidelines to maintain documents and develop Academic Performance Indicator (API) criteria for the recruitment of teachers. The inquiry committee, which was constituted following a court direction in August 2024, had appointed Elangovan Vellaichamy, Controller of Examinations (in-charge), as the nodal officer to take control of all documents pertaining to the recruitment process and prepare a confidential report based on the assessments as per UGC norms. 'It is found and as stated by the Nodal Officer, as per the data provided by the D1 Establishment section, only three applications relating to Dr. S. Manivasakan of the Centre for South and South East Asian Studies, Dr. P.D. Balaji of Ancient History and Archaeology, and Dr. V. Chandrasekar of Department of Education were verified by the IQAC and other applications were not verified,' the report, which has been accessed by The Hindu, read. Discrepancies Citing specific cases, the report stated that S.S. Sundaram had applied for the position of associate professor and his application was submitted at least six months after the last date for submission. He was appointed as professor in the Department of History. Similarly, the committee found no evidence to show that V. Bhuvarahamurthy, appointed as professor in the Department of Medical Biochemistry, had any prior teaching experience. With regard to S. Sumathy, appointed as professor in the Department of Anthropology, the Nodal Officer could find no application or particulars about her PhD, publications, and teaching applications in the university documents. Dr. S. Manivasakan, appointed as professor in Centre for South and South East Asian Studies, secured 54.1% in his post graduate degree in Defence Studies, while the minimum qualification marks is 55%, the report pointed out. S. Saravanan, appointed as professor in the Department of Saiva Siddhantha, did not have the required services as associate professor and his application was not scrutinised by the IQAC, the report added. Many of the 16 professors appointed during this process have since retired from service. In 2019, Syed Rahamathullah, a retired professor of the Department of Hindi, filed a writ petition in the Madras High Court seeking direction to constitute a committee to probe the irregularities in the appointment of professors. In August last year, the court ruled in his favour following which, a committee was constituted with Sarit Kumar Das, professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, IIT Madras, as convenor, and S. Gowri, former Vice-Chancellor, UoM, and Justice P. Jyothimani, retired Madras High Court judge, as members. The committee submitted its report on May 14, 2025.
Hans India
10 hours ago
- Hans India
NSUI protests against NCERT's special module on partition
New Delhi: The Congress-affiliated National Students' Union of India (NSUI) protested at Delhi University's Faculty of Arts against what it termed as the RSS-BJP's hateful and distorted NCERT module. The Congress and other opposition leaders are accusing the ruling BJP of 'interfering' with the functioning of the institutions and 'distorting' the country's history after a special module, released by the NCERT to mark 'Partition Horrors Remembrance Day', held Jinnah, the Congress, and then Viceroy Lord Mountbatten responsible for India's Partition. Hitting back, the BJP said that the Congress is in pain because the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has brought a 'bitter truth' of India's Partition out for the students to study. According to an NSUI statement, many students joined the protest, raising slogans to safeguard the true legacy of India's freedom struggle. Addressing the gathering, NSUI National President Varun Choudhary said, 'The history of India will not be written with lies and hatred. When the nation was fighting for freedom, these people were standing with the British.' 'The same traitors of that time are today blaming Gandhi, Nehru, and Sardar Patel with falsehoods. We will not allow the innocent children of this country to be victims of RSS and BJP's distorted history,' he said. NSUI announced that this movement will not be confined to Delhi University alone and vowed to continue the struggle in every state and university across the country until the 'hateful and misleading NCERT module' is withdrawn. The students' body asserted that restoring truth and dignity in the portrayal of India's freedom struggle is non-negotiable, and pledged to intensify its agitation in the coming days.
New Indian Express
13 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Ahead of polls, student bodies in Delhi University release ‘report cards' to woo voters
NEW DELHI: With the Delhi University Students' Union (DUSU) elections slated for September, contesting organisations have begun showcasing their performance over the past year. Both the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), which led the students' union last term, and the National Students' Union of India (NSUI) have released detailed 'report cards' of their tenure and initiatives. On Tuesday, ABVP leaders presented their achievements at a press conference at the DUSU office. Highlighting their work, office bearers claimed the union directly resolved 4,248 student grievances, pushed the university to fully implement the National Education Policy (NEP), introduced a centralised hostel allocation system, and resisted fee hikes under the 'One Course-One Fee' demand. They also highlighted initiatives on women's safety and empowerment, including the 24x7 Vamika helpline, deployment of women PCR vans, and self-defence training under Mission Sahasi. Campaigns such as Ritumati Abhiyan for menstrual health awareness and Shakti Vandan to recognise women leaders were projected as major milestones. ABVP leaders further underlined their opposition to the proposed Rs 1 lakh bond policy and attempts at indirect elections, calling these 'decisive steps' in safeguarding student interests. Meanwhile, NSUI released its report card through posters and infographics on social media, stressing that its priority was 'governance, not politics.' The organisation showcased the launch of multiple functional cells — including Legal, Environmental, Sports, Placement, Cultural, Grievance, Business Development, Women Empowerment, and Start-Up Cells — aimed at addressing everyday student concerns. As the September polls draw near, these report cards are being viewed as early election pitches by the leading organisations to highlight their performance and win over the student electorate.
