D.C. families, facing lost jobs and a gutted city budget, beseech Republican lawmakers.
A Republican spending bill to fund the federal government through Sept. 30 would inflict major fiscal pain on the city where much of that government resides.
'This'll just be an absolute economic disaster,' said Paul Strauss, one of the district's nonvoting 'shadow' senators, at a protest in the Senate office building attended by hundreds of defiant district residents.
The spending bill, which must pass the Senate by Friday to avoid a federal government shutdown, would essentially strip the district's ability to spend more than $1 billion in revenue it already has on hand. That would include more than $300 million from the city's education system, according to district officials.
'My school would probably go out of business,' said Mateo Roberts, 11.
He was one of many students in the district's public schools, which had the day off for parent-teacher conferences, who joined their parents to protest the Republican spending plan.
Sitting in the towering atrium of the Hart Senate Office Building, they made signs with crayons and colored markers in an attempt to appeal to senators — none of whom represent them. One read: 'You cut my dad's job and now you want to cut my school,' punctuated by four sad faces.
Many of the parents at the protest on Thursday morning have already seen their livelihoods threatened by the Trump administration's government shake-up, which has put thousands of federal employees who live in the city out of work.
The current government spending bill could force layoffs at district schools, the Police Department and other critical city agencies, local officials say, compounding the economic troubles incited by the administration's federal work force cuts.
Mingo Roberts, Mateo's father, is among those who lost their jobs when Elon Musk's effort to shrink the federal government targeted his employer, the U.S. Agency for International Development, in late January.
'It feels kind of like the city is under siege,' said Mr. Roberts, who has lived in the district for nearly 40 years.
Under federal law, Congress has to approve the district's spending. That's usually a routine step. But in their stopgap spending bill, House Republicans treated the city like a federal agency and forced it to keep its spending at 2024 levels, 7 percent below its budget for this year.
The move wouldn't save the federal government any money, said Mr. Strauss. It would simply prevent the city from spending its own dollars raised from taxes, fees and 'even the unpopular parking tickets that D.C. may be known for,' he said.
Senate Democrats have said they can't support the House measure and have introduced a shorter-term spending bill that wouldn't touch the district's budget.
Around 11 a.m., a group of about 10 protesters walked into the office of Senator Steve Daines, Republican of Montana. A staffer asked if any Montana residents were among them, and then directed them to the hallway.
'We are residents of the District of Columbia,' said Miriam Goldstein, a parent of twin 9-year-olds. 'We have no senators, so we are here to talk with you anyway.'
Her son, Solomon Wolff, flashed a handmade sign that read, 'I like to play baseball,' and said the spending bill could mean cuts to youth sports. He was also worried about safety: 'There will be less firefighters and police when fires start.'
His sister, Diana, pointed out that the money wouldn't be redirected elsewhere if it wasn't spent. 'It's from us,' she said. 'They don't have a right to take it away.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
a minute ago
- Politico
Paxton urges Texas judge to jail Beto O'Rourke over fundraising related to redistricting fight
But an attorney for O'Rourke says Paxton's characterization of O'Rourke's remark was an 'outright lie.' O'Rourke's comment, she noted, was a reference to the broader nationwide fight over redistricting — a call for Democratic states to counteract Texas' redistricting push by undertaking their own partisan redrawing of political boundaries. 'In their zeal I guess to intimidate a political rival, they are actually lying to the court,' said O'Rourke's attorney, Mimi Marziani, who said she would quickly alert the court to the context of O'Rourke's comments and her intention to seek sanctions against Paxton. Paxton's request to jail a political rival comes amid calls by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, Paxton and their allies to arrest dozens of Democratic state lawmakers who left Texas to prevent Abbott from holding a special session to pass his ultra-partisan redistricting measure — one expected to net Republicans five seats in Congress. Paxton's motion to hold O'Rourke in contempt accuses him of raising funds to directly cover the expenses and fines of the dozens of Texas Democratic lawmakers who bolted from the state to deprive Republicans a quorum to conduct legislative business. Fahey ruled that such fundraising would violate Texas laws against deceptive practices. But Marziani emphasized that Fahey's ruling was specific to raising funds that directly bankrolled the state lawmakers' effort, as opposed to general political fundraising. O'Rourke, in court papers, has labeled Paxton's bid to constrain his political activity 'frivolous' and urged Fahey to transfer the case to his home base of El Paso. 'They have no basis for this lawsuit,' Marziani said.
NBC News
a minute ago
- NBC News
Texas redistricting fight provides Democratic Senate contenders with a megaphone
The Texas redistricting fight has provided the Democrats eyeing the state's Senate race with an elevated platform ahead of a potentially crowded primary clash. State Rep. James Talarico, who has been considering a bid for the seat held by GOP Sen. John Cornyn, is in the middle of the debate as one of the Democrats who are holed up in Illinois to deny Republicans the chance to move forward with a plan to net their party up to five more House seats in Washington. Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke, who hasn't ruled out a Senate run, has played a central role in helping to financially support the Democratic lawmakers who have fled Texas. That has led to clashes with state Attorney General Ken Paxton — who is challenging Cornyn in the Republican Senate primary — in court. And the top Democrat who's officially in the Senate race, former Rep. Colin Allred, has put his opposition to the GOP's plan to redraw Texas' congressional maps at the forefront of his message on the campaign trail. While the Democratic Senate primary in Texas still remains in flux, the GOP contest has already turned ugly. Democrats are hopeful that the energy around the redistricting fight, as well as fallout from the Cornyn-Paxton battle, could help them put the Senate race in the traditionally red state on the map. Matt Angle, a longtime Democratic strategist in Texas who runs the Lone Star Project, told NBC News that the redistricting battle has fired up the party's 'activist' base in the state. 'This mid-decade redistricting has really touched off a little bit of a fire that wouldn't have been there otherwise,' he said. 'It plays to all three of these guys' strengths — Beto is a really good cheerleader, for lack of a better word, in terms of getting people fired up. Talarico is a fresh face and he's interesting, and Colin also shows a resoluteness and a competence that really plays to his strength." While O'Rourke and Talarico haven't jumped into the race, their political operations have massively increased their digital spending on Meta platforms in recent days. O'Rourke — who previously ran for Senate and governor in Texas, as well as for president — has spent $380,000 since the state House Democrats announced their quorum break on Aug. 3, including $98,000 last Wednesday alone, mainly through his group Powered by People. There have only been five days within the past six years where O'Rourke has spent more than that $98,000 on Meta platforms dating back to mid-2019 — all were during the summer and fall of 2022, during his campaign against Gov. Greg Abbott. Talarico had never spent more than $1,500 in one day on Meta platforms before last month. Half of the $400,000 he's spent on Meta platforms this year came after the quorum break announcement, including pouring $78,000 into ads on Aug. 6. For his part, Allred has spent far less on Meta, and has been traveling the state as the only major candidate currently seeking the Democratic Senate nomination. O'Rourke, who has become one of the more visible Democrats in the state after three high-profile bids for office, has been blanketing the airwaves for weeks, blasting the Texas redistricting plan and calling on national Democrats to 'match fire with fire.' He's also been raising funds for the Democratic lawmakers in the hopes of offsetting the steep financial penalties and other costs they're facing. Those actions have drawn the fury of Republicans across the state, leading Paxton to successfully petition a court to halt O'Rourke's ability to raise funds for the state Democrats. 'This guy thinks, Donald Trump, that he is absolutely unstoppable, he really believes he's the king that these knee-benders tell him that he is. And so he comes to our state to grab even more power in the form of these five congressional districts,' O'Rourke said at a rally over the weekend in Fort Worth, one many he's held in recent days in Texas and around the country. 'We're going to fight these motherf-----s for as long as it takes, with everything we got. We're never giving in, we're never giving up, and we're never bending the knee,' he said. Holing up in Illinois as the quorum break hits its second week, Talarico has been publicly singled out by Paxton and Abbott. Paxton filed a lawsuit aimed at booting Talarico and a dozen other state legislators from office, while Abbott's office posted a 'wanted' poster of Talarico on its social media channels. Talarico, who had already made waves this summer with a high-profile appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast and other national interviews, has become a constant presence on television and done a slew of other media appearances since the quorum break began. Last week, Talarico reposted an aide's message on X that clipped a photo of a news story about the Democrat that rounded up the number of interviews he's done. Evoking Texas politicians over the years — like former President Lyndon B. Johnson, Gov. Ann Richards and Rep. Barbara Jordan, as well as more recent examples such as O'Rourke — Talarico said last week during an interview on The Ringer's 'Higher Learning' podcast that Democrats in the state know how to be bold. 'If you know anything about Texas history, we don't surrender easily, we don't go down without a fight. Everyone knows the Alamo, that is part of our DNA as Texans, it's fighting for what we believe in, for standing up for what we believe is right regardless of the consequences,' he said. Later, Talarico took a swipe at Paxton and said that while he's looking at the Senate race, he has been more focused on the redistricting fight and will decide 'once we get past this quorum break and hopefully beat these corrupt maps.' Still, taking the Senate plunge would be a major step for Talarico, who has never had to build out a statewide fundraising or organizing operation before. While O'Rourke and Talarico have been playing more active roles in the redistricting battle, Allred has focused heavily on the issue after officially launching his Senate campaign in July. As a former lawyer who worked on voting rights cases and a former congressman who initially defeated a Republican incumbent on his way to office, Allred has grounded much of his pitch on his own expertise. He has blasted Republicans for their comments that the redistricting plan is solely about accumulating more power in Washington and testifying against the plan in front of the state House. Evoking the late civil rights advocate and former Democratic Rep. John Lewis' advocacy for voting rights, Allred t old the state House's special redistricting committee that he believed Lewis would be 'horrified' by the GOP efforts. 'I think he would say to us: We are better than this. And I think he would say: If you do this, then we have to mobilize in a way we've never seen before,' Allred said. As Allred continues his run and Democrats wait to see what O'Rourke and Talarico decide, Angle lamented that his party may only get the chance to vote for one of these candidates in the general election. 'We're not used to Texas having this many good [Democratic] candidates ready to roll,' the strategist said. 'That's why I sure wish we could spread them out across a few races.'
Fox News
17 minutes ago
- Fox News
Climate group scrubs judges' names from website after unearthed chats unmasked cozy ties
An environmental advocacy group accused of trying to manipulate judges has removed and anonymized the names of jurists who worked with the activist network and praised its activities, following a Fox News Digital report exposing an online forum promoting climate litigation updates. The Climate Judiciary Project (CJP), founded in 2018 by the left-wing Environmental Law Institute, describes itself as providing judges with "authoritative, objective, and trusted education on climate science, the impacts of climate change, and the ways climate science is arising in the law," according to its website. The group has been accused by Republican lawmakers, such as Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, of working to "train judges" and "make them agreeable to creative climate litigation tactics." In July, Fox News Digital reported on CJP's yearslong, nationwide forum where jurists privately exchanged climate-related legal updates and information alongside CJP leadership — a forum that was abruptly made private in May 2024. CJP's testimonial page boasting praise from jurists who participated in the program was overhauled this summer, including obliterating testimony from a judge identified in Fox News Digital's July report. Fox Digital reviewed archived links to CJP's testimonial page and found Judge Sam Scheele's comments were still public on the site in May but were removed by the end of July following Fox Digital's report. "It's been truly a privilege. I am welcomely absorbing everything that has been brought to us and I look forward to carrying that forward and paying it forward," read a quote from Scheele when he served on Indiana's Lake Superior Court's Civil Division, according to an archived link of the website's page from May. At the end of July, another archived link showed that Scheele's quote and name had been removed from CJP's testimonial page, while four other quotes were attributed to anonymous "participating judges." One remaining quote was still attributed to the former president of the William & Flora Hewlett Foundation, a nonprofit that funds progressive causes in the U.S. It is unclear the exact day the changes were made to the testimonial page. A spokesperson for the Environmental Law Institute told Fox Digital when asked about changes to the testimonial page that updates were made out of an effort to "protect privacy and prevent baseless criticism and harassment." "Judges are encouraged, and many required, to participate in continuing education on topics relevant to emerging trends in the law – including those related to science. Recent changes to CJP's website were made to protect privacy and prevent baseless criticism and harassment," the spokesperson said. Scheele was among a handful of judges who communicated on CJP's online forum that ran from September 2022 and maintained until May 2024, according to documents previously reviewed by Fox News Digital. While Scheele's testimony was obliterated from the website's testimonial page, two other favorable quotes from judges were anonymized and attributed to a "participating judge," while two other quotes remained unchanged and were both attributed to a "participating judge," Fox News Digital found. Fox News Digital obtained the archived chat history of the now-defunct chat forum between CJP and jurists last month, which detailed numerous messages between at least five judges and CJP employees trading links on climate studies, congratulating one another on hosting recent environmental events, sharing updates on recent climate cases that were remanded to state courts, and encouraging each other to participate in other CJP meet-ups. One message posted by Delaware Judge Travis Laster, vice chancellor of the Delaware Court of Chancery, features a YouTube video of a 2022 climate presentation delivered by a Delaware official and a Columbia University professor that focused on the onslaught of climate lawsuits since the mid-2000s. It also included claims that such lawsuits could one day bankrupt the fuel industry. Laster shared the video in the group with a disclaimer to others: "Because the link is of a judicial event that is otherwise not public, please do not forward or use without checking with me. I suspect that goes without saying, but the powers that be will be happier that I said it." Scheele was among a handful of other judges who responded to Laster's video and message, praising it as "great work." "This is great work/great stuff, Travis; congrats on a job well-done, & thank you so much for sharing this!," Scheele responded, according to documents obtained by Fox News Digital. Scheele's office did not respond to Fox Digital's request for comment regarding why his name and testimony were removed from the website. Scheele's office did respond to Fox News Digital's inquiry last month regarding his past participation in the forum, saying he first joined the 2022 National Judicial Conference on Climate Science more than two years before his appointment to the Indiana Court of Appeals. "At the last minute, when another appointed delegate was unexpectedly unable to attend, Judge Scheele was asked by Indiana's state court administration to fill in as Indiana's representative, and he accepted the invitation. As is normal in conferences attended by our judges, this conference addressed emerging, hot-button issues that might come before the courts," Scheele's office said. "Judge Scheele does not recall any substantive communication on the 'listserv' mentioned. He, like all of our Court of Appeals of Indiana judges, is dedicated to the unbiased, apolitical administration of justice in the State. He, like all of our judges, educates himself on emergent topics in the law and applies his legal training to evaluate the legal issues before him," the office continued. CJP told Fox News Digital of the now-defunct email list last month that it was created in September 2022 to help members of its Judicial Leaders in Climate Science program communicate and network with one another for the duration of the program. The one-year program, established by CJP in coordination with the National Judicial College, "trains state court judges on judicial leadership skills integrated with consensus climate science and how it is arising in the law," the group told Fox News Digital. CJP's educational events are done "in partnership with leading national judicial education institutions and state judicial authorities, in accordance with their accepted standards," a spokesperson for the group said in an emailed statement. "Its curriculum is fact-based and science-first, grounded in consensus reports and developed with a robust peer review process that meets the highest scholarly standards." "CJP's work is no different than the work of other continuing judicial education organizations that address important complex topics, including medicine, tech and neuroscience," the spokesperson added. News of the program's outreach comes as the U.S. has seen a sharp uptick in climate-related lawsuits in recent years — including cases targeting oil giants Shell, BP and ExxonMobil for allegedly using "deceptive" marketing and downplaying the risks of climate change, as well as lawsuits brought against state governments and federal agencies, including the Interior Department, for allegedly failing to address pollution risks or protect against the harms of climate change, according to the plaintiffs. Sen. Cruz has repeatedly put CJP under the public's microscope, including in June during a Senate subcommittee hearing, called "Enter the Dragon – China and the Left's Lawfare Against American Energy Dominance," where the Texas Republican argued there is a "systematic campaign" launched by the Chinese Communist Party and American left-wing activists to weaponize the court systems to "undermine American energy dominance." CJP, Cruz said, is a pivotal player in the "lawfare" as it works to secure "judicial capture." Cruz said CJP's claims of neutrality are bluster, and the group instead allegedly promotes "ex parte indoctrination, pressuring judges to set aside the rule of law, and rule instead according to a predetermined political narrative." CJP has denied Cruz's accusations, and describes itself as "neutral, objective information to the judiciary about the science of climate change as it is understood by the expert scientific community and relevant to current and future litigation." Judges have previously landed in hot water over climate-related issues in group forums, including in 2019, when a federal judge hit "reply all" to an email chain with 45 other judges and court staff regarding an invitation to a climate seminar for judges hosted by the Environmental Law Institute. The judge was subsequently chastised by colleagues for sharing "this nonsense" and suggested it was an ethics violation, while others defended that flagging the event to others was not unethical.
